I've been here since day 1 up to week 59 and I am thankful for Freebitco.in and Hhampuz to be part of this amazing campaign. I am leaving this campaign now, thank you once again.
The funny thing is I'm more inclined to stay put in the SigCamp for the very reason there are benefits such as the affiliate links in the signature enabling users to build a base of extra sats (especially if a user is a high roller). Then there's the FUN token and the extra free rolls that go with it. Definately worth buying into. Hope you're successful in your new venture @rhomelmabini |
|
|
|
|
Not having seen any of the contenders, I just took a punt with the names as put in the OP - Of the ones I picked, I was only able to guess Best Director ( Chloe Zhao ) even then I was split between two nominees. The other being Emerald Fennell.
|
|
|
|
@justme_gamblin You are not fooling anyone by making a newbie account to spread the same lies and sling the same mud you just did in your real account. Unlike your unsubstantiated bullshit the allegations against you come with evidence of criminal activity on your part: [Flag] - "broke_tradah" installing hidden backdoor.I think people should go that one step further and also DT distrust these users via the [ Link] then placing ~justme_gamblin
~broke_tradah as there is evidence they are attempting to build a default trust via their various alts. |
|
|
|
Didn't Twitter become a multi billion dollar company from people re-copying each other's useless short posts? It's one of the reasons I don't like the site.
If you are referring to the "retweet" feature then it might interest you to know that "retweets" attribute the original poster of the tweet, so there isn't any confusion as to whether or not a person has made the post, or copied it (unless of course the second person copies the text of the first and does not attribute - that probably counts as plagiarism unless the context goes along the lines of "I read a tweet that said..." |
|
|
|
|
There's a certain irony that tokens and coins that felt the need to create billions, or even trillions of coins are now looking to burn coins to make that coin seem more desirable at the same time as investors in bitcoin lament the fact that only 21 million coins will ever be generated.
DOGE COIN is probably the exception at this pint with its price mooning all the while not having (AFAIK) burned any coins - ever - even though it has billions on the books.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been in various Signature Campaigns for a little bit over a year. All of the funds I've received so far I've been able to HODL and intend to do so into the future (we're talking multiple years here).
Why only the SigCamp funds? At present, I'm receiving $60 in BCT per week which is a good amount to put aside - it hasn't come out of my pocket, so I don't miss it. Anyone wanting to fund a weekly purchase of bitcoin should probably look at anywhere between $20 to $50 per week as an amount you can afford to set aside apart from any-other savings scheme you might have.
|
|
|
|
I couldn't agree more - AFAIK all of my wagers have been run - not sure if anyone else has outstanding bets (it'd be funny if we were waiting on something like the NFL or Wimbeldon results with a 100:1 wager)  Anyways, I don't think I'll claim the title as most of my wins were ~ 2:1 (not enough of a win) |
|
|
|
|
@pooya87 is near to what I was thinking in terms of open, send, close a LN channel to send payments for a SigCamp.
I see two options.
Firstly say 25% of your participants would prefer to receive via LN, you could either do the above, or, have a funding solution such as the one Phoenix offers whereby funds sent via the block-chain to a Phoenix wallet address are automatically turned into an open channel which you then send via LN to the participants. The CM knows the amount ahead of time so only send that amount to a Phoenix wallet (plus a little bit of dust to cover the outbound TX). Regardless of any corresponding inbound channel created by Phoenix, you don't have to close the channel as it's all inbound capacity.
The second option would be to send the (example) 25% participants funds in one block to an Escrow who would probably do the above (open a channel, send funds (keep open/close channel) ) anyway.
A CM might even open one super LN channel for (example) ten week's worth of payments. The Campaign funder can see the balance being used to open a channel and that it's still open week-to-week as the campaign progresses.
In the end, it'd be up to the other side to close the channel as they have to bulk of the channel's funds once payments have been made.
I haven't used Electum, so can't comment on the available options that program has.
|
|
|
|
You might want to check out the thread " How to sign a message?!" by shorena before you go and try to reinvent the wheel (or the thread as the case may be) over in the Beginners and Help section of the Forum. |
|
|
|
Let's assume this guy had 220 bitcoins to gamble with, then his account balance would have earned him DAILY INTEREST of 0.02410958 BTC to gamble with... and that makes for MONTHLY INTEREST (30d) of 0.72425178 BTC .... He might even had more coins on here.  I doubt that anyone in their right mind would deposit that amount of coins on this site, for 4% interest... it would make more sense to trade with it and to deposit smaller amounts daily from those profits. Here in Australia, the official cash rate by the Reserve Bank of Australia is sitting at 0.1 % and they themselves state the it won't go higher for multiple years. You can get a home loan for under 3.5%. According to https://bitcoindata.science/bitcoin-units-converter.html BTC 220 is worth approx $10.8M ( € 9.03M ) so it may be someone's retirement fund which they are comfortable gambling the interest off of. (Great work if you can get it)   |
|
|
|
Eh no, failing to score in the first half and leaking 18 points is not a good start
even though the bulldogs failed to score in the second the damage was done.
Anyway, today I have Storm who are going nicely.  It's not that the Cowboys played better than the Raiders, rather the Raiders played just that much worse than the Cowboys did.
In the earlier game, the Sharks fell behind the Bulldogs and then couldn't catch up to the 18 points the Bulldogs notched up earlier in the match.  The second half of Game eight has just started and it looks like another blood-bath for the Melbourne Storm over the New Zealand Warriors Pro14 Rainbow Cup Big win yesterday by Munster V Leinster [Ireland] a replay of the Pro14 final itself, This head to head is always going to be worth a watch, the top 2 teams in Irish RU. I didnt bet on that game, very difficult to pick IMO.
Good win by England over France, was always going to be a close affair and england take the Title also. Yesterdays results:  I had a bet on Wales' Women's team (but had a feeling Scotland would trounce them) and another on England's Women beating the French Women's side, so one win and one loss near breaks even. Closer to home, I'd picked Canterbury Crusaders beat the Blues but lost on the Waratahs Vs the Rebels. I've put 3000 on Telouse to win against Begles Bordeaux.
*edit* ... and just in the time it's taken me to type that up, it's now 30 - 10 with just under 25 mins left to play.  |
|
|
|
I'm a little lost here... You might want to correct the title of your thread - there's user Cobra - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49473Name: Cobra
Posts: 289 in 118 topics
Activity: 289
Earned Merit: 0
Position: Sr. Member
BPIP Rank: >1000
Status: INACTIVE
Date Registered: 2012-01-11, 01:51:11
Last Active: 2017-04-13, 00:55:01 and then there is the user Cbra - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=249495Name: Cbra
Custom Title: Bitcoin.org domain administrator
Posts: 122 in 87 topics
Activity: 122
Earned Merit: 371
Position: Full Member
BPIP Rank: #1058
DT level: DT2
Date Registered: 2014-02-14, 07:43:50
Last Active: Today at 09:58:42
Website: Bitcoin.org
Current Status: Offline Offline
Admin notes: This is one of the administrators of bitcoin.org Two very different users. |
|
|
|
sounds good, I will keep the OP updated with how many are available as well.
Sure thing, just remember that other than the ones I've already ordered and paid for anything can happen. So, if someone wants to buy the remaining cards, by all means sell to then first (we can always order more later on). |
|
|
|
update: the multi-currency wallets have arrived - the XUMM/XRP ones are still in transit - will update once I have all on hand.
there are still 5 multi-currency available, if anyone wants one!
I've realised I've got to update my phone to an NFC capable device, or, buy a Bluetooth/NFC capable gadget to clip onto my phone. Either way an upgrade is around the corner.I've got two people here that might be interested in getting the multi-currency wallets, but everything's going to be dependent on getting the wallet NFC android wallet and having a play around (which I"m looking forward to). Will advice if/wen these people want to upgrade and get a card. |
|
|
|
|
I feel the price band will be as low as $45,000 to $47,500 at the end of the month. Not sure what the actual price bands on freebitco.in are as I haven't looked in for a couple of days...
But I wouldn't be surprised if we see a lower correction just around the corner.
|
|
|
|
What a game today in the NRL between the Titans and Rabbitohs 30-40. I had a very small conservative bet on the Rabbitohs but at half time I was sweating, 24-10 to the titans. In play ATM are the Eels v Broncos, again I have the Eels to win, A small conservative bet to dip my toe into NRL  I've been out all night and only just got back home to discover my first three pics have all come up. Screen shot via https://www.nrl.com/  I managed to get online earlier in the night and was amazed at the scores of both games. The semi finals this year are going to be electric for all teams given how hard fort the matches have been.
NZ Super Rugby I'm going the Chiefs over the Hurricanes and the Crusaders over the Blues. |
|
|
|
|
I predicted in yet another one of these up/down/sideways threads that bitcoin would have a major slump starting at the end of March (context, after the pre 2020 Christmas surges) due to new to crypto finding themselves suddenly out of pocket and the unlimited increases in the price of bitcoin just won't happen. Once the rut begins (which it now has) there'll be a sharp dump, crash and burn.
Another reason for the price slum is simply no ones transactions are confirming. Plain and simple.
Feel free to leave the thread open - I'm curious to hear of anyone else who can say "I told you so"
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
