|
Already on bittrex, interesting. This will probably only go up then.
|
|
|
|
@impulse2000 what does your bat file look like for myr-gr algo? does the pool-side hashrate agree with your local hashrate?
i'm still only able to get 10% of local hashrate to show at the pool , even using --diff 0.039xxxx
If the hashrate is too low poolside, increase the diff until you get rejects locally. |
|
|
|
Spreadcoin is up 125% today. My donation spreadminer is very profitable.  A copy can be yours for only 0.1 btc You're getting people to buy your miner by pointing out a pump and dump? You had to know that they really wouldn't have any time to mine before the dump - and the miner is useless for any other coin. Really, that behavior irks me somewhat. Not that I'm a saint, but IMO it's deliberately misleading. So, I took a few hours out of today to dust off my CUDA skills and look at your X11 miner. This is yours, on a GTX 860M: Maxwell card, compute 5.0 (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/spx11stock-12262015.pngThis is what it looks like on the same card, same stock clocks, after I spent a few hours on it (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolfx11ccminer-12262015.pngBoth done with CUDA 6.5. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that appears to be a 15.03% increase. I ain't lost a step. Nice! I wish you'd do more CUDA. |
|
|
|
Spreadcoin is up 125% today. My donation spreadminer is very profitable. A copy can be yours for only 0.1 btc This was the last coin I have mined solo, I only stopped because DEV is gone for good (Mr.Spread)....I simply can't remember the hash in the 980's....but 125% is huge, congrats!  I started mining it a few days ago when the net hashrate was about 200 mhs (now it's ~700 mhs). Sold over a thousand coins for a bit over 3k sat each.  I loved this coin when it was announced but I though it was completely lost by now and now it once again have close to 40 BTC volume. If I ever decide to clone a coin it will probably be close to Spread. |
|
|
|
Can you post coin mining statistics please.
Do you mean this? { "blocks" : 317, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 50.89078037, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414, "search-interval" : 1 }, "blockvalue" : 4500000000, "netmhashps" : 4967.59630314, "netstakeweight" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "", "pooledtx" : 0, "stakeweight" : { "minimum" : 0, "maximum" : 0, "combined" : 0 }, "stakeinterest" : 3000000, "testnet" : false } |
|
|
|
|
"blocks" : 122,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.06548870,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 1
},
"blockvalue" : 4500000000,
"netmhashps" : 0.23092925,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
|
|
|
|
Another coin with a useless token PoW stage for ~3 days for 5555 coins while there's 25k premined. And of course there's PoS as well so the premine will stake as well. Edit: and this got a pool from oc? |
|
|
|
R9 Nano mining results + power draw
This is pretty crazy especially considering that it's based on the same 28nm process as the Maxwell series. As if GPU mining profitability taking a huge dive wouldn't be bad enough, AMD stomping on Nvidia once again is making things kind of sad. agreed - but having that sort of competition is good ... it makes improvements in code and sdk - such that the optimal performance will be standard and NOT just for the elite ... good figures for the 980 btw ... #crysx Very true. Although I'd love some more competition within Nvidia as well. |
|
|
|
|
mshta.exe is a legit windows file but of course anything could be named like that. Always run wallets in a sandbox where wallets doesn't have write privileges in system folders and even read privileges for other wallets and important files/drives.
You could check when the file was created and compare that to when your wallets were downloaded.
|
|
|
|
R9 Nano mining results + power draw
This is pretty crazy especially considering that it's based on the same 28nm process as the Maxwell series. As if GPU mining profitability taking a huge dive wouldn't be bad enough, AMD stomping on Nvidia once again is making things kind of sad.
|
|
|
|
Ehm... the difficulty retarget doesn't seem to work correct at all!
How come the devs don't recognize such a obvious problem?
The oscillations are ridiculous!!! Something is VERY wrong here.
What is even more annoying is a few miners do not support the network at all, they wait until the difficulty drops to an insanely low rate then point a bunch of hashing power at one of the pools. They then mine a bunch of coins really quickly while the miners that actually support the network get almost no coins for their efforts during this time due to the very quick turn around the larger miners are able to produce blocks, leaving smaller miners with no shares. This then drives the difficulty way up and they leave the smaller miners to support the network and mine for another 20-22 hours for almost no reward. The miner e5e on yacoin club is one of the worst offenders. All he is doing is taking a bunch of coins and offering no network support at all. The oscillation of the difficulty needs to be fixed, this is a joke. As long as the difficulty retarget keeps being a joke and allows for such huge oscillation, it will get exploited. It's not the miners fault they don't mine when the difficulty is so high that they are just wasting electricity. The difficulty doesn't adjust if the TWO miners that actually support the network stop mining. So e5e is a complete a**hole and is taking advantage of the TWO miners that actually are keeping this coin alive. Guess what, if everyone was like e5e the coin would die and then it's value would be next to nothing. So no, it's not a waste of electricity to support a coin that you mine. e5e is defecating where he eats by mining this coin for 30 minutes a day for a reward of like 10,000 per day while the other miners get very little for what they do in exchange for allowing him to be able to exploit it. I guess those 2 miners should stop wasting electricity and let the coin die. I think you should read up on what the difficulty actually means because apparently you have absolutely no idea. uh... if the other miners stop mining then blocks are not minted and difficulty does not adjust. I understand it just fine. The only thing pushing the difficulty forward (up or down) is the miners that mine during the times when the difficulty is completely out of whack. Staking does not adjust the mining difficulty so it will ONLY adjust when people are mining. Clearly YOU have no idea how difficulty adjustments work. Seriously why are you even carrying this conversation forward, it's like you are rooting for the guys that are destroying the coin and the network stability. Get lost. I know exactly what I'm talking about and the difficulty retarget here is seriously flawed. It takes way too many blocks for it to actually retarget and by the time it tries to retarget it always way overshots the difficulty, this is why we have flashmine periods with very low difficulty (which doesn't change for hundreds of blocks) and barely any blocks with super high difficulty. |
|
|
|
Let’s look at a simple machine: AMD core, 8Gbyte of DDR3 memory, SSD, 5 Radeon GPU (R290x), two Enermax 1200W power supply etc.; that will cost us around £2000. Say we want to earn this back in two years and look at energy costs per watt that we need to mine LEOcoin. Before the recent nFactor-update we calculated that any price below 1,25£ would not cover your costs, unless you are using older hardware or very cheap energy. So, is LEOcoin with it’s current price of around 12 pence undervalued? You can answer that yourself.
Nobody owning mining rigs with half a brain is still mining LEO for a long while now. And I have to say that any miner with a ROI well over a year is doing something terribly wrong. Anyway, I got no answer so I take it as a reinforcement of my skepticism and so I won't be commenting here because it's entirely pointless at this point. |
|
|
|
Ehm... the difficulty retarget doesn't seem to work correct at all!
How come the devs don't recognize such a obvious problem?
The oscillations are ridiculous!!! Something is VERY wrong here.
What is even more annoying is a few miners do not support the network at all, they wait until the difficulty drops to an insanely low rate then point a bunch of hashing power at one of the pools. They then mine a bunch of coins really quickly while the miners that actually support the network get almost no coins for their efforts during this time due to the very quick turn around the larger miners are able to produce blocks, leaving smaller miners with no shares. This then drives the difficulty way up and they leave the smaller miners to support the network and mine for another 20-22 hours for almost no reward. The miner e5e on yacoin club is one of the worst offenders. All he is doing is taking a bunch of coins and offering no network support at all. The oscillation of the difficulty needs to be fixed, this is a joke. As long as the difficulty retarget keeps being a joke and allows for such huge oscillation, it will get exploited. It's not the miners fault they don't mine when the difficulty is so high that they are just wasting electricity. The difficulty doesn't adjust if the TWO miners that actually support the network stop mining. So e5e is a complete a**hole and is taking advantage of the TWO miners that actually are keeping this coin alive. Guess what, if everyone was like e5e the coin would die and then it's value would be next to nothing. So no, it's not a waste of electricity to support a coin that you mine. e5e is defecating where he eats by mining this coin for 30 minutes a day for a reward of like 10,000 per day while the other miners get very little for what they do in exchange for allowing him to be able to exploit it. I guess those 2 miners should stop wasting electricity and let the coin die. I think you should read up on what the difficulty actually means because apparently you have absolutely no idea. |
|
|
|
LEOcoin Foundation is pleased to announce that LEOcoin can now be traded in Thailand on the Bitcon Co. Ltd exchange website: https://bx.in.th/BTC/LEO/. Excellent news!! Can we expect more in the coming months? Mate that is old news. Exactly, it's traded there for like 9 months now. This thread is weird. I mean I'm not sure what the incentive here is announcing this coin when it's probably at the very end of its life (based on price and trade volume). I mean if it was purely an MLM/ponzi/whatever else scamcoin then it would be pretty self defeating to post it on a forum where people are actually familiar with crypto and can point out obvious scams from miles away. Which leaves me to believe that OP is either not familiar with bitcointalk's strong skepticism and brutal honesty or even how quickly the landscape of crypto changes or he's convinced that LEO will make a comeback (price- and popularity-wise) for watever reason. With that said, I agree with pretty much everyone's skepticism here about this coin but I also have to say that this coin is very different from the usual copy/paste coin in a sense that there's a company behind it which seem to be on point of their marketing game as far as I can see and I believe that company could potentially push this coin really far without scamming people. But then again, we got nothing solid about what we can expect from this coin in the future (features, exchanges, etc) and I wouldn't cross off my list that user LEOcoin Foundation, LEOcoin member and LEOCoinClub being the same user (same local time, arguably similar writing style) - which would be laughably lame. So yeah, so far my vote is on a combination of incompetence and scam but I'm not completely sure yet. Full disclosure: I started mining and silently following this coin since March and own a few thousand coins. |
|
|
|
Ehm... the difficulty retarget doesn't seem to work correct at all!
How come the devs don't recognize such a obvious problem?
The oscillations are ridiculous!!! Something is VERY wrong here.
What is even more annoying is a few miners do not support the network at all, they wait until the difficulty drops to an insanely low rate then point a bunch of hashing power at one of the pools. They then mine a bunch of coins really quickly while the miners that actually support the network get almost no coins for their efforts during this time due to the very quick turn around the larger miners are able to produce blocks, leaving smaller miners with no shares. This then drives the difficulty way up and they leave the smaller miners to support the network and mine for another 20-22 hours for almost no reward. The miner e5e on yacoin club is one of the worst offenders. All he is doing is taking a bunch of coins and offering no network support at all. The oscillation of the difficulty needs to be fixed, this is a joke. As long as the difficulty retarget keeps being a joke and allows for such huge oscillation, it will get exploited. It's not the miners fault they don't mine when the difficulty is so high that they are just wasting electricity. |
|
|
|
|
No, the Gridseed dual miner does SHA256 and Scrypt algorithms but Monero is using an algorithm called CryptoNight.
|
|
|
|
A bug in cudamalloc. On windows you need to add 16gig of virtuaL memory.
I don't do windows. I don't think it's very different in linux (swap file) but it could be. Before that crash happens, sucking all out of it. 83MH@600W.
Yes, pretty good to mine right now. Just remember to mine directly to the autochance btc exchangeadresses. Anyway I look at it Eth seems pretty bad profitability-wise. |
|
|
|
That's the fattest faucet I've ever seen, nice! |
|
|
|
Tor is on by default, as far as I know you can't even disable it.
Awesome! thats great to know thank you. Just makes this coin even better! cant seem to find it on c-cex though? has it been de-listed for now? I'm not sure when this was on c-cex but it's on bittrex. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
