- no dates listed in communication (tickets) via the web-app bitcoin-central.net
- verification not completed within 10 days - former verified account

Cool, I did not know that kraken.com was the "leading platform for
trading digital assets", as stated in yesterdays' press release  

Are users from Germany now eligible to be verified due to the Fidor
cooperation? If not, when will this be the case (please underpromise).

I noticed week(s?) ago and asked Mt.Gox support how this could be, as
the OKPay site's statement still is "do not trade with bitcoin exchanges".

Mt.Gox answer: "No OKPay atm, we will inform you on change..."

What an awkward feeling...

This being said, I love Mt.Gox, and when OKPay works both ways, this is
a real game changer imho.

Edit: Deleted the Google Authenticator again, installed
new one. Now I possess a different shared key. I filed a report
concerning this issue.

I agree. Not even a facebook page update... I can't understand either, why they
gamble with their immaterial capital (trust), being the oldest exchange.

If they recover from their financial issues, they lost lots of customers for sure.

Your ID does not contain an address?

Before the hacks you became verified by submitting:
- passport or national_id copy, both containing an address
- utility bill, containing address

Another thing that seems a bit odd: I just enabled my
Google authenticator and to my surprise obtained the
exact same shared-key I possessed earlier this year, but
disabled back then. Is this ok?

Let's see how fast customers will come back... This exchange looks very
promising, even though they had a series of security breaches earlier this
year.

They provide information in a way that is imho model to bitcoin exchanges -
corporations in general.

That stated, they fail in:

• providing a HTTP API
• looks like one has to verify again (documents lost??)

stay on topic, please.

check out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85495.20

I got this error too. I cancelled my two SEPA withdrawals after not
receiving status changes for 3 weeks. Now I cannot withdraw BTC.
I just contacted the Mt.Gox support on this issue, and will act
on their response.

Edit 1:Kept trying, now I receive the normal messages when
withdrawing.

Edit 2:It took a couple of hours for the last transaction to be
broadcasted, but now everything is visible in the blockchain.

Sure, but not even the first came through. A pity, as these
have just been test withdrawals, for deciding if I re-invest
in the near future using Mt.Gox.

I hope they make progress on this front very soon, as imho
they are still the most credible exchange.

2013-09-05: 10³ EUR; Status: confirmed; Type: SEPA withdrawal
2013-09-10: 10³ EUR; Status: confirmed; Type: SEPA withdrawal

I'd love to conduct further business with Mt.Gox, but it is difficult,
if money does not flow. Under these circumstances, I have trouble
investing more.

@Luno
You mention lots of valid points.

I think I should have stated it differently. What I tried to convey is, that the format
of a 70+ pages thread on bitcointalk is ok to inform future users, as you state it,
but lots of energy is not really channeled.

I am dreaming of a bitcoin exchange ranking site, where incidents are reported in
a uniform format, backed up by evidence or proof. This would increase the
competition for excellence, i.e. customer support. If this would be set up the right
way, output of such a site could serve as a starting point for legal action.

I am just bouncing around an idea...
BTW, I agree with you on all points.

Matonis is the Forbes-Guy. He is also a member of the board
on https://bitcoinfoundation.org/about/board
together with Karpeles. In addition, he is often on bitcoincharts.com,
which is run by Tibanne corporation (perform a whois query).

I'd say Forbes is out of the question for critique in this case.

But do we need more critique? An assessment of Mt.Gox 's
financial position besides looking at symptoms, which can
be created through FUD and fortified, is imho needed.

Every follow-up exchange profits from Mt.Gox taking a loss.

how could this be a feature???
I hope you mean this as in it is not a bug it's a feature
User: I do A
Program: You just did B, i throttle you.

The current version of smf seems buggy.
It tells me I search too often, without having performed
a single search query. This error comes in various flavors.
Sometimes it tells me that I search too quickly, right after
my first query.

That is not a PEBKAC.

Couple of years back phpbb and jforum were cool

You are right, I changed the dot to a question mark. Actually, cases exist in which
no question mark is needed. Please see the original post.

Thank you for your information. Please tell me where I can find the phone number, I checked:

• faq
• support section
• about-us
• facebook

All I can find is either a contact form or an email address.
Your answer is highly appreciated.

Wow, I finally came around reading up on BIPS. I am positively impressed,
even though I have not tried this service yet.
Thank you Kris.

"Without further action" is the important part here. It means that without further action on
my side (invested time), how can I verify Kris to be the Kris.

I postponed looking into him and his corporation, after I found confirmation of bitstamp.net
joining forces with gbgplc (as provided in my post above).