All of this anti-police media hype is about selling federalized police to the nation. Don't fall for it. Just imagine every police officer nation wide also as a ATF/DEA/DHS/FBI/EPA/IRS/FCC agent. State laws will instantly become meaningless and federal law will be the only law enforced. This is nothing short of a coup d'etat.
Brilliant comments. The media and their masters are exploiting this situation yet again to show some of the inner city folks (viewed negatively by your average white person) to being what they're showing themselves to be. Others are seeing the violence/looting and then siding w/ the cops since the selective media narrative is doing the job well despite so many peaceful, interested neighbors/protesters. Make the police look good to the majority even tho, at times, they're downright terrible. Lastly, thru making the police look deviant it opens them up and the public for federal review/takeover and all is taken care of.
|
|
|
Chris McDaniel (Former GOP US Senate candidate that got screwed by the establishment) of MS: Rand Paul is right: "Lindsey Graham and John McCain are “lapdogs"Like him or not, Rand Paul is right: "Lindsey Graham and John McCain are “lapdogs” for President Barack Obama’s foreign policy, Rand Paul said Tuesday, at once firing back at recent remarks from the hawkish Republicans and seeking to distinguish his defense credentials." https://www.facebook.com/senatormcdaniel/posts/920419898021899
|
|
|
Rand Paul Welcomes Hillary Clinton to the Fight for Criminal Justice ReformThe Republican presidential candidate notes the need to "undo some of the harm inflicted by the Clinton administration."Earlier today I noted that Hillary Clinton, while declaring "it's time to end the era of mass incarceration," did not mention her own role in promoting the "tough on crime" policies that have put so many people in prison for so long. This morning Rand Paul's office issued a press release calling attention to that omission: According to Salon, the Clinton administration's focus on the "War on Drugs" is responsible for increasing incarceration by 673,000 new inmates.... Not only is Hillary Clinton trying to undo some of the harm inflicted by the Clinton administration, she is now emulating proposals introduced by Senator Rand Paul over the last several years, and we welcome her to the fight. In the Salon article, Jeff Stein notes: The explosion of the prison system under Bill Clinton's version of the "War on Drugs" is impossible to dispute. The total prison population rose by 673,000 people under Clinton's tenure —or by 235,000 more than it did under President Ronald Reagan, according to a study by the Justice Policy Institute. "Under President Bill Clinton, the number of prisoners under federal jurisdiction doubled, and grew more than it did under the previous 12-years of Republican rule,combined," states the JPI report. The federal incarceration rate in 1999, the last year of the Democrat's term, was 42 per 100,000—more than double the federal incarceration rate at the end of President Reagan's term (17 per 100,000), and 61 percent higher than at the end of President George Bush's term (25 per 100,000), according to JPI. The JPI report, titled "Too Little, Too Late: President Clinton's Prison Legacy," is here. Hillary Clinton is not her husband, of course, but she was a vocal supporter of his criminal justice policies, and her recent discussions of reform have been notably light not only on references to his administration but on references to the drug war's role in overincarceration. ... More... http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/29/rand-paul-welcomes-hillary-clinton-to-th
|
|
|
I heard recently that polls were showing Rand beating Hillary in several swing states, and at least one or two that are "usually blue"/ democratic party victories. I don't have a link now though. I heard this too many times. Most of them were linked on Rand's facebook page but they are true and the polls are done by 3rd parties. Re-reading over the article it says that they are the odds that gamblers are gambling on, not actually polls from real people. I see so much stuff on Rand that I'm not going to dig up these different polls showing him up on Hillary in IA, PA, OH and on her heels in VA, I just know for a fact that it's true cause I'm not likely gonna forget this info. I'm sure there's something on this in the last few pages tho. The main thesis is that Rand does better against the bitch over every other republican is because of his broad appeal among the youth, independents and even minorities this early on. The other republican candidates, specifically Bush and Rubio, are going to lose support against the bitch because many Rand voters simply will not support fraudulent establishment figures.
|
|
|
SPRINGFIELD, Virginia - Today, Campaign for Liberty came out strongly against the inaptly named “USA Freedom Act” and endorsed the Surveillance State Repeal Act. The USA Freedom Act, sponsored by Rep. Sensenbrenner, would extend and amend three controversial surveillance provisions; Sections 206 and 215 of the Patriot Act and Section 6001 of the 2004 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act. The amendments will not, however, prevent warrantless and widespread surveillance of Americans and continue to allow the NSA to violate the 4th Amendment rights of innocent Americans. Campaign for Liberty strongly believes the only way to eliminate unconstitutional mass surveillance of innocent Americans is to fully repeal both the Patriot Act and the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, which is why Campaign for Liberty supports H.R. 1466, the Surveillance State Repeal Act to do exactly that. "Proponents of civil liberties should not be fooled by the cosmetic, limited reforms of the USA Freedom Act," said Campaign for Liberty Chairman Ron Paul. “This legislation, negotiated by Congressional leadership determined to perpetuate the surveillance state, would not prevent innocent Americans from being spied on by their own government. Americans were rightly outraged at the revelations of Edward Snowden and its time Congress listen to the American people and end these outrageous programs that do nothing to enhance our national security. “I, along with Campaign for Liberty, encourage all Americans who value privacy and civil liberties to contact their representatives and urge them to reject the USA Freedom Act and support the Surveillance State Repeal Act.” ... http://www.campaignforliberty.org/national-blog/c4l-chair-ron-paul-opposes-usa-freedom-act-endorses-surveillance-state-repeal-act/
|
|
|
When I was younger I used to think all drug dealers should be given the death penalty but I didn't realize that they were the equivalent to bartenders, it's just one thing is legal and the other isn't. You're not serious about taking the violence and other associated drug problems out of the drug business until they are legalized and the product costs similar to aspirin. Those proficient in the use of force enter black markets where the authorities can't be called to help out.
|
|
|
Who's ready for the weekend?
powder
Is that your wall on stamp Mr Loaded? That's the only downside to Bitcoin. You can't use it to roll a toke. No worries, that crap isn't something you want to get over-involved with anyways. Also, no point in 'blowing' your eventual profits on it when there's better and healthier things in life you can enjoy. Lastly, when your dealer knows what your financial status is, he's gonna start cutting your product or claim he's got newer/better batches and charge you more. You don't want to get stuck in this rut, I'm telling you.
|
|
|
This time it's different
That isn't exactly a huge vote of confidence, Mr. Legendary. At this stage of the game it's only a matter of time but there's just so many more imminent options for different type investors to finally get their hands on coinage that the demand is bound to pick up and stay pretty steady which will drive us up the charts. My birthday is in June so that's as good a time as any but I'm presuming that we'll see some decent action in May.
|
|
|
I honestly just don't think any of the shareholders are in a hurry to sell there shares. Few have probly even opened the email to read how to transfer there shares. Its not like bitcoin is there only investment taking up there time.
They're likely high net worth investors and like you say, probably have a small or modest investment that they're just letting ride for the time being.
|
|
|
Going from $300 --> $700 --> $400 within the next few months sounds weird to me. Won't happen.
If we are destined for another bull run then 700 could be the first sell off phase and if it did go down near 400 it wouldn't last long there as newer buyers would be getting their second wind at cheaper coins.
|
|
|
That's fuel for the rocket. Yeah, these carefully planned spurts of funding/good news are not so subtle winks that things are a changing so ya better grab what ya can.
|
|
|
I'm not capitulating. I'm accumulating. Like a whale but little. Not even as big as a dolphin. An accumulating tiddler. kwuckduck and fonzie make me laugh. Are they the same person by any chance ?
Not sure and don't really care as they both have been on ignore for quite some time. It's one thing to have a valid opinion but something totally different when you're being downright ridiculous.
|
|
|
come on man, this isn't going far. But you aren't doing anything decent for it nor any related marketplace.
|
|
|
Yo folks, this is your chance to ask questions of a security that is posting here, never happened before. We're nearly 6 months into CVFS dealing out a dividend and the biz is on the expand motion. Too many shitstorms have ruined this area and now CV is taking it back. Few more days before the fulfillment takes place.
|
|
|
Dead Broke Libya Hires Million-Dollar American Lobbyist
Libya’s teetering government has almost no money—and lots of ISIS enemies. So how can it afford to pay its D.C. public-relations firm’s hefty fee? The fledgling government of Libya has hired a top-flight Washington PR firm to represent its interests in D.C., even though by all accounts Libya is a failed state with no real functioning government.
This has western neocons hands all over it. They are the ones that were salivating at the mouth to overthrow Gadaffi and then create the vacuum that ISIS took over so they can use the media to show them murdering more Christians. F them all the way to hell.
|
|
|
I'm going to give you and F for the spread you just offered. Having enough action here you should know how to present a post yet you didn't even provide a link. This is bunk all the way around and not yet worthy of a response to the material. Did I say garbage?
|
|
|
[...] ... For the past several years, the Clinton Foundation has basically been a foreign money-laundering operation. The scheme works like this: collect millions of dollars in foreign money, dump it into a foreign charity, pretend that the law prohibits you from ever disclosing the identities of those foreign donors to the foreign charity, then have the foreign charity bundle all the cash and send it to the Clinton Foundation. Then, when the time comes–whether it be a Clinton Foundation conference or a lavish Clinton Foundation trip overseas–make sure those individuals get some me-time w/ the Clintons… [...] The foreign-to-domestic laundering scheme satisfies a number of key Clinton objectives. First, it gave Secretary of State Hillary Clinton total plausible deniability about the millions in foreign cash that were being funneled into her family’s non-profit coffers. She wasn’t on the board of CGEPartnership, and wasn’t even named to the board of the Clinton Foundation until 2013, so how could she have known about this? Second, it gave Hillary’s allies the ability to claim that wealthy foreign individuals were not sending cash to the Clinton Foundation. How? Because they were sending cash to the Canadian CGEPartnership. And while Bill Clinton’s name is obviously in the organization’s name, he never actually served on its board while Hillary was Secretary of State. Instead, Clinton retained control of the organization by placing Bruce Lindsey on CGEPartnership’s board. Lindsey, a long-time Clinton confidant and adviser, currently serves as the chairman of the board of the Clinton Foundation. He was also the Clinton Foundation’s CEO for over a decade. http://thefederalist.com/2015/04/29/is-the-clinton-foundation-just-an-international-money-laundering-scheme/Great post and information, these lowlifes have long been on the end of the criminal uptown territory. I just wish the world can see it for what it is and network on social media /w associates around the world about how bad these people are. Hopefully, it reverberates back to other associates in the USA.
|
|
|
This week Saudi Arabia bombed an airfield in Yemen to prevent an Iranian aid plane from landing. Yemen's population is suffering severe food and water shortages after five weeks of US-backed Saudi bombing. As Ron Paul says in his latest Liberty Report below, this is reminiscent of the terrible civilian toll taken by US sanctions against Iraq before the US attack: Video of Ron Pauls's statements... http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2015/april/29/whos-starving-yemens-children/The interesting thing is that almost no one has a clue about this or what is going on on the ground in Yemen. Too bad the democrats aren't for the children in other places.
|
|
|
Make it happen Barry and I'm not talking about Barrack O. At some point soon this SM has to give us a boost.
|
|
|
bullish
every single one of these people needs putting down!! aka - euthanised aka - culled Because they are letting a bull out of a cage or are you talking about actual bullish folks on bitcoin? I don't think I've ever heard such terrible speak on this forum if the latter is true.
|
|
|
|