Yes - I am using the new wallet.
Says its staking but getting 0.0 minings ..
Also lost lots of stake accumulated in previous wallet, as I was involved from beginning.
you were on wrong fork. try sync, and stake, you will receive the same amount in one piece. |
|
|
|
Also, I wouldn't blame this on any multi-pool. Hash-to-Coins -- the only "multi-pool" that I think carries this coin was hashing only 4Gh/s at the most and then the owner was kind enough to switch to another coin early as to not hurt the coin on the next difficulty reset. Hash-to-Coins is a good pool, btw, as the owner actually cares. One of the last few that do.
What killed SONG was a lone miner on LifeForcePools. This person was hashing 12.5Gh/s (or more) up until the last 20 blocks - which was too late. I repeatedly asked him to please drop it back (as others were kind enough to pull back), but he got greedy and took advantage of the situation.
Yeah, this solves a better retarget algo (kgw) or decrease the TargetTimespan (to 2 hour => 60 blocks): if a high hashpower jump in, the diff fast move to high too, if he jump out, then the diff fast move to low. This is good for miners, and bad for multipool  |
|
|
|
this was happened many times: multipool with large hashpower jump in when diff is low, and after the diff increased, jump out, and leave other miners with high diff alone... i already posted a solution: change the retarget to kgw (the fixed one, not the buggy! ) |
|
|
|
They are not forks they just need to update to the newest wallet. I am contacting them today in regards to this.
Nope, they are different fork. fork began here: # ./securitycoind getblockhash 103018
47f6c522c82e01a174405e6c64b195741da76ed891dd976e15ed4c31f2b6785e
# ./securitycoind getblockhash 103019
9f0e7d863a0ac8fdfa9f90e3b6d284e5bfad6b1550f8ca07febbe153ea268585
|
|
|
|
what is the official block height? some peer (v2.1.0.0) has this: 104668 , ccex and multifaucet (v2.0.1.0) has this 104254, bitexp: 103936   |
|
|
|
New spreadcoin address begin with ''m'' but i have ''S'' address.
How will i import it to new wallet?
S -> mainnet m -> testnet You use the wallet on main net, so addess begin with "S". |
|
|
|
|
encrypt the wallet with a password
|
|
|
|
So after all, I still don't get what you people are having against mining on a pool, there is and was pool mining on SPR all the time, just on private pools, now you have a public one and some start to FUD the hell out of it but don't even know what they are talking about, why ? :-)
Oh and btw.. These nice charts / graphics etc always implied there was NO pool mining and "decentralization" here .. Well.. I've mined LOTS of blocks with the pool already and it seems that noone ever realized.. So maybe your "decentralization" is not as good as it seems ... How else could I get away with it then all the time ?
As long as a coin is mineable by anything like CCminer/Sgminer/Minerd you can start a pool for it.. Its just a matter of time and a matter of effort.. I had some spare time and nothing todo so I invested the time into this.. If this thing would be of more worth, already more pools would be there.
If the community want pool mining, than this minersignature stuff is useless, back to normal x11 algo, hurray everyone can mine in pool! And you dont have to build a closed+encrypted miner. |
|
|
|
me to this past 3 days cant sync or stake ;(
@AllCryptoAllDay has tried to help but it doesnt work for me.
try redownload the blockchain! |
|
|
|
Hey,
I can make android wallet for SpreadCoin. Need?
If yes, have any bounties for this?
I already working on it... Elbandi |
|
|
|
So, for a pool, I think what you would do is just have people send the BTC equivalent of one block's reward to the pool (which isn't much), then if the miner's steal the reward, the pool still retains their deposit so net miner gain is 0. You would have the miners themselves mine to their own pubkeyhashes, and you'd submit partial solutions to these blocks to the pool itself. When the miner gets a block, they would be given n many blocks to get the coinbase from their block to the pool to redistribute to the other miners. If they didn't return the reward to the pool, the pool would then just take their deposit and ban them.
So, I don't think there's a big issue with pooling, just a slightly more complicated implementation. There's a small associated cost with joining a pool, but it's not really much.
coinbase mature is 120 blocks, pool have to wait that time, before spend the block reward. a big miner can mine more blocks during this time, so every miner sould pay a bigger guarantee (60 spr for 10 blocks, 120spr for 20 block guarantee), do you think they will do this? |
|
|
|
In crypto world is a lot of altcoins but SPR must have potential if so many people hate it and put such effort to reveal this hate. Someone feel threatened by SPR.
From what i see the Code is strongly based on darkcoin with some extra stuff in it, but they surely did not reinvent the wheel It's a darkcoin clone.. Or do i miss any new features? From White Paper: No pool: no public pool (miners know the reward privkey, they can steal the coin, want this a public pool owner?  ) Compact Transactions: Transactions are smaller -> less blockchain size. I dont know darkcoin internals, but masternode maybe different here than drk. (FIXME) |
|
|
|
Feel free to extend mine. |
|
|
|
Not a good idea to add 10000 addresses using importprivkey when each import triggers a full rescan.
At least with pywallet i could add the addresses and then bitcoin core could rescan when i start it, but not for each import, it would take a week.
No. importprivkey 5gfasgfsgfd name1 false
importprivkey 5jhdhgfhghf name2 false
importprivkey 5gfgdssdgfd name3 false
importprivkey 5gtsgggggdg name4 false
importprivkey 5fgdgfdgfgf name5 true
the last true triggers the scan. the other disable it. the rescan will scan for all keys. |
|
|
|
I dont like the way that DmD team are manipulate me and other dmd supporters to invest in their DmD shares/cloudmining. So I will stake much less as the ''VIP'' users. Boys are you sure you are doing this right ?
Yes. market will show this!
29.01.2015 - 50k sats.
lets see.
and decentralisation will be gone... if there is a place where it worth to store the coins, then many ppl will store their coins there. (only little miner wont, because they havent enough coins.) |
|
|
|
@Danbi How to remove an address from a wallet completely. I want an address that is currently being used to mine to be seperated from my staking wallet. I would importprivkey to different wallet, I just don't see a way to remove address from orig wallet after the addr is imported to a different wallet  (In particular my cloudmining addy which I cannot simply change ...) I know of a drastic way to do it ... but don't want to lose staking age on 1600+ coins ... export all keys with dumpprivkey, make a new wallet somewhere, and import the keys what you want. importprivkey name1 gfdsvfdsfdsr false
importprivkey name2 ztrwhsdfgdsg false
importprivkey name3 hgfdhgwgvsg false
importprivkey name4 gfdsgfdsgres true
false= do not scan the blocklist except at last import (scan the blockchain after last import). you dont lose anything. |
|
|
|
This SPR chart is different from the others because it's historical (not current) and includes only addresses that mined over 1k coins. That means it doesn't cover the whole network hashrate, making all those numbers actually much smaller pieces of the entire pie. The top "miner" SNYq only mined for one month last year, but his 25k coins is still the highest proportion among mining addresses. There may be farms, but SPR is still supported by many small miners. http://spreadcoin.net/explorer/index.php?q=SNYqcyEtXr5UWpxMds8mQ9x8jo8fWFJVKzMr. Spread, is it possible to make that clear on the Network Hashrate page? Or a way to make a comparable chart? I think everyone is used to looking at current hashrate charts. I added a little note to that chart. (if someone can make a better english text, that's welcome ). And i made a new chart: this displayed the last 1000 blocks stats: addresses who mined at least 2 blocks. (address with 1 block goes to "others") Elbandi |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
