via the official thread

2c74e1de0950318febf4ee1b9ad256e8b641ae693ad72be304ce8249df65d593
Repaid.

69. Payment coming soon.

EDIT: e95381f95040e474e7989f261664ceda946d8c8ecd1c56660318ffb5e9df9a94

How can I be a pedophile when I'm only 15?

Those are mighty strong words you're using. If only you spent as much time learning English as you did trolling, perhaps you would be able to formulate a proper sentence.

Interestingly enough, I did have a thread discussing the effects of higher house edge: that it was inversely proportional to the number of problem gamblers created.

I am staying on topic. However, I have expanded it so that you have a sense of perspective. Once you begin regulation, you have to determine subjective values.

Ban gambling advertisements... but should we still have the Gambling board? That promotes gambling, doesn't it? How about the Investor-based games section which is just a cesspool of ponzis and HYIPs? What about ICO's, in which most of the time, investing in it results in a deep loss?

Even new users to Bitcoin won't scour through the scores of shitty posts that permeate throughout the many Bitcoin Discussion and Economics threads. And I assume most new users would enter those nice-sounding board names... to subsequently exit after they see the nonsense that's spouted by "high-ranking" forum members.

Why stop at the forum? Why not go stop all gambling advertisements?

And while you're at it, let's also stop alcohol and cigarette advertisements. After all, they are promoted to minors! And hey, bitcoin too! It's used to buy drugs and illicit items! And it's a money-laundering tool! Oh no!

You say this, but do you know where those shitty posts end up in? Sections that nobody reads. Well, nobody except for other fellow shitposters. And they're too busy shitposting to pay attention to the ads. Oops.

Consider: what is the likelihood of a signature ad reaching users that will actually click in the Altcoin section, or one of the Economics megathreads?

Innocent until proven guilty is great for criminal court.
Protecting users against extraordinary claims which have onus (the claims must be proven) is great for the forum.
You would rather temporarily cease transactions to stop a likely scam than wait for the scam to occur, then act upon it.

In both scenarios, one must disprove the null hypothesis. However, the difference is that in the former, the null hypothesis is guilt and in the latter, the null hypothesis is innocence.

I wouldn't say that asking for reports is mutually exclusive to handling of campaign spam by the manager. Given that the campaign is set to take in a large number of users (from what I assume, since there are yet to be actual numbers on the member list), any kind of help should be welcomed.

What I don't like is the "earn up to 0.1 BTC weekly" part of this campaign. That's a minimum of 990 posts that they'll accept (weekly) and a maximum of 4950 posts.

There is no way a normal person can create that many constructive posts.

Assuming 9 hours of sleep and 15 hours of posting (every single day, without break) that corresponds to one post every 6.4 minutes at the Legendary rank. Or, one post every 1.3 minutes (76 seconds) at Jr. Member rank.

Where are these 100,000?

Oh, right. Shitposting in the Altcoin boards, that's where.

Not sure why you want to show off how your trust list affects their profile.

I can easily adjust my trust settings to show any user as severely negative. In fact, if a user isn't negative enough in one's perspective, it's simple enough to create alt accounts to flame them with negative feedback and add them to one's trust list. Not that this has any real effect if the feedback is without substance.

You should stop promoting cryptocurrency. It's related to illicit activity and you are promoting such a terrible, terrible thing to underage children. How immoral of you

---

Brilliant. Actual campaign managers that care about rooting out spam will make the forum a better place.

Cardboard coins. Unique and only of value to Bitcoin enthusiasts.

Got it. Cheers.

(can sign with 398Ak address if necessary as well)

Address: 3FbEx4dhqgedQF3HGupg35uPLfWhTJm1pP
Repayment: 0.27 BTC
Loan Time: 3 weeks (most likely less)

Signed message available at request.

50-300 is fine.

If we do not state a definite upper limit then we run into a Sorites paradox, where n+1 is as good as n and hence we arbitrarily increase.

Example? I love blanket statements but others may choose not to believe your claim until there is sufficient evidence.

If they really don't add anything to the discussion, perhaps you should add such a detail in reports. That would create a foundation for assigning the replies to a "spam" category.

lol.