The site seems to be down. When was the last time someone accessed and played on Multidice?
I can see that their forum representative hasn't logged in since November 2022.
Does anyone have any more news? Is their faucet still working?

Hi FortuneJack,

I have a thread where I keep track of Crypto Casinos with The Best Faucets, and FortuneJack is on that list due to its dice faucet. I noticed that you made some changes to said faucet. I can no longer claim it as I could in the past where I got 5 free claims daily. You now call it airdrop where you apparently give free spins and cash.

Can you give me some more information about it and how it works so I can update the table? How often can you claim it? Is there a cooldown period? How big are the rewards? Do I need to have an empty balance or make a real money bet every time before claiming it again? 

Satoshi didn't create the forum as we know it, and he never made a single post on Bitcointalk. The forum's original domain changed twice until it finally became Bitcointalk.org. Satoshi was active in the initial forum on sourceforge.net. After that, the forum moved to bitcoin.org. I think it wasn't until 2011/12 that it finally became Bitcointalk. Satoshi was long gone by then.

There are reasons why it's necessary sometimes to copy-paste text, without having it be considered as plagiarism. There are two conditions for something to be plagiarized.

1. You make it look and sound like it's your original words.
2. You don't give credit to the original author.

Since you brought up Satoshi, I can begin a sentence by saying, Satoshi once said, "Satoshi's words here."
Even if I didn't put the source link, it's not plagiarism because I am not claiming the sentence as mine. I stated that Satoshi said it, not me. So, the first condition of plagiarism hasn't been met. Should you do it like that? Better not, just to be on the safe side. You don't want to give the admins question marks above their heads whether to ban you or not. So paste the link and be done with it.

They still have 5 days to respond.

That's why it's important to evaluate each case separately and objectively, putting aside any love or hate you might have for a user or casino that is involved.

I somewhat agree, but don't forget, those marketing investments need to be financed somehow.
If the casino refuses to discuss the case publicly and goes through a mediator that decides against them, that's the only proof we have that they are wrong. Same thing if the mediator sides with the casino. Since they won't share any information publicly in 99% of the cases, there is no other way.

I have never heard of PAW or the PawZone token, but it doesn't matter.
I browsed around a little and noticed the project is holding an official giveaway right now as part of their listing on a new exchange. The information is available on their Twitter feed > https://twitter.com/PawZoneToken/status/1643565743676739584.

Even before the latest listing, that token got listed on some other exchanges. The scammers are just trying to take advantage of the current situation to scam people out of their tokens. The fake site you mentioned in your OP is only 4 days old.

You weren't banned for what you said, but for what they believe you did. The discord screenshots mention sportsbook abuse and using multiple accounts. If you had previous accounts on Rollbit (which you won't admit if you have), they would have noticed them while doing their manual checks. That and some sports betting abuse are the reasons for your ban, not the fact you made one bet or talked badly with their staff.

Get in touch with their forum admin if you believe you are innocent.
Rollbitcom

If you aren't, don't waste time by prolonging the inevitable.

This can prove difficult to implement. As you stated previously, you don't know the content of the uploaded data, so you can't check what the buyer received. You also can't know if the buyer is lying and got the correct product, but is lying about it to get a refund. Unless you can form your opinion based on a hash of the updated file or something. How would this new system of yours work?

You still won't be able to see the content of password-protected or encrypted archives. What prevents you, theoretically, to report anything you want yourself (if that's a necessity) and get anything that is being sold for free?

What's even more surprising is that people are trying to abuse them with multiple accounts and get caught. The faucet amounts are so insignificant, making it almost impossible to reach a point where you will collect enough to be able to request a withdrawal. Doing that with multiple accounts is an incredible waste of time and resources that could be better spent elsewhere.

Update:

- I have added WeedDaddy to the table with with their faucet details.
- I wasn't able to log in or reset my password for BetFury due to a "Error 1015, You are being rate limited" notification. Disappointing. *SOLVED
- I couldn't find the faucet option on bspin anymore. I will remove the casino from the table if the support confirm that it's no longer available. *SOLVED
- I have checked and updated the needed information for sites until Rocket.Run. I will check the rest later.
- I couldn't log in or reset my password on MintDice, so I can't confirm the data for this casino. *SOLVED
- Multidice seems to be down, so I couldn't check the faucet on this site. * This casino has been removed from the table.

There is now a 3rd-party with CasinoGuru that is looking into the provided documents as well. They have a say, and will comment on the authenticity of what you gave them.

In the first instance, the ruling didn't go your way. Both CasinoGuru and AskGamblers ruled in the casino's favor. I think it was CG that mentioned that they think the provided KYC documents were edited. Two things could have happened:
1) You edited and submitted fake documents
2) TrustDice manipulated and altered the documents themselves

This isn't something a neutral party can possibly know. Only you and TrustDice know what you did and didn't do.

If TrustDice continues to claim that an (allegedly) authenticated document by an official notary is fake, but CasinoGuru says it's real, and the notary has verified it with his signature and stamp, then the casino is the guilty party here. However, if both sides come to a conclusion that you presented a false document, you will lose the benefit of the doubt.

As someone who has tagged this casino in the past for lying and taking money that doesn't belong to them, I have no problem doing it again.

I remain skeptical. Still, I don't know if submitting such reports has helped with similar sites in the past, has it?

If we go back to how Google handled the whole ChipMixer situation, we can clearly see they don't care what is right and what is wrong. I mean, you couldn't get the genuine ChipMixer domain to pop up in the Google results, but there were plenty of fake phishing sites. Those got reported, and Google didn't do anything about it.   

It would be good if the site didn't appear in Google results, but I am not sure if your recommendation will work. That page is for reporting phishing sites as it says on the top.

https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/?hl=en

CoinPayCard.net is not a phishing site created to resemble a different service and trick users into entering their logins or personal information. It's a scam service that has started stealing its client's money. Maybe there is a better way to get Google's attention.

OK, the CasinoGuru website is up and running again and I can see the latest updates. All parties have confirmed they have the needed documents and TrustDice now has 7 days to respond and make a decision. I doubt the OP would have jumped through all these hoops if he wasn't telling the truth. But that's my subjective interpretation of the whole incident. Let's see.
 

sername: Pmalek
BTC addy: bc1qc3nuawxfjrwfn2vlhvgtn6zxlq7fx2nl364vc6

That's one reason I don't believe OP lost money. If you lost money like that, wouldn't you try to keep and make backups of as much proof as possible and not delete your account? That's the first thing I find sketchy. The second thing is, he claims he first lost $350, and instead of taking the rest of his money and leaving, he decides to play some more. I guess he is a good Samaritan trying to save Bitcointalk from one casino while advertising a rival platform. Very believable.     

21 - Pmalek
Thanks

Create your own bet365 account instead of purchasing accounts from other people. You were either banned from using bet365, you are underaged, or you live in a territory where you can't sign up with bet365. In either case, you shouldn't have an account, and any money you spend on it can be wasted if and when they discover who is accessing it.

@alol1986
You don't need to communicate with the casino at all at this stage. The mediator between you and the casino is now Casino Guru. I can see from the last reply in your CG thread that TrustDice has confirmed they have received the document. Now you have to give them some time so inspect it. Have you provided the same document to Casino Guru as well? There seems to be some maintenance now on the CG website and I can no longer check it.

Something is not right about that. Your balance increases and decreases in the hundreds even if you are wagering $2.40 per spin. At 0:15 in the video, you don't even win, but it takes your balance up from $556 to $676. And then in the following spin, it goes down from $676 to $546. It continues going crazy all the time even after that. At one point going from $414 to $156.

Another example. At 0:33, you don't win but your balance still increases from $151 to $293. A few seconds later, it goes up to $432, then down to $277. Etc., etc.

I don't think those bets happened in those amounts. It must be a bug as some people mentioned. It would have been more credible if your video also showed you betting history where everyone could see hundreds of dollars being wagered and your balance going up and down in those amounts. 

I haven't done any updates in that thread since January, so some information might have changed or the faucets could have been removed altogether. I will try to check it soon. Generally speaking, the days of faucets are long gone. They are good for testing purposes and maybe trying some strategies on particular games, but not as a way of winning. The amounts on offer are mostly worth a few cents.