And with today, I believe the bear run is over. I know that people will call it a reactionary talk, but I believe that we have shown what the market could do and that's about it, we have dropped to our bottom and that's it. From the looks of it today, we have reached to a good increase and that could very well be the start of a bull run.

If nothing else, unless there is major horrible news like Binance crashed or something, then we will not see 13k, that's the key point, and that means if you didn't listen to OP and not waited and bought at the low, then you already started to profit, and you will keep on profiting more and more the higher it goes.

If we could, that would be great but we can't. The market is too far off gone to centralized and there is no returning back. There could be a few more bankruptcies that could cause it to get a little bit of shift towards decentralization and that's it. If we could have done anything then we would have done it but we couldn't and it is too late now. I personally do not mind, it is not a huge deal for me and I believe that we would be doing fine even if we keep going with centralized.

Because, if you trust the right places and if you end up protecting your funds at the right places then you should be doing fine as well and there is no need to worry about anything else. That's the key point here, you need to protect it the way you always should and there is no worry after that.

Obviously is the first ranked and first created one so there will be a lot of attention towards it at all times. I am not shocked that people would invest into it more than they invest into other coins. I have majority of my portfolio in bitcoin right now, bought 50% bitcoin and the other 50% went to other coins but right now bitcoin became even bigger than 50% as well.

So, it is clear that we are going to end up with something much better and that could be a bit about how bitcoin is better than others but it is also how we see it as better than others as well. Lovely situation to be in for bitcoin, and all its investors at the same time.

Obviously it could be someone who wagered a lot by using a lot of money, that is of course the common conception and probability of that is much much higher. I just wanted to point out that it is not a "must", doesn't mean that it has to be a whale for someone to wager that much, obviously it is a lot more possible for someone to be a whale in order to wager that much but it could very well be someone with just a few bitcoins that did it as well, it is not impossible for that one to be the case.

I do agree that it is more likely for someone with 100 bitcoins to be able to wager this much, but it is also quite possible for someone to wager and win with 4-5 btc as well.

The latest talks about Ronaldo is that he is about to sign a 2.5 year (remainder of this year and then 2 more seasons) with Al-Nassr for 200 million dollars a year. That really doesn't look like a good deal to me, not because Ronaldo would say no to that much money and all, but because Al-Nassr shouldn't really pay that much to Ronaldo, bigger clubs could offer less, and Al-Nassr owners also have teams all around the world, with some of them being big names, and they could offer less to him to play there?

All in all, if this 200 million a year is true, that is going to be biggest I have ever seen or heard and it will make big news, dude probably didn't make 500 million from salaries all his life, that's just way too much to sign.

It is definitely a good way to bet, it is going to happen for sure, and Kane is looking for the right call and looking for the pass and so forth, he already assisted a few times, and I am guessing that the best thing to do would be making sure that people are gambling the way we normally do and then add Kane to score as a side bet and not make that our regular bet.

Like let's say you wager on England to win with 90% of your regular bet amount, and 10% goes to Kane to score as added thing, this way you are neither missing that bet, nor missing the main bet, you get them both while we are also making sure that we are not having any added extra risks.

Expect the unexpected when gambling, not many people could end up with a big profit when gambling and the likely outcome is the loss of funds when you do. It is clear that not that many people could end up with something major, it will definitely cause everyone to lose and the very few that win big amounts will be shown as the people who are on the commercials and ads of those casinos.

They can show a guy who won 100k from a jackpot and make you want to gamble yourself as well for a chance to be that person, but do not show the tens of thousands of people who keep the gambling world alive. I believe that you should gamble, but with the idea that you will lose that money on your mind when you do.

It is easy to fall for fake projects if you are willing to fall for it. There are so many people out there who would like to invest into things that do not make sense to me at all. They are doing horrible as we all know because we see those new projects and how terribly made they are and yet they get paid for it for some reason.

Imagine this for a second, look at pinksale and all the new tokens that gets funding, there are ones that get money in millions, do you really think they all deserved it? Of course not, which means that just in one launchpad we see plenty of tokens that got everyone's money and for some reason everyone is fine about it and that's the problem.

I feel like that is justified and understandable. I mean after all during Obama's very last year, Republicans didn't allow Obama to appoint a new SCOTUS member, and during Trumps last year they did appointed a SCOTUS member. Which shows that if you change the rules while playing, then Biden could very well make the scotus be like 1000 member thing and appoint 990+ of them himself all pure democrat, some even radical left. I am not saying he would, that's of course not going to happen, but could make it 18 or so to get the majority.

I can hear that you may say "but that would be cheating!!" but Republicans did just that, if Obama couldn't so shouldn't Trump, if Trump did then so could Obama, if you change what can be done and can't be done based on who has the power, then when they get the power, do not cry about how unfair they could become. You were unfair to them, they are being unfair to you.

England is easily superior, there is no doubt about that and it is going to be an important game for sure. Iran vs USA will be another funny one to watch, and yes it is not going to be a great football because neither team is high in the ranks, but it is politically great game for sure and it is going to be entertaining as hell.

Obviously not that many people will understand it, and they will want to just watch football game, but anyone who knows what is what will tell you that it is going to be a bit of a different situation in the end since these two nations are sort of in a cold war situation. Let's see how tonight's games will be, and hopefully they are all fun.

To make it come back bigger, we should not lose hope each time it goes down. I understand that it is a hard thing to see the market crash and not sell, but if you do not sell and I do not sell and the other person doesn't neither, that 5% drop won't become 10% drop.

Right now, too many people just chicken out as soon as they see the price go down, but the reality is that we should not be, we should be seeing that as a chance to make a profit. That is why it is going to be a difficult thing to let the price crash. I personally hope that we find that courage within ourselves to not sell at these prices, it definitely causes a lot of trouble for everyone if we do.

I feel like the "help" he gets is not enough at all, they really need a good star along with him. I am not saying it's a must, look at Giannis and how he won without another superstar level player with him, Kris Middleton was his biggest helper, and he is not a superstar, so a good all-around team could also work.

But, finding 5-6 players that will be great role players and a great coach to help that team is not easy, I am guessing that it will take time, instead they could just hire a player from free agency and just get a superstar, their salary situation should be fine, so I am guessing that getting one other star, someone that is a great 3/D player for example would be awesome. I guess it's not going to be simple, and it will require a lot of convincing b if it happens then it would be great for them.

I know that Ronaldo is a rich person, and he probably has a lot of money so he doesn't "need" more money but to refuse that kind of money never made any sense to me. First of all he is no longer the type of guy that can lead a UCL level team, I mean Sherrif was in UCL last year, I do not mean that, I mean a team that is looking to win the whole thing, he won't be there.

So, if there is really an offer for 220 million to him, he should take it and then he could maybe have a chance to buy a whole team in the future. This dude could potentially have 400-500 million in the bank from what we understood on that interview, get another 220 on there and we are talking about at least 700 million, he could make some more deals and get another 300 from ads and sponsorships and promotions, and for 1 billion dollars you may not get City or Liverpool, but you could definitely buy some club.

That is true but at the same logic playing dice is better than any other game, because you could calculate the odds and the return, meaning you would be able to wager for something that has a very high chance of you winning, and then you could wager a small amount.

Obviously even in a bet with 90% chance to win, you will lose once out of each ten bets on average, and that means you could even lose 2-3 times in a row, so you can't expect pure profit from it, never expect profit from any type of gambling. But this would be the longest way to gamble, it would not make your money fully run out for a very long time and you would end up with a huge wagering amount eventually for sure.

Obviously, it’s not over yet, but it is getting there. It has been over a year since the drop started, it was October 2021 when we started to go up and reached that 68k level, and right now we are in November 2022 and we are still low. This means that there is a limit to how long it could stay like this, eventually it will start to go up and we should be hoping that it would be anytime soon.

I am not saying that it will be today or tomorrow, maybe it will take a few more months, but the market cannot sustain being low for this long, its hurting and there are too many people with money (from all the printed free ones) that will need to put that somewhere, and eventually that will be crypto.

I get that everyone wants Jude Bellingham, but it is going to be basically him who will decide which team to go. I guess it is going to be a big transfer for sure, but Jude will want to go to a team where he can grow bigger as well, and that's a very important sales pitch.

This kid is very young, so the team he goes to should promise him not just titles and cups but also a way for him to grow to be a better player as well, which means better training grounds, machines, staff, and plans according to that, so that he would become better in 2-3-5-10 years later. This can be checked by seeing the teams he got offers from and how players evolved there over the years.

90% of the sponsorships in F1 world is yearly because you rarely ever know which team will be great or not in the F1 seasons, one year it will be this one and next year it will be another one. However, the top is always the top, like if you want to sponsor Ferrari or red bull or Mercedes that will be a lot for sure, and it will get a lot of attention.

The rest of the pack is not really going to be that clear, and I believe that's why it is just one season deals. Next year we are going to see plenty of crypto again, but this season came after a huge bull run, so companies already had money to spend, I feel like 2023 season may not be the case, considering the huge bear run we have been, and lesser profits they probably made.

There are way too many people who would like to get some faucet type of money and gamble with it. There are two reasons to do that, either they would like to abuse the system in which case they would not really ask here, they will do that in a silent mode and just try to abuse it as much as they can. In this case, it's probably the other possibility, which is probably testing out a platform, or just keep gambling when the money they deposited runs out.

This allows them to give it a try and have some fun at the same time. I am guessing it is not a terrible thing to add for casinos but at the same time it's risky, as long as they don't get abused, it could work very well.

It would be great if this keeps up but we also could guess which underdogs would end up winning. So far I have seen a lot of upsets, and that is good for many people who wagered for it, but I never got them right so far, and that means it's not really looking great for me either.

There are many more games left and there will be other chances where I could end up being right, so from now on I will look for a few more unlikely results instead, will they happen? I do not know but its worth a shot. There is no point in wagering on the favourites up until like quarterfinals or so, that is why until that point I will keep on betting for the underdogs but a smaller amount.