https://www.spotrac.com/nba/golden-state-warriors/cap/2021/ according to this site, the Warriors owe 170 million dollars for the luxury tax of 2021-2022 season. I'm not 100% sure if I am reading that correctly, but it looks correct.

They also are 71 million dollars over the salary cap for 2022-2023 season so far.

It's obvious they don't care a ton about money or they woulda broke off some pieces before last season started. As long as the team makes a profit on the season, the owner is gonna keep over spending IMO.

It was almost a shot at $64 as the viewers voted on strawpoll whether to let it ride or not. In the end it was voted not to gamble, but Eddie showed the outcome anyways and the users would have won.

The stream is starting to really grow and has been near or over 7000 viewers the last 2 weekends. The requirements need tweaked IMO, but that's not my call. Was very hard to claim some of the earlier bonuses.

It's preseason, there really is no smart move when it comes to preseason. It's just another option for the degenerates out there. If I was to pick 1 game I feel is a lock I would probably go Pit -3, otherwise I would be looking at the over/unders.

I'm not sure the warriors owner or GM cares about the salary cap. They were over the cap this year and paid the luxury tax I believe. It's really just a matter of do they value Draymond and I think they do.

Draymond is a huge asset to the warriors. His basketball IQ is off the charts. He plays excellent defense and really gets under opponents skin causing them to play bad. Warriors may not agree to a max contract but ill bet they offer him something he will accept. He's  too valuable to them.

1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.

Let's keep the posts on topic guys. This is a thread about trust lists, not 1 about Jollygood or this 16x guy. I don't mind a little off topic when diving into trusting a certain user, but whining about getting tagged is another subject.

The feedback is correct or at least was, but it was given at a bad time. Prior to the bitlucy drama, Royse was considered a decent person and did help out with charity work. Feedback from Hhampuz and cryptoprenuerboss should have been left well before the bitlucy scam happened. It looks pretty suspect they leave the feedback trying to counter the drama. So timing really is the only issue with the feedback.

The guy thinks his posts are hurting Bitsler for some reason. He really needs to rethink his strategy and quit being a waste of life if ya ask me.

I kept all the people on my ~ list, I just removed the people whom I trust. I don't need the list to tell me who I trust. I've been around long enough to know who is a trustworthy person and who isn't.

So many people like to look for behavior that is not normal and start a witch hunt for whatever reason. That's the only reason I have made it public.

Correct, DT=default trust and some are merit sources but being on DT doesn't make you a merit source. It's a totally different thing.

I seen that when I was checking bpip and you dropped off my list.

Agreed

Which brings up another point. If users shouldn't be on DT1 then why the hell are they even eligible? Kinda makes no sense.

Jollygood and Royse have drama between them, they are not letting it spew out amongst the rest of the community as far as it leading to more silly tags. Having an opinion shouldn't keep you from DT. That's why I think when someone makes a new account to voice an opinion it needs to be ignored. Not because their opinion may be right or wrong, but more because they shouldn't hide. If I wanna call someone a bitch I will. No reason for me to hide, I want a person to know what I think about them.

Some users post an opinion and are unwilling to compromise or see anyone else's point of view. They are right and you cannot change their minds. I think those types( hell I may be that way at times but eventually i calm down and come to my senses lol) need to take a day and think before they react or post on a topic. Posting with a hothead is just gonna cause more drama and maybe tags that are inappropriate. Usually the community steps up and tells someone when they're being dumb and people come to their senses, but like I said above noone should get tagged for their opinion even if it might be a bad opinion.

Just as eddie13 said, your word is more powerful than DT. I would like to think he was referring to every user, not just myself.

People are trying to manipulate DT to gain reputation on this forum and eventually someone gonna do a huge scam because of it. A user can easily manipulate the system and gain IMO false reputation in the community just by hanging out in the collectibles section. Bid on some auctions, buy some shit, sell some shit, and boom gain positive ratings and likely inclusions. All that and never making a post outside of collectibles. Hence why we need 2 systems. A user hanging out buying and selling likely doesn't participate in the rest of the forum and shouldn't be in a position to make decisions about other users. They should be labeled an honest and trustworthy trader, not a community rep.

Welcome to the light!!!

11 replies to this topic so far and 6 have all talked about the forum rep not being active here anymore. Can someone say sig spam? Cmon guys let's not all say the same damn thing to get our post counts in. Read other replies before making a comment.

OP I suggest contacting efialtis as he is likely your only chance.

I decided to take a bit of advice and clear my trust list. dkbit98 made a suggestion and while I do not think it would force theymos to do anything, I do think DT isn't really a prestigious position to hold any longer. Also a bit tired of the drama and manipulation that is seen by users when it comes to DT. I may change my mind later but for now my trust list is empty. My distrust list still exists for now.

Not making this thread because I feel any of you care or need to know, but if someone goes looking at DT and wants to know why here is your answer.

Read a little more clearly. It says placed sportsbets, not anything about sportsbet.io. It is just saying that the user bets sports on casinos and does not read the rules of that casinos sportsbetting platform. What is a valid bet and what isn't.

Depends on the game but 1 thing I was always told when playing no limit texas hold em was " play bad you lose". 100% a true statement in my opinion.

Can you make money regularly gambling? I wouldn't suggest trying. Just have fun and gamble amounts that you can afford to lose.

Robbing bitcoiners since 2009? Guess that's not really a good slogan but certainly true at times.

Did you have multiple bets placed on the same game? If so, why not bet them all in 1 bet? Likely because you were trying to stay under the radar? I tend to side with a casino in cases like this assuming a player made multiple bets on the same match.

Being on DT is no longer a prestigious thing. It's like waking up, everyone can do it. I and others have already said there needs to be a change. We can keep what we have for reputation based feedback( which is what should matter as far as the forum goes), and we need a different system for trades as they are 2 totally different things.

He could stream on Twitch, Discord, Dlive, or maybe something like tiktok. There are always options if someone needed to find one.