It ll bounce back after halving, just watch. This is not natural drop, something s behind this and smart money will take advantage of this.
|
|
|
This is by far the best sig campaign there is on Bitocointalk. Regardless of that payout decrease which took place last time, Marco and the rest of the team are very professional and always fulfil what they promise. I d like to stress the importance of making this business relation two way. If you need a BTC credit card, go for these guys. That way u d help expansion of the company which we all benefit from.
Play smart.
|
|
|
I don't know what your real affiliation to Factom is, whether you re just an investors or anything else, but I think you re seriously biased towards Factom. 1. I'm a normal Investor, nothing special, without relations to Factom. 2. I believe it's impossible not to be biased in some ways 3. But I have reasons for my view on Factom and other projects etc. I think about all that, instead of just reacting emotional on price-changes. 4. I'm not just cheerleading Factom. There were points I criticized (wallet) and I never said they do it all perfect in all aspects. I also believe that more communication would be good, but if I try to think out of their perspective I can understand that they don't have much motivation to discuss with "Price-Complainers" while they have to do real work. 5. In comparison to other projects I do research about, it's the best project in my opinion, also and especially regarding the price potential. I just don't think in short-term because real value in short-term is a "Crypto-Illusion" - and DAO is just a good example. 6. If I should write posts against Factom I could do that. But I would need a lot more of speculations to give a negative impression while I just need to express my honest opinion to write about it how I do it. However, I ve said I m not going to talk shit about any coin I do not personally own anymore cause I m a nice guy and would really to see hard cord crypto enthusiast and investors make money on this.
Still, the fact remains M2 s still not here.
I don't say that there is anything wrong about it to criticize the delay. But it should be more than just the expression of "please, do something for the price!". I mean, what is the critique exactly about? That they don't work on but having a good time on vacations? Or that they are not able to finish it? Because if I should be right with my view on it, there is nothing to be critical about. Maybe just that they were themselves overoptimistic regarding the time-frame. But delays are normal. And we are not the ones who do the work. We just read posts and articles and twitter and check charts and trade or whatever. More precise: We try to make money out of the work others do. And kind of interesting is: The complaining about M2-delay is always related to the market-situation. If the price goes up - everybody is happy, no one cares about a delay. If the price goes down some try to blame the team while there are thousands of aspects with effect on the price they can't control (and shouldn't care about). Just by the way: It could turn out as an illusion that M2 will do much for the price. If they release it while Bitcoin rises even more, the FCT-price won't most likely react much more than it did because of the Rongdu-partnership-news. A little up plus dumping on release. What I count on regarding the price is: 1. If Bitcoin should reach a new ATH, form a new "bubble" like it did in 2013, there will be a time when money flows into other projects/alts. First Alt's lose if Bitcoin goes up. Then they win at least in marketcap. After that they shoot up because a lot of BTC-profit-taking won't be just between Bitcoin and fiat but into other Crypto-projects. And that will most likely happen even without any news or releases. 2. Real success of Factom. If they realize it how it's planned I see no reason why it shouldn't be used and grow and grow and grow. I m not that naive to believe M2 will do something spectacular for the price. On the other hand, it would differentiate Factom from a lot of other coins which present ambitious plans and whitepapers and then get stuck. Personally, what I hate the most is the policy of Factom we dont community with the community, we think this is the best way to do it, we dont care what you think, we dont care about the price of Factoids, all we care is to work on our service and sell entry coins. I feld a bit used by them when I owned Factom and this is why I sold. There, I said I wont talk shit and you made take shit. Ups, to criticize. The fact remains, Factom team couldn't care less about Factoid holders anymore. They have other priorities. This is a normal business behavious of a tech startup, I agree with that. Still, doesn't change the fact I felt used.
|
|
|
I don't know what your real affiliation to Factom is, whether you re just an investors or anything else, but I think you re seriously biased towards Factom. However, I ve said I m not going to talk shit about any coin I do not personally own anymore cause I m a nice guy and would really to see hard cord crypto enthusiast and investors make money on this.
Still, the fact remains M2 s still not here.
|
|
|
Anyone from actual investors commenting on profitability of the website? No offence to the OP but I d like to hear what do people who re not affiliated with the website think about it?
Thx
|
|
|
There s no way this list s legit. This is just them doing marketing for noobs and naive investors. 1k BTC invested in this kind of piece of shit online scam. One would have to be SERIOUSLY dumb to do something like that.
|
|
|
What exactly s been disabled? Only Ether or everything?
only ether buyign adn mining .. But alos i can for script and sha256 today's earning is also not credited till now ..which happen till now ..not not today ..not sure what is going on with hf That s why I ask. I also see earnings not being credited. This Ether issue should not affect all other payouts.
|
|
|
What exactly s been disabled? Only Ether or everything?
|
|
|
You do understand there is a possibility of Eth fork? You do understand there is a roll back possibility? This means any transaction after the theft might be revoked. So stop screaming, its not about Polo, they re protecting your asses.
|
|
|
Well, DAO seems to be dead, that s for sure. However, Ether and the rest will recover.
This is why I hate crypto anonymity, that hacker should suffer big time.
|
|
|
Hm, Factom going down should not be related to DAO and Ether. It s not related in any way at all.
This must be something else.
Now almost all the coins on the market are having problems and are in the red, it is a normal reaction to yesterday's events, burglary and theft of $60 million. Due to yesterday's events the credibility of the smart contracts and all that is connected with them are now dropped, and dropped credibility of the entire crypto market. It always has been, can remember as soon as the markets reacted when there were problems with the theft Bitcoins (Mt.Gox and others) on the exchanges. Now we need 27 days while all the markets normalize, unless V. Buterin and his team will be able to make the right decision. I dont buy that. We ve had theft and dumps even before and only the affected coin would be suffering. Having people dumping everything just cause someone stole something is not logical. Still, I do think things re going to get back to normal soon. DAO s probably dead but ETH has already started recovering and FCT should face the same.
|
|
|
I dont care anymore, here just to follow development of the situation.
Do not own Factom anymore.
|
|
|
We ve seen this kind of growth before and we all know what happened. So, this growth, this fast, lots of pumping for sure.
On the other hand, I think BTC can reach $1.5k by the end of next year.
|
|
|
Hm, Factom going down should not be related to DAO and Ether. It s not related in any way at all.
This must be something else.
|
|
|
Why do people enjoy writing BS as soon as they have some small problem? Polo HAS NOT been hacked, pls stop spreading FUD, it helps noone and it does not help you either.
|
|
|
I d like to add opinion of another legendary member to these previous 2 posts. Vegas is 100% honest guy and I respect his work and his efforts. There s no way this guy would steal or scam anyone. Cryptopia on the other hand is very unprofessional business run by only 2 guys, as far as I know. The fact these people re ready to come to some Bitcoin forum and argue at this level does not put any trust into them. So, it s my personal decision never to give them a single satoshi in fees again. I strongly recommend this to anyone who reads this. Unprofessional businesses do not deserve your money.
|
|
|
It really depends on a website. If we re talking about some large exchange with known owners, following AML and having millions of users, I m probably more comfortable then sending data to you local online beting website run from some garage.
Do not forget, anonymity s one of the traits which hurts BTC the most. It attracts scammers and ponzi operators and scares away real investors and large venture investments. Why? Cause 90% of people who seek anonymity, do that cause they deal with something illegal.
|
|
|
Around the corner? Hahah, until I see it with my own eyes, I trust noone.
Still, I do think FTC s got future, just one needs to hold it long run.
|
|
|
Why would you use Payza to deal with BTC? There re tons of better CC companies and exchanges where you can easily transfer between fiat and BTC. No need to play with Payza and their high fees. This lack of reliability only adds fuel to my argument.
|
|
|
Why giving you access to my accounts? Just send me your BTC address, I ll send you all of my BTC in addition to my social security number, credit card number, pin number, copies of of all of my documents and the name of my dog.
Yes, yes, I m that STUPID and I fully TRUST you.
|
|
|
|