Hey everyone, updated the CUDA GPU miner with some of KlausT's improvements: https://github.com/Vorksholk/PascalCoin-CUDA/releases/tag/v1.04No promise that the new miner can actually mine blocks, but if anyone gets a block with this, please let the rest of us know. About 360% performance improvements, I'm getting around 900 MH/s on an overclocked 1080. I've also seen some people worried about the PascalCoin wallet saying "Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload." This isn't a problem--the way my miner works (and presumably some others that are floating around now, although I haven't looked at the code for them) is by submitting shares that meet a target of 24000000. Note that we are currently on track for a target of 31000000 soon, which is 8192 times higher, so you should expect to see, on average, 8192 of those errors per actual block mined. The miner is submitting shares to the wallet, effectively. These shares don't count for anything unless they meet the target. you say that this error is not really an error, but just how it work, but why you are saying that "no promise that the new miner can actually mine blocks"? if it work it should eventually find one I'm saying that the error isn't necessarily an indicator of any problem (in fact, it's 100% expected), but that doesn't mean something else couldn't be wrong with the miner.  mmh ok...btw can you fix the multiple instance thing with the nvidia miner, amd can run all the gpu with one instances but nvidia still not... |
|
|
|
Hey everyone, updated the CUDA GPU miner with some of KlausT's improvements: https://github.com/Vorksholk/PascalCoin-CUDA/releases/tag/v1.04No promise that the new miner can actually mine blocks, but if anyone gets a block with this, please let the rest of us know. About 360% performance improvements, I'm getting around 900 MH/s on an overclocked 1080. I've also seen some people worried about the PascalCoin wallet saying "Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload." This isn't a problem--the way my miner works (and presumably some others that are floating around now, although I haven't looked at the code for them) is by submitting shares that meet a target of 24000000. Note that we are currently on track for a target of 31000000 soon, which is 8192 times higher, so you should expect to see, on average, 8192 of those errors per actual block mined. The miner is submitting shares to the wallet, effectively. These shares don't count for anything unless they meet the target. you say that this error is not really an error, but just how it work, but why you are saying that "no promise that the new miner can actually mine blocks"? if it work it should eventually find one |
|
|
|
|
so it was just bad luck, the miner is working as intended, it make sense because few members found block with the nvidia miners espeically in the early stage
|
|
|
|
not ready yet, still some special things need to be fixed no cuda miner? |
|
|
|
As KlausT mentioned, CUDA JSON-RPC issues are caused by Pascalproxyv2, it doesn't send "target" param to the miner. Now we need that shitty proxy source... or a completely new miner  Or if somebody has time he can read proxy console output and replace headeroutXX.txt with correct value for "target", currently it's 000000000 for every round... you mean the final numbers of zero with target "809473025"? |
|
|
|
I found in total 5 Blocks with 10 GPUs.
What the ?!?! In how many days ?? 2 since yesterday 12pm GMT+1 The other days before with the nvidia or amd miner? |
|
|
|
Of course Vorksholk's CUDA miner works, we've been mining hundreds of blocks with our cards in the early days. KlausT's fork has some minor modifications, so should not create any issues. minor modification can lead to a bug, but if he optimized only the speed like it say on github, then it might be the same exact build the only thing is that discovering servers, it can find block when there is no "running" in the node status? If you use the proxy miner you need to set your miner name to 8 chars in wallet (options). After that start the proxy, then the miner and when it asks about miner prefix just put the 8 chars from the wallet.
They proxy will append 00, 01, etc on each GPU so you will always have 10 chars miner name.
My assumption is that you use bathr008 in miner and forgot to set same name in wallet.
mine is pascalri as a name and i used that in the miner when it ask for it, but i have the same error |
|
|
|
1346156 mh,
that is just the nethash not your hash |
|
|
|
it work there is a guy that have found two block with it, on 750 and 1070, ignore the error on the log, it doesn't mean anything
this error in the log file? Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload yes it's false, the miner work, you just need luck, the diff retarget is bugged because some times you get 5 block in less than the block time and other time you need 1 hour or more |
|
|
|
can someone confirm to have found a block with this miner? |
|
|
|
Yes it doesn't work either it work there is a guy that have found two block with it, on 750 and 1070, ignore the error on the log, it doesn't mean anything |
|
|
|
|
there are soem good alt here and there that you can trade for good profit, those best one are the one with the most interest from the community
usually if you see a new coin with a new algo that is forgotten and still no pool etc.. it can be pumped later to a great extent
i see a good potential on lbry for another pump and now pascalcoin which is pumped to 5x already
you can trade on poloniex and bittrex, which are the bst exchange now for altcoin
|
|
|
|
Ok, so I just want to make sure I'm doing this right, I been using bitcoins for years but I usually just bought off someone in person, If you look at the picture it says price is.... 1201.53 .. in the price section I changed it to a lower price. 811.00 as shown in the picture, does that mean someone is willing to sell me bitcoins at 811.00.. so If i buy the BTC for 800 dollars worth thats 0.657.. but why does the total say 538.26... so if i buy 800 dollars worth am i only paying 538 to get about 800 worth
There's not nearly enough info in this post to actually help you... I don't see any pictures, nor any links to the site you're using to buy BTC. Nevertheless, i can defenatly tell you that nobody will sell you $800 worth of BTC for $538... If you think you're going to make this kind of deal, you're either mistaking or you're being scammed. EDIT: You seem to have edited your post, and added this image:  It's pretty clear: i think you're confusing the sell and buy orders. This image shows that some people placed a CAD 800/BTC bid. This means that there is a person out there who's only willing to pay CAD 800 for 1 BTC (who wouldn't). Chances are VERY slim he'll find somebody to sell him BTC for this price, unless the price plummets in the future and he keeps his bid open. You can make any bid you want to, but if you want to buy BTC right now, you should make your bid equal than the cheapest price somebody is offering BTC for. You didn't include this column in your screenshot tough. let me ask u something for example the site says the price is 1201.53 cad but why does someone in the trade have it at 811.00.. wouldn't i wanna buy the one that says 811.00 thanks for help im just a noob don't confuse the actual value of bitcoin with what they are willing to sell, if they are selling more than 1 btc of course you will see an amount greater than the current bitcoin value so 811 might because he is sellind less than one bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
first i only invest in mining and some good alt to dump them later, and only when you see a good amount of hype around it, i only invest when i see that the pump that might occur have a great chance to occur
you see pascalcoin was recently pumped and there was a very high hype around it, it was bound to happen almost no risk, the hardest part is when you go out after you enter in play, no onw know the top of the pump
|
|
|
|
|
Well if you are an engineer you can actually recycle some components of the asic, to build something else
but since the chip is not reprogrammable you are stuck with an useless thing
|
|
|
|
BTC could die tomorrow, some Alts would continue on.  One of Alts would take over as the main conversion between crypto & fiat. And Life goes on.  i highly doubt any alt would take on bitcoin, but perhpas it's true that some alt will work side by side with bitcoin, because people need alternative, need more anonymity there was someone comparing the crypto world to fiat, with bitcoin being the usd and the other coin being all the other currency, there is no reason to not have a great amount of other currency |
|
|
|
franky1 is now also an enemy of fungiblity and not just decentralization? color me surprised. FWIW, rumor I'm hearing is that Wright is going to be the marketing face for some a new altcoin. If anyone is selling futures on it, I'm interested in shorting it.  well you are either an enemy of scaling or decentralization, if no solution will ever come bitcoin will lose one of those aspect while decentralization is the point of bitcoin, without scaling bitcoin will remain a niche market and thus centralized...oh the irony... |
|
|
|
|
There are two way, one is to forget about fiat and go with bitcoin to buy what you need, you can re-invest them quite easily here
the other is to dump low amount if you really need the euro, these amount always below 1000 euro to avoid money laundering transmission from your bank
|
|
|
|
V3 have same error......... and I heard maybe from just one miner he managed to find block, which still mean nothing
well no.. it mean that is work I found two blocks, two days back with V3 miner [img]https://i.imgur.com/3W0YArv.png[img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/abRc9RL.png[img] tnx for the screen, the v4 only enhanced the speed, so it should work too |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
