Problem solved, with simple iptables rule.


Testing going on.


edit: done


ec2 instance +  aliased private ip + mapped EL ip + iptables + user account

multiple hot NM.

It's on a fat pipe at a datacenter

Solution: don't use someone else's hardware.

I got an old 2U pizza box on eBay for a few hundred bucks. Has more storage, CPU and RAM than I know what to do with... I've got over 50 VMs on it... 16 CPU cores at over 3GHz each, stacks of HDs... It's ridiculous.

what about using kvm inside the linux installation, and create separate vm machines running darkcoind each ?

the vnics as you created are just for inbound connections.

and if you are behind a router diing nat, than any outgoing connection has the routers public ip anyhow :-/

concept. still testing.

- 1 m3.medium + 5 private ip + 5 el ip(default max)
- 5 user account
- each user run darkcoind(bind + rpcport + externalip)


* problem : outbound connection uses default primary private ip -> same el ip.
                 inbound : no prob.

So you guys know, there is a solution to the non-compliance issue, but as I think I said in a prior post, it's not something Evan wants to implement.

From an email:


From another email regarding what went into RC3:


So no official support for stacked payments at this time.

Regarding RC4's anonymity enhancements - it is an elegant addition to the anon layers that already exist in Darksend, and it will be worth the wait.

There is another fantastic feature in the pipeline that (to my knowledge) nobody in cryptocurrency has even considered to this point, but again, the time is not yet right to release details on these things.

There is simply nothing to pump right now.  Over the next few weeks you'll start to get glimpses, but anything beyond that is premature at this point.

Assuming everything is working as intended, you are correct. At this point my concern is that there may be a bug in voting. At least one MN has been paid FOURTEEN TIMES (XwSPJo3v4253WqS7kRFm7Huo3gDojRWuev). I mean there's "variance" and there's "winning the lotto."

I have added one 10.11.5 server as sv06 which is testnet NOMP, and have changed version of sv03 from 9.11.5 to 10.11.5.

https://elbzo.net/masternodes.htm use 10.11.5 for drkmn01 ~ drkmn08 and 9.11.5 for p2pool.

I used this command and found 454 with a status of : 1.

darkcoind masternode list | grep "\: 1" | wc -l

I get darkcoin.io unlisted and p2pool inactive the rest are all green
Hope to see some payments on these which didn`t received yet so I could sleep easly that all is OK

I hope Evan does Ninja-Enforcement kinda like Ninja-darkcoind-0.10.11.5 - "Oh, BTW, Enforcement has been on for 12 hours, working fine, and I didn't tell anybody. How ya like them apples?"

Variance... is a bitch!!

But its raining DRK, hallelujah !!!

3 MN's, exact same config, fired up virtually at the same time. (1k deposit timestamp is not the fire up time).

MN1



MN2



MN3



So thats... 8 payouts, 3 nodes, 3 days = 0,8888 drk/node/day
Which is absolutely spot on, even above theoretical average since enforcement is not on.

Huge variance, but only time will evens the odds.

waaa ... waaaa ... waaaaa ... waaaaaaaaa ...

But they are afraid to even mention the word "bitcoin" for fear of reprisal, and won't even take my calls after having brought it up because they're so fucking afraid of what will be done to them.

I don't see that as an argument for adopting Darkcoin.  Businesses will just continue to use standard banking services.

Business to business adoption of cryptocurrency is a long ways off.  Businesses need professional services.   If the recent fork fiasco's, poor management and poor communication are any indication of how Darkcoin will operate in the future then it is definitely not a candidate for business adoption.  Would you trust your money with an entity that can't even communicate effectively?  Over six months and there still isn't a focused, professional communicator for Darkcoin.  Darkcoin will never be adopted by any legitimate business until it starts acting like a business itself, communicates effectively, and conducts itself in a professional manner.  Right now it more closely resembles a ragtag group of high school misfits conducting a science experiment than anything else.  

And what market sectors are you talking about that require this additional secrecy?  How is their privacy compromised today?

I keep hearing this argument about businesses using Darkcoin to prevent their competitors from knowing what they are doing but I don't hear of any practical examples as to why  businees would benefitt from Darkcoin.  Please elaborate on this as It's been a talking point for some time but I don't see it as a valid argument for why Darkcoin is going to be widely adopted.  

My MN has been running almost 72 hours and has still not received a payment. It shows up on every list, and "darkcoind masternode list" shows ":1" by my IP.

When I'm watching my debug log I do occasionally see "peer=xxx says we are misbehaving 20." Any idea what that means and if it has an effect?

Thanks!

You're both right because you're both wrong.

It is the intrinsic qualities of crypto in general, and BTC's First Mover advantage that give BTC it's position and acceptance.

It does suck for transparency. But it is the only show in town and the value inherent to crypto trump it's failings, so it remains the only show in town.

Being the only show in town is a false statement. But it appears true to the unwashed masses because they don't understand altcoins, and so many are shitcoins that the few that dabble usually don't step into the hot tub.

Until some creme rises to the top, the 'good enough' and widely entrenched will still rule. So, the fact that stupid people exist makes BTC effectively the only show in town. It is such a good thing and gets most of the job right, and until the ripples of it's shortcomings are more exposed and understood by the stupid masses, it will stay top dog.

Look at it this way. BTC is a 9 out of 10. Fiat is a 2. DRK is a 10. BTC gave the world such a huge improvement that most people still can't even wrap their head around BTC. How can you expect them to figure out the improvements made to BTC by DRK in such rapid succession? They haven't even figured out 1/10th of BTCs benefits yet. The majority are still choosing denial and name-calling because they don't want to admit that they can't figure it out. I still see the amazingly fucking dumb argument of "but it's not backed by anything" and "it hasn't got a central issuing authority" bandied about... Spectacularly fuckin' stupid! Until the majority figures out that these are good things, not bad things, there's no chance for them to move on to even better things.

these are people for whom using a smartphone is a joke... They can't use it. They have no fucking clue what to do with it. They just want to look cool; the iPhone market. This is why GuvCoin/CoerCoin will never exist; you can't force people to comply with a technology they are hopelessly unable to understand. It would be like passing a law forcing everyone to be physicists. The politicians themselves would all end up in prison becasue they would prove their own stupidity and violation of that law by passing that law in the first place...

It's the same as the Huxley vs Orwell argument. They've both wrong because they're both right... It isn't one idea or the other. It's both at the same time... The Huxlian begets the Orwellian, and vice versa.