this is indeed very reasonable, because indeed those who in this case are followers of Elon will always be like that with the hope of getting any benefit from what Elon is doing, for people who are experts in this field of course it will be very good but different from some people who are still just following along and without knowing how he got in and how he got out are finally caught in a loss.
I don't want to be involved in this kind of thing because I realize that when I do this, I will get a loss not an advantage because I am aware that my capacity and ability is still far from this.

When I saw the performance of Manchester United in the last few matches, I actually felt like I was always making unnecessary experiments.
indeed it would be very good to rotate players so that they are more prepared and fit because it can make their body condition much better if they have enough rest when the schedule is tight, but when backing up several core players at once I think it is too much.
this even happened when against Everton. he always makes new formulas to fit the players, I think this is the same as gambling when always trying new things in quite important matches

Elon's role here is still part of the influencer and as the pioneer of the fomo of this coin and that doesn't mean he is the boss.
and the boss is still anonymous and if I'm not mistaken the one who created this coin is Ryoshi who aims for Dogecoin Killer and to become a rival of this meme coin.
and Elon is one of the people who is still a facilitator in the fomo pump and dump movement who certainly already knows the results are for his own benefit.

I actually think that USDT is something that has quite a big risk, especially for the long term.
they are supervised and audited by a third party in this case indirectly they are the same as someone who is behind it and this makes usdt not good enough for the long term.
I'm not saying it's bad but with a system like this it will be very risky in the long term even though their liquidity is large

actually I don't really follow this but I've read several articles not only now this news about usdt has been around for a long time before.
but I don't think this has much impact considering that there are so many countries that use this usdt.
apart from that, when looking at usdt I think I will be more worried about other coins because the negative news is not only about usdt but a lot of coins that are affected by this.
but what distinguishes usdt until now is still strong even though it continues to experience setbacks

at least we just need to wait for time for that, considering what you said bnb is still one of the dream coins.
not only when it comes to their exchange, bnb also has a coin burn system which makes their supply dwindle more and more.
I don't want to say bnb to the moon or whatever it's for sure this is something that can be profitable to adopt especially for the long term.

what is happening in your country is exactly the same as what is happening now in mine.
instead of prohibiting or legalizing, the government is more in a neutral direction.
but precisely this can be profitable on the other hand, things like this also have their own disadvantages because there are indeed many forms in the name of crypto.
indeed it doesn't really affect me much but I'm uncomfortable with it because so many people are deceived by this kind of trick.

indeed it would be very good when something like this happened, but it seems this will cause a polemic first among the government's internal circles.
because indeed when the government legalizes things like bitcoin they can no longer control the finances and transactions made by its citizens.
other than that there will definitely be some problems with fiat because indirectly when this becomes legal the means of payment will automatically be divided into two options namely fiat and bitcoin
would be great for those of us who are in the bitcoin sphere but there will be repercussions for the government

apart from that they are still the same by using the hype pump and dump and the overpriced fomo.
and of course coins or tokens like this you know what the results will be.
I'm not even sure about the future of this shib even though there are lots of fomo especially for beginners, here you can also see the pumps made by billionaires and the events are the same as doge's a few months ago.
apart from that I think for those who are interested in buying here now is not a good time, because now it is too high and when this happens you will know the results.

it probably goes back to the main problem iran faced a few months ago which is their electricity supply is running low and when this is implemented actually i don't think it will be difficult to get a license like you said.
but the problem is that electricity supply remains an obstacle when many miners both in individuals and groups make Iran think hard about this.
but this becomes like an overlap between one another, apart from that, I think there are consequences that cannot be changed when making a policy.

This is a natural thing, because indeed when talking about companies, both individuals and groups, I think the goal is the same thing, namely to seek as much profit as possible.
and indeed for polygon now the network is the cheapest after tron when compared to bsc and eth of course the gas will be different.
and of course the companies want to make a profit even in the amount of gas fees.
so it's very natural about this, but that doesn't mean bsc and eth are losing their fans. and it is precisely this that can be compared as they are competitors who provide services in exchange.

this is not without reason, even though they often carry out policies that sometimes we don't understand about it but China is one of the countries with the largest economy so indirectly when they do it will definitely have an impact even though we already know that money from China can sometimes change quickly and sometimes a few months after this fud subsides and there is no significant effect they will make a new policy saying that bitcoin is legal in china. This is because China has implemented this rule several times.
talking about recovery is actually very reasonable because there are some rumors saying that fud was created for whales who want to buy from the bottom, and this seems to be true and with evidence that a massive recovery took place.
I'm not saying that it's caused by the whales as a whole, but I do believe there is their hand in every bitcoin move whether it's a fud or a massive recovery.

This is of course a new problem that is sure to happen.
and when it comes to the thread that you created, I think it will be very difficult to sort out the miners because it is certain that these miners will not be the same in the mining they do.
even if there is a license that supports the activity, this kind of thing must have specifications because again the mining carried out will definitely be different because the results of mining companies or groups will be different from the results of individual mining.
and this must be resolved immediately before it spreads everywhere.
not without reason, even if there are specifications and there are licenses that make the difference in mining in iran, but of course there are people who will use options that are prohibited by applicable regulations and this will definitely happen for some people.

apart from that, the initial goal when investing was indeed to get money both in fiat and real terms (in the end it came back here). as for if they want it, I don't think there will be a big problem because they don't want it at the same time.
and of course when transacting there must be a seller and a buyer and automatically there will be, even though the price will decrease but only to a small extent, not in a serious direction, I think because it must be gradual, but it will be a different story when everyone wants it at the same time .
in the end everything will return to personal matters in the real world, even though technology and civilization have advanced, but not all of them can feel the same way, because even if fiat and crypto or others already exist, not necessarily facilities in one area can all-encompassing exists, there are definitely a lot that still don't exist for now and real money is a solution that will remain as digital money continues to evolve.

Even so, we still have to be realistic in our decisions.
Trust is indeed very important in doing something, especially in investing.
but on the other hand a good trust must of course be in accordance with existing research and can be proven with results.
and bitcoins have proven their worth as it goes up and up and gets more valuable.
it is true that everything that exists today will surely be eroded with the development of the times and something new.
but it is to support life to be better right? so, as long as bitcoin is still profitable for us, why not use it as much as possible.

this is in accordance with Iran's initial statement which indeed banned bitcoin mining for 4 months because it was constrained by electricity problems and maybe now the electricity problem in Iran can be maximized so it is very natural for people to re-legalize bitcoin mining there.
this is good news again for bitcoin and for iran itself because if you look at crypto, including bitcoin in it, it is very influential and can bring good things to iran at this time, this is not without reason because the currency they use is currently weak and even tend to be less valuable for the global economy because the sanctions imposed on Iran are still in effect.
then indirectly with this will help bring them a little to the good in the economy.

Indeed, until now, Koeman's decisions have been controversial and the decisions he made have been detrimental to the team.
example like you said about suarez which does feel like a bad decision. even more so as the case related to griezman which did lead to losses that befell Barcelona.
but I'm still confused by the decision of the management team who are still kind enough to Koeman about this.
and for now, I think the Barcelona formation in play so far is not effective and the tiki taka pattern that has become the hallmark of Barcelona is slowly disappearing.

##PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION##
Bitcoin talk Username: Congyanh
Bitcoin talk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052849
Telegram Username : @congyang89
Participated Campaign : Sig
Bep-20 Address : 0xa2a12F07B3245F85Be622fFB5f583E07B4789d45

unfortunately only a small number of people do that and those who do that are only people who are already in a rich context and don't need money
it is not without reason that many gamblers now only gamble just to get more wealth, especially now that the era is already very severe, especially in the economy because indeed all activities are hampered due to the virus which until now has not been able to be overcome.
and one of the things that can make money is gambling, even though it is not really right because compared to profits, there are more losses, but many are trying to do that.

barcelona are in a transition period and it will definitely be difficult for them to deal with this especially this is exacerbated by some of their players currently still unable to play due to injuries they have suffered.
I think for this season Barcelona have to be prepared without a trophy being brought to Campnou and the fans have to be prepared for that.
not without reason, when playing in UCL in these two matches they couldn't get a single point and even had to concede 6 goals without entering a single goal, and even in the league they were thrown up to 6th position in the standings and this will be difficult for them