I found this google page for reporting a phishing site page designed to look like another page in an attempt to steal users' personal information. If bitcointalk.pw lets bitcointalk.org users enter their login details is should qualify as a phishing site. https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/?hl=enReport Phishing Page
Thank you for helping us keep the web safe from phishing sites. If you believe you've encountered a page designed to look like another page in an attempt to steal users' personal information, please complete the form below to report the page to the Google Safe Browsing team. Google used to provide a form to report scraper websites, but sadly it's now closed. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Pw1KVOVRyr4a7ezj_6SHghnX1Y6bp1SOVmy60QjkF0Y/closedform However are other tools available like the Google Disavow tool described in this stackexchange post. http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/78404/someone-has-cloned-my-wordpress-blog-how-do-i-prevent-it-from-hurting-seoIf the site produces backlinks to you it is important to use the Google Disavow tool otherwise the algorithm will be working against you, regardless. https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/disavow-links-maincreate a .txt file and add: domain:thedamnsitethatcloned.com then upload it to Google via Webmaster Tools. Here are exactly the steps that I would take to resolve this issue. I know that a lot of webmasters face this issue. I have had this problem before and there does not seem to be a straight answer on Google (ironically) (which is why I want to help). Matt Cutts is the dude who you are supposed to listen to about these issues, but listening to him is like trying to win a game of chess against a supercomputer inside a burning house (no help to be found). The short Cutts: Register with DMCA and put the badge on your website. Gather all copied content by pasting the first 60 words from your website into Google and submut VIA https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/dmca-dashboard DMCA requests will only accept permalinks. Disavow EVERY site which has copied content linking back to you. Do this on every page of your website. My first answer was to disavow the domain, but I forgot mention that you need to disavow: www. AND non www. (Google counts them as two separate domains). |
|
|
|
bitcointalk.pw is registered through WhoisGuard. https://who.is/whois/bitcointalk.pwI'm no legal expert, but someone must own the copyright to the content of posts made here, either the users or the forum itself. Reddit's agreement says users own the copyright rights to their own posts, but by submitting them to reddit they grant it an unrestricted license to display them. Any website hosting or proxy linking to bitcointalk posts is breaking the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and is risking a takedown notice to remove the copyrighted works. Whoisguard says to contact it here to report copyright infringement by any domain using its service http://www.whoisguard.com/contact-us.aspIn case you believe a domain using our service is engaged in abuse or any illegal activity and/or infringes third parties' trademarks (or other rights), please contact support@mail.whoisguard.com and file an abuse report. The website is just a proxy for bitcointalk.org, it forwards all requests to bitcointalk's server. I don't believe it actually hosts any of the content. Harder to make a case for DMCA. Yes the DMCA is more vague about proxys. However, this wikipedia page suggests proxied content is still subject to takedown notices. Also, is any of the content modified on bitcointalk.pw? Any modified content is subject to takedown. I'm not prepared to risk viewing the site myself. I hate accidentally clicking a link to any bitcointalk clone site because of the risk of a virus infection. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act512(b) System Caching Safe Harbor
Section 512(b) protects OSPs who engage in caching (i.e. creating copies of material for faster access) if the caching is conducted in standard ways, and does not interfere with reasonable copy protection systems. This Section applies to the proxy and caching servers used by ISPs and many other providers.
If the cached material is made available to end users the system provider must follow the Section 512(c) takedown and put back provisions. Note that this provision only applies to cached material originated by a third party, not by the provider itself. Also, the content of the material must not be modified as a result of the caching process. |
|
|
|
Take a look at this website. https://www.walletexplorer.com/It can guess which service an address belongs to, and covers all the big exchanges and gambling sites. The site's creator started an address mapping business which charges a fee, and he often lets his free site get out of sync with the blockchain. It can't often provide information about new addresses anymore, but it can tell you any service an old address belonged to. Sometimes it's a week out of sync, but it seems to be in sync today. |
|
|
|
bitcointalk.pw is registered through WhoisGuard. https://who.is/whois/bitcointalk.pwI'm no legal expert, but someone must own the copyright to the content of posts made here, either the users or the forum itself. Reddit's agreement says users own the copyright rights to their own posts, but by submitting them to reddit they grant it an unrestricted license to display them. Any website hosting or proxy linking to bitcointalk posts is breaking the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and is risking a takedown notice to remove the copyrighted works. Whoisguard says to contact it here to report copyright infringement by any domain using its service http://www.whoisguard.com/contact-us.aspIn case you believe a domain using our service is engaged in abuse or any illegal activity and/or infringes third parties' trademarks (or other rights), please contact support@mail.whoisguard.com and file an abuse report. |
|
|
|
Okay another question where do all those coins come from? There has to be a moment the seller sold all his coins. So many sells? I am not amused.
You can endlessly short if you have the capital the exchange has enough coins for you to short. And with no buyers right now, the whale can keep going. I guess the downside is that the Chinese exchanges have a bunch, since no one can withdrawal BTC right now. If you have coins on an exchange, pull them off and help the cause. This asshole will get rekt once sentiment shifts and other big buyers start coming in. (Or it could just be Roger Ver rage-quitting Bitcoin  ) I remember a few years ago a whale kept crashing the price. He had millions of dollars worth of coins on high leverage, but eventually get rekt. The price shot straight back up after that. This dump could have someone similar behind it, and lead to a fast pump afterwards. |
|
|
|
I have trouble understanding who is still selling? The price is insanely low.
Sometimes whales put buy orders on at insanely low prices, then dump to trigger the little fish's stop losses. Nice round figures like $1000 is where most of the little fish's place their stop losses, and the whales know it. |
|
|
|
Your first address in that screenshot sent 111 Bitcoins to one address and 89 Bitcoins to another address on 2017-03-10 (slightly over a week ago). This is the address, and transaction. 1PXQDfaRZykDRwAo8fzdrBusj4TX3wtETc https://blockchain.info/address/1PXQDfaRZykDRwAo8fzdrBusj4TX3wtETcThe 89 Bitcoins were sent through a series of addresses and transactions to 1FbzoaAJnXyDbj4a9nWFa61MCogz5WNHwX yesterday. Is that one of your addresses? The first thing you should do is backup your wallet.dat file from your Bitcoin core v0.8.3-beta wallet. Follow the instructions in the quote below to do that. Click the windows start button, then copy and paste the line of text below into the search box that appears, then press the enter key to open the folder containing your wallet.dat file. %appdata%\Bitcoin This is what your search box should look like after you have copied and pasted the line above into it.  Backup the wallet.dat file, it's all you need to secure your Bitcoins. Now you need to get all the private keys that wallet.dat file contains. Later versions of Bitcoin core have a dumpwallet command to do that, but I don't think v0.8.3-beta had. Certainly v0.7.0 hadn't because I have that version archived, and tested it. There is an easy way to get all the private keys in your wallet.dat by importing into a newer wallet and using the dumpwallet command. However, if you don't correctly back up your wallet.dat first it might overwrite the wallet.dat containing your coins and destroy them all. It's safer to use the method detailed below. After you have backed up your wallet.dat you can click the "receive coins" tab in your Bitcoin v0.8.3-beta wallet, then keep clicking the "new address" button until you have about fifty addresses. Next, use the dumpprivkey command in debug mode to get the private key of each of those 50 addresses. Import those 50 private keys into electrum and check if any of your Bitcoins show up. If that doesn't work then click the "new address" button another 50 times, get the private keys, and import them into electrum. Your Bitcoin v0.8.3-beta wallet contains a key pool of the next 100 addresses it will use, and if you have clicked the "new address" button 100 times your wallet will show all of them. Unless you changede your wallet's settings it should have the default 100 addresses in its keypool. This post explains about keypools.
The wallet.dat contains, by default. a key pool of the next 100 addresses your client will use. An address is consumed each time you click "New Address" and then each time a change transaction (back to yourself) is made it pulls one address from the key pool. The keypool is topped up after each time an address is drawn from it. (with a few exceptions).
So you as long as your backup is newer than the past 100 transactions it should have all the keys in it.
editAfter taking a closer (magnified) look at your screenshots I realised that electrum wallet with five private keys imported into it should be empty. Try importing the private key for the 16JrYHfgUfjSEFFarPFVvZtexW3oUETXqh address that contains 190.9995475 Bitcoins if it's one of yours. |
|
|
|
|
Do we go sideways this weekend? Bitstamp's volume's dropped and the last few hours have been the flattest in the last day.
|
|
|
|
If you export your private keys from your Bitcoin v0.8.3-beta wallet, then import them into an electrum wallet you can probably spend your 300 Bitcoins right away. I tested making a watching only electrum wallet by importing your 16JrYHfgUfjSEFFarPFVvZtexW3oUETXqh address into it. The address shows up as containing 190.9995475 Bitcoins thatare confirmed and ready to be spent. This is a screenshot of it. As you have the private key you can make an electrum wallet that's capable of spending those coins, instead of only watching their balance like the wallet I made.   I copied the 5 private keys from bitcoin 8.3beta client by using dumpprivkey command in debug mode. I then downloaded and ran Electrum wallet. During the setup I pasted the 5 private keys from bitcoin 8.3beta and here is what it shows:  That looks like the remaining balances (showing in milli Bitcoins) are available to spend. What are the addresses showing when you click "wallet" when open the addresses tab and the coins tab (as shown below)? Are coins showing as confirmed and available for spending?  You can change the units electrum shows Bitcoin balances in from milli Bitcoins to Bitcoins by clicking tools, then preferences, then appearance, then base unit as shown in these screenshots.    |
|
|
|
If you export your private keys from your Bitcoin v0.8.3-beta wallet, then import them into an electrum wallet you can probably spend your 300 Bitcoins right away. I tested making a watching only electrum wallet by importing your 16JrYHfgUfjSEFFarPFVvZtexW3oUETXqh address into it. The address shows up as containing 190.9995475 Bitcoins that are confirmed and ready to be spent. This is a screenshot of it. As you have the private key you can make an electrum wallet that's capable of spending those coins, instead of only watching their balance like the wallet I made.   |
|
|
|
I'm confused.  Is it possible that someone stole/hacked my wallet? I doubt it as your 9 Bitcoins still arrived at your btc-e address. Why would a hacker send them to your address instead of his own? I think your wallet has been sending transactions with no fee like the one below that sent 9 Bitcoins to btc-e. That was OK years ago, but now the network's overloaded, and you have to pay a high fee to get your transaction confirmed fast. The network now mostly ignores zero fee transactions, and forgets about them after a few days. That's when it becomes easy to double spend them. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/231a0d090d10955d1b2a8d312f2e72ea89adcbd9947afbb385e993a5d364bf17 The network will probably forget about your 300 Bitcoin transaction, then the coins should show up in your wallet, and you will be able to try spending them again. |
|
|
|
Your math is a bit off. 100+89+1= 190
Yes, I'm working on selling some btc and buying a new computer, and eventually a house as well.
The following transaction id was for the 9BTC sent to 1D5iD4yms85HRD3Cn4hYz7L8QRttNdzTZL
14:06:32

getrawtransaction 1314fa89e105bbe8e07bab4e6ba8cfc2c90a27df7b37f5d121c58882bba3b668
14:06:35

0100000001dc2090280977b2ffe044f53390c4e2506f18f68a603ad336e2450ff89284521900000 0006c493046022100b1c9fecb7e987708e02575d0967ec09df6891f7c897f2e13a1b683ff0641c4 ba0221008d7781e7f9b5c3559c6d797e4572eefe91835172c30d62e1b934c2d26b197fd4012102c bbcdcaf0d5c4b3b90f8d65fba6668ce4f142a6a916532c905626f71de4aaa82ffffffff0200e9a4 35000000001976a9148485927037a0f8a56eab1e07d8f622ce90d807cc88ac00df7272040000001 976a9143a390dbfdf1bbb0674e01dc374cfc0266c35ccb188ac00000000
I checked your transaction at this page. It says it doesn't pay any fee. It's now extremely difficult to get a zero fee transaction confirmed as the network's overloaded with unconfirmed transactions. Your other transaction can't confirm until that zero fee transaction confirms. https://blockr.io/tx/pushAdditional info
Sum of inputs: 200.00000000
Sum of outputs: 200.00000000
Fee: 0.00000000 You could contact a bitcointalk user called Quickseller or another called macbook-air and offer to pay a small fee for them to get your transaction confirmed. Both of them have access to the F2Pool mining pool, and can get it to include zero fee transactions in blocks it mines. QuickSeller's got good reviews for getting transactions confirmed. I faced a similar issue a few days back transaction not getting confirmed due to low fee but user "QuickSeller" got my transaction confirmed in minutes when I sent him 0.0001 BTC. He has access to some pool . PM him.
|
|
|
|
I tried using a different service to push your raw transaction. This one decodes it, and checks it's OK before pushing it. https://blockr.io/tx/pushThe site said it couldn't find all the transaction's inputs, so it's not worth pushing to the network. Additional info
Could not find all input transactions, you might have referenced some input transactions that are not in network. This is the decoded transaction. {
"txid": "fe55315b2581773e47161e4856b3631c1cccb62807d5fa1d07104fa0f4b110cb",
"hash": "fe55315b2581773e47161e4856b3631c1cccb62807d5fa1d07104fa0f4b110cb",
"size": 374,
"vsize": 374,
"version": 1,
"locktime": 0,
"vin": [
{
"txid": "3ca65e591e4f1989b2c7e4fdb664dbed7c89729e8a6abe321321b3f451061ef1",
"vout": 0,
"scriptSig": {
"asm": "3046022100b49bc174589605538da1efff302f331108cd832e490fcd007fea9d16a1bd2f0402210 0d6c526b639adfe4f965278399924710f1679ac7c2052b5f75b42a47b98e3a234[ALL] 0241cad022e296ec3d04a598e3c94ca822744b0999d3487e27fc6959ed0aa33afc",
"hex": "493046022100b49bc174589605538da1efff302f331108cd832e490fcd007fea9d16a1bd2f04022 100d6c526b639adfe4f965278399924710f1679ac7c2052b5f75b42a47b98e3a23401210241cad0 22e296ec3d04a598e3c94ca822744b0999d3487e27fc6959ed0aa33afc"
},
"sequence": 4294967295
},
{
"txid": "1314fa89e105bbe8e07bab4e6ba8cfc2c90a27df7b37f5d121c58882bba3b668",
"vout": 1,
"scriptSig": {
"asm": "3044022053c97caf1161e8a7ca628818fa96e7e2ba0f4a96f59db52bf6bfbbce03fb7c950220444 5ba51e03e22b87aa679ab19e409af2e9fbd02a10ddcf4300e8df5ac03c88b[ALL] 03385eb33f08f46d367974df7308f4c9f29de06a1ed1b31dbe26bff2d6df4e237c",
"hex": "473044022053c97caf1161e8a7ca628818fa96e7e2ba0f4a96f59db52bf6bfbbce03fb7c9502204 445ba51e03e22b87aa679ab19e409af2e9fbd02a10ddcf4300e8df5ac03c88b012103385eb33f08 f46d367974df7308f4c9f29de06a1ed1b31dbe26bff2d6df4e237c"
},
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
"vout": [
{
"value": 2,
"n": 0,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 25d61dc9f668a487d637f750dd465ec02814c757 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex": "76a91425d61dc9f668a487d637f750dd465ec02814c75788ac",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "pubkeyhash",
"addresses": [
"14T4WAUoLCe7kSBqovZGHwnHt5G5GgTz3W"
]
}
},
{
"value": 300,
"n": 1,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1c6b1a77c29fe9b4bd68ea5b6483e7b9945806dd OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex": "76a9141c6b1a77c29fe9b4bd68ea5b6483e7b9945806dd88ac",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "pubkeyhash",
"addresses": [
"13bGE3dCTwKQPGPyiupkfnya2VdBETCxCv"
]
}
}
]
} |
|
|
|
Would it be wise to update to bitcoin 0.14.0?
Yes, if you don't mind waiting days for it to sync. Otherwise choose a lightweight wallet like electrum. I removed the blank spaces from the raw transaction you posted and tried to push it through the blockchain.info website at this link. https://blockchain.info/pushtxHowever the site wrote this error message, and refused to push your transaction. Unable To find all tx inputs [1314fa89e105bbe8e07bab4e6ba8cfc2c90a27df7b37f5d121c58882bba3b668] This is it without blank spaces. 0100000002f11e0651f4b3211332be6a8a9e72897ceddb64b6fde4c7b289194f1e595ea63c00000 0006c493046022100b49bc174589605538da1efff302f331108cd832e490fcd007fea9d16a1bd2f 04022100d6c526b639adfe4f965278399924710f1679ac7c2052b5f75b42a47b98e3a2340121024 1cad022e296ec3d04a598e3c94ca822744b0999d3487e27fc6959ed0aa33afcffffffff68b6a3bb 8288c521d1f5377bdf270ac9c2cfa86b4eab7be0e8bb05e189fa1413010000006a473044022053c 97caf1161e8a7ca628818fa96e7e2ba0f4a96f59db52bf6bfbbce03fb7c9502204445ba51e03e22 b87aa679ab19e409af2e9fbd02a10ddcf4300e8df5ac03c88b012103385eb33f08f46d367974df7 308f4c9f29de06a1ed1b31dbe26bff2d6df4e237cffffffff0200c2eb0b000000001976a91425d6 1dc9f668a487d637f750dd465ec02814c75788ac00ac23fc060000001976a9141c6b1a77c29fe9b 4bd68ea5b6483e7b9945806dd88ac00000000 |
|
|
|
If you are using Bitcoin v0.8.3-beta it could sometimes create transactions including something called high S values. The network will no longer process such transactions since Bitcoin v0.9.0 was released. https://bitcoin.org/bin/insecure/bitcoin-core-0.9.0/README.txtOnly create signatures with low S values This created problems for anyone who didn't upgrade his wallet a few years ago, like for the user in the quote below. I sent an tx with older electrum client. It has not been confirmed since 3 days.
I can see on Blockchaininfo: Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: Non-canonical signature: High S Value
You should either upgrade to a newer version of Bitcoin core, or import your private keys into a lightweight wallet such as electrum if you don't want to wait a long time for a Bitcoin core wallet to sync. https://electrum.org/#downloadIf you dump your private keys from your Bitcoin core wallet you can install electrum, then import them into it using the instructions below. Electrum should sync almost instantly, then you can send your Bitcoins wherever you want. try clicking the file menu, then 'New/Restore' as shown below.  Afterwards try 'Restore a wallet or import keys' using the settings in the screenshot below. 
If I select 'restore.. or import..', it asks me 'Please enter a seed phrase, a master key, a list of Bitcoin addresses, or a list of private keys'.
Which of the 4 options should I select?
A list of private keys like the one below with no white spaces between them. L2BRfUPreAzmaCwbDYXBBPoCYsPQKjnT6uEY1X7GH2qdJUrMV1Kc Kz6jvwvAbi8DFw99MUbfrBc2rMcH3EDbv4YfqmcXpdWG1qhFZwew KzhLdGURnKne8HvTdxmK61CXvvb99gjCWxua2t7mxn3D11d7bGFR Kyez85nGijQATac8ej2tr44KawNe12nsoKFGMTpVrz6YnhVCD3HP Kyh7BqAHH6gFFMfP3EaoXbg8R67UfAZuZJZcR5hBz1iFwHKc2pYr |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
