Is this thing still going on? Pedophile rights? How about serial killer rights? Incredible.
No, nothing is going on they're just saying shit that's all... Yep. This still marches on. Chickenhawk (men who loves boys) 1994 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygrd29-_O3I(Thanks for the youtube video link posting) |
|
|
|
COINCIDENCE? Ford Cancels U.S. Plant Move To Mexico After Trump Declares THIS HUGE Threat To OutsourcingCan it be that “The Donald” is already affecting American policy, without even yet being the Republican nominee? It sure looks that way, or perhaps it’s just coincidence. However more likely than not, Trump’s constant bashing of Ford moving to Mexico, has apparently been making ripples both within the news media and perhaps among the voting public. In that there’s something about shinning the light of publicity that has perhaps made those Ford executives a bit uncomfortable, you know like being exposed and naked. Whatever it is, it seems that a switch has been suddenly turned on and thanks to perhaps “The Donald’s” constant public drumming, the issue of American companies bailing out of the U.S. seems to have caused some long needed reflection on what is happening to America’s industries. “Astoundingly” Ford’s announcement of outsourcing jobs to Mexico has caused the auto manufacture to suddenly reverse itself and bring the $2,000,000,000 plant back to the United States. Moreover by moving its facility, originally slated for Mexico, back to the United States, where it will employ 1,000 factory workers in struggling Youngstown, Ohio. Trump recently said that if he’s elected he would take steps to make it more expensive for manufacturers to shift work to Mexico and then export the items back to the United States. “How does that help us?” Trump said about the Ford investment in Mexico while campaigning in Michigan this week. “Mexico is becoming the new China.” Do you think Ford got Trump's message and is back tracking or is this just a convenient coincidence? http://usherald.com/coincidence-or-trump-effect-ford-changes-course-brings-mexico-plant-back-to-u-s-after-trump-makes-this-threat-about-outsourcing/# |
|
|
|
Pope Francis’ US appearances leave Christians wanting more … mentions of JesusPosted at 6:44 pm on September 26, 2015 by Twitchy Staff | 53 Comments Pope Francis has finished speaking at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, and those who made note that the Pope made no mention whatsoever of Jesus during his address to Congress earlier this week aren’t likely to be satisfied by his speech in Pennsylvania. As The Federalist reported, Pope Francis did cover quite a bit of ground in his speech to Congress: During his remarks, which were regularly interrupted by rounds of applause from the assembled lawmakers, Pope Francis condemned the death penalty, called for better environmental stewardship, and even talked about the ills of political polarization. He did not, however, mention Jesus Christ, whose life, death, and resurrection form the very foundation of the Christian faith. The Federalist wasn’t the only one to notice. The Pope certainly wasn’t obligated to mention Jesus, but a lot of people expected some mention during his visit to the United States. [[[see link for a bunch of tweets]]] Still waiting for the Pope to talk about Jesus or even mention his name in any of his speeches. Not even at ground zero! #PopeatUN — Amber (@oicStars) September 25, 2015 http://twitchy.com/2015/09/26/pope-francis-us-appearances-leave-christians-wanting-more-mentions-of-jesus/ There is something strange about this pope... There is something strange. No way around it. You can´t be the most important religious leader in the world and visit The United States of America - and not mention Jesus Christ once in your speeches. At Congress, Independence Hall and Ground Zero. And elsewhere. There´s something terribly wrong with that picture. We need to double check if he eats garlic with a complete silver table setting...  |
|
|
|
Supercharging More Electric Cars Risks Crashing the Grid—Here’s What Might Help Tesla claims to be the fastest on the planet, but BMW touts that it can go from 0 to 80 in less than half an hour. The electric car makers aren’t bragging about miles per hour—they’re touting percent battery charge. The race for fast-charging stations is on: Tesla has more than 100 of these supercharger stations in North America. Both Oregon and Washington have invested in direct-current fast chargers (such as BMW’s) every 25 to 50 miles along their “West Coast Electric Highway,” one of the largest continuous networks of fast chargers on the continent. And thus technology has begun to clear a great hurdle to adopting the electric vehicle—the inconvenience of long charge times. Factor in new legislation—such as California Gov. Jerry Brown’s Zero-Emission Vehicle Action Plan, an executive order designed to boost the state’s number of fully electric vehicles from a few hundred thousand to 1.5 million by 2025—and we can expect a new wave of electric vehicles to dart in within the decade, if not sooner. There’s just one problem: Our electrical grids might not be ready. The average California household uses energy at a rate of less than 1 kilowatt* (amounting to 19 kilowatt hours per day, according to the U.S. Energy Information Association). BMW’s new direct-current supercharger charges at a rate of 24 kilowatts, which seems like a lot until you realize that BMW’s charger is small potatoes compared to most DC fast chargers, which hover around 50 kilowatts. And Tesla? Tesla’s superchargers come in at a whopping 120 kilowatts. Supercharged vehicles haven’t used more energy to charge—they’ve just used it faster. When it comes to the grid, that’s a huge difference, because timing is everything. Scott Moura is an assistant professor in civil and environmental engineering at UC Berkeley, and a proponent of “smart cities”: urban centers that coordinate among their infrastructures. Traditionally, Moura says, cities’ electric and transportation grids remain separate, but with the advent of electric vehicles, the networks are “colliding.” The collision couldn’t be clearer than Moura’s example of a supercharging Tesla coming online, which he says would “feel” to the grid as if 120 houses came online for only half an hour. “It’s like an entire neighborhood popping up in the middle of a city, and then disappearing,” he says. Even when electric-vehicle owners charge their cars at a much slower rate of 6 or 7 kilowatts per hour overnight, that can still be a problem. The demand for energy is spiking each evening just as electric vehicles typically roll in to charge, and just when the source of solar power is setting. If demand spikes too high in an EV-smitten zip code (cough, Silicon Valley), its transformers, built to handle modest residential loads, may blow out. We’ve known what this might look like for a while now: In 2011, the Utilities Telecom Council trade group released a report highlighting the exponential rise in energy use that will come with the widespread adoption of electric vehicles. Gigaom, a blog dedicated to “humanizing technology,” followed up by painting a picture of “blown transformers (and) neighborhood blackouts” from mass electric-vehicle charging. The article noted that the electrical utility giant PG&E had flagged plug-in zealous Berkeley as a “hot spot” that may be vulnerable to grid overload. This hardly means we shouldn’t give the green light to green cars, which do move us away from dependence on fossil fuels. But they also present a problem: If California is going to go for 1.5 million of them by 2025, we need to know what to expect, and crucially, where and when to expect it. This is where Alexei Pozdnoukhov comes in. Pozdnoukhov, like Moura, works at Cal in smart cities research. He directs UC Berkeley’s Smart Cities Research Center, where a research initiative called the Smart Bay Project may provide us with the crucial information to prevent an electric-grid meltdown. http://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/just-in/2014-11-05/supercharging-more-electric-cars-risks-crashing-grid-heres |
|
|
|
Pope Francis’ US appearances leave Christians wanting more … mentions of JesusPosted at 6:44 pm on September 26, 2015 by Twitchy Staff | 53 Comments Pope Francis has finished speaking at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, and those who made note that the Pope made no mention whatsoever of Jesus during his address to Congress earlier this week aren’t likely to be satisfied by his speech in Pennsylvania. As The Federalist reported, Pope Francis did cover quite a bit of ground in his speech to Congress: During his remarks, which were regularly interrupted by rounds of applause from the assembled lawmakers, Pope Francis condemned the death penalty, called for better environmental stewardship, and even talked about the ills of political polarization. He did not, however, mention Jesus Christ, whose life, death, and resurrection form the very foundation of the Christian faith. The Federalist wasn’t the only one to notice. The Pope certainly wasn’t obligated to mention Jesus, but a lot of people expected some mention during his visit to the United States. [[[see link for a bunch of tweets]]] Still waiting for the Pope to talk about Jesus or even mention his name in any of his speeches. Not even at ground zero! #PopeatUN — Amber (@oicStars) September 25, 2015 http://twitchy.com/2015/09/26/pope-francis-us-appearances-leave-christians-wanting-more-mentions-of-jesus/ There is something strange about this pope... |
|
|
|
The ILGA fucked up big time there, no denying that. Had they not kicked them out when they did, the organization could have easily crumbled and fell down under the scrutiny that it did. The majority of the LGBT community does not support pedophilia, and the staff now on the board is vastly different.
The LGBT community is not a hivemind that supports something because a single organization fucked up over 20 years ago. The majority of LGBT organizations didn't even exist back then, much less support it. You'll always have some shit outliers, this one cleaned them out instead of just getting shut down by lack of support.
The title of this thread is not highlighting something that happened 20+ years ago, it's that the movements for pedo rights "marches on".
Can you tell us how all the people quoted and involved in this catastrophic gay-nambla cosy relation 20 years ago is not relevant now because you know for a fact they are all dead, with no direct political influence anymore? "Marches on": in progress. No to be confused with "starting now". No time limits on when the movement started the march, and with whom... "In progress" would mean they are currently progressing right now, and you brought no proof of that! Why would anyone defend the rights of adults to abuse children is beyond me. The same is beyond me, but the fact that nambla exists in the first place shows that there are people that would. Statistically there's gonna be pedos from every background and orientation. The church is a great example, I don't say every Christian supports pedophilia because of child porn going around in the Vatican, and it would be looked at as history if 25 years from now the issue is mostly gone except for some Christian people that also happen to be pedos. I didn't say they were ALL dead, you twisted my words. Really the march for pedo rights is always going to be attempted by a few crazy fucks that want to be able to get with kids, what matters here is whether there are any signs of success and whether the attempts are in any way associated with LGBT people, in this example. So back on topic, find some sign that the march is actually doing 'going on' instead of having their feet stuck in the mud. I'll keep updating this thread forever. Not to worry. As you wish but please take care about your way of interpreting things. And give only objective facts please... I do not interpret things. I copy paste. Your role is to interpret and make a judgement, accept it or reject it and move on. I do not judge people, calling them a bunch of crazies for example. I believe, according to the article, they have an objective and are still influential. Obviously all my threads have a theme, but it is based on the vision of the original author, vision I share or not share. It is not my role to give objective facts please... You do this withing your conscience. Abusing children and be associated with people abusing children is criminal. I do not understand why it is so hard for some people to compute this. |
|
|
|
This Wilikon person is a DICK Man get your facts straight more children are abused by the opposite sex I.E mum son.. dad daughter.. older brother younger sister.. uncle niece.. neighbour in the street.. 8 out of 10 times its someone close who abuses your children FACT very rare someone you don't know grabs your child to abuse.. mostly you will know them FACT.. To blame gays for all of it plus the fact its not gays who mostly abuse children its straight people what you say is total bullshit YOU HATE GAYS WITH ALL YOUR HART DON'T YOU  Because you sure sound like you do at least get your facts right You horrible little man Though I'd say the insults and capitals are useless, the stats are rather intelligent and useful to see that LGBT have nothing in particular to do here  I believe insults and capitals are very useful defining who you are dealing with in life: level of education, social skills, mental age versus a date of birth on a ID card, etc, etc... I welcome authenticity. If someone seems too annoying I never see their posts anyway. Everything is cool  Well I gotta say I find you a bit pedantic though But you're a cool dude; though I find your beliefs more or less all horrible ^^ /* I find this Wilikon dude hugely pedentic. * Alas, I have to deal with my creation and keep smiling */ { } |
|
|
|
Trump's victory over the Pope: Francis backs down over 'not Christian' claim as Vatican says it was not a 'personal attack' or attempt to influence presidential voteThe Vatican today executed a speedy climb-down in its feud with Donald Trump - handing the Republican White House hopeful a major political victory. Pope Francis's suggestion that Trump was 'not Christian' because of his views on immigration was not a personal attack on the candidate, Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said on Friday. Lombardi told Vatican radio that the pope's comments, which were denounced by Trump, were simply an affirmation of his longstanding belief that migrants should be helped and welcomed rather than shut off behind walls. He also leaned toward confirming Trump's contention that his statement that Trump was 'not a Christian' was based largely on 'what he was told' about the billionaire's position. Trump said Thursday that he suspected the Mexican government had propagandized to the Pontiff about him, prompting the unusual condemnation from the leader of the world's Roman Catholics. 'This wasn't in any way a personal attack, nor an indication of who to vote for,' Lombardi said. 'The Pope has clearly said he didn't want to get involdved in the electoral campaign in the US, and also said that he said what he said on the basis of what he was told [about Trump], hence giving him the benefit of the doubt.' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3454720/Popes-comments-Trump-not-personal-attack-papal-spokesman.html It's not because he doesn't want to get involved in US election that he didn't clearly explained that wanting to exclude people is not Christian.  The pope knows who the real christians are... http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/09/20/pope-francis-meets-with-fidel-castro/ |
|
|
|
This Wilikon person is a DICK Man get your facts straight more children are abused by the opposite sex I.E mum son.. dad daughter.. older brother younger sister.. uncle niece.. neighbour in the street.. 8 out of 10 times its someone close who abuses your children FACT very rare someone you don't know grabs your child to abuse.. mostly you will know them FACT.. To blame gays for all of it plus the fact its not gays who mostly abuse children its straight people what you say is total bullshit YOU HATE GAYS WITH ALL YOUR HART DON'T YOU Because you sure sound like you do at least get your facts right You horrible little man Though I'd say the insults and capitals are useless, the stats are rather intelligent and useful to see that LGBT have nothing in particular to do here I believe insults and capitals are very useful defining who you are dealing with in life: level of education, social skills, mental age versus a date of birth on a ID card, etc, etc... I welcome authenticity. If someone seems too annoying I never see their posts anyway. Everything is cool |
|
|
|
The ILGA fucked up big time there, no denying that. Had they not kicked them out when they did, the organization could have easily crumbled and fell down under the scrutiny that it did. The majority of the LGBT community does not support pedophilia, and the staff now on the board is vastly different.
The LGBT community is not a hivemind that supports something because a single organization fucked up over 20 years ago. The majority of LGBT organizations didn't even exist back then, much less support it. You'll always have some shit outliers, this one cleaned them out instead of just getting shut down by lack of support.
The title of this thread is not highlighting something that happened 20+ years ago, it's that the movements for pedo rights "marches on".
Can you tell us how all the people quoted and involved in this catastrophic gay-nambla cosy relation 20 years ago is not relevant now because you know for a fact they are all dead, with no direct political influence anymore? "Marches on": in progress. No to be confused with "starting now". No time limits on when the movement started the march, and with whom... "In progress" would mean they are currently progressing right now, and you brought no proof of that! Why would anyone defend the rights of adults to abuse children is beyond me. It was decades ago and concerns only a few crazy people. Do you have to talk a "movement" that is "marching on"? Those few crazy people are not crazy at all. They have a goal and they are still among us. Re read the first post of this thread if you care. Media Promotes “Pedophile Rights” Not long after same-sex marriage ruling, leftists now demand rights for pedophiles http://www.infowars.com/media-promotes-pedophile-rights/You are free to reject the idea they exist still. |
|
|
|
The ILGA fucked up big time there, no denying that. Had they not kicked them out when they did, the organization could have easily crumbled and fell down under the scrutiny that it did. The majority of the LGBT community does not support pedophilia, and the staff now on the board is vastly different.
The LGBT community is not a hivemind that supports something because a single organization fucked up over 20 years ago. The majority of LGBT organizations didn't even exist back then, much less support it. You'll always have some shit outliers, this one cleaned them out instead of just getting shut down by lack of support.
The title of this thread is not highlighting something that happened 20+ years ago, it's that the movements for pedo rights "marches on".
Can you tell us how all the people quoted and involved in this catastrophic gay-nambla cosy relation 20 years ago is not relevant now because you know for a fact they are all dead, with no direct political influence anymore? "Marches on": in progress. No to be confused with "starting now". No time limits on when the movement started the march, and with whom... "In progress" would mean they are currently progressing right now, and you brought no proof of that! Why would anyone defend the rights of adults to abuse children is beyond me. The same is beyond me, but the fact that nambla exists in the first place shows that there are people that would. Statistically there's gonna be pedos from every background and orientation. The church is a great example, I don't say every Christian supports pedophilia because of child porn going around in the Vatican, and it would be looked at as history if 25 years from now the issue is mostly gone except for some Christian people that also happen to be pedos. I didn't say they were ALL dead, you twisted my words. Really the march for pedo rights is always going to be attempted by a few crazy fucks that want to be able to get with kids, what matters here is whether there are any signs of success and whether the attempts are in any way associated with LGBT people, in this example. So back on topic, find some sign that the march is actually doing 'going on' instead of having their feet stuck in the mud. I'll keep updating this thread forever. Not to worry. |
|
|
|
Leaked German Government Report Shows Refugees Committed 200,000 Crimes Between 2014 And 2015 A leaked report from Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Agency reveals refugees committed over 200,000 crimes between 2014 and 2015. The report is only supposed to be seen by police and other government employees, but it ended up in the hands of Bild, a German newspaper, Deutsche Welle reports. What the document shows primarily is that refugees are responsible for 208,344 crimes. A total of 32 percent of those crimes were related to asset or fraud offenses, and another 33 percent were due to theft. Of the total number of crimes, only 1 percent, or 1,688, had anything to do with sexual offenses. There were 458 cases of serious sexual assault, which includes either rape or coercion. http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/02/18/leaked-german-government-report-shows-refugees-committed-200000-crimes-between-2014-and-2015-307659 And? I mean maybe it's a lot but the only stats that could mean anything would be the % of migrants in the population and the % of crimes committed by migrants. Brute number like this one is useless. And since we do not know the exact number of illegal criminals in the country we have to go by the raped victim testimonies, thanks to people who share merkel's view of letting them run rampant. |
|
|
|
He NEVER attacks harpy clinton. If you are a bernie supporter you should ask why, but you won't.
No need to ask why, because he said he wants to run a clean campaign, and he is doing exactly that... That's because Bernie has this little thing called integrity...   Nice one. |
|
|
|
Well there are no untrustworthy emails sent on her government email address . Then again no emails were sent there. On the other side thinking of computer security. Each person having their own email server does make it hard to compromise everyone at once. So she did add some security by doing it. No no no no NO. It's frustrating how many people don't understand this. SMTP is an insecure protocol. The be RFC compliant, an e-mail server MUST accept e-mail from another e-mail server that is not encrypted. Within the .gov network they can do refuse connections that don't have encryption but when connection outside the .gov network and accepting mail from outside the .gov network, they have to accept connections that are not secured by TLS. By running her own mail server outside the .gov infrastructure, she opened all of her e-mail up to potential MITM attacks. What she did was incredibly stupid.... Or in purpose. |
|
|
|
|
I never understood where all that energy is coming from when recharging all those EVs... Free air? Wind? Nuclear?
Or good ol' petrol?
|
|
|
|
On top of that the US has been perverted by the sjw cancer, like everywhere else.
What's the "sjw"? Dude read the Thread title --' |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
