What do you want to say by citing activity, merits, negative tags and flags as an example?
I can only speculate, but he probably means that you are not to be trusted. Based on the negative trust ratings you recently left for other forum members, I tend to agree with him. |
|
|
|
According to a quick search I did yesterday, there is not enough evidence to prove that both platforms belong to the same operator. Despite this, everyone is firmly convinced that 1xbet is just another interface for 1xbet. Do you have evidence that the two platforms are interconnected? This will facilitate the conviction process, in my opinion.
Yes, we do. There is ample of evidence that these two platforms are interconnected. Even by their own admission. This topic has already been covered extensively. References: here, here, here, and here. The problem is, when it comes to things like this, we are never going to have rock-solid evidence. It all depends on what you are going to accept as enough compelling evidence to draw a conclusion. Just think about it - any two websites can be managed by one guy sitting at a desk in his mom's basement, and insist they are unrelated. How can anyone prove irrefutably that this is not true, unless he admits it? The same thing applies here. It is impossible to definitively prove that they are one and the same company, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest that they are. On the other hand, is there any evidence that 1xbit is not part of 1XBET, apart from their claim? If we could identify the actual company or legal entity behind the 1xbit platform, it would be helpful. But there isn't one, is there? As for international stadiums, they are private or government companies. It is assumed that there are laws that control the display of advertisements during the transfer of matches.
As with most other private or government-owned companies, their main and most important drive is profit, not moral responsibility. |
|
|
|
Duelbits.com kampanja ima slobodno mjesto za jednog Full Member člana. Minimalno 20 postova tjedno (od toga barem 10 u Gambling-u). Local postovi se broje u tjednu kvotu. Payouts & Positions: Full Members - $40/Week.
We have 1x Full Member position open, apply now!
YAS.BET kampanja je isplatila sudionike za prvi tjedan i još uvijek ima slobodnih mjesta za nove članove. Minimalno 30 postova tjedno, od toga barem 10 postova tjedno u Gambling sekcijama (maksimalno 6 postova dnevno će se brojati u tjednu kvotu). Local postovi se broje. PayoutsFull Members - 25$/Week Sr. Members - 40$/Week Hero/Legendary Members - 50$/Week NB: We've 5 spots free for Sr. Member and 2 for Hero Member/Legendary Member !
|
|
|
|
This must be confusing since you said the address changed after being caught, how did that happen? I'd really like to get details on this.
It is possible that the scammer (the owner of the coin-wallet.info domain) periodically changed addresses to avoid negative reviews on etherscan explorer. Looking at the old comments from https://etherscan.io/address/0xaD3DF2892d663ba5167d891CcbC0668AA94338e2#comments it seems that this address was also linked to the coin-wallet.info scam, but was actually part of a hot wallet from the BTC-e exchange. @_BlackStar, it looks like Ararbermas might be telling the truth in this case, so unless you have other evidence, maybe you should reconsider the neg. tag.
I'm wondering why on this year you all find these information with the same wallet.. It would be better if it happened on the same year because my memory still fresh on that scam site.
Considering that you were one of the victims of this scam wallet, you should have reported it and warned other forum members. While your memory was still fresh. I'm wondering why you've never done that? Btw, stop making multiple posts in a row, it's against forum rules. |
|
|
|
I think this one is a evidence why it happened wherein 4 account used the same address, that time every one who created account on it get the same address but when they got caught they changed another address to get another victim if i remember it correctly..
<cut>
It seems that both of your examples refer to the same address: 0xd0457d7d5c5d81e2323723b1fddc2e4ff4480dbf. However, if everyone who used that scam wallet got the same address, as Coiner_ confirmed, how did you get a different one? You are connected to three other accounts through the use of this address: 0xad3df2892d663ba5167d891ccbc0668aa94338e2. Do you remember where you got that address from? |
|
|
|
An appropriate reference for negative feedback would be the scam accusation topic. Where did you get this idea? It does not always need to be on the scam accusation board. Don't twist my words. I never said "always". You said: "I am thinking a way how to correct it and also use appropriate reference...", I suggested an appropriate reference. Did you ask starmyc why he didn't create a scam accusation against JollyGood if he felt cheated by him?
[....]
[...] The way things stand, you seem to be taking sides based on the word of one party, despite the fact that neither side has provided credible evidence to support their claims. Your answers are here: From my perspective, that's just more hearsay. My thinking is more in terms of credible evidence. Each of us should check any trust feedback manually (if needed) and draw our own conclusions based on the evidence presented. |
|
|
|
The point is that it's more accurate  There is an after and before question now since he sent me a retaliatory feedback. 🤣 When I remove my old feedback then technically he will say I sent him the retaliatory feedback because my one will come later. I am thinking a way how to correct it and also use appropriate reference for starmyc case too. This no longer applies because his feedback on your account is neutral. An appropriate reference for negative feedback would be the scam accusation topic. Did you ask starmyc why he didn't create a scam accusation against JollyGood if he felt cheated by him? Like I said on my last post an employer thinks that they bought the freelancer and use them as their own property. JollyGood was demanding unnecessary additional job resulting not paying him for the 2nd job but inappropriately he was asking to refund for the first job that was done successfully. He was simply denying to pay for the valid job.
Again, the situation would be resolved much more clearly if starmyc made a proper scam accusation and provided all relevant evidence. The way things stand, you seem to be taking sides based on the word of one party, despite the fact that neither side has provided credible evidence to support their claims. |
|
|
|
Obviously none of us are perfect, none of us are above our personal likes and dislikes. But when a user's feedback leaving is (1) clearly out of retaliatory, (2) clearly to hostage others to silent against him, (3) clearly based on inappropriate arguments, (4) clearly using it to scam others would you still add him in your trust network or you will tilde (~) him?
I didn't really follow what kind of conflict happened between you and Jollygood, it seems that something is important because this is your second topic where the discussion will be based on Jolly's giving feedback. Also, I see that you and Jollygood exchanged negative feedback with each other. Everything confuses me a little now if you complain about something that you yourself do. For both tags, your and his (Jollygood), I would say that they are inappropriate and revenge-minded. I agree. Nothing really important to see here. This is just a continuation of the drama that started with Royse777 and BitLucy casino. @BitcoinGirl.Club, I really don't see the point of creating another topic and creating more drama between individual members. Both of your tags are equally ridiculous and absurd, and you started it.EDIT:I just noticed that JollyGood changed his tag to neutral, so I'm changing my stance. In my opinion, your neg. tag is an inappropriate use of the trust system. |
|
|
|
Since he's already been exposed for using a bunch of alt accounts (most of which were used to promote the 1xbit scam), if this one gets banned, all the other alt accounts should follow suit. Some more investigative work from Decrypted can be found here. EDIT:Looks like he already bit the dust.   https://bpip.org/Profile?id=45724 |
|
|
|
|
My review of YAS.BET casino
PROS:
Simple registration process (although some personal information is required, such as full name and phone number)
A wide selection of casino and live casino games as well as sports betting markets (with live streaming)
A 100% sign-up bonus of up to $200 is available to new customers
The website is user friendly and well designed
They accept deposits in both fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies
CONS:
Interface Language (even after changing to English, parts of the content remain in Persian)
Default currency is IRR
Not available in some countries
High wagering requirements on some promotions
Conclusion:
While Yas.bet is an attractive casino, there are a few things I didn't like, and some concerns that should be addressed. For example, the deposit method for cryptocurrency is a bit different from my experience with other providers and it could be confusing for new gamblers. It would also be nice if the site offered better language support in general. Many members have already complained about the use of Persian language as a default. I hope that the casino pays attention to these details, so as to increase its popularity among cryptocurrency users.
Even so, Yas.bet casino is worth checking out and it could be a good choice for people who enjoy gambling online and want to play at a regulated casino, especially if you're a into sports betting, as the sportsbook covers thousands of live matches per month.
|
|
|
|
Nije samo stvar plaćanje, to mi odmah govori da se guraju u kripto nišu a da ne vjeruju u kripto. Takvi nam ne trebaju  Ako ćemo biti iskreni, mnoge kompanije koje prihvataju kripto taj isti odmah pretvaraju u USD, EUR ili neki drugi fiat koji im je bliži preko nekog od platnih sustava. Ali ako ništa ostavljaju kupcima mogućnost da izvrše uplate kriptovalutama a koja je njihova sudbina poslje toga ne treba da nas zanima. Naravno razumijem to. Ipak postoje redovni troškovi, porezi, plaće radnicima i sve to je puno lakše regulisati fiatom nego hodlanjem bitcoina. Upravo to, razumijem ja da je teško imati firmu koja sve troškove rješava iz kripta. Još je volatilnost daleko prevelika da bi to moglo funkcionirati. Ali USDT ili USDC po meni trebali biti legit rješenja. U ostalom kako i sam kažeš ne mogu od njih zahtjevati da hodlaju kripto ali ako prodajes bilo kakve usluge ili robu iz kritpo niše, moraš i primati kripto za plaćanje. Nisam 100% siguran ali mislim da kod nas država ne dozvoljava da u imovini tvrtke budu kriptovalute. Znači nije zabranjeno prodavati robu ili usluge za kripto, ali u tom slučaju bi trebalo istog trena taj kripto zamijeniti za fiat. Zbog toga je Paycek popularna platforma kod nas jer automatski konvertira kripto u fiat i uplaćuje ga tvrtki koja prodaje robu ili usluge. Mislim da si u pravu. Prijateljica mi radi na blagajni u jednoj privatnoj firmi, i oni svaki dan, nakon zatvaranja, nose utržak u Finu i polažu na račun. Stvarno ne znam kako bi polagali utržak od btc i drugih kriptovaluta u Fini Za takve firme očito je najpraktičnije, i zapravo jedini mogući način, da preko paycek odmah sva kriptosredstva pretvore u fiat, koji onda na kraju dana kao utržak predaju u Finu. Takvi su trenutno zakoni i pravila a nisam optimist da će naša inertna državna birokracija tu skoro mijenjati. Nisam siguran da je sve tako jednostavno. Prije svega, ne nosi se sav dnevni utržak u Finu ili noćni trezor, već samo gotovina koja je primljena tijekom dana jer je zabranjeno držati je u blagajni trgovine nakon radnog vremena. Utržak od prodaje kartičnim plaćanjem i direktnim uplatama na račun u banci se, naravno, ne predaju u Finu jer su već na računu firme. Osim toga, država ne zahtjeva da sva prodana roba bude i naplaćena. Štoviše, državu to niti ne zanima. Jedino što ih zanima je da za sve izdane račune platiš porez, bez obzira jesi li se ti naplatio od kupca ili ne. Na primjer, ako posluješ sa nekom državnom institucijom, robu im izdaješ sa odgodom plaćanja od čak 60 dana i više, ali u međuvremenu ti državi moraš platiti porez za te iste račune tako da si u minusu većinu vremena. Apsurd! Drugo, nisam siguran da imovina tvrtke ne smije biti u kriptovalutama. Tvrtke smiju i mogu ulagati u vrijednosne papire na burzi, kao i privatne osobe, pa valjda isto vrijedi i za kriptovalute. Inače, kako bi tvrtke poput Electrocoina uopće mogle poslovati? Pretpostavljam da je dio njihove imovine cijelo vrijeme u kriptovalutama. |
|
|
|
Thanks for mentioning my name, even though it's not super clever. It's definitely unique though. Yes, it's clever. As far as I know, you are the only member who doesn't need to open his profile in order to find his UID (unless he memorized it). I find that very clever. |
|
|
|
<cut> Question. If you have a 100% working strategy that can earn you $500 - $1000 a day, why do you need payments from others? Simply use your strategy and live happily ever after. Isn't this much better than trying to teach someone every step of the strategy and asking them for money? Just a thought. |
|
|
|
now I need to check these seeds to see which one contain balance of which coin.
You won't be able to do it without custom programming. Even if you find a multi-chain wallet that supports importing multiple seed phrases (which I seriously doubt exists), you still won't be able to import all possible combinations. Not even close. As hosseinimr93 suggested, you can start with btcrecover, which is open source, and hire a developer who can make the necessary modifications to automate the process, if you don't know how to do it yourself. |
|
|
|
~snip~
badluckalways and ggalllow are two different user. badluckalways is a loser who is unable control his emotions. He has copied and pasted the above quoted post from ggalllow Yeah, I can see it now. I was too quick to judge. User ‘ggalllow’ has come here with a valid accusation, but Bitsler team is holding his withdrawal as they are waiting to get the investigation result of his gameplay activity from the slots provider. He has created a scam accusation thread too - see here. By looking at his accusation, it appears he's just too eager to get his money from the casino. So there's still no scam in this case. In my opinion, he just needs to be patient and wait for the casino (or their provider) to do their part. I understand situations like this can make people nervous, but it happens. We've seen similar cases before. |
|
|
|
I observe something similar in other online casinos, especially where there is a free spin of the wheel of fortune, as soon as you started spinning, the server already knows what you got and even before the end of the spin, this conditional win is credited to your account, at first I thought it was all about a big ping, but it turned out that it was not so.
All calculations are done in a fraction of a second when you place your bet or start a spin. Everything else is just a visual representation for a better user experience. The same applies to online roulette games, or for example, crash or plinko games. There's nothing to worry about, that's how it should be. This does not mean that the games are being rigged. |
|
|
|
For more than 2 weeks I have not been paid 10,000 dollars. And every day they say, "Wait"
So, is ggallow your alt account? Why are you posting with two different accounts here? Moreover, every scam accusation against a casino should have its own dedicated topic in the Scam Accusations board, and it should be supported by relevant evidence. Baseless accusations will not be taken seriously by the community. |
|
|
|
I think even when the full payment will be processed, I will still keep the SCAM tag on the LTCCasino. The current case has started to resolve only because of the victim's activity and the pressure from the community. It is hard to imagine how many other less-active players could be damaged by their paranoid decisions.
I agree with you here. They took a long time to complete the so called investigation. Meanwhile, ltccasino team was accusing the user as a cheater, then they blamed the slot provider. But they hadn't provided any single evidence there. I believe ltccasino has started paying the user to regain their reputation. Perhaps, they decided to pay the user by getting pressure from bitcointalk forum members and gambling community. The scam tag should be there as a warning. I think that is completely justified. As a whole, the SCAM problem needs to be addressed by all casino operators as soon as possible. We have all seen allegations from members of the community against almost all casinos, even the most respectable ones, but I think such cases must be handled professionally and transparently, so that the true picture can be known and measures taken to mitigate the damage. They cannot be left to the level of naivety on the side of the public. However, LTCcasino has demonstrated by its action and poor handling of the situation that it can not be trusted and that it does not care about the damage that a dishonest activity does to their reputation. It was disgraceful for them to try and turn the victim into a abuser, and to label him as a manipulative evil person who intentionally wanted to exploit "bugs", without any proof or evidence. |
|
|
|
My review of Wintomato casinoPROS: Simple registration process A good selection of cryptocurrencies to choose from Wide range of slots and casino games On site coin exchange Low withdrawal minimum (€15) CONS: Wintomato casino is a relatively new casino Slow customer support (from my experience) Withdrawals are not instant and can get delayed, but it's not a deal breaker. Their T&C link leads to a third-party forum-looking site, coinfolk.net, which I find odd, to say the least. The overall experience at Wintomato casino was good, but there are a few things that deserve mention. One, is the user interface and the extensive options available. It's a bit of overkill, to be honest, and that does sometimes lead to confusion. It's basically too many buttons to make sense of at first, so the first time you go through there, you'll spend quite some time trying to understand what you are actually supposed to do. They are advertised as "The fastest and flawless performance", and I had a fairly smooth experience. In most cases, dice bets are fast and smooth, with no delay in the betting taking place. However, the overall impression left on me after playing was that the user interface is slower than other gaming platforms and that it has some glitches. For my personal taste, UI looks a bit cluttered (especially when dice are selected), and not as intuitive and slick as other casino websites I've played on. This is somewhat frustrating but hopefully the UI and the bugs can be fixed in future updates. Take this screenshot for example:  and compare it to some other popular gambling platforms:    The second issue is the customer support. Wintomato casino offer live chat support, and it's easy to use, but the staff can be hard to reach. In my attempt to contact live support, I had to wait over 30 minutes without getting any response. They should at least enable automated responses until staff is available since this way I couldn't even tell if my messages were getting through. This is unacceptable when you have players who are serious about their gambling experience. Finally, the staff member was very friendly and helpful in solving the problem, so at least there is that. Conclusion:Wintomato Casino looks like a legitimate and trustworthy online casino operation, but keep in mind that the casino is still a relatively new so there aren't many user reviews online yet. Good reviews are hard to come by so for now it's best to try the casino for yourself and keep your expectations in check. Any online casino is going to take a while before they have an advanced reputation and player base. Wintomato operates under the Master License of Gaming Services Provider, N.V. #365/JAZ (Gaming Curacao). The license details of Wintomato.com casino are the same as those of Casinoroyale.bet and both sites are owned and run by Akkido Limited, a company based in Belize.  
Disclaimer:
This review of Wintomato casino is based on my personal experience and opinion, and published in good faith and for general information purposes only. It is not intended to endorse Wintomato casino in any way. Any action you take upon the information you find in this review is strictly at your own risk.
|
|
|
|
The best way to laugh every day is to check out this guy's post history. He's such a great thinker. User: jkoil- Can do!
This website that is here but if we notice what kind of trend is associated with it then it is so popular that many people take them there who only inbox or gamble but here they can join those sites but here the users participate in many gambling. can do
- Roller coasters!
In the keep market, sometimes it is seen that the price is increasing a lot and sometimes it is seen that it is going down a lot. If we sell, there is an opportunity to be good but pure from here, so those who want to invest here should check and get good amount.
- Before I die...
If we look at the benefits of passive income, many people are now attracted to it, but many users are using it, but they are gaining a lot of profit, but it is gaining popularity. Before I die, if we do well. It will be good for us to know about the project later
- What everyone here talks about?
What everyone here talks about rent is whether he followed but if you ask here you can see a lot of things here but definitely not here but just noticed from here but here but don't know if he is a good one but guess here Since you many people know how to
- They played hard because they played well...
I think they played very hard because they played well I think they will play very well in the next gate match but if they are very bad but then they can't snatch the victory they are playing well they won
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
