I guess the part I am trying to understand is what evidence do we have that indicates 100TH will deploy before Metabank ships their 120G miner? Is 100TH simply hosting tons of the same product that is going for preorder at the moment or are we talking about something very different, thus the potential early deployment?
Thanks
I'm not sure when metabank will get their chips, but they are getting them from tytus et al. If metabank gets the chips at the same time (or very soon after) as 100th, then I guess it could be a race to see who is able to assemble their hardware faster. I don't know how Metabank will package their ASICS, but 100th doesn't need to put things into a pretty box, so this could potentially give 100th a slight edge. /speculation Metabank definitely offers a good price, but 100th offers ( a little bit of ) liquidity. I missed how this all began but I always assumed Bitfury made a deal with the 100TH guys to create chip for them, 100TH manufactures 100TH in their Taiwan factory for themselves, then for Metabank to sell on behalf of Bitfury. Kind of like you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.
|
|
|
The dividend should usually be fixed in the contract as a function of various input factors that are outside the control of the issuer, so the issuer cant arbitrarily lower dividends for one day.
Yah, but he has a point about attempting to maintain a percentage of the network hashrate. People aren't even attempting to do that, they're just taking out loans (creating bonds/stocks) for diminishing returns (less effective hashes). So for a mining bond based on difficulty, the issuer gains a lot of capital during the IPO, and can buy the shares back at a later point (like a year) cheaper. It's great for him, but it's also great for the first comers too. The people after the IPO and near the end of the spectrum get the short end of the stick. The issuer would have a difficult time maintaining the % of network hashrate, but if he could, then it would be a sounder investment for the long run. As it stands, a bond like TAT.VM relies on the difficulty increasing and the dividends dwindling, because if they didn't then he would go broke. Right now he's paying out more per day than he's making per day, but he gets a nice fat cheque he invest in something else to (hopefully) profit enough to cover the loss. Thus he and the initial investors do well I'm not sure any mining bond out there is maintaining a network % with the huge delays in shipments. Maybe one day though..
|
|
|
Seems like you guys are trying to cash in on your orders. You've been mining for 2 years, but your orders are very recent. Maybe you're withholding the older orders, but no one would expect you to admit that. By the time you get those machines, your calculations are useless. Even if they were running right now, they're too expensive. You could have offered them cheaper, at the optimistically estimated price you'll see from them in a few months. Maybe then you'd get some hopeful gamblers. But with this greed...
The only reason you are "cheaper" than some of the other mining stocks is because they started low and demand pushed them higher. You can't just start at the top, and they also have much lower order numbers. You guys must know this. This is just free money to cover your expense on those orders that won't trickle down to your investors.
|
|
|
Them some sweet sweet divs. This first month will be the best, but it'll still be worth keeping it in here for ~8 months. After 8 months it'll prob be at 5% APY which is OK if stable.
|
|
|
I think you've got a decimal place wrong there. Bitfury's miner is 120GHash, and is available on pre-order for 30BTC.
Not ignoring the risk, but it works out at 30/120,000 = 0.00025 btc/MHash, 28 times the hashing power of TAT's IPO. Not arguing which is the better investment; they'll cater to investors with different risk profiles.
Oops you're right. I jumped the gun on that one. Thanks much 16x YABMC too.
|
|
|
when are the dividends payed?
will they be payed after all the 100k shares from IPO have been sold?
Dividends are paid daily at roughly 12PM EST. BitFunder does not have a feature to allow me to schedule payouts ahead of time, so they must be done manually. Payouts will be made on this schedule regardless of the amount of shares sold. The first payout will be in about 5 hours! Manual? Wow, that sucks.
|
|
|
You are free to invest where you like to, but you cant just take the 30 BTC and think this are the full costs..
We have to pay at least +6 BTC for customs and this is just to bring the device from Russia to EU, there could be other/more expanses to take into account.
Of course, I'm just thinking 10BTC = $1300 for customs when the device is $2100 and thinking what? and we could at least opt to pay a certain amount of DOLLARS for custom fees when it's ready to ship, instead of BTC now, because who knows what BTC will be worth in 3+ months? You could be getting $5000 for customs, or $50, but more likely $1500+. There's other fees, and I'm sure the 1.5% will help. If it's not enough, increase that IMO. Imports to my country, Canada, would only cost $245. What about yours?
|
|
|
Edit: missed a decimal place. Thanks stripykitteh. Phew.
|
|
|
Edit: Math error, thanks ChronoX5.
|
|
|
Thanks Foofighter, that's perfect!
I wish someone would do this with Bitfury's (600% more GH per dollar, less power).
Just have seen the Bitfurys Asic thread , but this sounds for the moment to risky for me, there is still no proof and also no excrow allowed. No proof, but you can hold the coins in your own new wallet if you purchase through their site (6-10% fees).
|
|
|
Nice to know that hopefully this will be on BTCT soon, I will definitely consider buying a few hundred shares.
However this is my main concern that might hold me back:
Buying a share is the equivalent of buying 1 MH/s in hashing ability. This amount of hashing power will remain static while difficulty will increase at around 10-20% every other week, so won't the value of the stock share go down significantly over time?
Not quite. People getting into TAT.VM are either looking for somewhere to put their coins as an intermediate between ups and downs in other stocks, or they're looking for passive consistent dividends yielding 5-30% APY (interest a year), like a normal solid stock. It's the *safe* choice. Currently people use YABMC for this, but YABMC doesn't have many shares on Bitfunder (500), and on BTCT it doesn't have much activity, isn't clear to people on the MH per share, and does weekly dividends (the difficulty for the last 6 days will be whatever is on the 7th day, which isn't fair). YABMC has been fairly consistent in price. Actually, it's been increasing, as more people want to use it as an intermediate. TAT.VM is very clear, and daily, and on Bitfunder. It's a great intermediary if you're interested in it. It's at like 30% APY, which is nothing to sneeze at, so even as it decreases to 5% it's still a good holding, thus the price should not drop below the IPO very much.
|
|
|
IPO will go live in about an hour, early bidding is open: https://bitfunder.com/asset/TAT.VIRTUALMINEBelow is a chart showing a comparison of the cost per 1MH/s for each mining asset currently on the market. I apologize if some details are a pinch out of date, it's hard to keep up with changing prices, etc! Feel free to check my math and let me know if I missed anything. hi tat, your handy chart should include picostock's 100th bitfury project. 200mh/share for btc0.289 at present is 0.001445 per mh. https://picostocks.com/stocks/view/19Yeah it should. 100TH is about 5x cheaper than TAT.VM, but not mining for a few more months at least, and the issuer screwed some people by distributing more shares at a lower price after IPO. ASIC.COOP's numbers are about the same.
|
|
|
Thanks Foofighter, that's perfect!
I wish someone would do this with Bitfury's (600% more GH per dollar, less power).
|
|
|
each share is equivalent to ~920Mh/s hashing power When only the first batch has arrived, in order for that to be true, you wouldn't split the 5.5 GH device between all shareholders, only the one who bought the 6 shares. Otherwise as more people buy shares, you are watering down (reducing) the hashing power per share (giving the new shareholders hashing power before their shipment has been delivered). If I buy 6 shares now, do I get hashing power when the first shipment you ordered is delivered (avalon batch 1)? or do I wait until the shipment I get into is delivered (batch 2 or 3)? Honestly I would prefer to wait and guarantee ~920Mh/s per share. Because once you start actually giving out dividends, a bunch of people will want shares and the shipments will take longer and never catch up to the demand. In essence, you would be hosting them for us (you should charge a % fee). That means the first avalon you pre-ordered is all yours, Foofighter, not shared. We wait Is that how it will work?
|
|
|
Sweet, I could use some TAT.VM for my TAT.AM
|
|
|
One more point. I do not know the laws of the United States and other countries, possibly at the time of receiving the package you need to pay the tax for that package.
If you say the value/cost of the device/box is $2160, then the USA and Canada will require taxes (14% in BC = $300) and customs (who knows, $200?). So, around $500 is to be expected.
|
|
|
Metabank, Bitfury, is it OK to pre-order and pickup in Moscow? I live in Canada and speak English (not Russian, I'm sorry!)
Thank you
|
|
|
2) Send your package devices (for international mail). I can even disassemble and send to you in the form of separate fragments. Hey Naima, is shipping (to Canada) included in the $5000 price? or additional?
|
|
|
I would really like to see a website setup to streamline sales and news too. Theres really no excuse plenty of people can do it, asicminer could probably do the whole thing with bitcoin too, website hosting paid in bitcoin, designers paid in bitcoin. Or just do it them selves, its really not hard to setup a wordpress store with bitpay. Being able to sell usb eruptors directly to people would be a huge benefit. They would probably need to hire someone to handle the orders but that shouldnt be an issue because of the added sales.
They have designed made and are now selling hardware, they really need to get their shit together and sort out the front end of the business, the part the public sees, it really shouldnt be that you have to delve through a unrelated forum to find out how to buy the stuff. They have product, they need to market it now before competitors have their own stock.
I don't know about that. The simplicity and profit of selling in bulk is a good excuse, because you have to interact with the third-party somewhere anyway, on like, a forum There's a lot of overhead in selling units of 1 to just anyone around the world. They could have a better public image though, than checking a large "fried cat" forum topic.
|
|
|
|