Could the persons 1-upping my orders stop doing that for like a day   Thank you kindly

True, some names make it easier to market though. As for linking certain ideas and feelings towards a brandname/logo. Marketing 101 lesson 1 pick a good marketable name and logo.

Not saying mammothcoin is a bad name, some people already have negative feelings towards it though, so why not start with a clean slate.

Pluspoint, it doesn't exist yet

Guardiancoin?

I like the meaning to the name, it's so long though, keep the meaning and somehow make it more 'catchy'

Does it, didn't know :p came up with it while driving and instantly posted it with carcomputer, should have checked

That new supercoin thread is quite nice, after the tech is in, we should think about doing something like that

It maybe hasn't gone extinct yet, very true. It does however have a double meaning. Bullish meaning expected price rise firstly. Second it's a strong powerful animal, which has been plagued for a few centuries nowbwith torture in bullfights hence the connection to animal rights.

It was just an idea from top of my head, so no need to hate on me :p

Just keep doing what youre doing, can't wait for the anon tech Once that's done, i suggest making a new thread, new announcement with clear pictures on what it is and a roadmap. Bit like they did with super

Exchange notation BULL

As in bullish ofc, as for logo change the mammoth to the wallstreet bull in white keep the rest red.

With the bull thing you can still keep de animal rights thing going.

Bullcoin 

There weren't any weird volume numbers at the time, I mined from start and kept eye on bittrex everyday. The largest sum sold since start was 70k at once and i happened to buy all of that. It has just been following the supercoin price at about a third of their price nothig more nothing less.

This is just a nice price to get in before the actual tech is implemented, after that supercoin and mammothcoin actual value should be a lot higher. Keep in mind this could be treated as stock trading and it's obviously mostly based o speculation, meaning the bittrex price doesn't really reflect the real potential value of certain technologies.


End note, im happily sitting on my coins and gasthering more when i see opportunities.

I'm 100% sure he doesnt have 90% of the coins.

The reason he didnt do it was because they wanted 1 btc worth of MAMM and the price back then that would have been pretty much more or less the whole pre-mine. Really not that weird he didnt want to close that deal, i wouldnt

Below is the first part on the SuperSend Trustless system. I will try to publish the next part in 2-3 days, maybe Monday/Tuesday time frame. Next parts will describe the overview and details of the algorithm.

==

SuperSend Trustless is an advanced p2p completely decentralized anonymous system. It belongs to Coinjoin category of the anonymous wallet. In this system all nodes (clients) are equal; there are no centralized or special nodes that hold more info than others. The coin transfer happens with the help of middle nodes that are randomly chosen. Mini-escrow is used with multisig address and transactions to ensure all the parties behave according to the transfer rules. This is a complete trustless system. The system is designed in a forceful way for all parties to behave correctly. If any party tries to cheat, he will lose more than his gain in the cheat.

Among all the online coin clients, if some minimum requirements are met (e.g. with minimum amount of coins in the balance, and with minimum 2 addresses in the wallet, etc), the node will advertise itself as a service node. Other nodes receiving the advertisement will add it to their service node list. There’s a limit in the service node list for each client (currently limited at 30). Any client can turn off the advertisement, if it does not want to be a service node. To turn off the service node advertisement, user just need to put a line in the config file. A service node will receive certain fee for each service it performs. Node not want to be service node can still receive other node’s advertisement and use the anonymous service, as long as it pays the service fee.

SuperSend Trustless makes heavy use of multisig technology. The sender of the coin will choose randomly 2 middle service nodes from his service node list to help the anonymous transfer. Among the two nodes chosen, one provides mix service, and another provides guarantee service. Why need 2 nodes? Because if there are any disputes between sender and mixer, it is up to guarantor to make a final judgment and then distribute the fund in the escrow accordingly.

Mixer is the node to mix the coins with his own, and send to destination. It is possible to have multiple mixer nodes, so to further obfuscate the transfer. At the current implementation, we use a single mixer node.

Guarantor is the one who will make the final judgment if any dispute between sender and mixer. If everything goes on well, Guarantor’s job is just to create multisig address and multisig transactions. It will not be involved in the signing processes of the multisig transactions in normal cases. But if there are disputes, the Guarantor will decide, based on the facts of the existing transactions, the outcome of escrow distribution. Of course, Guarantor cannot decide alone, he has to coordinate with another party (see below for the signing of multisig transactions).

We use a 2-of-3 multisig address for escrow. What is a 2-of-3 multisig address? It is an address that is created based on 3 public keys, each from Sender, Mixer and Guarantor, respectively. Remember, Sender, Mixer and Guarantor each hold the corresponding private key of the public key. Anyone is free to deposit coins to the 2-of-3 address. But in order to spend any fund from the address (i.e. send to another address), the transaction needs to be signed using at least 2 out of 3 private keys. Since the private keys are in different nodes, different nodes must willing to sign the same transaction before it becomes valid. In another words, the coins in that address cannot be spent by anyone alone, at least two of them should agree before the money can be spent.

==

Maybe you guys are right, I'm gonna keep my coins though and if the anonymous thing does indeed work when it comes out i'll be happy to use it to move some money around.

This is our weekly update on the phase-2 development.

The coding is going on well, we are working on the multisig escrow part, it is the key part of the trustless system in our algorithm. So far so good, we are still targeting for the testing in about 2 weeks. As the time getting closer, we will ask for a few volunteers to help us testing. Depends on our initial testing, we may use directly the main network for a closed circle testing (meaning not a public testing). We will decide it after our initial testing inside the dev team. If you are interested in joining our testing, please PM supercointeam.

On the other hand, after the main implementation work done, I will publish a detail white paper on the algorithm. Depends on my availability, the whitepaper may be published in 2-3 weeks, maybe sooner if I have more time working on it. Stay tuned.

On the positive side, it did create volume :p indeed richlist/largest wallets isn't correct it doesn't seem to update properly

Could somebody update the OP already -_-

He's saying that multipool wants 1 btc worth of MAMM, which is most of the coins reserved for bounties