In the USA, there is its own regulator called SEC, by going to its website you can read the regulations and how this body works.
I think you know that most cryptocurrency projects do not allow US citizens to participate in fundraising, because no one wants to run into a regulator from the USA.

Those who collected funds from US citizens, as a rule, fell under severe fines and sanctions.
Even Pavel Durov, who had been negotiating with the SEC for so long, was refused on all fronts, and his coin was recognized as a security.

And how can you know without permission to sell securities to US citizens is prohibited.
Thus, now Pavel Durov will have to return all funds to investors and pay huge fines for violating the laws of the United States of America.

I was always surprised by the fact that people who fell for scammers and lost money always blamed either these scammers or someone else. Although it’s just they themselves who are to blame.
If we talk about examples of scam telegram channels or other social networks, then you need to understand one thing.

We are dealing with cryptocurrency, which means scammers often cannot forcibly take your money from you. You do all the translations yourself trusting a person who pretends to be another.
You yourself click the “send” button, the scammer’s wallet means, and then it disappears and you understand that you were deceived, but it’s too late.

This is cryptocurrency, here only you are responsible for your money and no one else. Therefore, so that you are never deceived, never send money to wallets unknown to you. This will be enough to avoid 90% of scam.

It seems that in this way the German government will be able to solve the issue of the uncontrolled appearance and registration of cryptocurrency projects that do not fall under the influence of regulators.
Such a measure, of course, will destroy or create great difficulties for many competitors. However, it is worth noting that this measure will also reduce the number of scam projects.

In the framework of the idea that we are moving to a world in which cryptocurrency is fully regulated, this law can play into the hands of cryptocurrency projects that can be afraid to conduct fundraising on legal and regulated grounds. The main question is what are the criteria for admission of the project to the market.

Considering the fact that decentralized exchanges are the safest, the only unpleasant situation that you may fall into is switching to a phishing link.
There you either connect your Wallet or enter your private key, in any case, the funds will be compromised and stolen.

The only thing you can do here is always check the address bar, even if you think that doing it every time is superfluous.
After all, only once is enough to lose all your money located on the wallet that connect to this kind of fake exchange. Be carefull.

Cryptocurrency very rarely forgives mistakes, I would not hope for luck.

The market is much more complex and requires special attention from traders than the things that you listed.

In order to effectively trade cryptocurrencies, it will be enough for you to have a platform that is safe and fast enough, VPN if your providers do not approve of such a platform,
as well as certain technical and psychological skills, including the skills of a trader. In any case, the tips you listed can also be used in special cases.

By the way, the link to your article leads to material that is different from the English language, which prevents perception.

In cryptocurrency, I learned one key thing. The harder the safer. Trading using the metamask interface is very convenient, but has a number of security related disadvantages.
Namely, in case your device is compromised and someone gets access to it, it will also get access to all your wallets located in the metamask interface.

We are fortunate that we live in a multipolar world, because if only the United States made a decision of this kind, it would certainly not be reflected in the cryptocurrency market for the better.
However, the US has opponents such as China and it can easily turn the rules of the game fully approving the cryptocurrency, for example.
The United States simply will not have any chance in view of the fact that China will impose its game.

I don’t think that we need such a swift and final solution regarding blockchain and cryptocurrency technology as part of the world economic forum in 2020,
because in fact now no one knows how to use blockchain with maximum efficiency for everyone. In addition, the world now has significantly more problems that require a speedy solution.

The market is too manipulative and this poses a danger to large financial capital.
Blockchain slowly but surely continues its development and implementation in all spheres of human life, I think that all we need is to give it time.

I doubt that this is so. More recently, the market experienced a rather long wave of growth leading to an increase in prices of almost all major market assets.
Buying now is tantamount to playing roulette, because in the future the market may not live up to your expectations regarding growth; it’s quite natural to wait for a recession.

I agree with your answer. Why bother with new projects that are growing by leaps and bounds, promise mountains of gold and always look the same.
Real projects themselves speak about themselves, because the cryptocurrency community is very developed and always sees really worthwhile projects.
If you are interested in investing, then focus on existing projects.

No one has ever seen the funds that they raised and where they are. The only wallet to which we have access is the wallet from which payments are made to ordinary users.
The behavior of the exchange is rather strange, because they could have done exit scam for a long time, but at the same time they pull the rubber making themselves holy.

The answer to your question lies in the plane of the question of what will happen to exchanges in the future. The crypto community strives for decentralization, but exchanges embody the opposite side - centralization.
In the future, I'm sure most of the exchanges will be decentralized, having the speed and all the charms of centralized exchanges. What then will happen to you with the BNB coin?

It is difficult to say why this coin is actually being created, because in Russia there are quite a lot of rich oligarchs who are quite capable of creating such kind of coins for their own businesses.
It is possible that some of them have already put their hands to this. However, whether such coins will be of any use to those around me, I doubt it.

Of course. Given the digital environment we live in today, it is obvious that new projects can and will appear. After all, there are people who are ready to finance such projects, which means everyone has a chance to realize their most crazy idea. And that's great. In our case, it is very important not to make a mistake with the project, and not to fall into the clutches of scammers.

Taking a superficial look at the companies you have proposed, we can conclude that they are really safe and worth everyone's attention.
Thank you for the work done. I think a similar example may inspire some newcomers and experienced bounty hunters to take part in these projects.

It would be possible if all people began to use primarily stable coins instead of the usual fiat money.
Thus, people would be protected from market volatility and at the same time would have free easy and safe access to interact with cryptocurrencies.

This is exactly what can happen with absolutely any coin and with state coins in particular.
The market itself dictates its own rules and conditions, which can lead to unpredictable consequences for any market participant.

In addition, there are many on the market who manipulate the market, which means that almost any coin can be lowered if desired.

On the one hand, this is good, from the point of view of mass adaptation of cryptocurrencies among the population, but on the other hand, it will be enough for this population to invest most of its funds in state cryptocurrency once and lose this money due to volatility, as mass adaptation will work in a completely different direction and people will simply hate cryptocurrency and their states that knocked them out on it.

Any increase in the price of an alternative coin is due primarily to the fact that new money is pouring into it. This can be a real investment of large capital or fake using bots and fictitious cheat volumes.
In any case, there is some pattern related to the quality of the project.

Even if a project stands still for a long time, but has a potentially profitable idea, there is a high probability that a large market maker will enter this project and begin to manipulate the price.

I agree with you. Rather, banks will try to adapt certain areas of their activities to the blockchain in order to satisfy the needs of customers who somehow want to invest in cryptocurrency.
The rest of the banks surpass the blockchain in many respects related specifically to financial transactions, I do not take into account the level of freedom and transparency of these operations.
Speaking about the latter, not every bank needs such a level of transparency as the blockchain provides.