Yep. If you have that much, you divide it up into at least three stashes. The big main one you hope to keep, a much smaller one which is your backup in case your larger one gets compromised then one somewhere in the middle which you hope they won't bother with once they've got your main and your backup out of you. Then you have more just because you're paranoid. I wouldn't be surprised if SN had at least 10 cold storage wallets, all (exept one or two "sacrificial" wallets) encrypted and well hidden away in ways that the inventor of the world's first viable crypto currency could come up with and a good selection of hot wallets for walking around money.

Whereas a cynical and pessimistic attitude just makes you seem so cool and edgy.

Nice to have something to agree with you on

I am. See username
<---

Where's the 420 gifs?

I did

It's more the agenda than the change itself.


By which he means his opinions. He regularly says some pretty contentious stuff which regularly gets voted down *very* heavily. They have rationalized it in their minds as some kind of hacktivism rather than the more pragmatic interpretation that people just don't like what he's writing. The paranoia is palpable and the latest steps are just more signs of the bunker mentality that's setting in.

I usually go by Finex but truthfully, it rarely makes much difference and in the rare occasion it might, it's hardly a big deal to clear up any confusion.

More shit and shenanigans over on Reddit.

Anyone who is in a position of power on another forum fancy having ChartBuddy post there? I'm about done with Theymos' nonsense.

Oh god. Please don't even follow that link and give this guy views. It's that Rawdogletard guy. Nothing of value there.

It's about time for geocities styling to come back into fashion. Web 3.0

No doubt. But that is extra steps at least. At the moment, there is 0 effort required. Plus they may end up reported elsewhere before they even post here.

The cynical might say that the feel that BIP101 is a bit too "ready to deploy right now" and that they'd rather continue stringing everyone along.

I wonder if Adam would be agreeable to a script that would auto-delete posts from users below a certain post count...

They should vote for someone who will promise government-funded photoshop classes. Those were awful.

Anyone else waiting patiently here?

Restricted space => fee competition
More adoption+fee competition => expensive fees
Expensive fees => stalled adoption
Stalled adoption => declining interest
Declining interest => what are we even trying to do here?

This, however, is not a description of how bitcoin will fail but how bigger blocks are inevitable.

I suggest you go back and reread what Jorge wrote also. He describes well how the block size limit encourages attacks on Bitcoin

Also, it is not on developers to be setting up fee markets. It should be the realm of, well, the market.

If you want to block these things, block them with policy. Not by artificially limiting everybody. IMO, not enough has been done to encourage fine-grain control over transactions which are included in a block. It should almost have its own mini-scripting language IMO.


This is a fair statement.