Altcoins generally depend on BTC, which lost around $2,000 over the past weeks.
I'm not sure what exactly caused the dump this time (large volumes of sold coins or some bad news), but it seems like a normal cycle.
I wanted to sell some ETH but this rapid change of its price (more than $100 over the past two days) made me change mu plans and hold for a little bit.

Bingo!
Personally I use icodrops.com as this seems to be the most reliable source of information.
I also have several telegram channels (both english-speaking and in my native language) that provide me with the latest updates.
I've made my own excel table where I can analyze and compare the latest promising projects and see if I can apply for their bounty campaigns.
No offence to topic starter, I just wanted to share my own view on those "automated" bounty platforms  

As for me, the best way of detecting scam ICOs is studying the team that stands behind the project.
If they have already participated in successful ICOs that means you could trust the project.
Personally I've made a list of project teams - a "portolio" I can always refer to when I choose what ICO to participate in.
You could do the same 

Fiat money also have a kind of a hard cap - inflation starts if there are too much pieces of paper (or plastic) that are not supported by precious metals, goods or servies.
Remember what happened to Zimbabwe? Inflation there has reached some crazy several million percent over the past years.
Still the whole world uses paper money without thinking of some "hard caps" because they regulated it in a certain way that allows all these "cents", "centimes", "kopecks" and so on.

In this way, satoshis will rule when all BTC are mined.
Let's do the simpliest calculations:
1. 21 million BTC * 100 million satoshi = 2,100,000,000,000,000 (2 QUADRILLION) satoshi .
2. Divide 2,100,000,000,000,00 satoshi to 10 billion people that might live on the Earth in like 5 years = 210,000 satoshi per person.
It means that everyone (including old men and infants - and perhaps their pets   ) can get their share of the overall quantity of bitcoins mined.

Like no other, crypto market depends on the power of information.
The greatest majority of cryptocurrencies gained their value due to the reputation and image of the project they supported.


This is done by manipulators and scammers trying to dump and then pump the coins.
Bears support (and, of course, organize) the publication of articles like "Crypto currency is evil, pyramid and bubble" in order to cut the value of Bitcoin.


The legislative regulation of cryptocurrencies is one of the key news on the market.
I fully understand how it is hard to control the human psychology, but in order not get confused about the cost of Bitcoin after the decisions of state regulators we should always read this kind of news with a cool head.

If that's not a secret how much did you invest in all these ICOs?

Sorry to say that but it seems that you didn't bother yourself by analyzing the prospects of these projects and at least reading their white paper.
Okay,  I did it or you.  All the three projects you've listed appeared to be undervalued because of the following reasons:
1. ATFS: "Agricultural revolution". Not interesting for most investors as the greatest volumes of investment in food production are still concentrated within traditional banks.
2. BEZOP: E-commerce. Nice but not unique plans of gathering traders in a single paltform.
3. LEDU: Education. Another flat idea that failed to stimulate the investors.

So I would recommend you to concentrate on the projects that deal with:
1. Scalability of blockchain (nowadays this is the most actual problem for the whole system);
2. Gaming and/or gambling (a unique solution for all those several billion players could explode the crypto world);
3. Data management and storage (organizing terabytes of information in a blockchain-based manner could seriously contribute to data safety).

Good luck! )

Real estate is often treated as a low-risk asset, which can further on be sold or leased out.
However, the payback of such transactions has fallen down due to the flooding of the market (there are too many square meters that were built over the past years).
6 years ago I personally invested all my money into the appartment I currently live in. Now it's worth like 30% less due to tough economic situation in my country.
So if I were you, I would do nothing and just wait for the rise of BTC price, get some extra profit and, probably, reinvest in cryptocurrencies again.

I wonder what would happen if Facebook created its own mining platform (like Bitcoin Core) and connected all those 2 billion+ devices to it?
Would these tokens still be a kind of a "gift"?
I'm sure their price would reach the sky in the very first days since they could be used for so many various kinds of payment within the FB network - advertising, gaming, social analytics, etc.

I wish I was taught at least some basic info about cryptocurrencies at my university in late 2009 - I would be rich now.
Blockchain and related technology are hard to understand only during the first week, that's actually what happens with all new and unusual information.
By doing some google research and asking the right questions to those who already got the system (for example, here in the forum) one can easily grasp the whole idea (like I did  )

Yes, it is natural in the modern market, that good ideas can be met with disapproval.

I think this is not the only advantage of using the service.

Well, yes, that's what I meant

And it seems to me that the monopoly on information platforms is not bad. Unified information about sex in one application - why not?

Why do you need a bad analog, when there is a good original?

And who is it?

Steeply told, dude!

That's it!) Simplify the user's life. Now everything revolves around this.

The project potential is visible to the naked eye. It's really worth the service, you can not be so cautious.

Of course, Mr. Comic.

I meant some kind of global catastrophe that will no longer allow you to use the Internet.