Under certain circumstances, there can be two scenarios for the development of events ... I don't remember when Satoshi's email address was hacked, but it is likely that this short-term activity was some sort of attempt to prevent Dorian Nakamoto's doxing, (against the background of news reports in 2014 aimed at deanonymization Satoshi). After that, his email came to the attention of a hacker and his account was hacked.

Or another option is possible, a variant in which Satoshi's account was hacked even before these events, in which case the hacker decided in this way to attract attention to himself, pursuing God knows what purpose.  

Noorman0 forgot to mention that if the winning number does not match any number that was chosen by one of the participants, then the winner is determined by the means of the next block, (and so on until a winner is found). Anyway, you should probably wait for heisty's answer, (wouldn't he mind) since this is a free giveaway and only you have the right to decide how the winner is selected, unless of course you are talking about another prize drawing  

I made 6 substitutions, total - 5 points, as Tomiyasu, Odegaard and Wilson brought me 15 points (1 free, and 5 unexpected substitutions, including the replacement of Wilson). As for Guardiola's choice, I'm not surprised because if you look at past matches against those who are clearly weaker than them, you will see that Pep always puts up minor players in such games (for example Sterling, Zinchenko, Mahrez).

And by the way, I completely agree with your last statement, therefore, Cancelo and Dias + Rüdiger remain my permanent defenders. 

12 - icopress

Thanks! 

09 - icopress

Thank you! 

Честно говоря тут все зависит лишь от того кто больше импонирует Ратимову, и от того как долго будет он бухать (по крайней мере, могла бы быть фора в дополнительных пару недель). Но если бы я был третьим лицом, я бы вероятно поддержал сторону Снорка так как его шансы на порядок выше выиграть этот спор.  

Man, you yourself understand that this was only a formal discussion, since the suspension of the tournament would entail colossal financial costs. As it was said ... there is not a single club that does not have at least 13 players to replace, so those 90 positive results against the background of the total number of players seem to me a really funny figure. In one of the topics, I have already expressed my guesses about this, I can not find a quote ... but if in short it was about the fact that most likely the players become infected not because of the game process, but because after the game they visit each other's locker rooms. 

As a matter of fact, it turned out as you predicted, since in the end only 4 matches were played and I again had to unexpectedly change Watkins to another player. But the fact is that the round ended for me not very badly, because taking into account the replacements and those stationary players that I had at my disposal, I scored 75 points. As for the triple game week of Tottenham, then I will probably slowly be preparing for this by adding one player per week. 

It depends on what to compare, but in general I agree that Real's defense remained at the proper level even after the departure of Varan and Ramos. By the way, it is interesting that after the departure of Ronaldo, Benzema's talent and strength were revealed in full force.

I am only guided by logic, no more ... besides, I do not agree on the account of the similarity of the teams you mentioned, since Real Madrid has looked like a lazy cat for the last couple of years, while Liverpool players are working hard. 

Roma - Sampdoria
1. Match line - Home
2. Both to score - Yes
3. Number of yellow cards in the game - 4-5

Bilbao - Real Madrid
1. Match line - Away
2. Both to score - No
3. Number of yellow cards in the game - 4-5

29' minute

3 - Row 2 / Thank you! 

Don't tell me you're a BSV fan.  

pooya87, thank you, this is exactly what I wanted to hear ... I confess I didn’t believe that the situation in BSV is so sad, at least I thought that among the names of the developers there would be at least one respectable one who would dissuade everyone from the policy of artificially stimulating miners.

And one more thing ... as far as I understand, the Bitcoin Association is behind this transactional spam?

14) Chris Daukus
13) Stephen Thompson
12) Amanda Lemos
11) Ricky Simon
10) Mateusz Gamrot
9) Cub Swanson
8 ) Gerald Meerschaert
7) Raoni Barcelos
6) Justin Tafa
5) Eubanks, Sijara
4) Charles Jourdain
3) Raquel Pennington
2) Don'Tale Mayes
1) Jordan Leavitt

You hardly helped this guy by referring to this quote, because mprep's quote can be interpreted as desired only as long as he does not get tired of those who distort his words, (since this is one of those cases where rule #23 comes into play). I am sure that even without his detailed explanation today, it was clear that he then expressed himself quite unambiguously, (therefore, it makes no sense to compare that case with the current one).

This is strange, considering that, in theory, even an exactly copied thread structure or bbcode is one of the types of plagiarism or at least not gentlemanly behavior (copied without your explicit approval). If you remember ... when I needed to use a style like yours (in my thread), the first thing I did was ask you about it.

Since we are talking about a rather abstract topic, let me deviate a little. I see that the total number of transactions in the BTC blockchain is less than in BSV, so I have a question. First, how did it come about that BSV overtook BTC in terms of the total number of transactions in such a short time? (If we take a fork as a starting point). Second, could bots be involved in this? Since the daily volume of transactions in SV also exceeds the volume of transactions of BTC by 3.5 times.

Ты уже это второй раз повторяешь ... если будет третий, то я подумаю что ты мне навязываешь отморозится в случае чего.

Однозначно ... однозначно предпочту получить выигрыш в битке 

Не она, та нить была активнее, и каждая легенда публиковала свои цифры.

Bump

I knew that you would show up ... so I picked up your favorite number on time!  

I knew that you would notice what I noticed, and I knew that you would show up in this thread (not sure if you have any notifications but I was hoping). By the way, I had something similar ... only I was missing one of the exam questions (a torn sheet) and, as luck would have it, I pulled out this particular ticket.

Well, out of four slots on the bench, I had two slots to save money and two slots with players which I cannot sell due to price increases but which are suspended or on sick leave, (Cancelo, Toney). So I now have 4 players who will not participate in the next round, and even if I add Cancelo to the main team, I still need to spend at least 12 points to stay in the saddle.

The problem is I'm not sure if sacrificing points is worth it, as it is likely that the new trio will not recoup those costs in the next round.


This is exactly one of those moments about which you warned me ... a situation when a change of the whole team is urgently needed for one week.  

Guys, is someone following the news? Who knows when there will be game weeks in which teams play several matches at once?

Manchester United have a lot of pretty easy games ahead, so I have no doubt that they will quickly close the gap with the top three (although I could be wrong as I thought they would easily beat Watford, it was a fiasco in the end). To be honest, it seems unlikely to me that Manchester United will concede their place in the Champions League to anyone, especially given the arrival of Ralph Rangnick and Ronaldo's ambitions (including his goals this season in the CL).

Speaking of the CL, I remembered that in two years time there will be new rules, adding one additional slot in the four leading leagues in En, Sp, It and Ger.