If all mistakes are addressed to bounty participants, then that person is very stupid, because basically every project that creates a campaign in the forum is always looking for participants for the promotion section even though the number is sometimes limited, then what is the bounty participant for if in the end they always to blame and if the project which does not have a bounty participant, the token price will not go down? try everyone to think about this for a moment so as not to immediately accuse him with completely inaccurate evidence.

Yes, it is clear that they are scammers who do not go straight after cheating, especially if they are the big investors, so by mistake they have made no one to punish them, but directly their names will also be damaged and tainted in all eyes other investors.

If you don't know or fully understand the market, why would you say that some DeFi is still profitable at the moment? In fact, some people have said that DeFi has started to fail the Hype, even though you can't ignore some DeFi projects that you think can still benefit you this year.

Yes, the team that hides their faces is a team that is less professional in general, because they are very afraid that their faces will be known by many people when they want to cheat suddenly during the project journey, so it is better if projects with such teams are avoided if we have lots of doubts about it.

Indeed, not all projects have greedy developers, it's just that the average of them are greedy so that every year there are always more successful scam projects, so in general the promises from the developers must always be considered carefully so that we all not easily swallowed up by an uncertain promise to happen.

Obviously everyone who follows the campaign is based on their heart's desire, not the desire or coercion of others, because everyone is free to choose the campaign he likes and based on the results that we have individually analyzed, for Escrow's advice it is good but if it is not there is, then we ourselves have to determine it, keep believing in the project or even leave it.

1. Best Moderator .......................... hilariousandco, Cyrus
2. SpamBuster .............................. I Don't know
3. ScamBuster .............................. I Don't know
4. Golden Feather .......................... Theymos
5. Event of the Year ......................  Bitcointalk Community Awards, ETH 2.0
6. Fail of the Year .........................  DeFi
7. Discovery of the Year ...............   CryptopreneurBrainboss, icopress
8. Bitcoin Geek ............................. xenon131
9. Bitcointalk Ninja .......................  LoyceV, TryNinja
10. Craft Master ............................ yahoo62278
11. Antihero ................................. I Don't know
12. Absolute Hero of Good .............  satoshi, The Pharmacist
13. Miss Bitcointalk ......................   I Don't know

I chose these people for the Bitcointalk Community Awards [Voting 2020], although there are a few more that are very worthy to be chosen, but I'm also a little confused about which one to choose.

Yes, the average bounty project hunter prefers projects that have been listed on several exchanges, because that will clearly show how much profit they will get while participating in the project.

It's amazing, and when you have studied this protocol completely, don't forget to share it here because I'm sure there are still many people who haven't studied this one protocol in depth or completely.

Actually, all people who want money or big profits are not blind, it's just that the average of them are too hasty in making decisions and always want to get rich quick, so that it makes them lose money by losing the money they use in crypto because of their desire. it is used by scammers in crypto.

In general, Ripple is a good and good token, but in particular Ripple is no match for Bitcoin because so far no token has been able to move Bitcoin to the bottom of the rankings, so even though Ripple doesn't have a good move like other tokens on the market, it does not. still in a good category as a token.

Everyone can indeed do research on whitepapers, concepts, and other things in a project, but that also cannot immediately give fully whether the project is a scam or not, because there are many projects that can make whitepapers, concepts, and other different things. with other projects but it can still be a scam when their campaign period starts to end.

Yes, storing coins and tokens in the long term is very risky because market conditions often change every year and predictions that often miss predictions make someone have to think a few if they want to save coins or tokens in the long term, because they take a little bit more profit better than nothing.

Actually it was not the work of DeFi, but the act of the Ethereum platform whose gwei costs suddenly increased until it was not controlled by the owner itself, and this is a lot of reason because the development of ETH 2.0 is still not finished until now.

That's right, and one more thing if we invite people who are not familiar with technological developments or who don't know crypto at all, then indirectly we will also be a little difficult to provide understanding to them so we have to have more time for those who sometimes delayed our own work because of them.

It is true, but we must be able to show this positive view in real terms to every country in the world, because if we just say it by mouth or through words it is clear they will not believe this, because for those who do not understand crypto in a real The general public will always see it with a negative perspective, so what is needed here is to show positive actions for them so that they can believe in crypto indirectly.

It is very unfortunate, because the average UNI token reward is given to those who have traded on Uniswap before September 1, even so, don't be sad because there are also many other people who haven't got it, btw I see the price of UNI tokens is getting up for now.

Teaching other people will certainly take a lot of time, and for people who have already entered crypto, they definitely have a job that they have to do well coupled with their daily work in the real world, so teaching requires special time, moreover. if what we teach is not familiar with crypto at all.

There are two options that we can do if we have very few coins, the first thing is to find the exchange where the coin is listed, then see the amount of trading volume there along with the minimum deposit amount for that coin, if it meets the requirements then you can immediately deposit for traded, but if the minimum deposit is a little bigger than the number of coins we have, then buy that coin again on the exchange at a slightly cheaper price, then transfer it to your wallet so you can deposit it again when the price starts to rise in that exchange. , this is just a simple way, but if you have another way, then you can ignore the advice that I give this.

It's not impossible, but sometimes they don't want to assign someone to be their escrow, because the person who is used for escrow must also be paid by the project team and usually that person is someone who is truly trusted in this forum.