|
1. Wilder
2. Over 4.5 Rounds
3. Round 8
|
|
|
|
Wenn es einen zusätzlichen Gewinner geben soll, würde ich raten, den folgenden Block des letzten Blocks im Jahre 2022 zu verwenden, welches dann der erste Block im Jahre 2023 wäre.  Danke für den Vorschlag. Das hört sich nach einer sehr guten und gerechten Idee an. Dann nehmen wir den ersten Block des Jahres 2023, um einen Gewinner für eine weitere Karte von BitcoinRomania zu ermitteln. Alles klar, habe diesen Hinweis mit in den ersten Beitrag aufgenommen, dass es zusätzlich zur Karte zum ersten Preis noch eine weitere Karte geben wird, für welche die 3 folgenden Blöcke relevant sein werden und deinen Beitrag darin verlinkt. Dann können sich die Preise ja mittlerweile sehen lassen.
...
Ist mit aufgenommen. |
|
|
|
Ich würde dem CEO auch kein Unwillen oder Böswilligkeit unterstellen.
Auf mich wirkt es einfach so, als würde man an extrem vielen Stellen werben und die Organisation noch nicht ganz optimiert haben.
Es werden auf jeden Fall aktuell noch weitere Funktionen hinzugefügt, wie z.B. die Freiwettenfunktionen und letzt wurde die Seite ja auch kurz überarbeitet, siehe hier. Finde ich gut, wenn Betnomi hier dem Bitcointalk insgesamt eine hohe Priorität gibt. Insofern habe ich aber trotzdem lieber einen etwas langsameren/zeitaufwändigeren Kontakt und damit verbunde Prämien als gar keine  +1 |
|
|
|
Mir ist es auch grundsätzlich egal, da die Coins derzeit sowieso nichts Wert sind, auch könnten wir das Ganze auch einfach um ein weiteres Jahr verlängern... Im Februar raus nehmen wird vermutlich einfach nur ein fettes Minus davor sein.
Also wäre mir auch recht, wenn wir das um ein Jahr verlängern, denn so ein Bärenmarkt ist die schlechteste Zeit, um die Shitcoins wieder in BTC / USDT zurückzutauschen. In einem Bullenmarkt sollten gerade unsere Nominierungen gutes Potential haben, BTC auszuperformen. Natürlich gibt es keine Garantie, ob der Bärenmarkt nicht noch länger geht und ob die Shitcoins selbst im Bullenmarkt Bitcoin ausperformen aber das Risiko wäre es mir persönlich wert. Wie sam00 mag. |
|
|
|
|
1. CHI
2. WAS
3. CHI
4. Yes
5. Under
6. 1st
7. Even
8. Even
9. CHI
10. CHI
Final Score prediction 16-10
|
|
|
|
Many thanks, I've added them to my list. I just checked and it looks like there's Taproot support on "Yogh". Indeed, it's working, I think I have entered the address into the other suggestion from ajiz138 and confused it, therefore adding "No" to both...  It's changed now. - While I was doing the above thing, I noticed the one beneath it [Blockexplorer.one] seems to have added support for such addresses as well, but not sure when it was added exactly.
Added as well. Could have happened recently. With regard to "Spiral", I sent a small amount to my Taproot address and it also showed the result with roughly 10-minutes of delay after the confirmation.
I've tried it as well and it's also working there for addresses containing a balance. In addition I've completed the table and added "No" instead of previously free spots, which also meant "No" but it should be visualized better now. A bit embarassing how Blockchain.com doesn't support Taproot addresses in its Block explorer... |
|
|
|
Bei cygan kommt es halt meist darauf an, wie Werder spielt. Spielt Werder schlecht, sieht es auch für cygan schlecht aus, spielt Werder gut, sieht es auch für cygan gut aus. Da Werder zuletzt immer wieder überzeugt hatte, ist auch cygan immer weiter nach oben geklettert. Wir sollten jetzt immer alle auf Bremen tippen oder bei schweren Gegnern zumindest unentschieden. |
|
|
|
I was talking about the Newbie because he spammed his plagiarism content right away in a topic against plagiarism. Or the Newbie is just trolling... Who knows?
It's so bad, it's actually funny. I mean, after reworking the post that hard, why not just write something new, ffs? Reason 1: Since it's too hard for Belinda1732, to come up with unique content, I don't expect any miracle here. Reason 2: time is money. It's not efficient to waste time by writing unique content. But my bet is on reason 1. And then to post it back on the same page it was taken from and expect nobody to notice? My thoughts are too unkind to share, so I'll just say: Wow!  Shhh! Some shitposters will listen to your "advice" and post it in a different thread about a similar topic.
|
|
|
|
Ich habe ebenfalls nichts erhalten aber wie du schon sagst, wurden bestimmt nur Accounts angeschrieben, die vor 2016 angelegt wurden, als Ethereum noch recht wertlos war. Vielleicht kannst du mal in Meta nachfragen, ob andere Nutzer auch angeschrieben wurden, weil in Meta gibt es etliche Leute mit Accounts von vor 2016, die dort regelmäßig reinsehen. Wenn du meinst, dass der Account dunkelgrünen Trust hat, wäre das auch im Interesse anderer Nutzer, das aufzuklären. In solchen Fällen ist Meta immer sehr hilfreich. |
|
|
|
Yes, committing plagiarism in a topic where plagiarism is called out, is a good idea...  It's so bad, it's actually funny. Sweet Jesus, that's so pathetic a thing to do that it could only happen on bitcointalk. Seriously. I don't think anyone would go through all that trouble to paraphrase (and hence plagiarize) someone else's post on plagiarism anywhere else. Indeed, we have many "specialists" here on Bitcointalk. Did anyone report that to the mods, by any chance? Nobody mentioned they did so.
Yesterday, lovesmayfamilis reported Belinda1732 for different cases of plagiarism here but if we all report the post from Belinda1732 itself, add a link to lovesmayfamilis report in "report Plagiarizers" and the explanation from KingsDen, maybe a ban will get issued faster. It isn't as though we're lacking alt farms and account farmers who have limited imaginations.
And limited reading skills... |
|
|
|
Congrats to noobhere and vd309 for winning. This round has seen so many interesting results where predictions are difficult, 4x draw, Dortmund scoring 2 goals against Bayern very late and achieving a draw and Frankfurt, which has won against leader Union last week, has now lost 0-3 against Bochum, a team, which has lost 85% of their games so far and never won a single one... Interesting match will be Union vs. Dortmund next week. Looking forward to it. |
|
|
|
mit dem 1-0 auswärtssieg von union berlin beim vfb stuttgart endete heute der 9 spieltag. diesen konnte sich dann mit 12 punkten 1miau für sich entscheiden. an dieser stelle congrats von mir und eine nachricht an den Betnomi ceo ist ebenfalls raus Oha, damit hatte ich echt nicht gerechnet, nachdem so einige meiner Tipps ziemlich falsch waren... Danke für die Meldung an den CEO, wenn es in meinem Account ist, bestätige ich es hier nochmal. die meiste bewegung gab es in der unteren tabellenhälfte und dank Begru's 5-pkt.-spieltag konnten 1miau, Soonandwaite und ich noch näher an ihn herankommen ... meinen atem spührt er schon wie üblich unten wieder die spieltagsübersicht ... gesamtübersicht folgt Es bleibt spannend. Kein Wunder, denn bei allein vier Unentschieden heute waren etliche Unsicherheiten dabei. Und Frankfurt verliert beim Tabellenletzten, der bis dahin nur einen Punkt hatte, 3:0... Nur auf Werder ist Verlass. Wenn die Freiwette bis dahin ankommt, könnte man ja mal auf einen Heimsieg Bremens gegen Mainz tippen. |
|
|
|
I added two more Bitcoin explorers, and of course before posting I looked at the OP but it wasn't on the list so I created one.
Many thanks, I've added them to my list. If I don't know about "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*" maybe you can modify it again. I've added "no" to both. Especially Txflow seems to be a little bit odd, because tx hashs can't be checked. It looks more like a visualisation website for ingoing / outgoing transactions from / to an specific address, not a real Blockexplorer. While Taproot (bc1p) addresses don't work. Blocks can't be checked as well. I've added it to "Different other sites". |
|
|
|
After some time a new entry in our Wall of fame / shame: While talking about things, Newbies should avoid, we talked about plagiarism in KingsDen's Newbie Guide Compilation. Out of nowhere, a Newbie appeared and fabricated plagiarism by "recycling" a post from lovemayfamilis a few posts above: What is happening here? A newbie copying Lovesmayfamilis Lovesmayfamilis copying a newbie in a thread that is teaching newbies how to be successful and avoid plagiarism I remember all your steps. How noisily you tried to talk about yourself, and the fifth topic, made me smile. But I understood one thing: people are different, everyone has different views, someone appears very carefully, and someone wants to tell the whole world about himself, and this is normal.
What matters is where it all leads. You have proven this by reaching your rank. Beginners can really learn from the examples of those who somehow achieved their goals. Unfortunately, in our time, many of those who are initially actively involved in the life of the forum add up their enthusiasm at the slightest failure or criticism
I can recall each step you took. But I did realize one thing: it's normal for people to differ, hold different opinions, dress differently, and want the world to know everything about them.
The end result is what counts. Your promotion has demonstrated this. Beginners can benefit greatly from the experiences of people who have succeeded in some way. Unfortunately, many people who are initially engaged in the forum's activity build up their enthusiasm at the smallest mistake or criticism in modern society.
Yes, committing plagiarism in a topic where plagiarism is called out, is a good idea... It's so bad, it's actually funny. |
|
|
|
What is happening here? A newbie copying Lovesmayfamilis Lovesmayfamilis copying a newbie in a thread that is teaching newbies how to be successful and avoid plagiarism ...
...
Loool! Speak of the devil and he shall appear. Perfect symbolizing Newbies with bad intentions and he didn't even read your OP. Because if he had done that, he would have noticed that such a behaviour... ...will result in a ban. Imagine leaving such a shameful post when we are exactly talking about the problem. Great compilation and important advice for all Newbies.
Especially plagiarism is very easy to avoid.
... I have no words for this... |
|
|
|
Therefore: when presenting content which is very close to an existing source, always add a statement in advance about its origin.
If they probably do not want to add a statement in advance about the origin of the existing source of the information they want to post, they can copy the entire existing source and put it in a quote box in the forum +1 That would be even better as it's indicating perfectly that it's quoted from somewhere else. But obviously, this knowledge has not spread among Merit beggars for some unknown reason...
Very understandable as a merit source who is determined to spread his merits across quality posts. Some of the posts are quality and also lengthy. The irony of it, is that you can meet such a post when your are not in the mood to spend enough time in the forum, maybe just to have a glance.
Exactly! It's not the case for me but some Merit sources had some of their monthly allocation reduced when they didn't spend much because of vacations or other reasons. That's also why theymos once made a statement to allocate rather 50 Merit for a very good post in such cases: Well, it appears that your source merit either wasn't upped to 250 a month ago like me, or you are just letting it expire. Theymos gave me instructions to try and do my best to distribute all of it. I'm doing the best that I can; yet have already had complaints. I really despise this statistic. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topsendban Now I am on the list that appears to point out merit abuse suspects. I was originally very honored to become a merit source. But now I feel that my reputation is at stake with every single merit that I am obligated to distribute. I know that I only have black trust at the moment. However, I keep checking my trust rating to make sure some DT member doesn't decide to red tag me because they feel that I am being "abusive" or derelict in my duty. If they complain about amounts, tell them to complain to me. It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down. If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer. Aside from that, if people complain about whether things deserve merit at all, then that's something to perhaps think about, but if you conclude that they're wrong, then that's that. You don't need to stress about it or defend yourself constantly. It's conceivable that someday you and I will end up disagreeing too much about this stuff and I'll remove your source status, but it's really not a big deal. The topsendban list is just a first indication of abuse, and many excellent people are on it. Your place on there acts as a sort of benchmark: eg. chandra12 has a similar score there, but whereas you are an extremely active merit-giver with a diverse selection of posts merited (most of which anyone would agree with), chandra12 only has two large merit sends. His behavior in comparison to yours while having a similar topsendban score is what creates a strong abuse impression. I appreciate the work of you and other sources who take it seriously! A very bold statement but it's understandable what's theymos said. |
|
|
|
Könnten da mal ein paar Leute ihre Meinung dazu abgeben?
Ich habe vollstes Vertrauen, dass du weißt, was du mit dem Rest unserer Shitcoins anstellst und ihnen nichts weiter zustößt. Die Shitcoins habe ich sowieso bereits abgeschrieben. Also gerne volles Risiko.  Meine Antwort: Kannst du machen, wie du es für richtig erachtest. |
|
|
|
Anbei die Auswertung für den Monat September 2022:
Mit jedem Monat rückt das Ende des Spiels weiter ran und die Hoffnung auf einen Sprung nach oben von Etherland durch den Ethereum-Merge kann ist nun auch vergangen -__- Bei Shitcoins kann immer alles passieren.
Der Preis meines Gebots von damals ist nun auch von fast 10$ auf schlappe ~2,30$ gesunken.
Ja, die Altcoins sind seitdem ziemlich unter die Räder gekommen.  Selbst Algorand, welches ich zu den vielversprechenderen Altcoins zählen würde...
Die Person tut mir ja fast schon Leid, die sich deswegen evtl. ein Algorand Wallet einrichten muss oder CRO in sein Portfolio bekommt Das wäre nach aktuellem Stand Buchi-88 aber ich glaube, das dürfte kein Problem für ihn sein, da sich Buchi-88 mit Altcoins gut auskennt. Diesmal hat qwk ja nicht mitgemacht, weil dass qwk Algorand oder Cro besitzen würde, glaube ich eher nicht. |
|
|
|
Jetzt nicht direkt auf El Salvador bezogen aber Namibia war eines der teilnehmenden Länder, als Vertreter führender Zentralbanken nach El Salvador eingeladen wurden. Nun hat die Zentralbank von Namibia ein durchweg positives Schreiben bezüglich Kryptowährungen veröffentlicht, wie hier näher erläutert: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416306.0 Darin geht die Zentralbank darauf ein, dass Kryptowährungen zwar kein gesetzliches Zahlungsmittel sind aber von jedem Hädler freiwillig akzeptiert werden könnten. Da sagt qwk sicher nicht nein. |
|
|
|
Do some persons send merits in advance before reading a post? If yes, it's not a good habit. Unless it's someone I know that has been producing quality topics, even at that, I'll still be able to read through to determine the amount of merits to hand out.
As a Merit source, I'm always grateful if someone is writing good comments because I want to distribute as much as possible of my sMerit for quality content. Some of the good posts are very long and when my time is running out, I'm sometimes leaving a tab open to read the rest later, while already distributing some Merit after reading like 50% of it. Sometimes I'm also forgetting that I've left a tab open and therefore the rest goes unread sometimes... For the issue above, it doesn't require much time to check but it's still a trap for unexperienced Merit senders, which can fall for this. And yes, for example some topics from fillippone are very long, sometimes it's too much work for me to read them entirely.  But his topics are of amazing quality of course. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
