|
It maybe as simple as he just wants the price to fall to a certain point so that he can get in.
|
|
|
|
Funny how your long term is always up. How long is "long term?" All we've been seeing for the past 4 months is down, down, down
4 months are you sure? |
|
|
|
Repeat: No analyst ever has outperformed chance. Ever.
Now you made my day. I can't stop laughing.  It's exactly people with such beliefs allow some analysts to outperform chance. |
|
|
|
It happened today, see chart example
 Sorry ,I quoted the wrong post, what I was saying is I didn't see the spike on Mt.Gox's own trade data UI, and I don't know from which provider you're getting that chart from. So it's possbile that the problem is with the chart provider, not Mt.Gox itself. |
|
|
|
Don't see that spike on Mt.Gox's trade data price plot, could that be a problem with your chart provider? |
|
|
|
|
The lowest point is when so many miners quit that CPU mining becomes profitable again, since it's impossible, it won't fall below that point.
|
|
|
|
You praised Lebron James, that immediately makes your whole post worthless |
|
|
|
|
There was a small rally, as far as I am concerned, but not to 16-17 level which he said was possible, not probable or likely, he may or may not convey the exact peak point in the subscriptions, I don't know, but it seems fair enough to me. And sure, as the previous replier has pointed out, if someone can get every single one of his predictions right and make them freely available, we can officially declare that we have discovered a free crystalball.
Conclusion: OP probably needs to know how to read between the lines.
|
|
|
|
|
Does OP agree that I will get NOTHING from him?
|
|
|
|
Yea the walls could be bogus but I haven't seen anything like that for a long time.
Well obviously that's because mtgoxlive changed the scale to be the same for BTC/USD sides of the graph. Before, even when BID side was 3 times higher than the ASK side, they displayed the same height. Now it's adjusted to reflect the actual ratio and you don't have to calculate yourself. Thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
 Yea the walls could be bogus but I haven't seen anything like that for a long time. |
|
|
|
|
Not working with Firefox 6, for which Websocket is enabled by default.
|
|
|
|
No market movement for nearly an hour, maybe all traders suddenly found meaning of life and are now cherishing this uncommon tranquility. Nope, if they had found the meaning of life, the price of BTC would be 42 That is probably the total number of bitcoin traders who are living.  |
|
|
|
No market movement for nearly an hour, maybe all traders suddenly found meaning of life and are now cherishing this uncommon tranquility. |
|
|
|
|
Seems that the bots are pumping up the support as well......
|
|
|
|
While I am fairly certain that steadybot means well, by attempting to cultivate a stable market and all that, I do not think it's operator understands the unintended consequences of this strategy. By preventing price from floating up above $11.80 there is now redoubled resistance to the upside of $11.60 when it could have just as well have been a support level... Now I am seeing the upside potential unwind, leaving downside potential as the more likely proposition. If the hope is to attract investors/merchants by this strategy I would have to say at this point that it will be self-defeating. This kind of stickiness will virtually guarantee a gradual downward slide of the exchange rate over the long term... Now, if that is what steadybot intends all I have to say is "good job".  Well, in case of emergency, it would be quite easy for them to reverse the trend by removing the ask walls and buy all the 0.0* asks all the way up to somewhere like $15 anyway, unless there is a mighty short-seller working against them.... |
|
|
|
Interesting......There are so many bot padding sell's in place, The market is essentially coiled in an upward direction:
1000 BTC to get to 11.56 as opposed to 1500 to get to 11.29
Hmmm, was thinking the bot was going to ratchet us down and was tempted to go short...might hold off for a while now instead....
Agree, or be a bit more bold and adventurous, BUY! |
|
|
|
Methinks we got a stability bot running, wouldn't be surprised if this was for the sake of the conference, the market can still be moved just the bot/s are set to hold it where it lands.......
If the human masters of those bots don't care about their own losses, well, then you stand no chance to fight them. Aye, which is why I think the aim is stability, it comes at a cost, and the only thing I can tie in with that is positive pr for the conference. It sounds ridiculous but it seems that we're close to the point where all the other possibilties are eliminated and the remianing improbability is the only truth. |
|
|
|
Methinks we got a stability bot running, wouldn't be surprised if this was for the sake of the conference, the market can still be moved just the bot/s are set to hold it where it lands.......
If the human masters of those bots don't care about their own losses, well, then you stand no chance to fight them. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
