 Gaming rig. It would be alot cleaner if you have them on parallel |
|
|
|
|
Its my ISP, I contacted them and understood the issue.
Fortunately, that my miners are still able to connect the whole time.
|
|
|
|
To clarify, each botnet is a payload on individual machine. Thats how i understand a botnet. In distributed computing, you can say its a node but its not technically correct to say a distributed network a botnet.
Making a botnet is trivial, inserting such payload on a machine is not. Therefore, its not reasonable to think there are hundred thousands of botnets.
My theory is simple, there are more investors in mining business. Big miners will just get bigger. They can estimate well the cashflow. Ppl who say its botnets are in denial.
The payload is the virus on the machine, the botnet is the collective whole of all infected machines. "Bot" is short for "robot" and "net" means "network" - i.e., a network of robots. I stand corrected regarding the term. Having hundreds thousands of infected machines is reasonable to anyone? |
|
|
|
Still no confirmation from P4man when it is blatantly him doing it. How lame. 0 integrity and honesty. I guess you should expect that from a total hypocrite ! P4man : "Don't hop ! Let me do it and get all the $$$"  keep that to yourself, scammer |
|
|
|
You're suspecting there are hundreds thousands of bitcoin botnets. I think what seriouscoin is trying to say is that in order to see the difficulty increases we've been seeing, there would need to be a hundred thousand PCs inside one single botnet. Of course those PCs would only be capable of ~2-5MH/s so a hundred thousand of them would be 200-500 GH/s. Nah uh,,.... Someone with superior intelligence thinks 1GHs / botnet is more reasonable. Why do i always see retards making a solid case for himself. You done bitching? nope,  |
|
|
|
You're suspecting there are hundreds thousands of bitcoin botnets. I think what seriouscoin is trying to say is that in order to see the difficulty increases we've been seeing, there would need to be a hundred thousand PCs inside one single botnet. Of course those PCs would only be capable of ~2-5MH/s so a hundred thousand of them would be 200-500 GH/s. Nah uh,,.... Someone with superior intelligence thinks 1GHs / botnet is more reasonable. Why do i always see retards making a solid case for himself. To clarify, each botnet is a payload on individual machine. Thats how i understand a botnet. In distributed computing, you can say its a node but its not technically correct to say a distributed network a botnet. Making a botnet is trivial, inserting such payload on a machine is not. Therefore, its not reasonable to think there are hundred thousands of botnets. My theory is simple, there are more investors in mining business. Big miners will just get bigger. They can estimate well the cashflow. Ppl who say its botnets are in denial. |
|
|
|
I'm on OZcoin pool when there's no public work and its all fine. Just noticed that the price tag is going up quite fast. From 0.00004PPS, to 0.000051PPS atm. I think that is the reason there is no public work atm, because its too expensive. Cmon guys, ease your greed a bit Its been at least .000051 or more for a month. These lower rates are something new. I had always set my rate to .000047 and always had public work. Now .000043 is sometimes too high. BTW, How should difficulty affect the price?simple, how much higher are you expecting from PPS payout? I assume, 100% PPS is a great deal considering most big pools dont pay 100% PPS. |
|
|
|
Good, to set the record one last time. Dont bother to apologize next time when you pull this.
Now as for the "disagreement", i dont have to explicitly say how many bitcoin botnets there are. Anyone who agrees bitcoin botnets are the cause of this difficulty increase could easily estimate how many bitcoin botnets required. You're just too busy teaching English to someone on the internet to see it.
Assuming at least a GH per botnet, a "hundred thousand botnets" would equate to 100 TH, about 7 times the current speed of the entire network. Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm wrong. It might mean I simply did the math.  You sure did your math,.................. as well as how you did your reading I know ppl throw botnets around alot on the forum, but is there any actually proof? anyone bother did forensic search?
I cant imagine all the botnets happend to have GPUs (high end ones), last time i look CPU mining is utterly low .
Yes 1 GH/s per botnet is a rational way to debate this. I'm done. I cant argue with you there. You can sleep now, |
|
|
|
yes, that's the webserver IP
I need to go out /pick up kids and stuff
Will delve deeper on return
No problem, You've been a great help so far. |
|
|
|
Sometimes BAMT will create a file to disable overclocking. You have to go to " /live/image/BAMT/CONTROL/ACTIVE " and delete the file there.
In my experience I have never seen any card but 0 get flagged there, so it can be difficult to figure out which card is the culprit.
Does anybody know of a log or something which may indicate which card f'ed up? Has anybody seen any other card but 0 get flagged?
Thanks. If that is the case, its probably a false alarm. Prior to BAMT, i was using linuxcoin and all 4 GPUs have never crashed at the clock setting. Its a conservative clock 800/300 I would suggest starting up with purely stock settings, then tweaking them out one at a time in cgminer, then saving the config. I don't know if you are having the same issue I did or not, but different OSes, driver versions, and/or miners sometimes order/number the cards differently. What may have been card 0 in linuxcoin, may be card 2 in BAMT. I had a card go from 5, to number 3 when I went from BAMT to Ubuntu. It really had me confused for a bit. I havent restarted since manually set the clock. It has been hashing ok so far. I will keep an eye on it tho. "Mother" is quite a strict lady isnt she? |
|
|
|
So was my poor English.... You knew it , understood it. I love now you talk about how things are not relevant. I dont think i misquote you. My logical thinking tells me if you're disputing my claim, then you're implying otherwise. Dont play political talk. I guess you can say " i never said such thing".. I was not insulting your English, I was trying to help you. Of course it is irrelevant, it wasn't intended to be relevant. As for misquoting me, I invite you to find where I said anything about "hundreds of thousands" of Bitcoin botnets, or where you stated that there were not "hundreds of thousands" of Bitcoin botnets and I disagreed with you. But this is beside the point. I disagreed with your claim and I'm glad to debate it. I don't wish to spend my time arguing over what I did and didn't say. You can insult me, accuse me, and compare me with politicians all you want. If you consider me an idiot and interpret all of what I say according to that, nothing I could do or say will change that, ergo continuing this discussion is pointless for both of us. Good, to set the record one last time. Dont bother to apologize next time when you pull this. Now as for the "disagreement", i dont have to explicitly say how many bitcoin botnets there are. Anyone who agrees bitcoin botnets are the cause of this difficulty increase could easily estimate how many bitcoin botnets required. You're just too busy teaching English to someone on the internet to see it. |
|
|
|
It could be my DNS, i never suspected it because it was working fine earlier. Ping returned with unknown host.  Edited: i can ping ecoinpool server fine, with IP returned. The webserver is still unreachable for me. the only thing left is to try by IP 110.173.227.109 I'm scratching my head :/ That IP is also unreachable .... Is that the IP of the webserver? This is weird So the problem isnt just DNS then. |
|
|
|
bullshiet, your intention of correcting my grammar was clear : to belittle someone in an argument. What you've done so far was to show English isnt my mother tongue. Jackass.
I'm not trying to be mean, nor am I insulting your language. Call me whatever you want, I'm trying to help you here. I understand I come off as a total jerk, making grammar suggestions in long, complicated, extremely polite sentences just takes too long. Apologies for any offense caused. Requesting more details of a claim somehow turns into "being quite the expert" ? Or was that your ill brain to pick on someone?
I love the " without ill intent" part.
Maybe English is native to you, but frankly your brain isnt as wonderful as you hoped it to be. Botnets always exist because the nature of the term. But saying the hashrate increase is due to botnets is what i'm troubling to see. My post clearly hinted why? CPU mining isnt fast. You're suspecting there are hundreds thousands of bitcoin botnets.
With no ill intent, you must have a sad live. That was rude and unnecessary, I apologize. I'm glad you appreciate my meager attempt to be polite. Obviously I needed to up the ante a bit. I'm not sure how the discussion turned to my brain, but I agree, I certainly wish I had an eidetic memory, which alas I do not. And I don't see where I stated anything about "hundreds of thousands" of Bitcoin botnets. By all means please argue with me, but I'd prefer you don't misquote me. My brain, then my life. You switch topics rather quickly. I find my life rather enjoyable, but you can consider it whatever you want to. That's not really relevant, though. So was my poor English.... You knew it , understood it. I love now you talk about how things are not relevant. I dont think i misquote you. My logical thinking tells me if you're disputing my claim, then you're implying otherwise. Dont play political talk. I guess you can say " i never said such thing".. |
|
|
|
It could be my DNS, i never suspected it because it was working fine earlier. Ping returned with unknown host. Edited: i can ping ecoinpool server fine, with IP returned. The webserver is still unreachable for me. |
|
|
|
What am I disputing, not what's I disputing, and "police" is plural, not singular. Correcting your grammar may not endear me to you, but it will help your English grade.
bullshiet, your intention of correcting my grammar was clear : to belittle someone in an argument. What you've done so far was to show English isnt my mother tongue. Jackass. Doing a "forensic search", since it seems to be something you're quite the expert on, is not a trivial task, nor is it without risk. Even assuming someone wished to conduct such a search, the existence of a botnet is not necessarily easy to prove. I do not agree with many of the threads you term FUD in these forums, but some of them are based off information indicating a likely botnet. If a botnet got to the point where one could consider it's existence "proved" without a reasonable doubt, chances are we would be inable to do anything about it. Proactive concern is not always productive, but it's far better than the alternative.
Requesting more details of a claim somehow turns into "being quite the expert" ? Or was that your ill brain to pick on someone? I love the " without ill intent" part. Maybe English is native to you, but frankly your brain isnt as wonderful as you hoped it to be. Botnets always exist because the nature of the term. But saying the hashrate increase is due to botnets is what i'm troubling to see. My post clearly hinted why? CPU mining isnt fast. You're suspecting there are hundreds thousands of bitcoin botnets. With no ill intent, you must have a sad life. |
|
|
|
I obviously meant digital forensic investigation. Network forensics is a sub-branch of digital forensics relating to the monitoring and analysis of computer network traffic for the purposes of information gathering, legal evidence, or intrusion detection.[1] Unlike other areas of digital forensics, network investigations deal with volatile and dynamic information. Network traffic is transmitted and then lost, so network forensics is often a pro-active investigation.[2] Maybe this is why this forum is full of FUDs. We're not disputing the meaning of the term, the last time I checked. And FUD is not a singular noun, you don't add an s. So whats your disputing? Being a grammar police doesnt help jack. so let me ask, do you have any idea of what you're talking about? |
|
|
|
its all been fine on our end, what time was this? I woke up about an hour ago, this is the only report of an error I have seen. and yes the database and the website work independently, even if the database server is down the ecoinpool mining nodes cache shares for an hour  |
|
|
|
I wonder if bitsingles are responsible for it...
nope, just botnets. I know ppl throw botnets around alot on the forum, but is there any actually proof? anyone bother did forensic search? I cant imagine all the botnets happend to have GPUs (high end ones), last time i look CPU mining is utterly low . Did anyone do a "forensic search"? With no ill intent, do you have any idea what you're talking about? He/She may be ESL? you mean someone with Extra Special Linguistics? dont let me DDOS you man. I'm deep in street, i DDOS for fun yo! |
|
|
|
I wonder if bitsingles are responsible for it...
nope, just botnets. I know ppl throw botnets around alot on the forum, but is there any actually proof? anyone bother did forensic search? I cant imagine all the botnets happend to have GPUs (high end ones), last time i look CPU mining is utterly low . Did anyone do a "forensic search"? With no ill intent, do you have any idea what you're talking about? I obviously meant digital forensic investigation. Network forensics is a sub-branch of digital forensics relating to the monitoring and analysis of computer network traffic for the purposes of information gathering, legal evidence, or intrusion detection.[1] Unlike other areas of digital forensics, network investigations deal with volatile and dynamic information. Network traffic is transmitted and then lost, so network forensics is often a pro-active investigation.[2] Maybe this is why this forum is full of FUDs. |
|
|
|
Just add this to the dozens of reasons I already have to jailbreak my phone.
gosh i surely hate Apple. But at the same time, all the giant PC makers are fcktards. They will all fail because of laziness , completely lack of innovation. HP, Dell, IBM,...etc All of them, giving ppl a chance to go to Apple in the first place. They made so much money in the 80s and 90s. Now they're just a laugh in any MBA class. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
