Atheists are free and therefore there is no reason for hatred.
Then why hate religion? Do you hate people who rape 8 years old kids, over and over? Or steal money from poor or handicapped? You should hate religion for the same reason. I also hate atheist who do those things. Should I just hate the human species then? , those people should be hated and castrated no matter the religion status, and I've never read that it says that raping kids is ok, unless it's Islam where Muhammad was married to a kid... But the person can be, a christian, atheist, pagan,etc.. Religion doesn't follow mental illness, but mental illness follows religion. Tell it to the Catholic priests. Church harbors and defends pedophiles, it has been doing it for hundreds of years. Fucking altar boys has been strictly Catholic thing to do. Cases pedofelia do happen among Catholic priests, but we also know cases when Muslims are zoofeliya. Which is worse? All these cases indicate that any religion is nonsense. But Islamism is the worst nonsense because aggressive. I don't know about that, I kind of like buddhism, no gods and siht more like spiritualism on a personal level, helping you becoem a better person. Better person towards yourself and towards others. Well, at least we know you are not an atheist. After all, you don't know if God exists or not. Atheists claim He doesn't. But they don't know it for sure. So, they are liars. You would rather ignore the question altogether.  |
|
|
|
I am also an atheist and don't believe in God. Human health depends, first and foremost from himself. The Bible does not prohibit the purchase but this bad habit leads to death. Who is responsible for this?
One of two things. Either you are ignorant and think you are an atheist, or you are a liar. Why? Because an atheists says that there is no God. But no atheist has absolute proof that there is no God. The best he can say is that it isn't apparent to him that there is a God. This means that even the atheist knows that there might be a God. Then, when you add all the evidence and the scientific proofs for God, it seems to even the atheist that God exists. If the atheist had said, "There might be a God, but we just can't tell," then he would be more truthful. As it is, he is either ignorant or a liar. |
|
|
|
Are you talking money here? Robots don't need money. Tokens can be given to people to use the benefits of the robots. People who are fearful that they won't have a place in life, need not be. People will be way more inventive than robots for a long time. People will always be able to find themselves something to do. The metals, software and chips needed for manufacturing robots needs to be purchased from somewhere. Also, the robots need electricity for their operation, and paid services such as GPS and software subscription to perform normally. Why something should be free? I believe that for everything in this world you have to pay. This is important. If you are for something does not pay, then you don't appreciate it. Give something free that you appreciate. Exactly. People don't appreciate something, which is given for free. Wasteful spending and vandalism will follow. Subsidizing the public transport is a good idea. But making it entirely free may be bad. Further exactly. So, you realize that something that isn't free isn't appreciated? Well then work to keep yourself from using the free stuff. Work hard and figure out a way. Or pay for those who want it free. Nobody says you have to use free stuff. Just don't use it. There will be lots of people like you. Join with them and work like crazy. It will even be tougher for you, because you will have to fight your own temptation to use the free stuff. Be an man/woman. Stand up and work. But let those of us who want the easy life have it. |
|
|
|
I believe in God because my life is given from The God and Everything I have it's given from The God
Your life was given to you by your parents. Belief in god is not a bad thing, but you should not go overboard. Extreme religiosity is to be blamed for most of the violence in this world. But who gave my parents their lives? Oh yes. Grandparents. How far back do you want to go with this thinking? There is no evolution. Evolution is mathematically impossible ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.0 ), and irreducible complexity shows us that evolution couldn't have happened even if it were mathematically possible. Something built us. And that Something is way smarter than we are. We are the artificial intelligence, and the thing that built us and the universe matches the dictionary description of our word "God." In fact, our descriptions of God don't come even close to describing His power, knowledge, wisdom, and understanding. In fact, to use words from someone else, "The foolishness of God is wiser than mans' wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than mans' strength." |
|
|
|
Who create God? Why there is always a confusion, misunderstanding and debates on the topic of God? Why do people want God? Isn't we are the one to make everything possible? We don't have to give our faith and hope to God. Isn't it ? Why God exists in all people mind?  Nobody created God. God created the universe. God is different than the universe. The "physics" of God is different than the physics of the universe. God always existed. God has built the knowledge of His existence into the deepest parts of the minds and hearts of people. We want and need God, because there is so little we can do in life. We can't keep ourselves alive much beyond 100 years. If we don't hope in God, we despair, ultimately. |
|
|
|
well, that is the end of the world..there is now way you can hide/run for that. except you are an scientist that can neutralize the radiation .but still Bomb effect can make you into pieces or dust . Biological weapon is more dangerous than we taught  It is not possible to neutralize the radiation, at least with the current technology. On the other hand, it is possible to escape from biological weapons, using vaccinations and medications. It IS possible to escape the radiation. Right now, the winds from the southern hemisphere generally remain separate from the northern hemisphere winds. Keep the bombs in the north, and it will take a long time for the radiation to penetrate to the south. In addition, there are a few places in the world where the prevailing winds would keep the radiation from ever reaching. |
|
|
|
Are you talking money here? Robots don't need money. Tokens can be given to people to use the benefits of the robots. People who are fearful that they won't have a place in life, need not be. People will be way more inventive than robots for a long time. People will always be able to find themselves something to do. The metals, software and chips needed for manufacturing robots needs to be purchased from somewhere. Also, the robots need electricity for their operation, and paid services such as GPS and software subscription to perform normally. Not if the robots mine and refine the metals, manufacture the software chips, put together and operate the power plants, run the GPS towers and satellites. And why would they need subscriptions to something that they handled the services for? Robots can be designed to do all this with little to no supervision. And they don't have to be intelligent robots. Sure, a few people might need to be available for contingencies that were not thought of ahead of time, or for certain kinds of emergencies. But most of this can be handled in the programming. The few people that would be needed, would be around because they wanted to be. Robots would do all the heavy stuff. So, what would people do? Anything they wanted. Robots would make everything people needed for life and enjoyment. Travel the world. Swim in the Caribbean, or the off Maldives if you like. Transportation is free, handled by the robots. Everything that is made by people is now made by the robots, for free, because it doesn't cost the robots anything to go out and do it. They rebuild their own worn out parts for free. |
|
|
|
Transport free can be free + clothing + food + house + health + education. But you also need to work for free. Do you agree with it?
But sometime in the near future within 100 years. Once every work is occupied by robots the government are oblige to give the citizens its basic needs.
Maybe then there would be less people working so the costs of a business are lowered by that but robots still need to be taken care of... Any coin has two sides. The more robots will do the work of the people, the less jobs and the greater will be the deficit of the pension Fund. How will a person live in a society of robots? Are you talking money here? Robots don't need money. Tokens can be given to people to use the benefits of the robots. People who are fearful that they won't have a place in life, need not be. People will be way more inventive than robots for a long time. People will always be able to find themselves something to do. |
|
|
|
Transportation and other benefits will be free, only after we have the robots manufacturing and doing everything for us. You are kidding yourself. Even if all the robots will be doing, it is still the transportation services will cost money. Need to service robots, need to fuel transport. In addition, the robots need to produce, and it also takes money. Once the robots are built to service themselves, including mining and processing the raw materials, they won't need us, except in a few very specialized areas. |
|
|
|
Forget the fees for transacting in Bitcoin. Do it by supply and demand. Let a miner get his fee rewards ONLY in the bitcoins he mines. If this isn't enough for him, what will happen? He will quit mining. Then the difficulty will come down so that he will be encouraged to start mining again. We don't need any stinkin' fees. They only serve to make the whole Bitcoin thing a more centralized thing. |
|
|
|
I'm not really into the technical side of Bitcoin at all. But am I wrong to think that when a Bitcoin miner mines some bitcoins, that he gets to keep them? If he keeps them, aren't they enough reward when he cashes them in or buys product with them? Please explain very briefly, to the point, if this thinking of mine is wrong. |
|
|
|
Which would I rather have, feminism or cancer? Feminism! You can always beat a woman into subjection, but you can't always beat cancer. |
|
|
|
Christians have great assurance that God will hold them alive after their death in this life. I can't tell you how many times God has intervened for me in this life, both in small ways and large, and has saved me from all kinds of problems and troubles. My assurance that God will save me from death to a life in the hereafter is strengthened by this. |
|
|
|
Transportation and other benefits will be free, only after we have the robots manufacturing and doing everything for us. |
|
|
|
As a philosopher, Voltaire was not an atheist, but instead is a theist, he does not hate religion, but ordinary people hate those who control the priestly class only, my willing heart to try whatever the hands find to do, do it with they might. when you know what you need. Try your best
Voltaire (skeptic): “I am abandoned by God and man! I will give you half of what I am worth if you will give me six months’ life. Then I shall go to hell; and you will go with me. O Christ! O Jesus Christ!” (The talented French writer once said of Jesus, “Curse the wretch!” He stated, “Every sensible man, every honorable man, must hold the Christian sect in horror ...Christianity is the most ridiculous, the most absurd and bloody religion that has ever infected the world.”) He also boasted, “In twenty years Christianity will be no more. My single hand shall destroy the edifice it took twelve apostles to rear.” Some years later, Voltaire’s house was used by the Geneva Bible Society to print Bibles. Voltaire famous anti-christian atheist: "I am abandoned by God and man; I will give you half of what I am worth if you will give me six months' life." (He said this to Dr. Fochin, who told him it could not be done.) "Then I shall die and go to hell!" (His nurse said: "For all the money in Europe I wouldn’t want to see another unbeliever die! All night long he cried for forgiveness." |
|
|
|
Gun Range Owner Reveals Secrets to Bypassing California's Upcoming AR-15 Ban Describing how California's SB-880 will re-define "assault weapons," Jacob Belemjian of The Firing Line shooting range in Clovis points out exactly what parts of the rifle will make the gun illegal at the start of the new year, and what can be modified on the gun to make it legal.
Despite the AR-15 he uses as an example requiring a special tool in order to detach the magazine, Belemjian says the feature, which in the past allowed the gun to bypass detachable gun magazine restrictions, means the gun would be in violation of the new laws.
Under the new law, a "fixed magazine" is now defined as "an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action."
Belemjian also described other features on his example centerfire, semi-automatic rifle that would make it illegal, such as the aforementioned detachable magazine and any of the following features: a collapsible, or adjustable, or foldable stock; a pistol grip that protrudes below the trigger guard; a forward pistol grip; and a flash hider. Read more at http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-range-owner-reveals-secrets-to-bypassing-californias-upcoming-ar-15-ban.html.
|
|
|
|
...[clip]... Inner space is fake. It's part of the flat-earth deception.   Fucking degenerate, who's the one promoting a deception here?  The one-worlders tell us what they are doing and what they are going to do. Why? It seems to make their operations go better. Like it prepares the world for the things that they push on us. Now you are trying to tell us that you are a covert agent working for NASA. |
|
|
|
The life and soul ends with our death. Being a Hindu, my body will be cremated shortly after my death. I don't believe in any afterlife. Once we die, that is going to be the end. Full stop.
The complex vibes of your spirit, soul and mind go on forever, in a different form after death. Don't believe it. There is nothing after death. Life is given to man only once. Idiots Muslims spend your life killing other people is a great crime. I hope that I will not meet with him. I don't go on public transport but it still does not eliminate the possible attacks. Who told you there is nothing after death? Are you 100% sure about that? lol.. Well, he's right from the standpoint that it is no longer a man once it is dead. So, no matter how alive it is after death, life might be given to a man only once. It will be something else in the life after death. |
|
|
|
In regards to the Christian tradition allowing pork consumption I believe that comes not from the time of Noah but later from Acts in the New Testament. However, I have not looked into it extensively and their may be other sources. Why can Christians eat pork & shellfish, Muslims eat shellfish, but Jews cannot? https://www.quora.com/Why-can-Christians-eat-pork-shellfish-Muslims-eat-shellfish-but-Jews-cannotNo one mentioned Peter's revelation! So when Christ died, Peter was the senior apostle and most religions believe that he was therefore the President of the New Testament church. Catholics call him the first Pope; evangelicals may prefer Paul's zeal, but still defer to Peter in authority (as did Paul). So by definition Jesus "fulfilled" the Mosaic law, but there were still debates as to what that meant. To this day there are religions who throw out the whole Old Testament, and others who still keep a Saturday sabbath. Peter erred on the side of caution and until revelation was received otherwise insisted everyone stay kosher, and for a short time even mandated circumcision. Until... So Jesus ascended into Heaven in Acts 1. Shortly afterwards--nine chapters later--in Acts 10:11 ( http://lds.org/scriptures/nt/act...), Peter had a vision of a great feast prepared with both kosher and "unclean" food. God commanded him to eat it; Peter refused; God told him "what God has now cleansed thou shalt not call unclean." ( http://www.blueletterbible.org/B...). Most Christians believe that this experience proves that Kosher was one of the elements of the Mosaic law that was completed by the atonement of Jesus Christ. The vision appears symbolic, indicating that the gentiles or goyim were no longer unclean or abhorrent. I find that Paul's writings from 1 Corinthians 10:23 on are more relevant to this. All things are lawful for me, but not all things are helpful; all things are lawful for me, but not all things edify. It is not the food that is a concern since Christ was sacrificed, but the respect and love for others that matters. This is much like inhaling a medium-rare burger in front of a vegan could be rude to the point of offense; consideration of others is the primary focus. Much of the Old Testament, Deuteronomy in particular, struck me as a survival guide for a society. Numerous points of instruction were prudent forms of disease management and prevention considering the conditions of the time. I consider the change this way: with the practices ingrained in their cultural mindset and the people expanded in number, threats of eradication waned and the society as a whole matured to a point where it could be discerning with Jesus' guidance.Are you sure? Read it again. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1367154.0What? Trying to cast doubt in his mind? For a joker who admits to accepting fictional science theory, rather than factual science law, you sure are an outspoken little ding-dong. Which funny farm are you at again? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
