|
Wait, if you are stalking since 2 years.
How comes that don't you have porn to offer? Yet you claim the mom is hot.
Something doesn't add up here...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get why is this such a big deal for everyone. They are intended to have near zero value.
Why must you guys start speculating with every Coin that comes along and than complain if it losses it's value (that it never had).
Just use Ripple as intended. It's a pretty neat system.
|
|
|
|
|
If you used blockchain it's even better, because then it's very easy.
You can export you private keys from them.
Import them in any other wallet and send them.
Or import them to Gox --> make a new wallet --> send your coins there.
But wait some time before that. Maybe it will confirm.
|
|
|
|
|
No,
if it only has a few inputs it will confirm sooner or later.
If it wont confirm, wait at least a day and then use pywallet to remove this transaction from your wallet. Then you will be able to spend it again.
- If you are using BitcoinQT that is.
|
|
|
|
The addresses are your public keys.
Nope, the addresses are a subset of the public key What Giddeon wants is the 130 char Public Key (SEC). And as Gweedo suggested, click Private Key, paste private key, and it will generate the Public Key (SEC) for that key. Thx. Now I've got it too. Out of curiosity. What do you possibly need that for? |
|
|
|
Thanks. But that's a generator. I already have a wallet with a few addresses and it's those I want to know the public key for. I think you are confusing something here. The addresses are your public keys. |
|
|
|
No, 25 Cent is a centitransaction  |
|
|
|
|
Ich bin mir nicht mal so sicher, ob die BAFIN da wirklich groß was zu melden hat.
Nach eigener Definition müssen Bitcoins ja selbst zum Handelsgegenstand werden. Solange die Bitcoins in dem Service also nicht gegen Fiat umgetauscht werden dürftest du save sein.
Ist die Frage ob du es wagen willst derjenige zu sein der das herausfindet.
Ansonsten finde ich den Service eine sehr gute Idee und hoffe das du damit erfolgreich bist.
Wenn du jetzt z.B. noch Ripple implementierst und Bitstamp IOU BTC akzeptierst wäre es möglich bei Bitstamp BTC zu kaufen auf sein Bitcoinpal.net Konto zu transferieren und damit einzukaufen, ohne das diese einmal die Blockchain berühren müssen.
Dann wärst du das erste komplett Offchain Beispiel System für BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
Echt krass,
jetzt mal ehrlich. Hätte irgendwer vor 2 Monaten geglaubt, dass das so schnell und so plötzlich kommt?
Das wir das alte hoch irgendwann knacken hatte ja eigentlich jeder geglaubt, aber so schnell.
Wow.
Und dieses Jahr hat erst begonnen. Wird bestimmt noch ganz schön spannend.
|
|
|
|
|
ASICMINER with a spelling error?
|
|
|
|
Ich hab deinen Blog Thread auf meiner Watchlist und lese immer wenn du da postest, dass du ein update gemacht hat. Nur mal so nebenbei. |
|
|
|
|
Cool,
that can indeed be a win-win Situation as I imagine people will be much more likely to invest in a secured loan, even if it pays significant lower interests.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I some democracies you have to be a registered voter in order to vote.
One private key per registered voter, would do the trick.
Issues that remain would be:
Guarantied Anonymity of votes.
Expired of Keys, so nobody could harvest dead peoples keys / stealing of keys is less effective.
This would not be a pervert System, but certainly a huge improvement with potential to improve further.
|
|
|
|
Imagine every Person has a Voting public and private key. (Some Anonymity must be added to make votes anonymous, but it's possible).
The problem (which has been discussed numerous times) is just how do you limit 1 person to 1 vote (i.e. I can just create as many votes as I like if I have enough funds to do so). AFAIA no-one has really found any successful method to do so (if they did we'd already have seen it - and yes I've read various *papers* about such ideas but have seen *zero* implementations). Whenever someone tries to involve a central authority to *identify* people to limit their ownership to 1 vote then the libertarians scream *decentralise* but whenever they are asked *okay - how?* silence or vague *papers* are the response (i.e. they simply do not have any solution at all). That's a point, it's hard to prove that there is only one key per person. What I don't understand, what has this to do with funds? I'm not talking about Bitcoin here. Also, I already have a ID number on my passport. That could be replaced by my public key. Votes need to be Anonymous (not possible to trace who voted for what) so that's a different problem. |
|
|
|
|
Well, we already have the technology to make a real direct democracy on every decision.
Imagine every Person has a Voting public and private key. (Some Anonymity must be added to make votes anonymous, but it's possible).
Now every person could vote on every decision with signing with their private key.
Of course not every person wants to get directly involved. Therefore we would have representatives, that we could give our vote to, again by signing with the key. (Note: could not must)
Every of this representatives would vote with the exact amount of voices he has. All it takes is my representative to make one single vote with my voice that I don't approve with for me to take my voice away and give it to someone else, or a new person that enters and presents my personal opinion better.
Also if a Topic really interests me, I can always vote directly and my representative has one less voice on this topic, because my key has already been used on this topic.
Topics to vote on / discuss could be chosen by the same way. Basically everyone could at any time pass a proposal to vote upon and people start signing immediately.
Only to prevent someone to sneak laws through, by having very little approve votes a less against votes, only laws with a certain amount of votes pass.
So it would be enough for everyone to check "hot votes" all few weeks.
Of course this is only a concept. There are certainly flaws in this Idea.
|
|
|
|
|
That's sound like fun. If I have time on this Saturday I will play a round.
Did you make this game yourself?
With a quick look over the rules, I have to say, it's impressive. Although it seems a little to complex for the brade mass (but depends what your target audience is).
But as a passionate Civ IV (with all mods to make it even more complex) player, I like it.
|
|
|
|
@Friedcat:
A suggestion: could you start an official Asicminer announcement thread, where you have few people giving accurate info... this is getting awfully cluttered.
+1 I'm watching this thread solely to see the progress on ASICMINER. To go through all this ramblings every time to look if there is an Update is really annoying. |
|
|
|
What's the official statement about creating multiple accounts and "self-referring"?
If it is allowed (and I haven't seen a statement on the site forbidding it), then is it
possible/allowed to reuse one payout address for more than one pyramining-account?
Read the FAQ. Multiple accounts and "self-referring" is allowed. Try to reuse an address, if your account creation is not rejected, it's OK. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
