Google and Facebook have not banned advertising for gambling afaik, if Chips is the token used they only need to advertise the use cases and they avoid the ban, the Chips token doesn't even need to be mentioned, or crypto, just the gambling games offered.

I never understand these new exchange listing pumps, couldn't Korean people buy decred using KRW before , even by buying Bitcoin first, and then trading for decred.  Is the added convenience really worth paying so much more for coins you could have bought much cheaper another way. I just don't get it

What is the latest version of Agama, and where can I download it from?

The link I downloaded from before isn't working today - https://komodoplatform.com/komodo-wallets/

Wow, the leaked rumours about the infamous Q project are quite amazing, I wonder if over this next month before the details are released in full we see a last ditch attempt by Matthew Green and friends to troll IOTA with everything they've got before it finally becomes obvious to everyone not following the cryptosphere 24/7 that IOTA is something BIG, not just another crypto project with potential.

I expect May to bring out every allegation and FUD possible by those who stand to lose, especially those who staked their reputations on IOTA being 'broken' - should be better than MMA cage fighting.

Good comedians are masters of comic timing including long pauses, I think DE will be back for at last one more encore.

Sorry bro, I think unswapped unity were burnt already

Yes, this coin is sadly not about tech, it's purely gambling now and everyone is playing the greater fool game hoping to exit while there are still people holding bags of useless coins without any serious devs onboard. Great for gamblers with big cajones who love riding big risk waves, but seriously, there's no tech innovation left here, for that bitcoin hush BTCH has all the features locked and loaded - tiny blockchain, fast, cheap, atomic swap exchange etc etc , and one of the best dev teams in Komodo.

Can someone explain the connection between the FUNK currency and the band that releases the music, is there any economics involved (i.e. the music and merch is sold only for FUNK), or is the band and music really not connected to the currency in any practical way?

I like the concept, but it looks like a bunch of musos and tech nerds had a great idea with FUNK, but forgot to actually connect the two together, what is the point of owning FUNK?

You guys have been around for years, are any of you thinking about crypto economics, or just a very loose marketing connection between the coin and music with the name FUNK?

Am I missing something?

Anything could happen here, take nothing for granted in the cryptosphere, turds get flushed and reappear floating in the bowl with a new name and hey presto, you have Verge or some other new 'contender' coin that pumps 100x into the billions. This mega dump could attract a new dev team , maybe they're already accumulating now, then they release some BS feature like TOR masternode snark shards, and then we're off to the races. Hodl your bags guys, no point selling, eBTC has a good name and could moon even while passing through the S bend.

Who are the STO-dudes, can you explain what you mean bro, or are you another bot?

On the contrary now is the time to take action with any incarnation of CK that exists at all, which is the version Loaf has devs working on at the moment, waiting for risto to return, or someone to revive the current version with PJ as dev looks like a hopeless cause.

If the dICO is delayed for a while longer it only means there is still work to do, no dramas, just a fact of life with cutting edge tech. I really don't see the rush to launch something as revolutionary as dICO's without dotting all the I's and crossing all the T's first - who can really estimate how long it'll take to do something that hasn't been done before?

I'm checking here once a week for possible comedy postings, memes, crypto gags, and general clowning around like right-wing extremist Trump style rants.

For tech updates I've put yourchain in the same basket as bitconnect, but for comedy routines I'm ranking Carlos much higher than DE, much better live shows, plus his material can be put to music. DE stopped at memes only, plus one poem I can remember - if someone puts that to music and puts out a YourChain remix, well, that might bring DE level pegging with Carlos as one the highest rating comedy scammers in the cryptosphere.

I'm not bothering to watch anything else you do, you're a liar and a fraud, so many proven cases, and you can't even honor swaps you specifically said would happen, but then denied.

If you ever produced anything of value in crypto I never saw it, and I DID follow for a long time, but no more. You're so full of shit, I only come for the laughs now (I love the neck tattoos, really classy lol  )

All the guys who were denied a swap must be feeling better, at least this turkey sank like a stone, it would hurt much more to be wrongly cheated of a swap only to see that project fly like an eagle, in this case I doubt anyone will be bothered doing more swaps, so Lee Gibson Grant gets to keep his ill gotten gains from exchange shenanigans, but forever his reputation is crap. I followed the swaps since 2014, must have been 3-4 versions in total of this doge shit, but looks like the train terminates here.

@Lee, why not post another photoshopped letter from a low level official from some economic back-water, give the rusted on guys one last boner, or maybe some photos from a communist party meeting from somewhere in the remote areas of one of the 'stans', maybe Cryptoturkeystan, you've got a deal going there with a top university, right?

I agree, there are still plenty of opportunties for life changing returns, but not without doing some research work, and the risks are much higher now. Buying 1BTC might return 100K in a couple of years, but it might also return zero, BCH could take over in a flippening, or any number of other things could send BTC to zero. That's why I think the easy riches (i.e. millions and up) is basically over, the guys making big returns now need to work pretty hard, following up to 50 projects, the days of hodling bitcoins and expecting to come back in 3 years time and find you're rich is gone, but in 2010 that stuff happened, like it did for the original NEM 'interested' guys who got a FREE stake worth a lot of $$ today.

Good point, I think this could be the single most important issue for crypto investors in 2018 and beyond, how many of your crypto assets are imune from regulatory interventions that could likely make some coins illegal, and put the promoters of them in court, or even behind bars. Things are moving so fast now, and the regulators are well behind now, most were still grappling with the basic concepts when the ICO boom took off, and there's a lot of catch up for them to do. One high profile action to send a message, and more than half the market could literally get wiped out by a mass panic.

Anon PoW coins might be safe haven, but the obvious place to store wealth if there is a panic is PoW coins without a large premine or ICO, and that puts CBX right in the cross hairs as a great safe haven with good prospects in a boom, and phenomenal prospects in a panic induced bust.

You drank Charlie's koolaid bro, which 'the governement' are you talking about, there's approx 200 of them in the world, and I don't know of any that are behind any current cryptos, and certainly not LTC. Nobody forced him to dump his bag of litecoin, he pumped things while he was at Coinbase, then dumped for maximum profit.

I really hope the anon coin bans start happening soon, if Japan tees off first it might start the dominoes falling, we need to just get it done and dusted, it's inevitable and probably the best marketing any coin could ever hope for, let TPTB do all the heavy lifting on sorting the wheat from the chaff for crypto newbies.

Like the John West tuna adverts, "it's the crypto governments ban that makes Monero the best",

No, Satoshi made a good coin and Charlie Lee tweaked a few parameters and copied it, nothing more, he isn't an originator of any real tech innovations, and he used his profile to make millions off of his so called 'community' in a shameless manner, what you're attracted to is his 'image' , his actions are that of a scammer, and yes, he exaggerates about tech all the time. The great thing about crypto is the history isn't written yet, and when people look back they'll realise what guys like Charlie Lee did during the wild west days.

The quickest way to kill Helium after the delay would be to mess with another snapshot, people made decisions to hold spread for the snapshot last year, and if the devs even considered altering the social contract by having another snapshot I would not in a million years buy more spread after I sold it all last year, and I think most people would do the same.

There is a lot of competition for attention now, it's only possible to follow so many coins, and if devs change rules people walk and pay attention elsewhere.