pool.mn has synced with suprnova. We are now on the same fork. |
|
|
|
I reserve the right to delete any post I believe to frivolous or cast a negative light on something so many have worked so hard for. If you don’t like Achilles don’t partake .
You mean those regarding your 11millions hidden premine ? Thecoinfinder is a big pool admin, I don't think he would make such comment if there wasn't anything... You should better address the topic, rather than waiting for an unmoderated thread discussing your coin and its hidden premine. Are you talking about this? http://cryptobe.com/block/00000150f81c2fad44867a3915fe65ddd4fb6b962605064592c42fa22a3ede01But isn't this just 5% premine, i.e. 1.1mln? Block explorer is not showing anything apart from 5% premine. Btw, cryptobe is a legit block explorer. I don't know... the message mentioning that has been deleted  (works both way...) But there is only two pools... hashharder isn't one of them. and from what I remember thecoinfinder was pretty pissed off and wanted to fork the coin to a new version without the hidden premine... Ok, thanks for letting us know. I don't see the hidden premine but will try to investigate further. |
|
|
|
I reserve the right to delete any post I believe to frivolous or cast a negative light on something so many have worked so hard for. If you don’t like Achilles don’t partake .
You mean those regarding your 11millions hidden premine ? Thecoinfinder is a big pool admin, I don't think he would make such comment if there wasn't anything... You should better address the topic, rather than waiting for an unmoderated thread discussing your coin and its hidden premine. Are you talking about this? http://cryptobe.com/block/00000150f81c2fad44867a3915fe65ddd4fb6b962605064592c42fa22a3ede01But isn't this just 5% premine, i.e. 1.1mln? Block explorer is not showing anything apart from 5% premine. Btw, cryptobe is a legit block explorer. |
|
|
|
I reserve the right to delete any post I believe to frivolous or cast a negative light on something so many have worked so hard for. If you don’t like Achilles don’t partake .
Ok, thanks dev for at least showing that you are not chinese  The last week was rough with so many scams that everybody is now suspicious about new coins and I certainly don't want to support such coins. It seems to me that Achilles could be legit and I will reopen the pool. |
|
|
|
 Up and running!0.99% fees Powerful dedicated server DDOS Protection Friendly support via email, jabber or support forums Skilled admin Please, join us |
|
|
|
Wasn't there problems earlier with this charity address? Shouldn't be a problem here, pool op should be just aware of it. But people should be careful by the fact that dev is using donation address that was in other coins. It seems to me that he didn't even look at this part of the code. |
|
|
|
pool.mn are u ready ? ^^
i am tooooo drunk to Setup some Failover pools ...
please be the fastest :-) " like most of the time"
good night :-)
Yes, we are ready for the launch. Hoping for a smooth one ) |
|
|
|
if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
{
// ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
uint64_t nCoinAge;
if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());
int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
}
bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector<valtype> vSolutions;
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
Suspicious code...dev is constructing transactions bypassing the stake interest check? Newbie here; correct me if I'm wrong. You are right, this is the piece i was searching for, kernel.cpp line 216: bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector<valtype> vSolutions;
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
This allows the Dev to insert every block he wants after POW has ended because the normal "CheckStake" Function has been modified like I thought already: if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1])) This is wrong, it should only state: So like I thought already, the Dev has a malicious wallet and can inject every block he wants, it is also not very hard to write something similar, if I had some time, I could also write something to pay me 999.999 coins :-) This was a very well prepared scam .. You'd definitely go to jail for this one if they find you Dev... wow, thanks a lot for finding this. I couldn't get my head around what was going on here. We'll have to do much more due diligence in the future |
|
|
|
|
Thank you ocminer, pool.mn has shut down the pool.
|
|
|
|
http://ace.pool.mnThe only one pool who don't accept the rigs from miningrigrentals That suck, another pool with high hashrate please? The pool if offline. |
|
|
|
Sooooo shes dead already then?
Pool.mn shutting down?
Yup. Also, DRKC did exactly the same thing. So obvious it's him. DRKC didn't use tor and they had their own pool. I doubt it is the same dev. This coin has problems with peers and therefore forks. |
|
|
|
yeah im getting coins @ pool.mn ....we're getting the blocks
Can the pool owners confirm that there is/isn't a fork? thanks
There is a problem with the mined blocks - they are all orphaned. pool.mn, will you expose the node so hashharder can connect? Our node is 37.187.144.69 I've tried to resync with hashharder. Blocks are still orphaned. Does this mean the coin is forked or not? People paying money for renting right now. Pool.mn has shutdown the pool. Please consider mining at other pools. |
|
|
|
yeah im getting coins @ pool.mn ....we're getting the blocks
Can the pool owners confirm that there is/isn't a fork? thanks
There is a problem with the mined blocks - they are all orphaned. pool.mn, will you expose the node so hashharder can connect? Actually, I'm not sure if it will help - as I tried setting up a separate node and using both addnode and connect to connect directly to it - which doesn't work with this coin. The same here. I am shutting down the pool. |
|
|
|
yeah im getting coins @ pool.mn ....we're getting the blocks
Can the pool owners confirm that there is/isn't a fork? thanks
There is a problem with the mined blocks - they are all orphaned. pool.mn, will you expose the node so hashharder can connect? Our node is 37.187.144.69 I've tried to resync with hashharder. Blocks are still orphaned. |
|
|
|
Pools up so quick. It was on github before launch?
poolmn coin lol We have an automated process that makes compiling and running a pool quite quickly. We have nothing to do with this coin. |
|
|
|
yeah im getting coins @ pool.mn ....we're getting the blocks
Can the pool owners confirm that there is/isn't a fork? thanks
There is a problem with the mined blocks - they are all orphaned. |
|
|
|
Guys, I'm shutting stratums @ suprnova, please point your hashes elsewhere, this is senseless
Same here, dev failed to update. SuchPool going down. Sorry for the renters. Pool.mn has shut down as well. |
|
|
|
Thanks for doing it, you are the man |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
