The viability of altcoins depends on the performance of the project team, and the usefulness and importance of the project itself. and customer focus. That is, the buyer must see the potential of the coin.
from poop do not blind candy

ho ho)
quite often projects have a good base for work, team, product. Collect their given capital. pay the first some income and even start work (or imitation of work) and then collapse. perhaps because of one or two "black sheep" in the herd, and perhaps this is how it all just shows.
I am leading to this, that you should not equate all. among the obvious scam projects, good ones stand out as well as among the good ones - fraudulent ones

Scam is really a lot, a good reliable project is difficult to distinguish.
I consider it a good indicator if the project has real partners or large well-known investors.

everyone who panicked, tired of doing it in the spring or early summer.
Of course, if you can, you need to take care of the coins that you have. now they are worth less than ever before.
but there is no doubt that the market will grow, it's just unclear when this will happen

Yeah.
Patience, cold head, lack of panic and excessive confidence in all forecasts, especially from the "sofa" analysts)
Of course, mistakes are gained by experience, but mistakes are very expensive

perhaps universal tokenization will accelerate the introduction of cryptocurrencies in all countries of the world.
This is how cryptocurrencies can accept and understand, and begin to trust

I also think that the market will return to the level of the end of last year, and it will probably increase the figures, but not very soon.
I hope that at least by the spring of 2019 there will be a positive upward shift

No one should believe, the predictions that were made at the beginning of the year, failed miserably.
All forecasts do not serve as a direct indication to action, analyze them and draw your own conclusions.

Airdrops are not worth the time that you spend searching for a standing company, sifting away a bunch of garbage.
Payments are minimal, reluctantly and far from all paid, coins often cost nothing then
and all)

I agree, the conditions for the passage of the KYS should be announced at the beginning of the project.
Although the procedure is not a problem, but when they talk about its necessity after the end of the work of the hunter - it suggests that they carry out the "sifting"

people always fear what they do not understand.
cryptocurrency and cryptocurrency technologies have a good future and prospects, but I think that rather quickly they will not expand their niche in the field of payment, since there is high enough competition and there are just people and whole countries that do not benefit from "transparent" transactions

the author's speech is like an advertisement for a product
But the truth is, without knowledge in the cryptocurrency world, you can lose all your savings. there are many examples

good note, now such a market that most projects lose the price of their coins immediately after the end of the ico and exit on the stock exchange.
If the project has shown itself well in the course of fees, then of course it is logical that the bounty hunter will want to buy coins

it will ruin such a huge number of bankers. I don’t think that they will allow it once, simply because of the fact that millions of people will be left without work
except in super modern developed countries) but there are no such

free cheese is only in a mousetrap.
What is distributed for free, for example through airdrop, usually costs nothing later, there may be a minimum percentage of 1-2 out of a hundred

I do not believe in any long-term forecasts, and it will take more than one year before it will be possible to track the patterns of the cryptocurrency market and make more or less truthful assumptions. this year proves it every day

if you do not take into account fraudulent projects in advance, then the developers often set overestimated goals without having a plausible implementation plan for this and investors are scared away - no one wants to give their money for what is not clear.
And often the team overestimates its strength, or the relevance of the project and its competitiveness begins to work on creating something that already exists successfully and for a long time, and has some advantages.

if everyday work with altcoins - then of course trading. Work with small price changes. everything else makes a profit from time to time, but definitely much less often

you should not invest the last or only savings, what nonsense?
if you have experience in trading, try, with small amounts, the loss of which will not lead you to life on the street
the crypt has a future, while a rash investment makes it dubious

no one is safeguarded from scam, and it happens that the project has gathered its capital and imitated vigorous activity - and it turned out to be a scam.
Perhaps it’s a matter of a pair of black sheep in a team, and maybe it’s all conceived from the start, as a hoax