Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 05:40:42 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 [123] 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 ... 309 »
2441  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: why there is change address. on: November 26, 2021, 03:07:32 PM
So even if you disable change address, the rest of the amount from the UTXO that you're spending should be sent to an address;
Otherwise, it will be added to the transaction fee.
This is bad, if I forget to send to an address all the amount from UTXO will be added to the transaction fee. Has this thing happen to somebody before?
No, a well-written client/wallet will send the remaining amount to your 'receiving address' or back to the same address if 'change address' is disabled/not available.
It will only happen if you will create the transaction by hand and forgot to specify a change address, eg. through Bitcoin Core's createrawtransaction command.
I haven't heard of a wallet that fails to do that and forgot to claim the remaining balance from the UTXO.
2442  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory-Transaction through BitcoinCore running as TOR-hidden-service on: November 26, 2021, 11:35:40 AM
Try to add server=1 into your bitcoin.conf file.
If it didn't worked, please provide some lines from Armorylog.txt that may be related to the issue.
2443  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: why there is change address. on: November 26, 2021, 03:28:50 AM
-snip- So you will not use the balance in your wallet until the transaction is confirm and your balance is send back to you through change address.
Actually, this isn't because of the change address but because 'Bitcoin Transaction' is "UTXO" based (more info).
Each unspent transaction output in the blockchain should be spent whole so if you need to spend one with the huge amount, you'll need to send the excess amount to another address in your wallet
which is usually sent to a 'change address' but can also be sent to a 'receiving address' depending on the wallet.
So even if you disable change address, the rest of the amount from the UTXO that you're spending should be sent to an address;
Otherwise, it will be added to the transaction fee.

Your wallet is making you wait for confirmation, it must be because it's set to wait for confirmation before spending a UTXO (the change of the unconfirmed transaction).
Some wallets have a setting to be able to spend unconfirmed unspent transaction outputs.
2444  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Sending amounts > in wallet empties wallet on: November 25, 2021, 04:38:44 PM
The APP being used does not allow the setting of fees -snip-
It should have a fee setting there... anyway:
My reply is based from your replies to the earlier responses,
I've taken in consideration that you initiated those two transactions, the receiver have received the bitcoins and each transactions used your full balance at that time.

If everything checks out, then it's about the fee (but I didn't get what your last reply is all about).
If not, then it's the "other verdict".

Knowing the APP assigns the address would you not think its possible that the app is assigning the address in question from a third party some how though intervention when the app request this address.
-snip-
I didn't mentioned anything about the app assigning address by itself, where did this came from?
Is the receiver's address different than the "assigned address" in those two transactions (that you've initiated)?

Language barrier, perhaps? Try the local boards: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5
2445  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Core causes hard drive failures on: November 25, 2021, 04:18:31 AM
What a relief. It took a week of fiddling to rescue a bit of BTC that was stuck in an Armory wallet on Windows. Bitcoin Core has destroyed two of my hard drives (i.e. a Seagate Barracuda and a SanDisk Ultra SSD). -snip-
That's news.
I know that synchronization is I/O extensive, but HDD/SSD shouldn't fail that easily unless there's something wrong with the hardware.

Have you set the dbcache (database cache) to an insane value that your RAM can't handle together with the OS's background processes?
2446  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: My laptop crashed - need to restore Electrum on: November 24, 2021, 04:45:13 AM
The seed phrase is enough to restore the wallet.

The steps are simple, just follow this:
  • On the 'Install Wizard' of Electrum, select "Standard Wallet" (for the 'usual' wallets) or "Wallet with 2-factor authentication" (for 2FA wallets).
  • Click 'Next', select "I already have a seed", paste your seed and Electrum will automatically detect the correct derivation path.
  • Click 'Next', finish creating the wallet by typing a password.

If you already created a wallet, you can access the install wizard using the menu "File->New/Restore", then type a wallet name.
2447  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Sending amounts > in wallet empties wallet on: November 24, 2021, 03:31:17 AM
Can anyone explain why this would happen. I do understand there is a small transaction fee for the miner, but when it equals the balance of my wallet.
The fee was set to 54.398 sat/B on the last transaction which is equals to 0.00010390 BTC when multiplied by the total size of the transaction.
So, that will be deducted from the input together with the sent amount which may be equals to your balance.
It may have used all because the 'change' would have been "dust" (for privacy and to save fee later).

If you do not want this to happen, you should avoid extremely high fee, set it to "Economic" since the normal setting seems to be over-estimating most of the time.
Fee setting is in the "Menu->Fee" when sending funds.

-snip- ....... I'm using bitcoin.org app de.schildbach.wallet
Take note: the wallets listed in bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet aren't developed by bitcoin.org.
Those are just list of Bitcoin wallets to help the end-users to select a wallet based on their preference.
2448  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: can someone help me check and get the private key working. on: November 24, 2021, 02:56:46 AM
-snip-
I hope Dorian Prentice will see this post and contact me.
If you're thinking about somehow "recovering" the funds though the developers' intervention: it's not possible.
No one is in full control of the network, even satoshi himself.

What you should focus on is to find your correct funded addresses first, then find their private keys.

For the past and current reference client developers, you can find them here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/graphs/contributors
2449  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: can someone help me check and get the private key working. on: November 23, 2021, 05:03:17 AM
-snip-
i received the txid from the sender but not save it
Who is this "sender"?
Someone you don't know, your "friend" or a legitimate service where you can buy Bitcoins?

You must be sure that you've actually received Bitcoins because recovering something that's non-existent will just waste your time.
And as other have mentioned, those addresses didn't received any coins (neither Bitcoins or Altcoins).
2450  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Export as watch only on: November 23, 2021, 04:31:32 AM
Is there a way to export a wallet that has 1000's of different addresses as a "watch only" wallet? -snip-
Since the thread is not in a specific wallet software board, I assume that you're referring to Bitcoin Core.

There's a workaround but it involves using iancoleman's BIP39 tool and will not work with "Descriptor wallets".
For reference, here's the steps (Air-gap machine is recommended):
  • Use dumpwallet command to export your wallet's "extended private master key" [dumpwallet]
  • Open the dump file using a text editor to view the 'extended private master key'
  • Launch iancoleman's BIP39 tool [github.com/iancoleman/bip39]
  • Paste the 'master key' to the BIP39 tool's "BIP32 Root Key" input box.
  • Select "BIP32" under 'Derivation Path' for legacy addresses or "BIP141" for Native SegWit and P2SH-SegWit (select the correct script), then change "BIP32 Derivation Path" into m/0'/0' or m/0'/1' (change addresses)
  • Tick "Use hardened addresses" under 'Derived Addresses', then toggle: "Private Key" and "Public Key".
  • Scroll down and type 1000 (addresses) to "Show" and 0 to "starting from index" input boxes, then click "More Rows".
  • There's you'll have a list of 1000 addresses derived from your master key, you can use the "CSV" tab on top if you want to export the list.

Then use the list to create a watch-only wallet.
2451  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Problem: No seed, no 2fa, with password and access. on: November 22, 2021, 02:40:33 AM
-snip-
I don't agree. Paying a third-party service to give you the right to use your own money. Smells like your typical bank. He should get rid of that wallet and create a new wallet where he alone has access to the data that allows him to spend his bitcoin. The other reason why he shouldn't use that wallet anymore is because he will be paying more in transaction fees because it's a multisig.
It's far from a custodial service though, because TrustedCoin doesn't have access to his funds since they only have 1 master private key in their server.
For full custody of the funds, it's still in the user's control since the two master prvKeys and the master pubKey (of Trustedcoin's key) are in the seed phrase.

So I can agree with hosseinimr93's first suggestion to jotaemeese, only if he still wants to use 2FA
and willing to pay for their service (which I don't think he's aware of).
2452  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Multibit issue - invalid EC private key scalar: zero on: November 22, 2021, 02:30:09 AM
-snip-
unfortunately its a different wallet. I hardly used them myself so just a FUBAR ordeal ..
Okay, so I assume that the Multibit wallet backup is corrupted then, because you wont get that error in Electrum with any other private keys aside from the four mentioned above.
2453  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Get master key from 128bit on: November 21, 2021, 02:10:26 AM
what I need to fix in these two lines, to get the master key (deterministicKey) if I do not have string bip-39 at the entrance
 i have only 128 bit number -snip-
I don't need to receive Seed. I need to get a master key (deterministicKey) from a 128-bit number
There's no shortcut to this since the entropy (128 bit number) needs to be a 'UTF-8 normalized' mnemonic before you can get the 'binary seed'.
You'll need to do the above to convert it into a mnemonic, then use the result to your code.
2454  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Samurai wallet passphrase sintaxis error on: November 21, 2021, 01:34:51 AM
what do you think about https://www.walletrecoveryservices.com/

What data do I have to provide?
The service has quite the reputation and the user has positive ratings as well: walletrecoveryservices
There's also a link to their 5-star Trustpilot review page: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/walletrecoveryservices.com

For the data, it depends on what they'll ask you but the whole portfolio plus a list of possible passphrases should be enough.
2455  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why the receiver doesn't get any bitcoin on the balance if sendtoaddress or send on: November 20, 2021, 12:33:57 PM
The transaction needs to have at least 1 confirmation for it to be included to the getBalance command's result.
2456  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Multibit issue - invalid EC private key scalar: zero on: November 20, 2021, 08:23:00 AM
-snip-
nope its a different key .. but indeed  the same error ..
How about 5Km2kuu7vtFDPpxywn4u3NLpbr5jKpTB3jsuDU2KYEqetwr388P or L5oLkpV3aqBjhki6LmvChTCV6odsp4SXM6FfU2Gppt5kFqRzExJJ?
Those will produce the same public keys as the private keys I listed above, and also the same error.

I haven't used MultiBit but I've heard that they've got a bug regarding generating keys outside range. (if not, it's from a different wallet)
2457  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Multibit issue - invalid EC private key scalar: zero on: November 20, 2021, 04:23:40 AM
Are you perhaps importing the private key:
5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAbuatmU or KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU73Nd2Mcv1?
Because it's the uncompressed and compressed WIF format of the invalid ECDSA private key 0x00.

I got the same error when I tried to import it to Electrum:
2458  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Problem: No seed, no 2fa, with password and access. on: November 19, 2021, 02:59:50 PM
Unfortunately, those private keys are only 1-out-of-the-2 required 'private keys' and 1-out-of-the-3 required 'public keys' to re-create the MultiSig addresses of that 2fa wallet.
Without the seed phrase, there's absolutely no way for you to spent your funds without the intervention of Trustedcoin (Electrum's 2fa service provider).
The wallet file only has one key, they have the other key, your seed had two keys.
If he has the seed phrase, he can easily bypass TrustedCoin key and use only two of his keys to spend from the wallet, it is a special setup in a way TrsutedCoin key can be bypassed. If it can be like that, he should be able to make use of his private key to spend his coins, I have not tried it before
-snip-
Unfortunately, he doesn't have it, the wallet file also doesn't contain the seed; otherwise, it defeats the purpose of a 2fa wallet.

In his previous thread, he mentioned that he got the private keys from the wallet.
All those are generated from the master private key that' saved in the wallet file which is only 1-out-of-the-2 required keys to spend from it,
he needs the second set of private keys generated from the 2nd master private key from the seed or the 2nd master private key itself.
He can't just simply pair the keys the he got from the wallet file to regenerate the addresses.

Code:
p2wsh:Kz89M5YVDYv1KnzLMvLqfKKdJY2wn94DKyrPHJmkJR7GWR8Vs79B

I think he should be able to make use of this 2-of-2 private key to spend his coins.
That won't work, Electrum doesn't have a method on importing individual keys for MultiSig address nor supports a "p2wsh:" prefix for PrvKey import.
2459  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Problem: No seed, no 2fa, with password and access. on: November 19, 2021, 02:08:13 PM
I had a reply to your previous thread that was deleted (prob. because the OP isn't English),
Since the contents are similar, I'll just repost my reply here:

I have the private keys, obtained from the wallet itself
Unfortunately, those private keys are only 1-out-of-the-2 required 'private keys' and 1-out-of-the-3 required 'public keys' to re-create the MultiSig addresses of that 2fa wallet.
Without the seed phrase, there's absolutely no way for you to spent your funds without the intervention of Trustedcoin (Electrum's 2fa service provider).
The wallet file only has one key, they have the other key, your seed had two keys.

Quote from: jotaemeese
Anything you can recommend to me to mobilize those funds?
Electrum wallets wont suddenly switch between standard->2fa.
My guess is it's just simply a different wallet file (File->Open to select);
Or you might have initially created a 2fa wallet but never really spent funds before so it never asked you to enter a 2fa code before.

Anyway, if your funds is in that 2fa wallet and you have the email address that's used to register to Trustedcoin (during the creation of the 2fa wallet),
then try to contact them using that email explaining that you've lost the seed phrase but have access to the wallet and email.
I've seen successful recoveries using this method before.
2460  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Wallet fee. on: November 19, 2021, 01:21:02 PM
-snip-
Many recommended not to do this because it completely voids the security and purpose of having a hardware wallet so its better to sweep to hardware wallet than importing the private keys.
You cannot import private keys to a hardware wallet (or at least with Trezor and Ledger).
So you actually don't have a choice but to sweep, maybe that's why "many recommended" it than import.
Pages: « 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 [123] 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 ... 309 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!