Monero is nearly perfect but there is a intentional attack called EAE attack that makes the receiver vulnerable if the sender intentionally wanted to find about sending many transactions and have a look at the volumes.

Monerooutreach.org explains it as
"Monero’s ring signatures provide plausible deniability, but they aren’t perfect. We model examples where two colluding parties ‘E’ attempt to learn information about an individual ‘A.’ By sending outputs to individuals and tracing their transaction graphs, these colluding parties may perform powerful statistical tests to learn significant information, especially for repeated transactions where they would not normally occur by chance."

Monero mixers claims to stop this.

Bitcointalk username: Nalbo
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1096158
Rank: Full member
Current post count: 614
Amount of earned merit(last 120 days): 8
BTC Address: 3F1HwT5ywhpozwnUjc8sL1UbZ19vRT3iN2

Btctalk name : Nalbo
Link to profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1096158
Rank : Full member
Current post count : 618
MintDice username : Nalbo
Wear appropriate signature : Yes
Wear avatar : Yes

I was too suspicious at first. We don't have the tech available right at the moment to put us farther from LEO how could we have possibly landed on moon 50 years ago.
But as I got a chance to relive the experience in real, I finally understood what it was like during the space race. Space was a war and budget and safety issues were not a concern.

The current price boost in Bitcoin is said to be associated with the comments made by congressmen in the Libra hearing in the Financial committee of the house of representative. They seem to have realized there's no going back from bitcoin. And as of Libra, being an stable coin from a large enterprise, it would certainly impact positively on the price of bitcoin.

It's not just about Libra, Congress is also looking at the good and bad sides of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and realising now it's not possible to implement a ban on cryptocurrency because no one can have a full control over the blockchain.

With all this discussion, I'd like to caution people that it's not a good idea to keep all of your asset in an exchange. There can be individual phishing attacks where the exchange won't be able to help you and not every hack could be covered by SAFU.

Seems like they'll limit the use and transfer of Libra within the Messenger and Whatsapp wallet. Something similar to We chat pay.
That would not make it a real crypto even if it used blockchain. What's the use of blockchain if people can't export the private key.

I'd like to differ. A year or a couple of years is not a very long time considering the work, technical difficulties it would take and the confusion that it may create with the users. Ethereum is holding till date and would hold until the upgrade. They should rather focus on the development of Ethereum 2.0 than looking for other experimentations.

#Proof of authentication
Type of campaign: Signature
Bitcointalk Username: Nalbo
Telegram username: @Nalbo

I think it's too late. We've turned bitcoin mining to an industry and we are very much depended on the miner that users can't do anything about bitcoin. Bitcoin has turned into a miner's coin.
I'm not complaining about the miners, they have done a great job bringing bitcoin here. Always worked for the collective good of the community. Yet, too much centralized mining could bring up problems in the future.

If I were to recommend two good altcoins, it would be BNB and BB1. Both of them are tokens from highly experienced team in crypto with a flawlessly working system and has plans to further expand in an aggressive way. Both of the coins are value services. BNB gets burned and limits it's supply. While BB1 works similar to a 10 years mutual fund with fixed earnings.

I'm glad to hear the high level of crypto understanding and use in China. Even though crypto is officially banned in China, there are many merchants that readily accepts crypto as payment. There are many factories that accepts crypto payment and I even ordered an item and paid for it + the shipping fees from China in crypto.

If a project is good enough. It would require no advisers. It's just the newbie projects or the fancy ones that requires advisers.
Most of the so called advisers shown on whitepaper of most ICOs are self proclaimed ICO experts. They just let their photo get published for a low fee.
While some are genuinely helping the project with their experience.

I barely think any investors would be getting any inspiration from joining a telegram or discord group. Though they might find it easier to get in touch with the official team from the project. The numbers are just to compete with the other projects and adds no benefit to the project itself. Video bounty and article bounty as well the social media and signature bounty may add up if they are placed correctly by correct people.

Ethereum is still highly unpredictable. The supply of ethereum is still not fixed. Until it's we could consider it limitless in supply and it's application somehow demands higher numbers but again it is now getting tough competition from other tokens like EOS and Tron. For me, it's not a good investment at current time.

Almost all of exchanges are providing some sort of extra interest for holding specific coins in their exchange in one for or other. I remember liquid did collected good liquidity by offering generous interest. Either by staking, locking or as an investment in liquidity, exchanges are being more beneficial to normal users even for those who don't trade.

Most of them clearly state that they won't be paying to the bounty participants if they don't reach the hard cap.
There's also no sense of paying as the funds of any investors would be returned and the received token would be worth nothing when the project is cancelled.
So, its better to go for a popular project than hunting for large rewards.

The exchange sale are evolving according to the choice of investors but not all of these terms are mutually exclusive.
For example STO is a type of ICO, it's not necessary that every STO be better than ICO. And every STO are also ICO unless they are hosted on exchange which makes them IEO.
And now the STO being hosted on exchange are given a name of STEO. Many of the ICO also claims to be STO to sound impressive but they have no direct way of providing dividends to the investors like real STOs.

Craig is definitely not the Satoshi Nakamoto but do know who Satoshi is. His claims now and not being able to prove his claims and accusation, it suggest he knows the real satoshi won't come to testify against him. So, the real satoshi could be Dave Kleiman, he was real close to Wright and is dead in 2013.