200 million to some one who had no faith in XRP?  Faith in "electronic postage stamps"? I must say that I am not surprised (all along Open Coin had stated that the purpose of XRP was not to be a currency itself - but at the same time they profited greatly by not intervening as the gullible bet on it). They are clever at "social manipulation" but I think they will find that people don't actually enjoy be tricked (especially people that have ended up losing money because of it). ah not so much that but valid point but that OC would give 200M to some one who they knew or reasonably knew may dump it, |
|
|
|
OC recently gave 200 million XRP to an unknown individual/ company and they proceeded to dump. Expect the price to go a lot lower.
200 million to some one who had no faith in XRP? really....where is this news? |
|
|
|
|
is there any explination as to the sudden XRP loss of value, by 400- 500 % v BTC
|
|
|
|
kinda to late to hit the backspace button now. you're not very good at conveying your ideas to others. other than that your premine names are not very catchy. why did you waste your time making this post anyway?
i'm open to any improvements you may suggest to improve what I am trying to convey there is quite a bit of info to get in.... I saw a lot of arguments to the point of videos why coin 'x' was not a premine a good portion of alts are [ANN] and invariably have some sort of no pre mine claim but the term has lost most of its meaning to the point of being semantically gamed |
|
|
|
I propose the new term 'n' order launch minedefined as true zero order launch mine zero order launch mine = <2x target .2 order launch mine >=2x target .3 order launch mine>= 3x target .4 order launch mine>= 4x target etc 1st order launch mine >= 10x target 2st order launch mine >= 100x target etc these terms addresses the semantic problem of "pre-mine" which can be technically met by not mining before release which can be proven by the blockchain explorer and forum announcement date stamp. This covers so may different serious it becomes cover for orders of magnitudes of coins of the first few days. The usage of launch mine, covers what happens on day 1/0 onwards the Launch mine defn will alert people to be able to discriminate between and make more informed choices about coins and [ANN] NO PREMINE, BUT 1st order mine. I think this term will re place the term PREMINE, which offers to many outs and not enough info. a good site to get this data http://cryptometer.org/index.htmleg bottle caps coin would be a good zero order launch mine http://cryptometer.org/bottlecaps_96_hour_charts.htmlnovacoin would be a > 1st order launch mine http://cryptometer.org/novacoin_96_hour_charts.html |
|
|
|
|
is it data missing in those drops at the 9+ diff, and the way its rising now is it chain length or GPU miners
the diff is exponential, but something is just eating through that.....making it look linear...!
or is that the latest hp release
|
|
|
|
|
I actually forked TRC on a repo, to put back a BTC target system into it.
|
|
|
|
FTC is being manipulated again.
After the previous 51% attack some individuals created a regenerating wall at around 1.
This time they are more ambitious and bumped it up even higher.
You know a coin is severely pumped when nearly 50% of the buy support is within 10 points of each other and you see large buys like that.
Stay away, you can make some money but the risk is exponentially higher.
I gotta say this was my feeling about FTC, and NVC is a the other end, so little on every levels...... |
|
|
|
|
also as sunny king pointed out, BTC and move to POS model and has the dev power to do it.
end of problem
|
|
|
|
why is their so much btc on each price level on BTC-E vs other currencies, eg LTC on usually has say 4, 1, 0.3 or 2 btc, but FTC has 10, 20, 60, 50 etc.
I also noticed CNC was like FTC in this regard, PPC is between FTC and LTC
I just can't figure out why or what it means?
There are a lot of bag holders when ftc was opened on BTCe much higher than it is now. They are doubling down to break even or try to turn their loss into a profit. ok, i the hope it goes up.... I was thinking maybe all the 0.005 sellers, are supporting at 0.0005 - 0.0015 as they now have the FTC to do it haveing sold out at 0.005, and just cycle pump and dump in new waves of suckers investors |
|
|
|
|
brilliant
one question though its costs btc to send a bit of info....
though when you think about it, a cheap way to get a secure block chain!
|
|
|
|
Well it looks like I chose a convenient time to have made this thread because after sitting at ~.0008 for some time, as has been stated the price has just now started climbing.
A final pump maybe. Btc-e devs said that ftc and trc might be delisted soon due to blockChain instability and attack attempts. where did BTC-e devs say this? |
|
|
|
|
why is their so much btc on each price level on BTC-E vs other currencies, eg LTC on usually has say 4, 1, 0.3 or 2 btc, but FTC has 10, 20, 60, 50 etc.
I also noticed CNC was like FTC in this regard, PPC is between FTC and LTC
I just can't figure out why or what it means?
|
|
|
|
That SXC answer isn't really great. This has been covered a number of times times in this forum, I suggest finding one of my posts. E.g. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=194078.msg2014204#msg2014204In the reference client checkpoints will play less of a role in the future as better (but more complicated) solutions to the issues mention in that post are deployed. thank you |
|
|
|
Quote from StackExchange: The checkpoints are hard coded into the standard client. The concept is, that the standard client will accept all transactions up to the checkpoint as valid and irreversible. If anyone tries to fork the blockchain starting from a block before the checkpoint, the client will not accept the fork. This makes those blocks "set in stone".
so it just because the majority everyone is using the same client with the checkpoint in it...? any pointers on how the code works....*I guess should go and read the code* (I think I just made a C/C++ joke) |
|
|
|
if there don't use merged mining they will all hang separately due to not hanging together, like all the scrypt crapcoins.
Already some, maybe most, of the SHA256 coins that cannot yet be merged mined are looking into adding merged-mine-ability for the same reason - survival - the old wave of altcoins did.
-MarkM-
when does ixcoin run out again? |
|
|
|
|
I would be glad if some one could explain check pointing for me or point me to a good resource
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
