Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 08:10:39 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128] 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 546 »
2541  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: March 01, 2016, 01:33:03 PM
Zebpay Signature Campaign Report (22/02/2016 to 28/02/2016)

BTC Payout process for 2nd week of the campaign to registered participants completed Smiley

For details check: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OBhED5wfA0gb6ROU6L1lVlo-GGHvjfvybmUlfyCawDM/edit#gid=0

Participants are requested to post in India boards only.

Thanks.

Moved them to active accordingly -> http://pastebin.com/JDSb6psW
2542  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Cancel Transaction because of fee = 0? on: March 01, 2016, 01:28:38 PM
From what I know, it's not possible to cancel an unconfirmed transaction. The closest thing would be a dojble-spend attack. Seeing as you sent it without a fee, it will most likely be returned to your wallet within a few hours/days.

No! OP is using bitcoin core. Core does not "return" transactions, it constantly rebroadcasts them if they have been created with the wallet.

Just be patient and it'll come. On the other hand, it could confirm after a while but your only option right now is to wait and be patient. Always remember the fee, I know I've sent a few transactions without a fee and it took forever to get the Bitcoin transaction confirmed. Could you possibly post a txid so we could try to rebroadcast it or just check on the status?

A TX ID would be nice, yes. It will most likely show a low fee though.



@huberius you have two options

#1 keep core open and hope the TX will get picked up. This will happen eventually, but it might take days or weeks. Its difficult to say without knowing the details of the TX. It might be possible to get a confirmation even without fee, depending on the priority.

#2 remove the unconfirmed transaction from your wallet (more below) and wait another 24 hours so the rest of the network had a chance to forget about it. Create it again, this time with a higher fee.

To remove the TX from your wallet (assuming you dont run a pruned node!)

#1 close core
#2 make sure its closed
#3 start it with -zapwallettxes (make sure the spelling is correct), for windows you do this by:
#3.1 opening run (win + r)
#3.2 enter: c:\Program Files\Bitcoin\bitcoin-qt.exe -zapwallettxes (modify path if needed)
#3.3 confirm with ok
#4 core will forget about all transactions and rescan the local blockchain. This will re add all confirmed transactions, but not the unconfirmed one.
2543  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Transaction pending for over 15 hours...am I getting my btc anytime soon? on: March 01, 2016, 01:22:26 PM
I actually did not send the transaction , its beening sent to me.  Is it an easy thing to do to increase the fee of an existing unconfirmed Transaction ?

In this case there is not much you can do besides withholding your part (if its a trade) until its confirmed. I think it would be best to talk to the sender and discuss which way you want to go.

#1 keep reminding the network about the current TX and hope that it will get picked up eventually. I and others can help with that if you post the TX ID

#2 Hope that the network forgets about the current TX so the sender can recreate the TX with a higher fee.



I actually did not send the transaction , its beening sent to me.  Is it an easy thing to do to increase the fee of an existing unconfirmed Transaction ?

there's two ways. one makes it return to the sender's wallet and the other will need the sender to double spend it. basically it's up to the sender. you can only wait.
Lol wouldn't it be hilarious if someone tried trolling you by sending you a payment with very low fee?

You can try sending me some coins with a low fee if you want.
2544  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: March 01, 2016, 01:19:22 PM
cortexx066
1G2utWZJpUVc6XSQGiVAKkxmf7fTcGdyLR
2545  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: sats won't confirm on: March 01, 2016, 01:19:02 PM
There are currently a high number of unconfirmed transactions.



-> http://statoshi.info/dashboard/db/transactions

The most common reason for a slow confirmation is a fee that is too low compared to the other TX.

-> https://bitcoinfees.21.co/
2546  Other / Meta / Re: Tagging both operators and participants of Ponzi schemes is extremely effective on: March 01, 2016, 01:01:42 PM
As someone that fought ponzi OPs in the past and will so in the future under certain circumstances I applaud your effort, but I think its wasted. You may or may not see these as counter arguments. I dont really see them as such. They are my personal reasons why I no longer go around in that section and tag people. You can disagree with them without being wrong, they are at least partially subjective or based on my view on the world.

We have to assume people here are grown up. As such we further have to assume they did the proper research or are unable to do so. In either way, a negative rating will not affect them into rethinking their decisions. I see it similar to punishment and not as a consequence. A punishment can change behavior, but does not create insight or understand of the problem. The behavior is simply avoided openly in order to avoid the punishment. You as an external party can not create consequence for the ponzi, the ponzi OP and/or the "investors". A proper consequence would be loss, be that due to the ponzi OP running away or because "the round ended". Even though these consequences are constantly present, people keep "investing".

Any attempt to educate those you hate and distrust will not be fruitful, because you are unable to see their perspective and change it bit by bit to communicate yours. There is no interaction, but you create a barrier instead.

The flashy red warnings (we had them in the past, didnt we?) will like be reported and removed as spam (they did in the past, didnt they?). If not the ponzi operators can and will create self moderated threads to remove the posts.

This forum has a very non nanny state approach and while it creates things I dont like, I think many of these things have to be tolerated in a free society.

I personally draw my line when they advertise their ponzis outside their section, e.g. in their signatures and I will continue to mark those that do so.
2547  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Pruning? on: March 01, 2016, 12:11:34 PM
-snip-
kein FullNode mehr sonderen ein Zwischendingsbums Smiley

Kann man drüber streiten, ich würd sagen: Ist noch n full node, kann aber keine anderen Full Nodes mehr erschaffen. Es werden weiterhin alle TX und Blöcke geprüft und weitergeleitet oder eben nicht. Nur "alte" Blöcke werden nicht angeboten. Wenn man "full" in "full node" als "fully validating" versteht, hat man das auch mit weniger Blöcken auf der Platte oder Karte.
2548  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: payment confirmation zero from past 5 hrs on: March 01, 2016, 12:04:57 PM
Nothing more to do, you need to wait.

You can follow network's state here:

https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

https://chain.btc.com/en/

https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin

People making transactions now will pay a bigger fee than previous transactions and go ahead of all the suckers that've been waiting for long hours.

I have learned that if anyone else send the push to priority then it may be more chance of getting confirmation, can you help me to push my transaction to priority. so that it can get confirmation soon.

Pushing the transaction does not change its priority, it just makes sure the network does not forget about it. In your case I would argue you should wait for the network to forget about the TX and resend with a higher fee.
2549  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 forces me to pay a certain fee. on: March 01, 2016, 12:03:18 PM
Could it be to avoid a dust change output?

How large are the input(s) you use and how many you want to send?
2550  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: why transactions are taking too long ? on: March 01, 2016, 11:56:10 AM
I dont know if its an attack or just high demand, but its true there is a high number of TX waiting for a confirmation. People will have to step up on fees if they want to avoid waiting.

Code:
$ bitcoin-cli getmempoolinfo
{
  "size": 27281,
  "bytes": 52437613,
  "usage": 118470704,
  "maxmempool": 300000000,
  "mempoolminfee": 0.00000000
}



2551  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Pending payments on: March 01, 2016, 11:32:03 AM
I have 2 pending payments from 2 days ago , still 0 confirmations . What's possible to do ?
thanks

Payments to you? Nothing, but reminding the network about the transactions (rebroadcasting them)

Payments you made? The same as above or let the network forgot about them and resend them with a higher fee.

Can you post the transaction IDs and which wallet software/service you use?
2552  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: A transaction has 0 priority on: March 01, 2016, 11:09:22 AM
Chaining transactions after each other makes no sense. The idea behind this is "CPFP" (child pays for parent), but this is not commonly implemented by miners.
2553  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Beware of users scamming WITH escrow! on: March 01, 2016, 10:58:35 AM
-snip-
og isnt online at the moment, and i need to go in 30 mins.

ok, send me your address, i'll send you 0.0375 BTC with double fees(0.0002 BTC), you can either wait for the conf or you can choose to trust me, then you send me $17 PM. Then we do this again.

Thanks

Alright we will do 50/50

1EAFZnCQZFxBmerD3fiEuVXbHtb8CaSDMa

BTW: OgNasty is invisible.. I used him before ;-)

Hope this helps.

I dont see how this is related to fake escrow PMs.
2554  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: how to get back the bitcoins if I fail to send ? on: March 01, 2016, 10:48:20 AM
can you do this on blockchain.info, stopping the broadcast or would you need a software to do this because I deposited small amounts of btc on a gambling account and it said I have to deposit more btc to play but I don't have anymore Support wont help either,
Anyway i can get around this?

Not with blockchain.info no, but they return your coins to you after 3 days IIRC.

Alternatively you would have to export the private key into a different wallet (e.g. electrum).
2555  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: No Confirmations, no transaction? on: March 01, 2016, 10:44:55 AM
allright..

fact is: There are, after -rescan and -zapwallettxes,loading the complete blockchain again and so on, no btc in my wallet.. I guess my transaction is therefore not forgotten and cancelled by mempool.

Does it still show in the list of transactions? Did you update the a version that is no longer called "qt"? -zapwallettxes will not exist in <0.9 versions AFAIK.

i would doublespend, but i never did this before and i read several threads about it.. seems not to be a perfectly safe way if you mess around the wrong way.. As yóu might already know: I'm no genius on this topic

If i double spent or receive the btc back is the same to me at this moment; i just want a safe way to get my disappeared btc back somehow..

edit: yeah, i learned now.. I payed a fee of 0.0001, will never ever go again with a fee lower than 0.01.. This whole thing i ruining my nerves so hard and isn't worth 1 or 2 bucks

edit: I found this "ERROR: CTxMemPool::accept() : nonstandard transaction type" like a thousand times in my debug window... should this mean the mempool declined my tx or accepted it?

I really hope someone understands what happened here and could help me out

The error has nothing to do with your transaction, its about transactions of others. Bitcoin core (again, newer versions) is good at estimating fees, 0.01 will almost always be too much.
2556  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: 0 blocks received in the last 4 hours on: March 01, 2016, 10:31:34 AM
Also notice that the daemon's memory usage starts to grow tremendously

Code:
39843 nobody         15  22    2  6186M  1746M uwait   3  94.4H   0.00% bitcoind

Probably because all those transactions are piling up.

With an update to 0.12 you can limit the amount of RAM used for transactions (300 MB by default).
2557  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: March 01, 2016, 09:41:03 AM
-snip-
After a successful first week, we're now stopping the Free Tipster Competition signature campaign (we'll probably restart it at a later point in time).

removed it -> http://pastebin.com/sx9sfVUb

we can just add it again when you continue.
2558  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: BTC Node installieren on: March 01, 2016, 09:34:04 AM
Vielen Dank für die Info

Sagmal, wie würdest du den Node konfigurieren, was würdest du warum wie einstellen?
Würde gerne von deinen / euren Erfahrungen lernen.

Gruß
Willi

Das kommt drauf an. Mein VPS z.B. ist anders konfiguriert:

Code:
server=1
daemon=1
-rpc zeugs-
maxconnections=42
disablewallet=1
dbcache=4
rpcthreads=1
prune=40000
minrelaytxfee=0.00002

um den Bedarf an Arbeitsspeicher zu reduzieren ist der dbcache auf den minimalen Wert gesetzt, die Wallet ausgestellt und die Anzahl der Verbindungen beschränkt.

Sofern keine Problem bestehen oder Du bestimmte Sachen machen möchtest, würde ich erstmal bei den default Einstellungen bleiben.
2559  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: ~18 hours with recommended fee's, still no confirmation :( on: March 01, 2016, 09:24:46 AM
The double spend[1] is confirmed. You may want to use the fee estimate by core and make sure its ready to avoid these issues in the future. It shows a small text warning when its not ready, in this case wait a few more blocks.

[1] https://blockchain.info/tx/e2ffaf2034f8124904ef9441d32b8ded98dc7b56cff732208a1aa9e35d45a612
2560  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Reindexing blocks (5 years...) on: March 01, 2016, 09:09:20 AM
I think that a full reindex is slower and less reliable than anyone likes to admit to.

Its needed to fix certain errors, not sure what time frame you consider "slower than like to admit".

0.12.0 has changed some stuff which might index the chain differently enough to want reindexing.
In linux at a terminal,
after [file][quit] to stop bitcoin if it had autostarted at login,
bitcoin-qt -reindex -datadir=/home/username/.bitcoin &

You dont have to pass the default datadir.

I'd expect that to run for three days straight on an average 3GHz quadcore such as an i5 with plenty (>=3GB) of RAM

Id expect <24 hours with 0.12.

If that runs for a random length of time between an hour and a day before crashes, try moving (?deleting) /.bitcoin/database/ and /.bitcoin/peers.dat and then
bitcoin-qt -reindex -datadir=/home/username/.bitcoin &

Why delete the peers.dat? Also there is no /.bitcoin/database folder, are you refering to chainstate maybe?

Once a reindex has completed, you can start BTC as normal at login or from its icon, and it remembers the location of your /.bitcoin/

As for how to speed things up, it is indexing every BTC transaction ever.  Perhaps could someone comment on pruned nodes ?

Pruned nodes dont store the entire blockchain, but only a part of it. What exactly is your question?



Anyone know if there's any way to accelerate this reindex?
Get better hardware. Tongue

I think the setting the -dbcache=<n> where N is the size in megabytes of the cache to a larger size might make it faster.

dbcache=4096 is a speedup, but it will result in core using ~5.5 GB of memory.

I recently did a full sync in 8.5 hours[1] with 2/4 i5 cores on a mechanical disk. It significantly slows shutdown time though, so I wouldnt use that as a normal setting.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1357766.msg14008753#msg14008753
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128] 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 546 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!