Possible and easy if it doesn't take into account old quotations
Possible and hard if it takes them into account
So, is it worth doing and if it is why hasn't it yet been done?  |
|
|
|
Is it possible/worth to implement some kind of quotation index calculated automatically and based on the number of quotations of a given post? The primary aim being that of giving an integrated objective assessment of a poster's "usefulness"  |
|
|
|
I'm not happy cause i only got half of what i should have received.  See how many of your posts got quoted... I'm not Stunna, so his ways are unknown to me, but in my opinion one of the most objective measures of assessing a post's value ("constructiveness" in local speak) is "quotation index", i.e. how many times your post (be it a question or an answer) has been answered/quoted... |
|
|
|
Personally, I've never yet rolled even a round number such as 1000, 2000, etc. wetsuit, you haven't been heard recently but wouldn't it be a nice idea to have a jackpot for free players too (don't know if it exists in Multiplier), something like 7777/3333?
I'll look into it. Will be tough though as the increasing price of Bitcoins is already eating into the ad revenue like there is no tommorrow. I feel lucky!!!  To keep things going, you could lower the payouts accordingly... Oh, wait... isn't this what you were doing all the time recently?  Just remember to raise payments back when the price finally collapses... |
|
|
|
wetsuit, there would be more fun if the capcha was clickable, updating the code every time it's clicked... Personally, I like some numbers more than others (and have luck with, lol)! Sure, I'll work on that. Don't forget to send me a little bonus! |
|
|
|
He is not that smart, but living in a poor country makes him feel smart.  I think he was given his due, time to roll on guys! |
|
|
|
Crap, just rolled 9884 Personally, I've never yet rolled even a round number such as 1000, 2000, etc. wetsuit, you haven't been heard recently but wouldn't it be a nice idea to have a jackpot for free players too (don't know if it exists in Multiplier), something like 7777/3333? |
|
|
|
I am contented if you want to think that. Thanks. Good luck to you all.
Good riddance to you also! |
|
|
|
Any way, I will remove myself from the landscape. I don't want eyes on me. I don't want to be famous or a personality here. I was just trying to "do the right thing" in terms of creating some awareness of the need to fix Bitcoin, as I perceive it.
In your place I would too. Nobody wants to be laughed at. Even (and still more) people with "high IQ" ... |
|
|
|
High IQ individuals tend to come across as arrogant, because invariably they must push against the inertia if they want to "do the right thing".
Tell me...
I've already told you that you think too high of yourself (you are not that clever ). People boasting about their high IQ are usually psychopathic by nature and have problems socializing as a rule, there's nothing to brag about... |
|
|
|
Seems it might be you soon, based on the mental level and maturity demonstrated.
Enough of this nonsense. I made my point. Good luck.
Fair enough. You seem to have some good ideas, but they're not well put together. This guy is clever but his arrogance alienates him strongly. So he ends up being brushed off by other clever guys... |
|
|
|
Wow, payment received (was in doubts)!!!  I'm in for a new cycle, post count starting from 328... |
|
|
|
I wonder if this would happen to USD, you know the debts is uncontrollable..
US dollars will go directly to their e-Heaven (or e-Hell, who knows)... So, unlike Weimar marks (or Zimbabwean dollars for that matter ), they will be pretty useless for anything! |
|
|
|
Also, just looking at a few accounts that have PMed me. If you have done a ridiculous amount of posts the past few days with half sentence answers, I don't consider any of those constructive. Do NOT try to pad your post count, I really don't want to have to go through everyone's post counts. Just post as you normally would, it is very obvious when people are just trying to game the system with spam. I am paying around 50 cents per post at this moment, all I ask is that the posts are constructive and not just made for the sake of upping your post count. Be honest when you send me an estimate of constructive posts
Could you please provide us with examples of posts you consider constructive and posts you consider as spam or padding up? I mean something which is beyond what's written on the first page. Would this question as such be considered constructive?  If you think some of my posts shouldn't be counted, feel free to quote them here (as a sample)... |
|
|
|
You can never be sure.
At first you said you can never be sure you will be able to buy lower, now you say you can just never be sure (for anything). I like the train of your thought, dude! But when you sell all at 400, and no correction under 400 happens next half year, when do you buy, never?
I could have said something about price going down to zero within the next three months, but what actually matters are relevant facts, not wishful thinking. Do you have any, pro and contra? |
|
|
|
Selling all coins is not best, you can never be sure you will be able to buy lower
It cuts both ways really. How can you be sure that the price will ever go higher? |
|
|
|
wetsuit, there would be more fun if the capcha was clickable, updating the code every time it's clicked... Personally, I like some numbers more than others (and have luck with, lol)!
|
|
|
|
Sorry but I don't understand what you are trying to stay, why would it be losing for average down?
Let's first define what we mean by averaging down! I mean this, i.e. adding to a losing trade |
|
|
|
мозги всем тут уже выклевал
Знаешь, братан, есть очень хорошая, сцука, американская пословица - если ты не понимаешь, о чём идёт речь, то речь идёт о твоих деньгах... Так вот речь в данном случае речь идёт не о твоих, а моих деньгах, поэтому вопросы, грубо говоря, задаю я, а не ты, ферштейн? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
