Around 8-10 i guess
Ark Iconomi Janus Spectre Neutron Exclusive Transfer Safex Bata
|
|
|
Can I vote for two delegates. And can I receive more ARK by voting when I send more ARK to my wallet?
1. If you want to vote for 2 delegates you will need to split your ARK in 2 ARK address and vote for the ones you want from this 2 ark addresses ( 1 ark address can vote for 1 delegate at a time) 2. Yes, if you sent more Ark to address you are voting with it will automatically reflect in bigger voting weight (and depending on the delegate you are voting for, bigger share of rewards) I'm not fully understanding this voting system. Is there a possibility to lose all ARK as well? Getting more ARK is great, but against what cost...? No worries there, when you vote for the delegates, you don't pass your ARK to them, you pass your ARK vote power to them. You technically still hold your Ark in your wallet, but the coin vote power is passed towards the delegate. But every vote/unvote delegate requires a small payment. More Ark = More Ark Vote Weight in a pool = More Revenue Block Sharing https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FGo3FkC3uSWXGHatPQyny2brMWjAIJsHFCR-Lhkl_m0/edit#gid=0Here you go, for the calculator If you are new, i would suggest you to vote for delegates that doesn't has a huge amount of ARK Vote on top of it, the reason why is because if your ARK Weight is less than a minimum amount of the Total Vote Weight in a delegate You would get very less of revenue sharing. Kindly use the calculator to find out the approximate Ark that you could get by voting in the delegates
|
|
|
Great buy orders price an amount we can see in Cryptopia
And with MNode, low amount of coins, this coin could be just great once it is developed
|
|
|
Hello OP, i know its frustrated that this kind of issue happens, i guess you could join slack and find an ideal solution with the dev, direct communication can an issue better, try to join the slack
|
|
|
What are peoples thoughts on Ubiq? I've heard it could be a contender with Etherium. Do you think it will sustain at 30k before going higher? It's price has seen steady growth since being listed on exchanges, 5k range, then 10k range, then 15k-20k range, now 25k-20k range.
Also, altcoins being is a semi bubble right now, bitcoin going through growing pains, changes coming in August, is it smart to buy any coin to invest right now? Why not just place really low buy orders and wait for the ineveitable halfening of every coin, before they really start to go up near the end of the year?
If i am not mistaken UBIQ is built on top of Ethreum codebase, so its has similar feature like ethereum but perhaps minor change i guess ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The recent APX is built using UBIQ If not mistaken
|
|
|
Is the dividend for this month paid?
Or it will paid on the actual date which is the 1st of June?
It was paid yesterday. Check it up on https://poswallet.com/profile/ "Recent deposits". If it was on exchange, i wouldn't get the dividend? i mean if i list it on exchange
|
|
|
Is the dividend for this month paid?
Or it will paid on the actual date which is the 1st of June?
|
|
|
2% every 10 day for pos
Whats the meaning of max 250 coin?
|
|
|
Good luck everyone, i has no idea who will win as i don't watch Anyway its really a great community event for everyone! Anyhow, any ETA Date for Wallet Redesign?
|
|
|
I buy more posw when i bought 600 Satoshi.
I bought 200 POSW at 17000 satoshi and restrained from selling at 20k expecting more price hike but since then price is continuously falling and now it is 2k ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) but I still believe in POSW and is waiting.I know it will soon give me good profit Well, posw is kinda at a situation that tons of coins that has no development/volume in it, and recently having some withdrawal issue due to coin quantity But indeed, at total of 70M supply of coin, with exchanges provided dividend. Even at loss dev still pays out 150k posw as dividend. Once everything is fixed, expect to hit $1 easily with goood volume ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Just shows what an awesome community this is . Great way to support the Dev.
Only one way to go from here
Yeah, lets rebuild though it take time tho Lets wish Dev good luck!
|
|
|
Hello for the block explorer, why i couldn't see the hash rate of the network?
Or is POW Ended?
Thanks
|
|
|
A "soft fork" is a change to consensus rules that requires those that add data to the ledger to agree to implement the change, but is backward-compatible to all those that enforce the rules. Bitcoin Core currently has a change called "SegWit" that is waiting to be activated. If it activates, then it will be a "soft fork". It is called a "soft fork", because if a significant majority of those adding data to the ledger implement it, then the blcokchain doesn't fork, but if a minority of those adding data to the ledger implement it, then the ledger will split with a shared history prior to the implementation of the new rules, and two incompatible histories after the implementation of the new rules.
A "hard fork" is a change to the consensus rules that requires an overwhelming majority of ALL USERS (miners, nodes, wallets, merchants, exchanges, etc) to all agree to implement the change. It is not backward-compatible to anyone. Bitcoin Unlimited currently has a change called "Emergent Consensus" that is waiting to be activated. If it activates, then it will be a "hard fork". It is called a "hard fork", because if EVERYBODY implements it, then the blcokchain doesn't fork, but if ANYBODY chooses not to implement it then the ledger will split with a shared history prior to the implementation of the new rules, and two incompatible histories after the implementation of the new rules.
First of all, appreciate on the long explanation! Understood most of it except this part In this case for soft-fork, it change the consensus rules that require those who proceed blocks to agree with the changes, but the update is reversible. As long as Majority of the user apply the updated consensus rules, the original blockchain will not be "Fork"(Recreate/Split). But in the case of Hard-fork, All the user are REQUIRE to implement the new consensus rule towards the chain else a "Fork" (Split Chain) will happen? Therefore, for the segwit update, it can be 80% of user to process block with the segwit updated core chain and the leftover 20% to process block without the segwit package? Sorry if my words sounds confusing because english is not my native so hope you got me ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
3) if the overwhelming majority decides to change the supply or anything else for that matter they can do it. otherwise any change like that will lead to a fork aka an altcoin.
Thanks for your answer, as currently we has bitcoin (Under bitcoin Core) and Bitcoin unlimited (Under Bitcoin Unlimited), therefore BTU is also a fork of BTC Right? Majority decides will be like the consensus meeting of 2017? Where all the big one decided to implement Segwit and Increase the block size to 2mb? As Segwit does not require a soft fork, for the plan on the meeting where the block size will be increase to 2 MB, in this case does this means we are require to undergo a hard fork?
|
|
|
Few questions here, i understand that bitcoin is powered decentralized across network by multiple PC's, founder is Satoshi nakamoto, 21 Million supply
But i am more interest to know
1) Will Bitcoin ever ever get shut down? Perhaps every user still mine the coin, but will a minor code change result the whole thing to be gone?
2) Do satoshi nakamoto hold a specific % of premine btc?
3) For the 21 Miilion supply, as it is open source according to some news i read. This shows people can actually change the supply in the code? Lets say currently most people uses btc-core, are they be able to change the max supply to 22Million?
Thank you
|
|
|
Anyone has any idea when will the exchange launch?
And, for the coins, there's no pos, pow for this coin
Other than purchasing off exchange, no other way else?
|
|
|
When i started the mnode, sometimes it will show that the masternode is not in the masternode list
How can i make sure it doesn't stop ?
|
|
|
Received my bounty. Thanks. Just waiting for taas list on big exchange like bittrex and poloniex. Dev was promise for big exchange befor ICO start. Hope it will realized soon.
It will depends on the trading volume tho, as most of the exchange wanted trading volume than anything else, because there is where they made revenue ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2Fw01GH%2F7284e23b4b.png&t=663&c=VfJJkfUOBXCgng) Wallet back online.. It's still catching up though.. edit: Nice dump.. Cheers! Yea, can say most people who invest only look at end product, they don't care the development process or situation case, anyhow im holding currently as it seems ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|