People tend to rate how.genuine a project is based on the ROI the get and this is a very bad way to rate projects, there are scam projects out there that are doing well in the market because price is all they have to show and people still don't care, and there are also projects that are genuine but are neglected or tagged scam because they are not doing so well in the market, people should change their perspective.

I remember the first thing I ever bought with Cryptocurrencies some years back... Airtime. I felt like I had just taken a huge step into the future when I sent BTC to receive airtime and I still make this transaction whenever I am low on airtime, I eagerly await the time when I would be making payments across major retails outlets with my Cryptocurrencies.

I have a very large expectations and I guess I set the bar a little too high and so my expectations has not been met yet but I have full confidence that it's just a matter of time, the crypto space is changing and things are moving very fast right now and I believe that the positive change we are all hoping for is just right around the corner.

This is one of those questions where the answer is not black and white, the decision lies entirely with the team, some teams will pay out the allocation to that individual and some teams would cancel the campaign entirely and refuse to pay anything, while some would just reduce the reward given to the individual, each case is unique and I have seen campaigns where a single individual got aid 92% o the whole signature allocation.

If we are to be honest with ourselves, we would admit that if Ethereum had been launched in 2018 to 2019, it wouldn't be the force it is today, one of it's advantages is the fact that it's the first blockchain to implement smart contracts and it drove the ICO model in 2017/2018. But if you take a closer look, you would notice that there are superior blockchains in existence but ethereum already made a name for itself.

One thing about LAtoken is that they seem to place an emphasis more on quantity than quality, there are some good projects listed there ofcourse but the useless tokens seems to overshadow them by a good margin, their style of operation seems very similar to Mercatox.

I remember the time when Airdrops were very valuable and could fetch you thousands of dollars but those days are long gone unfortunately, nowadays it would be hard to see an airdrop offering more than $10 in rewards, it's very annoying sometimes.

This post reminds me of a time I was promoting some projects for a particular bounty manager, he had 3 active bounty campaigns and while I did my research and settled on the two best campaigns, th third one had more rewards and many bounty hunters rushed it even though a simple research would show that the project is not good, turned out I was right and hundreds of hunters wasted their efforts for nothing in that projects, we should always endavour to research, it takes nothing from us.

I do not check cryptocurrency prices much because I do not like stressing myself too much and looking at the market when everywhere is red would definitely stress me, I only check it multiple times daily when there is a bullrun in progress, so I check how much % moon my holdings are doing.

I love Bitcoin but I haven't o admit that I am also a huge fan of Altcoins for many reasons and one of them is the transaction fees, a transaction in the EOS blockchain costs less than $0.01 in most cases but the same cannot be said for bitcoin and additionally you just can't compare the speed of transactions, while I love bitcoin for being the first, I love alts for the wonderful improvements.

When I see bounty campaigns that offer bounty hunters millions in their tokens for promotion, I do not like participating in it at all because it is quite obvious that they are just out to scam people, if a project team is not wise enough to regulate the amount of tokens they give out to keep their prices stablez then the bounty hunters who just accepts what is given shouldn't be blamed at all, BTC and ETH paid bounties are good, but the fact remains that many of these projects cannot even afford to pay in those tokens.

Criminals would always be criminals and where there is innovation and money involved, you can bet that there would be criminals there too, these criminals are giving Cryptocurrencies a bad image but let us not forget that good guys exist in the space too and are giving crypto a positive image, let's focus in that and try to always research before falling into any scams.

I find this post quite funny, after the bullrun in late 2017, we have been experiencing Highs and lows in the Cryptocurrency market with the lows dominating and you are saying that it's just a test of patience? A test if patience that is close to 2 years old. We have grown and adapted but the fact remains that most of us would still adjust and maximize our profits I a bullrun too.

All existing big projects started with an idea before they grew to be what they are today, if you think you have a good idea and have a way to monetize it for your investors, I think you should go ahead and launch it, although from your brief explanation, it sounds like it would be a security token and this would be much more hard to raise funds because of regulations.

With the current tokensale model, buying during the tokensale and busying in an exchange are one and the same thing because tokensale seems to be held in exchanges these days.. your question depends on the individual project though, these days good projects seem to do well when they hit exchanges.

Check the current signature I am wearing, they are paying in an already trading token and the pay is quite good, but the campaign is full for now although you can join the waitlist to be selected in the next week if anybody quits.

Instead of doing a coin like Libra, why not go the decentralised route and make a coin for the Chinese people that would be decentralised and stick to the fundamentals of blockchain technology? Seems those that has been fighting Cryptocurrencies are now searching for a way to undermine it.

Apart from the scam emails received from airdrop forms, some of them use it to steal details of people and this is why you should always verify every form before you fill it, if anything looks suspicious, stay away. I have experienced this severally and even had to discard my main email because of too much spam.

One exchange I would never advice anybody to use or store their funds is Coss exchange, I once deposited a coin there and the wallet immediately started showing that it is on maintainance mode, I asked my friends and theirs is normal, this incident happened over a year ago and up till now, that particular wallet is still on maintainance mode and my funds has been lost, support didn't even bother replying me.

Change is constant and the day the world stops changing, then something is terribly wrong, the ICO model has been found to have many flaws and criminals has taken advantage of this fact until people finally got tired and stopped investing in them. This leafy a gap in the fundraising aspect and now IEOs had come to fill that gap, I wonder what the next would be. I see a long and colourful future for IEOs before that happens though.