Bitcoin is not easy to understand, but you do not have to understand everything about bitcoin, there are some technical aspects of bitcoin and the blockchain used that is very difficult to understand by bitcoin users which are for developers to understand, not users. To buy and sell bitcoin by transferring it from one wallet to another is not hard, reputable wallets used today will give you just the basic warning like the reason to keep your seed phrase safe and not let anyone knows about your seed phrase, because anyone that knows your seed phrase is able to spend your coins.

If only 1 DT1 inclusion is needed for DT1 to get to DT2, it is not bad at all, I am okay with that, some members will be okay with that too, but if the community support a minimum of 2 DT1 inclusions, it may also not be bad too, but just that it will be harder for people that are in DT1 to get to DT2. DT2 may become more centralized. What I think is that DT system can not be totally accurate, it will be faulty to an extent, but the good side of the one we are using now is much more than the bad side, like 80% or more good side.

Theymos can try and make a poll about this, but I do not think it is necessary. I do not want more power to be among some people that can make DT2 more centralized. Some people want this just because they are unable to manipulate the DT2, I do not know but that is what I am thinking, which makes me like this current DT system. I am not supporting this proposal.

This present DT system is good.

Most fake projects plagiarized white paper of another project, you can easily tell that a project is fake if plagiarized white paper is used. White paper contains the information about a project for you to know the aims and objectives of the project, it is good to consider reading it. But having legit white paper does not still guarantee a project not to still fail or resulting to pump and dump.

Binance is an exchange, the exchange will try possible best to list good coins, but some coins can turn bad like Luna and UST.

Definitely. If you have an organization, won't you want profit? All you will be looking for is to make profit in a legit way if you think you can.

It depends on what you call this type of coin, they have high marketcap and I can not call them shit coins. In coin listing, Binance is better than many other exchanges.

You can say that again, you are not wrong. As CZ said it, it can help beginners, even if not helping, saying it does not take anything from anyone.

Please, you do not have to do that. It is just like saying you have some people that you trusted before but you do not trust them again, when you still trust them. If you trust anyone trustworthy and people that you think can not do harm on this forum, you shouldn't change that, it is helping in one way or the other, everything can not be 100% accurate or perfect.

Less than $1 is enough to move USDT on Tron blockchain, but newbies can be ignorant to the extent that they can be lured to use $10 fee or higher to make the transaction.

Avoid this scam.

Did anyone that told you to invest in bitcoin told you about bitcoin halving,  bull and bear market and the right time the bull or bear time can probably occur? Just like this:


If no one told you something like that, that is why you are not getting it. Know also that if you want to invest in bitcoin, you can hold it for like 2 years or more.

Some people can think they can live with gambling but later find out that they are wrong after significant losses. Anyone that is thinking that they can make a living with gambling is deceiving himself until he finally realizes that. No one should depend on gambling, it is a game of luck and the luck is more towards the gambling sites. Gamblers should not take their financial life a joke, they should not depend on gambling.

You are not right about this, how can gambling be a source of income when there are chances that you are more likely to lose while the gambling sites are more likely to win? Gambling should never be taken as a source of income. Because you make profit from gambling today should not be seen as a good reason to see gambling as a source of income, because it is not reliable.

The casinos that make their users to be able to gamble with money that is not real make the offer because they want their casino site to be newbie friendly. Newbies will find it easy to look for a games on the casino site and test it, just like demo. With that, they use it to know about the game so that if they want to gamble with real monery, they will not find it hard as they have known more about how the game they want to use for the gambling is.

My reply would have been different, but I couldn't see that link before. Evidence: https://ninjastic.space/topic/5409101

But I wonder why people want to make things strict for themselves, fiat is still fiat, be it paper money, digital fiat or CBDC. Instead to look for alternatives like gold or bitcoin. There are good time to invest in bitcoin, a time like now.

When the countries in the world are talking about cashless society, you are talking about how people are using more fiat. Take it or not, the world is going more digital daily. Though people still depend on cash, but the dependency on fiat may continue to vanish as more people are going digital. Some people just depend on cash because they know digital transfer may not be accepted in some places.

I thought it was a spam because he was referring to meta, not knowing he wasn't but only suggesting new board for lending discussion.

Thank you for the clarification. New lending board about lending discussion? Is that necessary at all? That can fit into lending and reputation board. Isn't that right?

This board 'meta' is about discussing what is related to the forum like improvement, suggestion about this forum. If you want to borrow or lend, go to lending. But you do not have the qualifications that can make anyone give you loan.

I can see that too, stake.bet is also taking people to stake.com official website, it is not fake.

I do not know how betting site affiliation works, if it is a one time payment or continuous payment on every bet gained or lost by the gambler referred to the betting site. But if it is one time payment, I do not think OP is right. I do not have to think twice, I will avoid this, but if the site links are legit, people trying it also will not lose, but I will prefer to use the official site, or people should be very sure they are not directed to a scam site.

I have experienced this before, it was on another exchange to another exchange, but very similar issue. You did no mistake, contact Binance customer support. You coin is with Binance.

I contacted the exchange I wanted to the receive ripple and they told me the problem would be resolved and it was resolved after 2 days or 3 days. But it did not favour me as ripple falled in price massively during the time. It was the time SEC filed suit against ripple when some exchanges even dilised it.

People can make analyses if gambling on sport, but their analyses does not determine which team would win. For a big team that have more opportunity to win a match, to win is also by luck, a big team can still lose to a small team that has low chance of winning.

Those should be olden days. There can still be people that believe in something like that, but they are superstitions in reality and does not guarantee more winning.

Billiard should be considered sport, if table tennis is seen as sport, why billiard not considered as sport too, billard is sport has it fits the sport category than being a casino. That is why in many countries, billard is considered sport. But if billard is listed on any sport betting site, this does not change the rules and everything about it, even if it is in the category of sport or casino.

Either he has a means to sustain gambling or not, it is not a good decision. Even if he has another source of income, that already defeats the purpose of making gambling to make a provision for his family's financial needs, and that is how it suppose to be. You are right, better to have a source of income, if not having a job yet, is not mandatory to marry compulsorily until you get a job or find something to do than thinking gambling will do it.

If you have been following up the match right from the beginning of it, Arsenal played really good and scored before the first half was over. The second half was a bit different as Crystal Palace played better and have opportunities to score, but they were not able to score. Probably the pressure on Marc Guehi led to the mistake he made and Arsenal was able to win with 2 goals. Crystal Palace played good too, but no luck on their side.

Arsenal is not my favorite today, I do not even have a favorite between Arsenal or Leicester because Arsenal can either perform good or bad, that is how they are. Arsenal can have more probability of winning but I do not like betting on this type of match, my favorite match in Premier League would be played tomorrow, which is Fulham versus Liverpool. My main game of the day is the Bayern match. It should not be about the most important match but should be about the ones with you having the highest chance of winning.