Its OS specific. #1 hit win+r to open "run", enter regedit and confirm with ok. #2 go to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\bitcoin\shell\open\command#3 edit the (Standard) from whatever it is now to "C:\Program Files (x86)\Electrum\electrum.exe" "%1" (modify path if needed) Edit: tested here -> http://213.165.91.169/only works if electrum is alreay open |
|
|
|
~4.5 hours with ~36Mkey/s on one 970 GTX.  |
|
|
|
setban "ip(/netmask)" "add|remove" (bantime) (absolute)
Attempts add or remove a IP/Subnet from the banned list.
Arguments:
1. "ip(/netmask)" (string, required) The IP/Subnet (see getpeerinfo for nodes ip) with a optional netmask (default is /32 = single ip)
2. "command" (string, required) 'add' to add a IP/Subnet to the list, 'remove' to remove a IP/Subnet from the list
3. "bantime" (numeric, optional) time in seconds how long (or until when if [absolute] is set) the ip is banned (0 or empty means using the default time of 24h which can also be overwritten by the -bantime startup argument)
4. "absolute" (boolean, optional) If set, the bantime must be a absolute timestamp in seconds since epoch (Jan 1 1970 GMT)
Examples:
> bitcoin-cli setban "192.168.0.6" "add" 86400
> bitcoin-cli setban "192.168.0.0/24" "add"
> curl --user myusername --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "setban", "params": ["192.168.0.6", "add" 86400] }' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
|
|
|
|
-snip-
you need help from Bitcoin Dev!
CIYAM already looked at the source code. The coins are gone. The only problem now is that OP thinks we did not understand the problem and that there is still a solution. There might have been a solution a long time ago, before OP recreated the problem over and over again and the last chance that something is still on the disk are almost 0.
@totohasproblem stop the system, take it to a data recovery expert. If there is any chance there is still something left after all this mess, they will find it. If not, Im sorry for your loss. |
|
|
|
Well they told me via PM that it was for a riddle and there would be reward. Be that as it may, here is a quick and dirty (2 beer) solution in ruby: total_count = 0
h = BitcoinRPC.new('http://rpcuser:rpcpass@rpc_ip:rpc_port')
for i in 0..399000
hash = h.getblockhash i
block = h.getblock hash
#puts block
txs = block["tx"].size
total_count = total_count + txs
puts "block #{i}: #{total_count}"
end #for
puts total_count
its still running (~block 260k) will update with the result.Edit: 110863024 so its a different number than the one posted. There's reward & yes this is correct number. But you can get the reward if only you know Turkish. Also you didn't have to run this program to find it  ( This value is stored on Core's debug.log). Interesting, well its not in all of my debug.log files, only in one test VM. I guess it was already trimmed from the other files. Well, if you open debug.log (I suggest notepad++) and look for (ctrl+h) 399000 you'll find this line; 2016-02-18 14:12:13 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000000003d2548d4c19a5e91a8762c764f3195a7cb4be189bb1da48 height=399000 log2_work=84.137116 tx=110863024 date=2016-02-18 11:41:04 progress=0.999923 cache=53.4MiB(14531tx) "tx=110863024" this one is the total confirmed transaction count till block height 399000. Yeah, not on all systems though. Block 401263 is the oldest on my windows box. 2016-03-05 11:02:08 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000000002d84ebbcf33e8951cfdb3234768de5026e399c79f92f987 height=401263 log2_work=84.24007 tx=114496141 date=2016-03-05 11:01:37 progress=1.000000 cache=57.1MiB(21671tx)
The log file is trimmed from time to time, at 10 MB IIRC. |
|
|
|
Well they told me via PM that it was for a riddle and there would be reward. Be that as it may, here is a quick and dirty (2 beer) solution in ruby: total_count = 0
h = BitcoinRPC.new('http://rpcuser:rpcpass@rpc_ip:rpc_port')
for i in 0..399000
hash = h.getblockhash i
block = h.getblock hash
#puts block
txs = block["tx"].size
total_count = total_count + txs
puts "block #{i}: #{total_count}"
end #for
puts total_count
its still running (~block 260k) will update with the result.Edit: 110863024 so its a different number than the one posted. There's reward & yes this is correct number. But you can get the reward if only you know Turkish. Also you didn't have to run this program to find it ( This value is stored on Core's debug.log). Interesting, well its not in all of my debug.log files, only in one test VM. I guess it was already trimmed from the other files. |
|
|
|
Depends on the client, an electrum server would have your IP as its your only connection.
My question was in the form of:"How would user X get the IP address of someones transaction?", in the case where user X is not the owner of such a server (for example). It is definitely not "much easier". Certainly not. If you are just anyone that has a TX ID chances are you will never find the IP of the person that created it. It was more a remark in terms of "desktop wallets are not always more secure". |
|
|
|
Wouldn't a desktop client makes it more vulnerable to be traced since finding an ip of a device i.e pc would be much easier?
No, this doesn't make sense. Exactly how do you plan to get the IP address? Even if you did that how would you connect the IP address to a person? What if they were on a public Wi-fi, or using TOR or a VPN? Depends on the client, an electrum server would have your IP as its your only connection. |
|
|
|
Why should the other person have the newly created address if he's not able to get the latest wallet file? The copy of the wallet file that person has does not automatically update.
I already explained to you that there are pre generated hidden addresses. Please explain how you "create a new address". If you talk about hitting the button that says "+ New", well fucking done you just risked someone elses coins because you have no idea what you are talking about. That's like me creating a PNG file, sending it to you, opening it in paint and drawing a line and the line appears in your file too. Well wallet files work somewhat different than pictures so your analogy is wrong. As I already said he has to create a new address and when I say create a new address I mean an actual new address. I didn't say anything about how to create this new address, you're just assuming I did. If there's 100 pre-generated addresses, then he must just skip these and the problem is solved.
And again, I never said creating a new wallet is wrong. So what is your problem?
My problem is that you are giving bad and borderline malicious advice to someone with a problem. A problem that potentially involes a lot of coins. And your solution is for them to "create a new address", without any indication on how to do it. What advice is that? If you tell them to "create a new address" and they are using a software that has a "+ New" button that is creating seemingly new addresses, what do you think will happen? |
|
|
|
Well they told me via PM that it was for a riddle and there would be reward. Be that as it may, here is a quick and dirty (2 beer) solution in ruby: total_count = 0
h = BitcoinRPC.new('http://rpcuser:rpcpass@rpc_ip:rpc_port')
for i in 0..399000
hash = h.getblockhash i
block = h.getblock hash
#puts block
txs = block["tx"].size
total_count = total_count + txs
puts "block #{i}: #{total_count}"
end #for
puts total_count
its still running (~block 260k) will update with the result.Edit: 110863024 so its a different number than the one posted. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Any particular reason why?
Technical or level of disclosure on topic creation issue?
Forum policy. If the topic post of a topic gives very specific rules for the topic, I will use those rules in addition to the global board policies for that topic. The starter of the topic may not change rules after posting their topic (not even by editing the topic post).
It prevents arbitrary changes of local rules, esp those created in hindsight. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Thanks man, I managed to send the entire balance with a custom fee. I will keep this form so I can use it from now on.
What if there are several unspent inputs that I want to send at once to a single address. What form do I need to use then?
Give me your address and I'll send you a small tip as you helped me very well.
Great, you can use the address from my profile ( 1HZG6bTazS4AApVEnJciGRWSkQk67Vwhq5 ) What if there are several unspent inputs that I want to send at once to a single address. What form do I need to use then?
You can add other inputs as per this: createrawtransaction
"[
{\"txid\":\"040a4aadd58794ab0360af01cd30112898371f46a6a8a96e4122102d21038d83\",\"vout\":0}.
{\"txid\":\"040a4aadd58794ab0360af01cd30112898371f46a6a8a96e4122102d21038d83\",\"vout\":1}.
{\"txid\":\"040a4aadd58794ab0360af01cd30112898371f46a6a8a96e4122102d21038d83\",\"vout\":2}
]"
"{\"1TtxVxWQwXCcdrbzXFQZGnrBP8oSVjYwP\":0.0348}"
(assuming that the same txid had three UTXOs with vout's 0, 1 and 2 that you owned - I think the format I've used above is correct but you should verify that with the createrawtransaction documentation) Looks good except for the " ." I think they have to be " ,", but Im not 100% sure if not both are possible. Below is the boiler is usually use. It also has several outputs. Keep in mind to remove the " ," if you only use one. createrawtransaction
"[
{\"txid\":\"-tx id-\",\"vout\":23},
{\"txid\":\"-tx id-\",\"vout\":4}
]"
"{\"-adr-\":0.12345678,\"-adr-\":0.12345678}"
A common error that happens to me and you might look out for is that when I paste a TX ID or address I sometimes mark one of the " \" or " ," which makes the entire string invalid. Its working better now that I have added the " -". |
|
|
|
Doesn't it bother anyone that DDosing is heavily pushing down Classic? Satoshi devised a system where people vote with their software choice. DDosing is taking away legitimate votes. It is as if Donald Trump set fire to the ballot boxes containing votes for other people. WTF? Is their no bottom for the actions taken by the core people?
For one I wouldnt jump to conclusions that this is paid for by core devs. I do think its something no sane person would resolve to. Be that as it may, it happens, and there are counter measures[1]. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380642.0 |
|
|
|
Wow, didnt know that. I didnt even expect someone to create something like that even though I know there are phone miners. Did you try it? Do you know any numbers of how powerful a recent phone is? |
|
|
|
Message verified. I missed the part where this was needed, so Ill stay out of that discussion. |
|
|
|
Hi Shorena! I'd like to know how much will it cost for 1jacee or 1jACEe?
1jacee with exact case - 0.0002 btc 1jACEe with exact case - 0.0002 btc whichever is found first of the two - 0.0001 btc (I could also do this twice for 0.0002 btc which would give you a 50% chance to have both prefixes and a 50% chance to have the same prefix twice) both (requires two pubkeys) - 0.0003 if you agree send me a PM with the public key(s) and payment to the address in the OP. Wait, you said to much number and I didn't quite undertand which one am I going to pay.  If I only want the 1jacee then I only have to pay 0.0002 BTC , did I get it right? Yes. Also a separate 0.0003 btc for the pubkeys?
No. How much exactly do I have to pay?
The 0.0003 BTC is if you want both prefixes (two addresses, on starting with 1jacee and one starting with 1jACEe). In this case I need two public keys. I'm sorry if I sound dumb I'm just not familiar with this and the technical stuff.
Another is, I can use mycelium wallet to import the private keys for this, right?
Yes, but it will be a separate account and the imported key is not covered by the seed. |
|
|
|
-snip-
i was logged in the wallet and i renamed it to walletxxx.dat
THEN i closed bitcoin core
-snip-
You renamed a file that was used by a programm? No wonder its corrupted. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
