Thats a winning Combination. Blockchain, Al, and Medical Expertise sounds like a Successful ico.  It is, but they have to clear everthing out now. Very general terms were ok like 2 months ago, and now the public need more precise ideas yes, the project is winning but more information would be welcome, for example how exactly the app will work, and what exactly are the next steps in the progress of the project The main idea and how this project will work (not technically) is already informed on their site and ann thread. About the app, i think dont even design it yet because the start of the software development is after the token sale according to the roadmap, so the progress of the projects now is focusing / preparing for the token sale. |
|
|
|
That would be a long video I guess but there are different kind of people out there. Some prefer reading and some listening to a podcast or video.
280 paged whitepaper, roadmap stretchs to year 2025, i'm pretty sure that video won't be short. Watching videos is the best way to understand something for most people including me. But if the video duration is too long, we can get bored sooner. It will be better to cut the video into parts hence it'll be more comfortable to watch.
If the youtuber is attractive/funny, it certainly wont be as boring as reading the whitepaper and for some people, the information will go deeper into the brain. |
|
|
|
I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.
I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this. Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos? Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team. There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps But at the ent you don't know if they are independent or paid. I linke these youtube videos but I allway watch out if there were changes or if another source reports the same Well we should be looking for the fact / information that they tell to us, not focusing on the praise. And after watching the video, i think we will be able to be more to the point when we read the whitepaper, save a lot of time. |
|
|
|
What is http://crypto-valley.io/ doing? Am I really able to buy units in a virtual world? Would be interesting how many would will exists. Haven't seen the cryptop-valley site before.. is this the main site where Mark.space will sell it's virtual real estate? Looks like a promotional site to me. OR its scam  It does seem strange that the naming doesn’t seem like it’s a part of Markspace. I think it will be about crypto , not real estate. And its officially from the mark.space team as you can see it on the cointelegraph article which are already on a few posts above. |
|
|
|
I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.
I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this. Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos? Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team. |
|
|
|
Im wondering whats the current state of this project except preparing for the tokensale?
Are they really will only start the development in August 2018 according to the roadmap? it means only after the token sale?
I think they are currently preparing different stuff. Probably trying to find big investors to achieve their goals (like for example getting near the hard cap). But I assume their development will just start like it is written in their roadmap. So they will really depend on the raised funds and maybe we wont see any prototype soon. Thats quite bad, but good luck to the team. |
|
|
|
|
Im wondering whats the current state of this project except preparing for the tokensale?
Are they really will only start the development in August 2018 according to the roadmap? it means only after the token sale?
|
|
|
|
On 23 February, the Co Founder Denis Polulyakhov will be presenting http://MARK.SPACE during Blockchain Symposium is a SYNCO Investment’s monthly conference.  Any idea on how this will influence the last round of token sale? This time the amount raised is only 57 ether with just 4 days to go and well short of the high of the first round which was 3600+ ether. I hope they announce some collab. I think this is a normal thing in ICO period, big investment at the start, and then the amount will raise slowly after the period of maximum bonus is over. But yes a big move can help them. |
|
|
|
Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.
it's way too early for that. they need to develop the product first and then shopping around. Its not about the time actually , i think their team has a big connection in this field/sector, so it can bring this to some potential users that will say "Hey i want to user this platform once its ready." If it really happened, It would be good if they tell the community about it. Even the most patient users will forget about the platform in 5-year time, too long still to aim for customers. If there's no product, no demo, no something, you can say whatever you want about potential user amount, in reality it will still be different. Ahh i think youre misunderstood my sentece, im not talking about strangers/common people who dont have any idea about this project other than what is written or informed to them. I said "connection", so im talking about people who have regular communication with 1 / more person of their team, mostly someone in the same field, people who probably know or even see the progress regularly. Maybe someone who has a high position in medical companies or hospitals and then he want to use this platform for their companies or hospitals to improve a lot of things. If youre in the same field, you can measure if this is really going to happen or not. Im not talking about time / patient here, im talking about a soccer club manager who just found a very young talented boy and tell to him "hey kid , after a few years later you can try to join my club, you will get a free pass" and then the boy tell his friends "i will get a free pass there". In this case, ehealth tell the community that they are going to be used by ... |
|
|
|
Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.
it's way too early for that. they need to develop the product first and then shopping around. Its not about the time actually , i think their team has a big connection in this field/sector, so it can bring this to some potential users that will say "Hey i want to user this platform once its ready." If it really happened, It would be good if they tell the community about it. |
|
|
|
|
Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.
|
|
|
|
Please, help! I've never bought an ICO coin but I am interested in MRK I know that we contribute to this project by ETH or BTC ==> Can we also withdraw (in ETH and BTC) anytime that we want to? Any body has ever withdrawn (in ETH and BTC) successfully from this project? Thank you so much! you pay with eth btc and get mrk tokens, then you can sell those mrk tokens later on an exchange. do your own research about erc20 tokens on the ethereum blockchain. Yes, you will get MRK tokens (worth the ETH or BTC you've invested, see the token rate/price) and you cant get back your ETH or BTC except if there is a refund. If youre new to ICO you should watch some guide on youtube or ask people, maybe you can ask directly to the Markspace team for the detail information in telegram but be careful with scammers, always do a double check. |
|
|
|
Health on the blockchain is always wonderful. We need more projects to care about people health rather than wealth
Many projects from various sectors are integrating with blockchain technology and holding an ICO recently, not only about health and also not only about wealthy. And actualy there are already some projects about health not only 1 or 2, so the competition is tight. |
|
|
|
Using blockchain in medicine is one of the few areas where it really needs to be. Information is the most valuable thing we now have, and medical information is even more valuable. Good luck with the project and thank you that you are!
Blockchain is a perfect technology to make database becomes more useful and helpful, it can improve a lot of sectors including medical field. The future about easier and faster things and we can say a new era of it. |
|
|
|
Users of this platform will have great opportunities to interact with each other, and all this will be carried out on the technology VR\3D
You will be able to create an exact copy of your home and other users will be able to visit it . The project provides a really great opportunity. And also the education and shopping districts which make me very interested about this. Maybe in education district markspace could make a partnership with an education vr project that are already focused in this sector/field. I think it will be more effective and efficient. |
|
|
|
I think nobody read the whole whitepaper...except the guys who participated in the bounty campaign to translate it If i were a big investor and would put some 100k's or even millions i would probably read it but for 1-2 eth (my investment budget) brochure is enough i think so, for a small investors is probably not necessary to read all the detail about the project, in particular the very technical ones. The brochure is giving all the general information to make a decision. We are complaining about the Whitepaper being too long but we should be happy that they made it very detailed and not just like any other project's whitepaper. yes thats true, but it scares other interested people in reading it ^^ thats a fact, too If there are some review article/video about this project, it would be very helpful. Maybe they can try to make a deal with some famous / smart ico reviewer on youtube. |
|
|
|
The only mind that the development team is Russian, so you need to approach this project with caution and carefully investirovat to this company
The reputation of the Russians in the ICO was spoiled because of several fraudulent ICO ,but these guys are professionals, especially to avoid all possible problems with local law, the developers have established their main office in another country. To this project are only positive,and not be considered a reason for concern the fact that the development team is Russian. Everywhere there are scammers and to put an end to all Russian projects is at least stupid. Only time will tell whether this project will take root or not, most people will be very difficult to move from the usual Internet to the usual 3D Internet virtual reality. Yes of course, even VR is still not commonly used by all people, so markspace wont win the market very quickly. But the time will tell, the amount of VR users is still growing, we can expect a very positive result. |
|
|
|
i just think that in the foreseeable future, ehealth will achieve very good results with this project. clearly, it will take a long time before first results can be achieved, but the will and the idea behind this project plus the extraordinary professional team behind it are a reason for my purchase of these tokens later.
I think so, the concept or what they will bring to the world will be very helpful, im sure this will get a mass adoption. If we see the current condition, we can see that this project will improve a lot of things. The long roadmap is acceptable for a big project like this, and patient will be worth it. |
|
|
|
The thing with such algorithms and devices are that the fail rate is quite higher. Just the other day, my doctor had to manual check the BP because the clip on Blood Pressure monitor gave a totally different reading from the doctor who did the referral. Such issues need to address satisfactorily. They compared the accuracy of the eye scan with traditional blood tests. The result: 70% vs 72%. Not bad eh? I wouldn't be surprised if big data and AI eventually give more accurate results for some diagnostic tests. That could be helpful to prevent the worst effect of diseases actually. Quick check up, and discuss it to the doctor if there is a problem. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
