Does giving an overview of the market represented, for example, in the four-year cycle, need analysis from Bob Loukas or anyone else?
I do not know, but what he is trying to say does not come out of formulating a generalization that has no meaning. If the four-year cycle is not used to predict the bottom or estimate the maximum rise, what is the benefit of it?

The common denominator between all these analyzes is that we witness a new peak and a new bottom every four years, but the question is the price range.

Is what your service is trying to provide different from the following scenario:

 - I will create an account in a non KYC CEX/DEX, deposit the bitcoin.
 - Convert Bitcoin to Monero.
 - Send Monero to another platform that does not require KYC, such as KuCoin
 - Convert Monero to Bitcoin.
 - I withdraw bitcoins to my wallet.

Costs will be less than $10.

If so, the platforms may track these currencies because the Monero deposit is suspicious.
In addition, if you receive money from activities such as money laundering, your account may be frozen.

I live near Saudi Arabia and I have acquaintances with many economists, and I can assure you that they have zero plans regarding encryption. What the article tries to narrate is Saudi Arabia’s attempt to sell part of the oil in Chinese yuan, because the volume of oil exchange (the largest buyer of oil) is China, but this risk has It affects the global economy because the dollar is its currency because of the term petrodollar.

In general, I do not expect it to develop into more than buying some bonds.

Most investors do not understand how Bitcoin works^{they don't}  and therefore keeping Bitcoin in those platforms is much better for them than withdrawing them to their wallets, and thus you will find people who trust PayPal, closed source wallets, CEXs more than hardware wallets and well-reviewed open source wallets .

As for the fees, they are somewhat exorbitant, and therefore if the bank launches the appropriate promotional campaign, some beginners may be convinced of it.


Therefore, It is about obtaining that liquidity.

Will the people be patient for about 3 years to achieve these gains? Their buying times were wrong and therefore they could have doubled the profits if they had bought several weeks ago.
Also, the year 2022 was downward, as everyone knows here, so what about a head of state who can appoint many economic analysts and has sufficient resources to hire a specialized office, right?

As for buying, they are not obligated to buy.

What technologies are you talking about? Without a detailed explanation it will be difficult to trust what you are saying.
But let me make a simple comparison. The highest fee is 2.4% in Coinjoin option and about 2% in the advanced option. Does this mean that Coinjoin highest fees option gives higher privacy than advanced option? If the answer is no, then the higher privacy should be with the higher fees (in other words lower your Coinjoin fast fees,) right?

I believe that banning China is one of the things that whales use to circumvent prices, just as it happened with variables such as Elon Musk's tweets, and therefore there is no real effect on the price, and with their complete ban on mining everything disappeared.
Therefore, your tracking of these events would be correct if it was within the framework of a broader analysis of the market and not on the part of the "China ban" and its impact on the price.

It is rare for current members to know a lot of people because we share topics that are not shared by the identification denominator. Most of us have posts close to zero in sections such as meetings, and there are no famous developers active in the forum. In short, the vast majority are either participants from the wall or signature campaigns, both of which are activity based on ( Anonymity.)

Personally I know 3 members and only one knows me

I think you did not understand what I mean. In the example above, and assuming that Musk has an effect on the price, his tweets such as “I will buy #Bitcoin only for $1” are a sell signal, not a buy signal. Therefore, if the bot understands the buy signal using keywords, it will not be able to determine whether it is an order. Sell or buy.

The same thing happened when Tesla stopped accepting bitcoin, the tweet had the keyword bitcoin.

So, without a simple AI integration this bot will give wrong results.

I still see that the position of this country on Bitcoin is somewhat floundering and hasty.
El Salvador's President Nayeb Bukel bought at the wrong time and thus wasted a lot of money that his people paid and then continued to buy, which means that either he does not have economic advisors and this is a disaster, or he has and the disaster is greater.

In general, the fame was gained by Alejandra Guajardo by wearing the Bitcoin suit more than any other suit, and therefore perhaps she wanted to achieve fame with that, and the goal is not awareness.

If the good news continues for the coming days, we may witness these levels before the end of the month, although I bet that we will not break 19K barrier in the next few days.
In general, there is nothing new, there is not enough liquidity to make real breaches in the price, and therefore it is better not to bet on an upward wave, at least for the time being.

DNS sever performs a conversion from Doman name (i.e. Bitcointalk or any human readable URL) into IP address. this process also known as address translation.

So its not a a part of internet connection and there they don't see your recovery seed.

Also, with the exception of the web wallet, the seeds are encrypted in a file, and then you need a password to decrypt that encryption, while the hacker needs both the file and the password, and therefore there is no logical reason for you to enter your wallet seeds in an online device.

One of the signature campaigns that were working here was seized^[1], however, there was no court ruling related to the individuals participating in the signature campaign[2], and some of the most popular scam ICOs^[3] were published in this forum.

Therefore, for users, they are safe, but I do not think that this will be the case for campaign managers, as they are part of this system unless they write explicitly that they do not know information and that their role is limited to tracking posts and receiving payments.


[1] Dutch Police, Europol seize crypto transaction mixing service
[2] [CFNP] BestMixer Signature Campaign | Sr. Members - Legendary | Up to 0.01225BTC
[3] [ANN][ICO] 🚀 Confido - Trustless escrow payments with shipment tracking

What is the relationship of price to survival? If the price of a bitcoin is one dollar, then the bitcoin can be said to last as long as there is an individual willing to mine it.
In the early days of Bitcoin, the number of people running the node was less than 100, yet Bitcoin continued to operate for long periods, yet the price was low, and after several years we reached all these levels.
What I am trying to say is that price does not rule continuation.

Is the one-person or one-CEO model of a company a great idea? I don't know, but investors should think seriously about the period after Elon Musk. What will happen if he dies?
There are many companies that collapsed once the founder or the main development partner died.

We also do not forget that the year 2023 and the energy crisis will force many companies to compete with Tesla, and thus put more pressure on the price.

The move to the $SOL network was mainly due to the fee issue, so when the fees return to stability, it is better to work on the Ethereum and Polygon rather than risk a central network that can shut down if the load is high.
Solana chain has started to lose a lot of momentum recently, and many currencies are looking for rapid development, so a decrease in revenue means a lack of investors, which means a slow network means its death.

I do not think that the Solana chain has reached the stage of death, and therefore things will move slowly, and if the platform does not develop quickly, losing all liquidity is a matter of time.

What is the decision-making mechanism? Will keywords be used? Artificial intelligence? market movement? Or what.

Suppose, for example, that Elon Musk mentioned this tweet: I will buy #Bitcoin for $1.

 - Will the decision-making be based on keywords, for example, Elon, bitcoin, buying?
 - Or will artificial intelligence decide?
 - Or will the algorithm monitor the market and from which the decision will be taken.
 - Or will the influential people control the execution of orders?

Personally, I see that even the influencers depend on the herd policy, and therefore they will not create the market trend, but rather contribute to amplifying it.

Did you achieve these profits or do you read the charts? If you achieved it, it is better to withdraw your capital and leave the rest for a month.
The market lacks liquidity, and therefore the price movements with sharp fluctuations coinciding with the movement of Bitcoin is an indication of the of pumping/dumping coin, and therefore it is not a good investing signal.

Good signals are continued growth, a slow rise, and the occurrence of platform-related patterns away from the Bitcoin price.

---

I did a quick read about this project, and other than the recent hike there is nothing worth watching.

Cardano (ADA) was a great project, but its success was dependent on the continued rise in Ethereum fees and its failure to transfer to POS crypto, something that did not happen, and therefore the project needs real development in order for it to stand in the coming years.

Such events will not change the price.

When alternative currency projects were created, they were intended to support developers and early investors by providing them with free profits, but projects such as OpenAI are profitable and do not need such support, and therefore all the symbols associated with them are fraudulent and will be deleted from all central platforms (due to scam and plagiarism) and therefore it is better to Avoid investing in it.

I hope you learned from this lesson and I am sorry for your loss.