I don't think that any developer would pick LTC for his Metaverse project.
Why are you asking this?Do you think that Metaverse projects can pump the price of Litecoin?
There's nothing special about the Litecoin project and blockchain.Nothing bad,but nothing great as well.
Litecoin was created with the purpose of being Bitcoin's competitor,but it's basically identical to Bitcoin,which kinda makes it worthless.I have more respect for ethereum,because ETH was built with the purpose of being different than BTC and to offer something different.
You can stick with your LTC coins if you want to.I don't expect the LTC price to collapse severely in the future.
LTC is the oldest altcoin and it has it's own community of believers,but the lack of good developers is what might make the project to fade away.

Това са предложения за нови крипто регулации,а не влезли в сила закони.
Тези предложения може да бъдат отхвърлени.
Аз чувам слухове по скоро за задължителна ID верификация за собствениците на p2p портфейли,отколкото пълна забрана.Освен това се предлага задължително изпращане на инфо за всеки,който изпраща или получава крипто.
Не знам дали това е истина. 

The USSR actually did sell oil and natural gas to western Europe.The decreasing oil prices during the 80s had a major negative impact on the soviet economy.
Anyway,the problem is where to buy rubles,in order to pay for the natural gas.The Russian central bank is under heavy sanctions,so the western banks cannot buy rubles from there.
I'm 99% sure that the EU will refuse to pay with rubles,but will the Russians stop the gas and get rid of their number one income source?It has been said,that Asian countries cannot fully replace European countries as natural gas buyers.

It's hilarious how every new crypto casino claims to be "the number one" new crypto casino.
7000 games is an overwhelming number.I like casinos that have a decent number of good games.
I don't get the point of offering so many games,since most of them would have the same game mechanics and just different graphics.
Your website looks really professional and you have a gambling license,which is great.
You don't need an absurdly long forum thread here,my browser also failed to load this super long image.
Sometimes less is more.Sometimes over delivering and providing an outstanding amount of options to your customers can have the opposite effect.
Anyway,good luck with this casino,OP.

 

Can those shitcoin creators use the name of Will Smith without his permission?
I really hope that Will Smith sues those shitcoin scammers for using his name without his written permission.
A big problem is that the "developers" of such shitcoins will remain anonymous.
250% price dump isn't that much.I was expecting more like a 10000% price pump.
Almost nobody cares about Hollywood celebrities nowadays.Even the Will Smith vs.Chris Rock beef was kinda boring.

You are kinda late with your post.China banned Bitcoin/crypto months ago.
The reasons why China banned crypto have already been discussed.
1.To support the "digital yuan".
2.To reduce energy consumption by the cryptocurrency miners.
3.To reduce capital export outside of China.
4.Fighting money laundering and tax evasion.

All those reasons are questionable and we already know that there are multiple ways to export capital outside China without the help of Bitcoin.
Many people inside China will keep using cryptocurrencies despite the ban.I'm not sure about whether or not those people will use crypto in order to purchase assets outside China.This doesn't seem like a valid point to me.
It would be nice if China returns to the crypto world,but the crypto world is doing just fine without China.

Physical casinos still exist and they are doing quite well in some countries.Your statement is wrong.
Offline gambling will continue to exist forever.


So what?Is this a problem?The casinos can accept both crypto and fiat payments.Accepting fiat payments comes with KYC verification,but there are players,who want to gamble with fiat money.


Comparing sports and casinos is like comparing apples and bananas.
They cannot be compared and they can both exist without competing against each other.
I don't understand the point of your forum thread,OP.
If you really want to find the best online casino on the planet just do your own research.

This seems like a good idea,but:
1.I assume that all the security measures are taken and the security of this browser wallet is top-notch.
Anything below top-notch security is a big no.
2.I don't think that many users are going to use their Bitcoins for spending.They would just keep their BTC and HODL them.Perhaps integrating this browser with more altcoins than just the six coins mentioned in the article would be better.
3.Who cares about Dapps?I've completely lost my interest for Dapp projects a long time ago.There's might be good Dapp projects here and there,but I just don't care about them.

The Brave browser project(and their BAT token) is going to die slowly.Most of the Brave users are using it only for the sake of getting tokens,not because Brave is a good browser(it actually is a good browser,I have tested it).

The news about the Russian prime minister are fake.
OP,what you are talking about is just wishful thinking.
NO big and developed country in the world is going to make Bitcoin(or any altcoin) a legal tender.
El Salvador is not a big and developed country.Maybe other small and underdeveloped countries could accept BTC as a legal tender.Good for them,there's nothing wrong with that.
The big and developed countries will stick with fiat money and replace fiat with CBDCs.Period.
They might let the people use cryptocurrencies,but only under heavy regulations(like making the usage of custodial wallets/exchanges mandatory). Using non-custodial wallets and decentralized exchanges might become illegal in the future.
Comparing Bitcoin with the Russian ruble is nonsense.

Should we keep paying attention to every politician/clerk,that makes such statements.
It's pretty clear that the politicians/clerks of the EU(and many other countries) want zero anonymity and full transparency of all financial transactions(both crypto and fiat),in order to maximize tax revenue and "to fight money laundering".
They clearly want to turn cryptocurrencies into fiat money,or even worse.You can be anonymous by paying with paper cash,but they want to break this 'last line of defense'.
They want the people and business owners to do the work for the lazy government officials,by declaring all their financial transactions.
When the bureaucrats are lazy,the businesses are going to suffer.

Congratulations to Portugal.They really deserved to qualify for the World Cup in Qatar.Their loss against Serbia was the only thing that would have stopped them,and they kinda had some luck against Turkey(a Turkish player missed a penalty),but there's no doubt that they were the better team in both games against Northern Macedonia and Turkey.
Also congrats to the Canadians,but I don't think that they are strong enough to achieve anything significant in the World Cup tournament.They will just lose three games in the group phase and leave the tournament.Their win against Jamaica was probably because of the cold weather in Canada(AFAIK,the match was in Toronto).

"popular crypto trader Ed"

This guy is so popular that I've never heard him before.Does he have a last name,or he's so popular that the people know him only by his first name?
It seems to me that this guy doesn't know anything about the Bitcoin market,he's just following the trend.
If the Bitcoin price does up "it's a good time to buy".If the Bitcoin price goes down,"it's a good time to sell"  
Such amateurish advise is what makes me cringe so hard,when I see "crypto experts" on Youtube and social media.
Anyway,it looks like there's isn't enough momentum in this price pump for a FOMO phase to appear.
There's going to be a price correction,but there's nothing wrong with that.Many traders,who bought at prices below 40K would want to sell at 48K and take the profits.

The Bitcoin reserve will have to be way bigger than the token emission,but such stablecoin projects would never resist the temptation of doing fractional reserve banking(issuing 100M USD worth of tokens,which are backed by 10M USD worth of Bitcoins). That's the main problem with stablecoins-fractional reserves.
What would be the main purpose of Terra,since we already have Tether?Does anyone think that the crypto exchange platforms will suddenly dump Tether and replace it with Terra?What's the point of this?
Tether could easily beat Terra,just by replacing a part of their USD fiat reserve with Bitcoins(if they really have a big USD reserve).
Terra doesn't offer anything new in terms of innovation and convenience.Maybe it will turn into another pump&dump shitcoin.

The idea of changing the code of Bitcoin,in order to make it "less power hungry" has been shared multiple times across the years,and yet nobody hasn't been proposing any working solution.
I have nothing against a hardfork/softfork that will split the BTC blockchain and create some kind of "EcoBitcoin" or "Bitcoin Green".
It's pretty easy to predict that the Bitcoin Core blockchain and the Bitcoin Core community will remain united and a small number of altcoin seekers and environmentalists will support this "Bitcoin Green" PoS shitcoin.
Let them have what they want.They will leave the BTC community and probably stop with their FUD against Bitcoin.
I've always thought,that the freedom to choose between multiple options is what makes the crypto industry so appealing,even though 99% of the altcoins are shitcoins.

1.Crypto does allow imposition of taxes(if you are using centralized custodial crypto exchanges).
2.He's a central banker.What else do you expect from a central banker?Almost all central bankers in the world are against cryptocurrencies,because their favorite baby-fiat money is failing and losing value slowly.

I think that you are exaggerating a little bit,by calling the monetary policy of the central banks "monetary fascism".The money supply and the monetary policy is a monopoly of the government.It always has been.
The US Federal Reserve system is an exception,because FED is not a government owned central bank.
It's more like a pseudo-private institution(a bunch of private banks "working for the benefit of the people").

I don't understand the players,who want to bypass or break the Terms or Service of crypto casinos.
What will be your benefit of doing this?Your account can still be blocked,even if you somehow miraculously manage to upload fake documents and get accepted for a Level 4 verification.
Breaking the Terms of Service of a gambling platform would always bite you in the a$$,at the end.
Are you brave enough to deposit crypto coins in an account,that has been verified with fake documents?
Perhaps the Stake customer support runs manual reviews of all documents,that have been uploaded.
What happens then?

I still don't know whether or not crypto mining in Russia is illegal.Perhaps crypto mining is in the grayhat area.
Russia is in the Top 3 countries,when it comes to crypto mining and hashpower.With that being said,I don't believe that so many cryptocurrency miners keep running their business outside the law in Russia.
By the way,Kazakhstan is a country that's been very politically dependent on Russia and crypto mining is being under attack there.Maybe Kazakhstan will follow Russia's example and legalize crypto mining as well(or at least impose more liberal regulations upon the crypto miners).
I don't trust the Russian government and I think that news coming from Russia should be taken with a grain of salt.

Happy Birthday.This seems like a great gift.I wish that more people would give me money at my birthday(not just useless gifts).
I really hope that Kucoin won't block your account for logging in via a different IP address.
I guess that teaching other people about the benefits of Bitcoin(and cryptocurrencies in general) pays off at the end.I just don't have the motivation to go outside and teach other people about Bitcoin.I'm very introverted and I'm really careful,when it comes to talking about Bitcoin/crypto.You never know what might happen,if some evil people find out,that you own and trade Bitcoins.
People like you are the reason why the "Bitcoin army" keeps growing.

A 50K BTC price at the beginning of April would be great.During the entire winter season,I've had a positive feeling about the Bitcoin price in the upcoming spring and my gut feeling might be right.Of course,a Bitcoin price level of 45-50K USD might be temporary and the price might drop back to 40K,if major FUD news appear out of nowhere(probably USA or Russia).
I'm not one of bullish maximalists,who are expecting 100K,250K or a million dollar Bitcoin price.We should be happy with a 50K price.Greed is always a bad advisor,just like fear.
 

The scarcity of oil and gas is artificially created by the political situation in Europe.
There's no actual shortage of oil and gas.It's just the political situation in Europe,that is creating uncertainty on the gas markets.The European countries are dependent on Russian gas for their electricity production(many power plants in Germany are using natural gas).When the gas prices went up,the electricity prices also went up,so the goods produced with expensive electricity also became more expensive.
American gas is more expensive than Russian gas and the USA cannot export enough quantity to Europe,in order to fully replace the Russian gas.
This inflation would have existed even without the energy prices going up.The money printing machines of the Federal Reserve and the European central bank created the conditions for high inflation levels years ago.