It should have been an easy win for Atletico because even Leandro Cabrera got their card and the match was still in the first half. That means, Atletico have a long time and can do a lot of experiments to turn it into a goal.
Even though Espanyol's defense was good but still, in reality Espanyol played away which should have been Atletico able to maximize the home factor and end the match with full points.
Because if it happens like this, I personally don't care about the excuse that the opposing goalkeeper is good and or they change their strategy to be very defensive. because Espanyol with 10 player can still play well and even, Espanyol can score an early goal which if we consider their performance so far this season is clearly very different.
Therefore, with Atletico still in the top four, surely Atletico have the quality to win and this is clearly a bad result for Atletico and their declining performance.
They had a terrible run at scoring goals, they shot a lot, but they were all either saved, or went off the post, or went outside. The finishing that was required to win the game was lacking, they were the better team for sure and dominated the game and looked like they would win normally but sometimes you can have 100 shots and not score a single goal. They are literally lucky to get a draw looking at how many goals they missed and may have missed that one as well. In the end, these games are not common and sometimes you are just unlucky and the result will show itself. Next time they play, they will remember this and do not shoot willy nilly and shoot when they think they can actually score, or pass for a better chance. |
|
|
|
Not really forgotten if we are talking about it here. Plus, even though many other coins from those days went away, Litecoin is still 20th at the moment. If a coin is top 20 that means it’s not really forgotten and it’s still there. This is a coin that has been around since 2011, and it is still in top 20 which should tell you how strong it is.
I have always been a supporter of it, and invested a small bit into it as well. I am not supporting it because of my investment because it’s a very low amount, but if I had to rank my favourite four, it would be bitcoin, ethereum, bnb and litecoin. Those four are really better than I could ever expect.
I haven't thought of that before. Most old coins practically disappeared, while Litecoin is still among the top 20 coins in market cap. The same can be said about Dogecoin. Development progress for the LTC project may be slow, but at least it's being actively traded on the market. I wouldn't count on it as a long-term investment, though. Every day, it seems LTC's price is getting lower while other coins pump like crazy. At times, market prices remain stagnant, giving us little-to-no chance for profit. As much as I'd love to see LTC valued in the $1k range someday, there isn't much demand for such prediction to become a reality. LTC is by far one of the most decentralized cryptocurrencies after Bitcoin, so it's likely it'll last for generations. Just my opinion  I have to say it could be, if the top 20 requires it. You may consider it going lower and not hyping up like others, but the hype it has is a steady one and that’s what matters. Some other "new" coin could end up being above it one day, but a year later it would be 50th while litecoin is still 20th. That’s the reason why I invest into it, it may not be in top 5 or even 10, but it is in top 20 and sustainable way as well. While some other coin could start at 50th position, be 8th after a few years, and then go out of top 100 after a few years, and it has happened with many coins whereas Litecoin will keep on being top 20 all through those years. |
|
|
|
|
I do not understand why this should be a lawsuit though. I mean I get that he "wanted to invest" into stake, and be part of it when it first started. But just because he was part of primedice, and didn't get accepted as fellow founder to stake doesn't mean that he is owed anything.
Apparently Tehrani and Eddie didn't want to work with him and that’s it, that’s literally the only reason for him not being part of it, there is no secret behind it. If someone doesn't want to be partners with you, then you can't force them to be partners with you. This is why it will drop very quickly, he will not be paid 400 million, if stake feels generous, they can give him a few millions at best and close the door, or maybe not even pay a dime.
|
|
|
|
Any shitcoin that survives the bear market will do well in the next bull run. How about coins created during the bear that has not experienced bull before. They will definitely survive the bear, maybe if they were created few months to exit the bear. During the bull they can cash out and dump the project. The crypto industry is so wide and the wider it becomes, the more confused investors will be. But top 10 coins will not disappoint, not until the next bitcoin halving.
Bear market is the moment where weak projects quenched to liquadation and it's the major cause of people assets loss. I don't trust all these shitcoins out there, because they're versatile and can do the unthinkable. Just check when Luna dumps heavily, it was frustrating for traders and investors who were keeping hope on the coin. Although I'm positive that most coins will survive the bear season and will definitely pump during the bull season. Is time to study the market and knows how it operates because crypto is becoming more difficult by the day. Shitcoins are where the problem begins during the bull run as well and that’s why I hate them so much. I mean in reality, we are talking about a situation where it would be idiotic to invest, but people see them as a way to make quick profit and during the bull run it does become a quick way to make money and they all invest into it. Of course when the bear starts, these shitcoins are the ones that drop a ton, and that’s a problem, we shouldn't really have something like that in the long run. I personally hope that it would end in the next bull run, but there is a big possibility that it won't and people would still invest into them. |
|
|
|
Argentina no doubt have messi but as a team they are not strong enough to win the WC. I think Chances this time are with Germany and Brazil but we can never preict with certanity that who will lift FIFA WC.
Argentine current form is amazing, and their squad is also at his best which can mark his presence in this world cup and Messi factor is also going to be important for them as well, but Germany is surely missing few things which need to be settled, and it's not easy for them to have quality for reaching into last two and have final against Brazil because few other teams are doing good job like France, Croatia and Netherlands are also one of the best teams in current event. In last all cups we have winners from two continents and in last two decades we have winner from one continent, Europe which is clearly indicating things are not easy for any team from this continent because any team can win with their quality and skill players which are surely going to be best. |
|
|
|
Ideas should be voted out by the community since this kind of feature might create conflict of interest on each user since this might create dislikes to others who doesn't want to make their life more hassle, so maybe if many users would agree on this feature to be added then this is the time roobet should think about adding it. But it will be a hell of inconvenience since imagine you are out for vacation and you cannot withdraw your funds anytime you want.
I do agree that it should be asked, but it's a company in the end and not every company has to ask peoples opinions when they are doing something. You may dislike it and move your funds somewhere else and gamble there, it's your decision but you don't have to be asked. Look at Apple for example, do they ask you when they make a new phone? Of course not, but what they do is get a new phone and provide it to people and if people like it they buy it, if they don't like it then they could end up buying samsung or xiaomi or whatever else. Which is the point here as well, if Roobet feels like something should be done, they can do it, and if some people dislike it, it's their problem. |
|
|
|
|
Think of it like this; if you would be given 1 million dollars in cash or 1 million dollars in bitcoin, which one would you pick right now if you cannot touch them for 6 months? It’s going to be locked for 6 months, and you are going to be given that choice today, so if in 6 months bitcoin is higher, you would have more than 1 million, if lower then less, but in 6 months only inflation will impact that million if you take in cash.
If you say crypto that means you believe in 6 months it will be higher and that means it’s going better. I personally believe that it will definitely be something that will help us all very well if we could just hold for a while.
|
|
|
|
Well they said "Your account had been blocked forever" that is same as calling me cheater don't you think. And if they don't want to give me my money they aren't scammers right? What about if I deposited 200$ and made 100$ with bets, ~
You have no rights to address it as 'my money ' while you had accumulated everything from their bonus system without making any deposit. They wouldn't block your account if you made deposits occasionally to place bets. Your intention was to make free money by using their crypto boxes. No casino will tolerate such user who's intention is to take benefits from the bonus system always. That’s the type of situation that giving people out money causes. I mean if betfury simply just didn't credit his account for lack of deposits, they would be in 100% right for not giving anything out, but having boxes available to all, made it feel like it’s a faucet and for free money, and they were just giving money away. I am not saying the complaint is right, it's wrong and betfury is right, all I am saying is that it could have been solved in a simpler way and it would have been a lot easier to handle it earlier if they did it that way. Just don't give people the right to earn free stuff if they are not depositing any money, would be a lot easier in the long run. |
|
|
|
a good site overall but a little boring from the design
It depends on each player perspective as Rollbit interface is liked by many with dark mode theme and easy to navigate interface but the main thing should be casino should be legit and games should be fun and exciting for me personally and it's good you liked the site and some new development can improve interface more. That is understandable because at the end of the day if the casino is legit but you are not having fun with it that could mean that you do not want to continue gambling anyway. There is no single legit casino, there are other casinos which are legit as well and if you like the design of it then you could gamble there. I like the dark theme here, personally this is better than most places, there is one other place, which does insane marketing and has amazing design, and I gamble there because of those two reasons and they are legit too but they have horrible odds and house edge and yet I still gamble there, sometimes marketing and design matters that much. |
|
|
|
|
I do not really think that Elon's $8 per month would really put bitcoin into a whole new level, and neither would ads. It’s not going to really change anything in the crypto world.
It’s not "public awareness" that causes bitcoin to be not adopted, there are tens of, maybe hundreds of millions of people who heard about bitcoin and never got into it. That means it’s an appeal issue, we are so volatile that there are too many people who do not want to get in because they see it as too risky and they are not wrong, if you are not comfortable with this volatility then you should not get in, but twitter will not change how much risk they are willing to take neither.
|
|
|
|
But let's get down to business lol... the new 50% cashback, it doesn't seem to explain quite well in the games and rounds thread. It says, if you win you win, if you lose, you get cash back. So is it actually 50% lossback then and not a rakeback? And do you have to wager ALL the deposit to try? Yes it's definitely a loss back. I’ve got confused too on the mechanics but one thing is clear, You can only get the lossback if you loss 100% of your deposit. You can’t get the bonus if you still have balance left on the original balance. And also all the bonus earnings is included on the amount needs to be zero to get the loss back which means a whale should be broke completely before this bonus will trigger. This is good as insurance and to let the whales play a little bit careless due to the lossback. Nice tactic. Yeah, that's not really a great promotion to be honest, and you guys know me I'm always honest on BJF  5% rakeback is better than 50% lossback, and even worse, you have to lose 100% of it all to get 50% back. That's actually a terrible promo unless you're all-or-nothing kinda dude. Not all promotions could be knock out of bounds, sometimes you get some stuff that are not as great as the previous ones and that’s fine, people need to learn how to live with that too. I am not saying it’s a bad one, or a terrible one or it shouldn't have happened. Compared to having nothing else, this is better than nothing, I am going to lose anyway so it is at least understandable to have this when I lose so that I could get something back and lose that too lol. But, is there any other better methods? Sure, there are, that’s why I believe that we should not be saying this is bad, but instead we should be saying there are some better ones out there that we would rather see. |
|
|
|
Haas has still not decided on the second driver of the following year.
Today they released an interview and said the spot would be 50 / 50 between Schumacher and Hulkeberg.
Steiner spoke too and he said the fine done to RBR is ridiculous and they will not penalize them at all.
So he quit on his idea to get Ricciardo if Daniel wanted to come,just some weeks ago Steiner said that I am not pressuring Daniel to come to Haas but that he would welcome him if decided to come to Haas.Now I see that it is going to be 50/50 between young Schumi and Hulkenberg and from these two honestly the better driver we all know who is,Hulkenberg in my opinion because of a much better experience in F1 so far while Schumi will have his time to improve and bring some quality racing. I think Daniel will go towards reserve driver for Mercedes kind of role with the hopes that Hamilton would retire in a few years and he could take the spot for a few years and actually win something in a big team. But, by the looks of it that’s not going to happen because there is a chance Hamilton may race as much as 5 seasons more, and that’s not really an easy thing to wait for, and Daniel is not young enough to wait 5 more seasons, if it was just 1-2 that would make sense. As much as I really hate to say this, but there is a huge chance that Danial Ricciardio will be out of the league after this year, lower level teams shown no interest, and higher level ones already have their team :/. |
|
|
|
if you look at the freebitcoin sunday lottery often see the first winner only has a few tickets it's like they are free users who routinely every day do free rolls and get several tickets from every roll that is done every hour
I'm also not interested in buying that many lottery tickets, because the lottery winning is very fair and it motivates that everyone has a chance to get it it just depends on luck, we all compete with other 50 million users in the hope that one day we get an email from freebitcoin because it came out to be a weekly lottery winner, it will give a sweet surprise, don't expect more just do it free rolls every hour
That is not really a problem, is it? I mean looking at how there are people with very small amount of tickets that ended up winning something, then maybe we could earn something from it as well. I do not think that hope should die, I do not think that we should be forgetting that it is going to be a difficult thing, just focus on what you could make from it at the very best chance and keep grinding. I do that, and I have never won anything from weekly lottery but that doesn't mean I should give up, it should mean that I should keep on hoping for the best, because if I live another 30 years, that’s another 1500+ weeks, maybe one of them will be a win? Who knows? |
|
|
|
|
Depends on the first one that you buy. If you do not own your own house, it’s always better to have a house, so if you could ever get enough money to buy your first ever house and live in it, then it would be the best investment.
I was lucky enough that both my parents and my wife’s parents helped us to get our own house and that’s awesome, but after that I do not think that a second house is really worth it. I personally believe that the best thing to do would be making sure that you are profiting good enough in the long run with easily liquidated assets like stocks or gold or crypto over real estate. Crypto is the best of them for sure, and that’s why I am buying bitcoin constantly.
|
|
|
|
I think the only situation where it should be ok to work in something only for the money is if you're doing it for a temporary time and plan to change your situation soon, would still be hard to sustain and not sure if it's worth it, it'll vary from situation to situation
sometimes one can work a lot for, let's say, 5 years and then be set for decades.
Plus, a competition and a work is not the same thing, even if you get paid in the end. Art for work and art for competition have different reasons, if you work and earn a salary and your job is to create art then its fine, its one thing. But, if you are working a not making any profit at all and just end up doing art for hobby and want to test yourself with the results here with a competition? That’s sitll something for fun and not something serious. After all you do not know how great or terrible it will be. It’s not always the quality of the art, but the meaning of it. You could do something with amazing quality but with no soul in it, and could lose to someone who draws stickman but can make you feel something from it. |
|
|
|
It looks like Manchester United are also getting ready to be on the line for Jude Bellingham. A 100 million-pound offer might be on the way. Technically I don't think that Manchester United would be advantageous in a race with much better teams like Manchester City and Real Madrid for example. As far as I know, those two teams are also interested in signing him next summer. I think that his choice would be between them rather than Manchester United. As long as Bellingham doesn't have a special desire to join the Red Devils such as his dream team etc., I don't see any reason to choose them. He can get bigger successes with Real Madrid or Manchester City. Even if he has such desire it is still not guaranteed that he would go to Manchester United. We have witnessed an Mbappe example recently about that.  United has a name, and that worths a lot and in the end if they are offering as much as anyone else, then why shouldn't they get him? However, getting Jude wouldn't really turn them into a beast team overnight, it would make them decent at the very best but wouldn't be the key player to change them. They urgently need a great striker and I keep saying that they need to spend that money on a great striker. Someone like Vlahovic or something would be great for them, he is both 22years old and he could be bought for 100 million give or take as well. It would benefit them a lot, if they got Kane too but he is both same price but also 29 years old which doesn't make sense. |
|
|
|
|
Not really forgotten if we are talking about it here. Plus, even though many other coins from those days went away, Litecoin is still 20th at the moment. If a coin is top 20 that means it’s not really forgotten and it’s still there. This is a coin that has been around since 2011, and it is still in top 20 which should tell you how strong it is.
I have always been a supporter of it, and invested a small bit into it as well. I am not supporting it because of my investment because it’s a very low amount, but if I had to rank my favourite four, it would be bitcoin, ethereum, bnb and litecoin. Those four are really better than I could ever expect.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on how good you are isn't it? This has been talked before and I have said this before but it’s a common topic apparently. If you are trading with absolutely no idea what you are doing that’s called gambling, if you have been a trader for a decade and have made 20%+ yearly return on average for that period of time then you are doing the right thing.
There is really nothing wrong with what we have, it’s not that much of a trouble and if you are not certain then just make sure that you are not at the veteran profit level yet and be careful, because if you are at that level and know what you are doing then you wouldn't be uncertain of what you are doing and will be confident enough.
|
|
|
|
The only thing you can do is keep looking for every opportunity because you still hope to survive if the recession worsens. If you do nothing and just wait, that won't provide any solution either. Therefore, we should use the remaining time to look for other opportunities because we still have opportunities that can help us survive, especially if this condition or recession worsens. And who knows, we may also get more than before. We can only try our best. We leave the results to God because only God has the right to our lives.
Waiting is scary for some people because we are risking our money and waiting for your money to be valued or potentially crash and make you even poorer is a big problem. I am not saying that it would be impossible to fix it, of course there are issues where it would make you wait easier if you do have the income for it, someone who makes 5k per month doesn't worry about the 1k they put in there, but if you make 500 bucks a month, and have 5k in investment then that money is a huge reason why you would be scared on waiting. We need to find a way to make the waiting more fun for people, and that’s what the staking world was created for, it gives you a good return for sure. |
|
|
|
Big congrats man,5 Golden tickets equal to 0.00125 Bitcoin and it is not a bad price,in fact is one of the best prizes from the wheel of fortune,you automatically become part of the draw for the next Lambo draw.Sure the last couple of rounds were won by people with more than 4000 tickets but it is a provably fair draw and even someone with only 1 single ticket have "equal" chances to win it.
Only one spin and 5 Golden tickets makes it even more special as a prize,the chances for this to happen are really slim so congrats once again.
That’s a question though, would you rather get 5 lambo tickets, or would you rather get like 1 lambo ticket worth of satoshi directly? It all depends on the person and what they would normally do. If I have just 1 lambo ticket, then all the other lambo tickets are useless to me, I do not aim at collecting a lot, I just like to have 1 so that I feel like I have a chance and then I don't want anymore, if I get it by luck like this that’s fine, but if I am offered even half of that as satoshi then I would pick that instead. Also, as far as I know Rolex was the biggest reward, and I know it’s unlikely that anyone would win that, the odds were quite low and I haven't seen anyone who won it, but that’s quite big reward. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
