It's better short term (less than a month normally).

Other options like binance margin (where you pay 8% interest a year on money lent) will be a lot cheaper than using futures.

Every coin can get into problems when setting a stop limit, not just shit coins.

Binance have a stop market option. I think bybit do too, I haven't seen one that offers leveraged trading that doesn't?

I haven't been asked to? Only if I tried to deposit fiat would it ask me for ID? I still haven't got it verified.

use a stop market

Stop limits can get filled and they also can't. It has much more to do with volatility at the time you're stopped than market cap.
If you're trading a continuation and want to put in a stop limit in the hopes you don't get stopped out too low then put a stop market at the bottom of that pattern too so volatility doesn't completely liquidate all you have)!

Looking at the last bull market we had 5 successive greens, followed by a red, followed by 3 bigger greens.

I think we could even go slightly red as long as we don't encroach on around half of the previous candle then we can still keep going up from here.

It mightve just been that you'd have to do jyc to deposit to binance and maybe they weren't happy with that.

Also your trades on binance can't be linked to your identity as easily if you buy them through coinbase and transfer (so neither can say how much tax you owe reliably).

Yeah you've got nothing to worry about then just wait for them to fix it (they should respond within 72 hours afaik - hopefully waiting isn't too much of a problem when you know your funds should be safe).

Youll have to wait for their answer. If you've provided the correct details and used the official site (preferably onion) then you will be fine just waiting for them to reply to the email.

Just try simulating it.

If you're not pulling live data (eg importing open and close prices into excel) then you're going to have to remember to factor in candle closes on any bot you build to trade this (or wait for the candle to close). 

You might also want to add trading fees to the simulation as those could turn something that makes a profit into something that doesn't...

I think it's because only the security chip is closed source (according to what people say) so it's worth the risk to them.

Other than that and its compatibility with open source software (which could create an illusion of it being open source) then idk.

Can you link the topic? Did you check it definitely didn't post - on the actual thread?

I don't read errors I just click refresh and then post again and it normally fixes them.

In a crypto scene, stocks are still necessary at least at the start.

Unilever and a bunch of other companies are still needed to handle supply chains of food, qbanks will still be needed to allow conversions. I think a lot of wealthy people will be fast to adapt to a new economy. Especially considering they can hire people to do the work for them.

There probably was some institution buying stocks at the start of the stock market. I've seen similar parodies about Robinhood terminating stock trading in those assets because people were over leveraged and they did thave the funds to pay them (believe what you want either way).

I think shorting a firm with workers is less ethical than longing the same firm. The hedge fund wanted those workers to be jobless and in doing so make them more money to widen the gap...

Are you doing a trade or are you just looking at the value binance lists as the total of all your wallet funds?

If you're trading then they match you with someone else. Who wants to trade. If not then they just work out what a good assumption for the price is and go with that...

Yeah it's possible to analyse based on candles what's going to happen next but I'm not sure whether for bitcoin it's so accurate unless you stick to analysing just one timeframe of candles. For example there are technical analysis patterns involving candles but finding 3 candles that are red on one timeframe might be 6 on another...

Gme had alright revenue though, they just didn't have a good profit margin. There's a small chance they could bounce back with something, I heard a company in a similar position released more stock and managed to recover from the extra money (or something like that).

The thing of RH closing kinda shows how centralised the exchanges are (especially for small cap stocks like this. One of two international exchanges stopped trading it and the rest just followed (even cross continent).It also didn't seem to be listed in premium exchanger services (ones you pay a fee per trade and a maintenance fee on the account...


They (retail) didn't actually do anything illegal though. Enough people in legal spaces have said as much and how do you know they traded exactly off that reddit post? Like they could've had a volatility alert from another site or seen "top gainers" for a certain period. As long as the original entity didn't not give disclaimers and a disclaimer wasn't given for the board (where either could've been considered necessary) that'd be the only thing considered prosecutionable.

On the other hand, exchanges closing and actively reducing volume would be a reason to sue. As well as there being some volume on there even though most (I can't find one that was open in trading hours) are closed.

I answered "yes" but I could've answered both thst and depend on other users.

If I don't have time to run something from source with line hopping (or don't want to) then I often just check some significant parts and check things are in order and resemble other stuff. There's also the advantage that other users provide as a large user base in an open source piece of software often means quite a few people have looked at individual modules on their own and worked out how they worked at least and enough have probably done that anyway.

The US exchanges look like they're going to be causing the crash themselves. I noticed a buy I placed yesterday (with a fraction of the profits from another trade) hasn't gone through because some European exchanges don't have enough and can't buy them from the US so... (although you can still sell for $340/share (or whatever live price is) so are exchanges trying to get some - or just to not get sued?

---

If anyone was interested it's still possible to buy on some exchanges although it'd be a massive risk if you're expecting profits.

Did you try restarting electrum and then connecting to a different server if it didn't work just by restarting?

Why do you say you downloaded from electrum.org using the link in the wallet? What wallet did you update from?

Go through the relevant stickies in this section (sespecially rules and ranking) : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0

Welcome to the forum! If you're here to learn you should get merit and be able to rank up pretty fast, but if you don't that's also fine ranks don't mean too much anyway if you write good content and interact meaningfully.

I just saw something on this and I think it's quite funny...

Hopefully the retailers on reddit know when and how to pull out though and make a profit. If a hedge fund wants to do something and it's leaked to retail then that hedge fund is stupid, if it was intentional then that's pretty predatory of them.

The hedge fund(s) might make more money out of this though if they're still trying (which it looks like they are).