My wallet out of sync for 16 hour now. Does anyone has a working wallet?
Yes, my wallet is synchronized (now at block 1448285). Using the only 1 node in conf file (104.128.225.215 - rest comented), I have 16 connections. On the other hand, network weight is very small ~2600. Is probably ok... I don't know what to believe ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Same for my wallet. Working fine. Looks like chain needs to become stronger again! Using only one guarantee node to save chain make chain more weakly. This node also can spread and will spread wrong blocks. Now attacker can concentrate efforts in only one node. Please do not cherish illusions.
|
|
|
The only way to avoid splitting in future is to accept and execute my suggestions: 1. Hardcode main pools in client (need list) to be guarantors of the chain, not forever. For example, we have 10 pools in list, if 7 of 10 accepted block, that block true. 2. Try to find out vector of attack (pow or pos) and develop a protection system. 3. Test protection system several times with emulation of attack 4. Remove hardcoded pools.
Without this steps, we will have new splits again and again.
|
|
|
Check the post from Joe and follow that info
Your advice to me?
|
|
|
Again!? Bloody hell
And will again and again, untill my suggestions will accept, point by point.
|
|
|
I understand this is frustrating while this is the situation we have at this moment, and becomes quite most recently. My looking back the chain turns out a lot of PoW blocks mined right after the fork point pointing to one /few miners own considerable hash to push the chain faster than the rest, and I go the direction that the big miners somehow reported by people might be the cause. I'd see this a dilemma we're facing when we try to maintain the whole network hash up to a limit but few parties can bring in huge hash from whichever channels they can acquire. This is the plan we are thinking of to take on at this moment:
1) Please connect to the chain that 104.128.225.215 and poolinfo.systms.org are on. Shortly, I'll get an updated block data / wallet for downloads.
2) We will make changes to the PoW ASAP. I must admit and make such a note upfront here that there is no guarantee that we'll be 100% isolated from hard fork, and there is always a probability unless we grow up to a scale that no one can compete the rest in both PoS and PoW. I recognize a weak point that we keep the network hash to a lower limit to favor low-hash miner, and that is where we're suffering from, while I would remain to stay on this.
Please make suggestions.
My suggestions 1. Hardcode main pools (need list) to be guarantors of the chain (not forever). 2. Try to find out vector of attack (pow or pos) and develop a protection system. 3. Test protection system with emulation of attack (several times) 4. Remove hardcoded pools.
|
|
|
Folks - this newbie account ~ Vitalik_Pedik~ has only posts on this thread
just sayin, he showed up when the problems showed up
Exposure of the century just sayin, nobody care ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) will do it again and again when problems showed up ))) What do you mean with that? Will do it again and again! Don't you like Magi? not right now Could you answer the first question also? will showed up when the problems showed up
|
|
|
Folks - this newbie account ~ Vitalik_Pedik~ has only posts on this thread
just sayin, he showed up when the problems showed up
Some people do not have need to be on a forum untill there r some problems and they want to know what to do Better say "most" people
|
|
|
Folks - this newbie account ~ Vitalik_Pedik~ has only posts on this thread
just sayin, he showed up when the problems showed up
Exposure of the century just sayin, nobody care ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) will do it again and again when problems showed up ))) What do you mean with that? Will do it again and again? Don't you like Magi? not right now
|
|
|
Folks - this newbie account ~ Vitalik_Pedik~ has only posts on this thread
just sayin, he showed up when the problems showed up
Exposure of the century just sayin, nobody care ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) will do it again and again when problems showed up )))
|
|
|
The block explorer switched to the good chain I think, I see now my transaction from the 7 august, the explorer is up to block 1447862, in my wallet the last block is 1447962 and my transactions are not here, and the last block on https://poolinfo.systms.org/#magi is 1447962. How you can't understand? There is no good chain now. look at the date, my transactions are from ~2 weeks ago, and all this fork things started a few days ago edit : the "good" chain that shows my transactions is 100 blocks behind the "new good one" that is synced by my 1.4.1.1 wallet and didn't have my transaction All chains are bad, since split. Thats not true And what chain is good?)
|
|
|
The block explorer switched to the good chain I think, I see now my transaction from the 7 august, the explorer is up to block 1447862, in my wallet the last block is 1447962 and my transactions are not here, and the last block on https://poolinfo.systms.org/#magi is 1447962. How you can't understand? There is no good chain now. look at the date, my transactions are from ~2 weeks ago, and all this fork things started a few days ago edit : the "good" chain that shows my transactions is 100 blocks behind the "new good one" that is synced by my 1.4.1.1 wallet and didn't have my transaction All chains are bad, since split.
|
|
|
The block explorer switched to the good chain I think, I see now my transaction from the 7 august, the explorer is up to block 1447862, in my wallet the last block is 1447962 and my transactions are not here, and the last block on https://poolinfo.systms.org/#magi is 1447962. How you can't understand? There is no good chain now.
|
|
|
The transaction has had 400+ confirmations. I wrote bittrex support to ask for help recovering it.
Status: 408 confirmations Date: 8/16/2017 15:58 To: ready to go. 9******************* Debit: -150.02 XMG Transaction fee: -0.01 XMG Net amount: -150.03 XMG Transaction ID: 07f7*******************************************
Enoch
Your coins in ***************************** now)
|
|
|
I have transferred 150 coins to bittrex to become involved in trading and they vanished. I had sent them prior to the last fork when i was in wallet 1.4.1
I cannot find the transaction. They seem like they were lost to the fork? I cannot get them to come back with Repair Wallet.
How do i get my 150 coins back that was half my wallet! I am not ok with losing 50 dollars in coins to a software malfunction.
Where'd my coins go and how do I get them back?!
Enoch
Write address-from coins was send to bittrex. I will find out where it now.
|
|
|
I mean that my wallet and supronova daemon on the same fork. Untill fix, all existing chains need to call "forks".
|
|
|
By the way, suprnova start to mine our fork ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
So you on fork, my last block #1447839, and suprnova too. Or we on fork)
|
|
|
I am ready to sell anyone my 7k sh..t-magi coins by 0.00005btc/xmg now. PM who interested.
How could you send them? According to my wallet, the last block was generated > 30 minutes ago ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I will send only after regular and 100% not last fix.
|
|
|
I am ready to sell anyone my 7k sh..t-magi coins by 0.00005btc/xmg now. PM who interested.
|
|
|
ALL working normal on 1.4.1.1 1.4.1 NOT working
|
|
|
|