|
ocminer have you considered limiting pool enrollment? I know that would mean lower fees for you but as of now your Shift and Expanse pools are hogging a good deal of the networks, not to mention centralizing the control of the blockchain.
As for everyone else, it's not all that hard to mine to a local client, and you don't need a lot of hashrate to do it either.
|
|
|
|
Wow, great job on the explorer! (I just wish etherchain would use actual timestamps instead of the reddit-style ambiguous "2 days ago" stuff!) Besides that, it's top notch.
Which timestamps do you refer to? Besides the frontpage all timestamps on the site show the full date & time. I see individual blocks have timestamps but when you look at transactions/mined blocks on account pages it just says "1 day ago" etc. I'm just very used to blockchain.info style explorers perhaps. |
|
|
|
|
Wow, great job on the explorer! (I just wish etherchain would use actual timestamps instead of the reddit-style ambiguous "2 days ago" stuff!) Besides that, it's top notch.
|
|
|
|
Now i ran out of coins. Why do people want to buy more than i can produce  Haha I'm in the same situation. I've been selling since Bleu first added their market and never would've thought this Poloniex thing would happen. Crazy! |
|
|
|
|
I've had an error withdrawing Expanse from Bittrex. The withdrawal is listed on the wallets page but the tx never made it to the destination, and the txid hash comes back as "null" when I look it up in gexp. Hopefully it'll get resolved.
|
|
|
|
I understand it'll be done when it's done but I've got a few transactions I'm wondering about and I'm hoping for a block explorer  |
|
|
|
Awesome that this is on polo now!
Question - what does an R9 280x run like mining exp? (21MH??)
Around 22.5 to 25 stock, depending on the card. I do around 25.3 to 26 at 1150 MHZ core OC on a HD 7970, older version of the 280x. Core overclock improves hashrates and underclocking memory decreases power consumption with very little hashrate loss, if any. I'm running 3 cards and get around 76 to 78 MHS, sometimes it peaks to 80 MHS. Ether mining with different cards is odd. Tahiti (7950, 7970, 280X) and Hawaii (290(X), 390(X)) cards like higher GPU speed and Pitcairn (7870, 270(X), 370(X)) seem to like higher memory speeds and almost couldn't give a damn about higher GPU speeds. |
|
|
|
Yeah of course, Tomatocage is more mature and honest compared to Quickseller. Now I don't know if QS will stay active under his 'main' account or will use another alt.
QS isn't his original account nor his first one. Going by the way he has been selling accounts from the time he was a part of this forum makes me believe he has been stalking this place and he has learnt a lot about the rules, ways to get on the DT, getting in good books of people out here, not getting banned inspite of having SO MANY ALTS and earning a reputation. He seems much more knowledgeable than we THINK he is. Snake in the grass comes to mind. Or like a hydra-snake hybrid because of all the alts.  |
|
|
|
|
Really cool to know people are working on viable cryptocurrency beyond the Bitcoin model. I have a suggestion for you if your vision is to see your creation become a successful proof of concept like Bitcoin is. Please choose a good name! DagCoin doesn't particularly stand out, or roll off the tongue well in my personal opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
If I enjoyed throwing money away this would be a great way to do it! I don't though, so I can't join the fun.
|
|
|
|
Can i mine with a MSI GeForce 960 2Go?
Miner say to me:
"No GPU device with sufficient memory was found. Can't GPU mine. Remove the -G argument."
try color 02
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
@echo off
color 0A
"ethminer.exe" -G -F http://127.0.0.1:9656
PAUSE
The same message. I have my GTX960 but i have an integrate gpu to my motherboard. The miner saw just integrate gpu or not? It'll be cheaper to buy on an exchange than mine with your hardware. |
|
|
|
This issue has already been resolved, I've spoken with Unibtc about it. But I will explain in detail, what happened for all you people wondering.
Magicaldice has been open for just over 2 weeks, so when Unibtc came to our website and managed to profit 54 BTC there was definitely red flags raised and questions that needed answering. The main concern being that Uni knew exactly when to switch from hi to lo and knew exactly when to change his bet from 1 btc to 2 btc. This happened on probably 25-30 separate occasions which A LOT of people pointed out to us, so it wasn't only us thinking there was something strange going on, it was others too.
Regardless, we still had no proof so we paid out all of his winnings. Although yesterday we did ask him to show us who he is, he gave us his ID, bank statements and also added me on FB with the same name on the statement + ID so everything seemed to check out. We also got him to verify some of his accounts that he played on, on other dice websites. We thought if he could prove he plays a lot on other sites, this would also strengthen the idea that he really is a legitimate player and just got lucky. After all of that, we we're pretty confident maybe he did just get lucky.
Let me bring you back a week or so to when we experienced a pretty big bug. Our dev was fixing a few things to do with roll speed and he accidentally fucked up pretty big. He made it so all rolls would produce the same result, and the nonce would stay the same. We fixed this issue fairly quickly and nobody got harmed since we re-set balances to the amount they were at before the issue occurred. Unibtc was online when this happened and that was where he managed to cash out 3 btc due to constantly winning (because roll was the same) and kindly gave them back to us. Now we forgot all about this until yesterday when we started thinking about it some more and we thought what if a user didn't re-set their seeds since then, maybe it's a possibility that it could have messed up future rolls or somehow leaked the server seed without us realizing it. So for that reason, we thought ok.. it still may be possible Unibtc has some sort of exploit. Maybe he knows the server seed and that's how he knows when to switch from hi to low and when to switch from 1 btc to 2 btc bets. So because of that possibility, which I admit probably was very small we decided to change Unibtc's server seed without telling him. The reason for not telling him was because we wanted to see if he'd continue to bet and if he did continue to bet then it proves to us that he probably is a legitimate player and we're just being paranoid. The correct decision was to message Uni and kindly ask him to re-set his seeds though, which is where we fucked up. We acted on impulse without thinking about it, our thought process was, "there's a possibility he's using an exploit? Ok, let's remove that possibility".
Like I said, I've spoken with Unibtc and although he was mad at first he did eventually understand where I was coming from and accepted my apology for not telling him in advance about re-setting his server seed.
But if the server seed was changed, why would it retroactively change the hash on an old bet? And why, if the seed was changed, would the old bet still not have a revealed server seed? |
|
|
|
Guess i should have mentioned that ...YES LOOK AT SERVER HASH
lol what do you expect though from noob;p
Ahh ok, you didn't tell me to look at the server seeds. Yes, it seems they changed the encrypted SHA 256 of the server seed without notifying the users and without publishing the secret of the hash. It seems fishy but I think they just made a mistake not telling the users to generate a new client seed + server seed as primedice has done many times. No, the server seed hash shouldn't have changed, and if it did, the server seed itself should have been in the second screenshot. |
|
|
|
That one guy was very lucky. And no, the winner is not the same guy as the owners.
Same thing can happen on primedice, just-dice or luckyb.it is just LUCK.
Take a look at the server seed hashes. |
|
|
|
|
Huh I'm still on 0.2.0. Am I forked off already?
|
|
|
|
Thanks all for your help and suggestions. Both machines are running on Ubuntu, and the machine hosting gexp is mining as well. On the host machine I have ethminer 0.9.38 installed which seems to work fine, only it does not report hashrate to the go client. This allows me to use miner.hashrate in gexp however to see that the other machine is reporting some hashrate to it:
> miner.hashrate
3744483963011968000
However I can't be sure if the latest ethminer (--version reports 0.9.92) I got using apt-get is actually mining or not because its not giving proper output in the console. Plus I want to see the damn average hashrate for tweaking. I've tried to figure out how to get an older version of ethminer that correctly reports hashrate and new work but I can't come up with what versioning they use for the PPA to do "sudo apt-get install ethminer=(old version)" Anyone know how to do that or build an old version from github?
This is more frustrating than I thought it'd be. For now I am going to use a second gexp client running on the second machine.
I figured this shit out. I think whoever is developing ethminer isn't bothering to test their own code because they've broken text output almost completely it seems. I copied the binary from the miner with a working version (0.9.38) to the 2nd machine, chowned it and now its working as it should. Software is supposed to get better with revision, not worse Ethereum devs. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks all for your help and suggestions. Both machines are running on Ubuntu, and the machine hosting gexp is mining as well. On the host machine I have ethminer 0.9.38 installed which seems to work fine, only it does not report hashrate to the go client. This allows me to use miner.hashrate in gexp however to see that the other machine is reporting some hashrate to it:
> miner.hashrate
3744483963011968000
However I can't be sure if the latest ethminer (--version reports 0.9.92) I got using apt-get is actually mining or not because its not giving proper output in the console. Plus I want to see the damn average hashrate for tweaking. I've tried to figure out how to get an older version of ethminer that correctly reports hashrate and new work but I can't come up with what versioning they use for the PPA to do "sudo apt-get install ethminer=(old version)" Anyone know how to do that or build an old version from github?
This is more frustrating than I thought it'd be. For now I am going to use a second gexp client running on the second machine.
|
|
|
|
This is great, nicely done! I'd like to see a more featured chain explorer if you can spare the code |
|
|
|
Anyone know the trick to mining from a computer to an EXP client running on another computer? I'm doing "ethminer -F http://192.168.1.x:9656 -G" and its giving me a "libcurl error 7: Could not connect to http://192..." Make sure you use --rpc eg: gexp.exe --port "42786" --rpc --rpcaddr "192.168.1.x" --rpcport 9656 --rpccorsdomain "*" console Thank you, the --rpcaddr switch seemed to get it to connect, however it doesn't seem to get work from the gexp client and just sits there saying [timestamp] gpuminer0 workLoop 1 #00000000... #00000000 Currently googling and searching for an answer, but one here would be appreciated |
|
|
|
Anyone know the trick to mining from a computer to an EXP client running on another computer? I'm doing "ethminer -F http://192.168.1.x:9656 -G" and its giving me a "libcurl error 7: Could not connect to http://192..." |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
