it will fail and the feds will come crashing down on it, this coin will still be around though.

Cant access it, please tell me it's not DDos.

EHoKK8Ag1dLQabGvrHSrpDHT4PXVrR78xW

Yay!! thanks 

actually, it's not rushing considering when this coin came out. And as you can see from phenix coin, holding off from an exchange too long kills a coin

really have no idea how but i've noticed that if you cant get a stable connection when you start up the client, it wont sync

Thanks

send some my way please

EHoKK8Ag1dLQabGvrHSrpDHT4PXVrR78xW

i dont even have any to dump, actually gonna compile the client now, care to share me some?

do you have any orphaned coins? maybe when the pump and dump you wer left with 45CNC or 10 elacoins, whatever you have, consider giving them to me  

just post the kind of coin you have and i will put up an address

you know there is someone giving out thousands for free right?

Yay thanks!!!! 

EHoKK8Ag1dLQabGvrHSrpDHT4PXVrR78xW

yay!!! send me tons please!!!

If we had a member who has done macro finance and economic models, we'd be a foot ahead. The problem of course is that variable market cap would only go higher. Even variable block rewards would not stem it.

Any ideas guys?

I apologize if i came off critical, my bad.

I think i understand where you guys are going, but i'd appreciate some more info on how that works. Sheesh, i've only been coding for 9 years. Nothing on this scale though, one thing i'd point out is that when i looked into the forked coins, it was awful , some of the changes made the coins lifespan useless or compromised security, all in the hopes of pump and dump.

Either way, an integrated exchange may be an idea, but is it feasible and will it add anything of real world value and use? As for The one coin idea i like it a lot, but that would be a mammoth programming task. Though i've heard of a pool that is testing merged mining for litecoin and it's forks.

i'll read through your ideas and explanations, are you a coder? That is one issue we always forget to consider, My thoughts on the next gen of alts is to basically start from scratch, writing the entire code myself. It may take half a month or two if i use the main.cpp for references, (the one everyone has raped) to have a fully functional code. And due too the untrustworthy nature of some of the individuals on this forum, it makes it hard to have a large dev team of up to ten members.

for you to trade , you use your wallet, it counts as a node. Also miners will mine for the interest and node fees.

i do not attack ideas, i asked for the reasons why this is viewed as innovation, if you look at the current state of affairs between monetary policies and fiscal policies manipulating exchange rates and inflation you will realize the fallacy in that line of thought (in my opinion). There is a lot of wealth in the world, and if we were to try and create a crypto-currency the factors involved would first lead to hyper-inflation as the market demands more and as they gain more uses, this would continue until we reach a balance, at which time we would reach a balance and then know the actual value of the currency and what it can achieve. What you are talking about is called deterministic monetary collusion, where by setting such parameters we essentially make miners rich yet that defeats the purpose of wide spread adoption. Such thoughts are novel when we have other forms of backing for the currency, but we dont, ergo the market should decide unril we find a crypto that can back it's self. Today if the price of bitcoin fell to ten cents, all the cryptos would fail and it would be essentialy worthless in real world terms. A currency nomatter if it is paper, rocks or zeros in your wallet must have a measure of accepted value worldwide for it to be deemed acceptable, in the old days, paper money represented a share of gold, ergo gold (accepted everywhere) was the backer. We cannot back cryptos with existing currencies of countries because they are susceptible to any changes in that particular economy.

That is how money works, so for us to begin attempting to meddle with money supply issues, we would end up exactly where we are now. The only factor is the total limit of the number of coins, which are then sub0divisible. When you factor these numbers in, you will see what i speak of, if a  large group invested today and decided to make Yacoin their currency, the demand would be high, price would spike and more miners will mine, up till the market is satisfied. See the bitcoin bubble of april.

don't make suggestions you can't back up. explain to us why that is innovative, throwing bullet points and pretending to be smart says otherwise.

Trying to balance coin inflation and demand is like trying to set prices and interest, that is not the purpose of crypto-currency, in a way you are suggesting a form of market control which is  self-defeating. If you know what "free market" means, you'd understand that it's the markets forces that decide on those factors and any tampering with that mechanism is trade control, which will cause wild fluctuations in price and availablity, making for an unstable medium of exchange. Please consider reading up on how markets work and maybe we can discuss the merits of such a system on a global scale.

cryptsy?

WHo can get this added to cryptsy?