The websites your going to create DNS for hidden from censorship 'ect.' I think it makes sense to include them within the network. If it won't work for Tor create a public blockchain for it(which shows its weakness) and a hidden blockchain within the I2P for that network. If the SilkRoad got massive or this new 'Armoury' Tor site did or alt-currencies got massive and the US tried to block them but people were still using them via Tor the US could and would pull the plug on Tor if the thorn in their side got to big. So if alt-currencies were outlawed and they also pulled the plug on Tor it would be very difficult for alt-currencies to be usefull but a block chain within I2P could still be used if people could get access to the I2P client because apart from outlawing encrypted web-traffic I see no way of stopping I2P unless they monitored a persons internet traffic. You see with Tor they only have to monitor/block the output nodes which would be easier for them to find then monitoring every persons internet traffic for I2P traffic. I think they would find it hard to ban Tor or I2P but to stop Tor it would easier (like I said they like a large Tor network for the CIA to better hide in) than I2P. So an alt-currency within I2P could end up the only alt-currency if the likes of bitcoin got massive and the governments thought they were loosing too much tax.
Your assumption is that bitcoin tech (maybe not alt-currency offshoots) is not a CIA darknet project like Tor. Check your assumptions maybe? Possibly but I don't want to get to into conspiracy theory's apart from I do think the US government could shutdown Tor and also outlaw bitcoin transactions. Leaving me no way to access the bitcoin block chain anonymously but if there was a I2P network that would not be a problem. To be honest my own conspiracy theory's regarding bitcoin creation are more due with 'A.I' - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity  |
|
|
|
I think they would find it hard to ban Tor or I2P but to stop Tor it would easier
Why? Tor works even in places where governments are actively trying to ban it. But the US government is much bigger so could if they desired find every exit node, monitor it and block it if the desired like I said it's the CIA own darknet the bigger the better to hide in but if the thorn becomes to big? |
|
|
|
|
If alt-currencies were outlawed and they also pulled the plug on Tor it would be very difficult for alt-currencies to be usefull but a block chain within I2P could still be used if people could get access to the I2P client because apart from outlawing encrypted web-traffic I see no way of stopping I2P unless they monitored a persons internet traffic. You see with Tor they only have to monitor/block the output nodes which would be easier for them to find then monitoring every persons internet traffic for I2P traffic. I think they would find it hard to ban Tor or I2P but to stop Tor it would easier (like I said they like a large Tor network for the CIA to better hide in) than I2P. So an alt-currency within I2P could end up the only alt-currency if the likes of bitcoin got massive and the governments thought they were loosing too much tax.
|
|
|
|
|
The websites your going to create DNS for hidden from censorship 'ect.' I think it makes sense to include them within the network. If it won't work for Tor create a public blockchain for it(which shows its weakness) and a hidden blockchain within the I2P for that network. If the SilkRoad got massive or this new 'Armoury' Tor site did or alt-currencies got massive and the US tried to block them but people were still using them via Tor the US could and would pull the plug on Tor if the thorn in their side got to big. So if alt-currencies were outlawed and they also pulled the plug on Tor it would be very difficult for alt-currencies to be usefull but a block chain within I2P could still be used if people could get access to the I2P client because apart from outlawing encrypted web-traffic I see no way of stopping I2P unless they monitored a persons internet traffic. You see with Tor they only have to monitor/block the output nodes which would be easier for them to find then monitoring every persons internet traffic for I2P traffic. I think they would find it hard to ban Tor or I2P but to stop Tor it would easier (like I said they like a large Tor network for the CIA to better hide in) than I2P. So an alt-currency within I2P could end up the only alt-currency if the likes of bitcoin got massive and the governments thought they were loosing too much tax.
|
|
|
|
Check who is the biggest sponsor of Tor - https://www.torproject.org/about/sponsors.html.en - The US government and taken from the official Tor homepage - Tor was originally designed, implemented, and deployed as a third-generation onion routing project of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. It was originally developed with the U.S. Navy in mind, for the primary purpose of protecting government communications - All Tor traffic exits through a number of public nodes which are all known. These nodes could all be/being monitored and blocked. Like I said I think a blockchain that solely exists inside the I2P network is a good idea as all Tor traffic is probably monitored and could be stopped by the US government. The only reason they let it exist is to make the CIA darknet bigger for them to hide in. Looks like their child brought a lot of problems like Silk Road =) There is no sense to make Tor/I2P transport layer to commucate to TCP/IP through it via out proxies at all. Anyway, I need to get it work over TCP/IP first. Like I said I only think the US let their creation public and continue is to grow their own darknet to make it easier for them to hide in. They could monitor all exit nodes and they could block them all so I don't think Tor can be relied on long-term to hide in the internet but a blockchain that solely exists within the I2P network would be a very robust way to hide your mining, transactions and wealth. As I don't think Tor can be relied on to access your bitcoins anonymously so a I2P alternative would offer complete anonymity as I don't know a way to connect to the bitcoin blockchain from I2P apart from a proxy (again which could be monitored and blocked) only using Tor. |
|
|
|
You can't rely on the CIA darknet called Tor for anonymity check who is the biggest sponsor of Tor - https://www.torproject.org/about/sponsors.html.en - The US government and taken from the official Tor homepage - "Tor was originally designed, implemented, and deployed as a third-generation onion routing project of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. It was originally developed with the U.S. Navy in mind, for the primary purpose of protecting government communications" - All Tor traffic exits through a number of public nodes which are all known. These nodes could all be/being monitored and blocked. Like I said I think a blockchain that solely exists inside the I2P network is a good idea as all Tor traffic is probably monitored and could be stopped by the US government. The only reason they let it exist is to make the CIA darknet bigger for them to hide in. |
|
|
|
If I do this, I automatically make this DNS closed to other anonymous networks, as they will require i2p router to run. The DNS client must be light.
However it is possible to add i2p BOB transport protocol as additional layer along with TCP/IP
Then it would be totally anonymous if the blockchain only existed inside the I2P network. The problem with Tor is you have to rely on a certain number of output nodes which could all/most be monitored and also blocked. I'm sure that there will always be TOR exit nodes somewhere in the world that aren't blocked from accessing the DIANNA blockchain. I just don't like Tor as the only reason it went public because it makes the CIA darknet bigger for them to hide in. I'm not a expert but I think a blockchain that solely exists inside the I2P network is a smart idea. Ok. But then you limit it's availability. If you are concerned about being anonymous you could access the registrar using I2P and do the DIANNA lookups with I2P. I'm sure sites will pop up allowing you to access DIANNA through I2P, TOR, and just the regular old web. Check who is the biggest sponsor of Tor - https://www.torproject.org/about/sponsors.html.en - The US government and taken from the official Tor homepage - Tor was originally designed, implemented, and deployed as a third-generation onion routing project of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. It was originally developed with the U.S. Navy in mind, for the primary purpose of protecting government communications - All Tor traffic exits through a number of public nodes which are all known. These nodes could all be/being monitored and blocked. Like I said I think a blockchain that solely exists inside the I2P network is a good idea as all Tor traffic is probably monitored and could be stopped by the US government. The only reason they let it exist is to make the CIA darknet bigger for them to hide in. |
|
|
|
If I do this, I automatically make this DNS closed to other anonymous networks, as they will require i2p router to run. The DNS client must be light.
However it is possible to add i2p BOB transport protocol as additional layer along with TCP/IP
Then it would be totally anonymous if the blockchain only existed inside the I2P network. The problem with Tor is you have to rely on a certain number of output nodes which could all/most be monitored and also blocked. I'm sure that there will always be TOR exit nodes somewhere in the world that aren't blocked from accessing the DIANNA blockchain. I just don't like Tor as the only reason it went public because it makes the CIA darknet bigger for them to hide in. I'm not a expert but I think a blockchain that solely exists inside the I2P network is a smart idea. |
|
|
|
If I do this, I automatically make this DNS closed to other anonymous networks, as they will require i2p router to run. The DNS client must be light.
However it is possible to add i2p BOB transport protocol as additional layer along with TCP/IP
Then it would be totally anonymous if the blockchain only existed inside the I2P network. The problem with Tor is you have to rely on a certain number of output nodes which could all/most be monitored and also blocked. |
|
|
|
That wouldn't be much better than using Bitcoin with Tor, since the problem with Bitcoin anonymity is mostly due to the way Bitcoin transactions work. Anonymity at the network layer isn't the main problem.
But with Tor you have to rely on a certain number of output nodes which could be blocked or monitored? |
|
|
|
Have you thought of creating the block chain so it only exists inside the I2P network for better anonymity or is this not possible  |
|
|
|
Has anyone every thought of creating a new blockchain that only works inside the I2P network for better anonymity or is it not possible The rest of the web could still access online wallets and stuff as long as the site was a connected or acting as a proxy. |
|
|
|
Don't use Google Translate - ask someone to translate it  OK thanks  |
|
|
|
Impressions:
30102
Clicks:
38
Earned from advertisers:
0.00000000 btc
am i doing something wrong?
I am not sure, but probably advertisers are doing wrong not paying to you. You got registered just couple days ago, maybe they will. Anonymous Ads doesn't pay for clicks/impressions anymore since there is no easy way for it to distinguish productive clicks and impressions from the ones generated by botnets. Good news is that Anonymous Ads will be paying you for having your affiliate code on your sites if you add them to the list. I just added my sites to the list but once I checked the list they were already on. Sorry for the spam. |
|
|
|
Good price If I can't get the funds tomorrow will look into it if not then it'll be in two weeks time. I live in the UK and presume that is not a problem? |
|
|
|
Yeah I've been looking at them. If it's cheaper then their website I might have a kit in two weeks? |
|
|
|
OK thanks maybe you can't view the GLBSE page because I have a LTC mining script on it and its generating LTC so some/most people can view it. About earning expectations well AdSense pay me over £0.80 a click but I've only had 6 AdSense clicks to the 21 Anonymous Ads clicks.
So your site generates less than 1k unique impressions/month, but your traffic is high quality and is valuable for particular advertisers, thus you expect about 1.5 btc/month for it? Yes, it works now! Thanks! I'd take less than 1.5BTC to be honest. |
|
|
|
you havent updated the op
Updated it a bit but it needs drastically improving. Working on the new FPGA company's website at the moment so will sort it out proper by tomorrow hopefully. Any major shareholders have good prose |
|
|
|
yes fastest delivery
Cool it should be mining away then within three weeks then  |
|
|
|
yes do motion, once we get all boards, and we are getting dividends each week, we can decide in vote whether to sell more shares or hold 50% of profits for expansion
Shall I do a motion on delivery costs too or just go for the fastest delivery? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
