I also saw this viabtc bitcoin transaction accelerator before and recently I just tried it and not working. It says that something like service is not available at the moment.
When I am trying to do some acceleration in my some bitcoin transaction, all of them are failed using viabtc, I think that service of transaction accelerator is not working anymore?
Because the service has a limit of 100 transactions per hour, and seeing how the service is popular you can guess everyone is constantly trying. Not even talking about people who automate it with bots/scripts to be sure to be the first. I never managed to be in so stopped to try. 100 TXs/hour is like saying "Hey, I have 2 masks for the whole country"  And when they will be tired to be abused they will probably close the service. (reducing to 100/h was already a sign) @pooya87 post is right by the way |
|
|
|
Anyone know a reliable BCH mixer, or are all BTC mixers? Can't find any with quick googling.
Sorry I don't, all the ones I know are either closed or scams (i.e. bestmixer, coinmix.to, etc). I may be wrong but Electron Cash has a coinshuffle feature, an implementation of Coinjoin to mix several transactions but without a 3rd party ( see here about CoinShuffle). I think there is even a wallet called "Coinshuffle" but think about doing your own research because I'm not Bcash fan and don't really know the wallet Edit: - the coinshuffle feature with Electron cash https://news.bitcoin.com/how-to-shuffle-your-bch-coins-like-a-boss/- the wallet is called cashshuffle not coinshuffle https://cashshuffle.com/ |
|
|
|
In the thread itself? Yes, it's full of shit accounts. From users joining to make 2-3 posts in the thread only, to users coming back after ~10 months to make 26 posts in the same thread. Or the one coming back from 2018, just for Zorro coin (the name is funny btw, I even started to sing the song). There are 5-6 accounts feeling the topic with a lot of shits. It looks like several posts have deleted before but they seem to continue their trash. I don't even need to visit the website, it must be the same quality as their ANN thread Edit:OK, I couldn't resist visiting the website and started to read the WP, saying to myself "hummm.. very similar" https://www.zorrochain.com/ZorroWhitepaper.pdfInspired by the Blockchain architecture and the existing Merkle tree-based signature scheme, we
have proposed BPQS, a scalable post-quantum (PQ) resistance digital signature scheme, which is
most suitable for Blockchain and Distributed ledger technology (DLT). A unique feature of this
protocol is that it can use a dedicated chain or image structure to reduce the cost of key generation,
signing, verification, and the size of the signature. Compared with other recent improvements, when
a key is used for a reasonable number of signatures, BPQS is better than existing hash algorithms.
If necessary, it also supports a rollback mechanism that allows unlimited number of signatures. We
provide a specific open source implementation of the protocol, and benchmark it.
The latest developments in the field of quantum computing and its threat to classical cryptography
have stimulated more interest in post-quantum research Taken and rephrased from Inspired by the blockchain architecture and existing Merkle tree based signature schemes, we propose BPQS, an extensible post-quantum (PQ) resistant digital signature scheme best suited to blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs). One of the unique characteristics of the protocol is that it can take advantage of application-specific chain/graph structures in order to decrease key generation, signing and verification costs as well as signature size. Compared to recent improvements in the field, BPQS outperforms existing hash-based algorithms when a key is reused for reasonable numbers of signatures, while it supports a fallback mechanism to allow for a practically unlimited number of signatures if required. We provide an open source implementation of the scheme and benchmark it. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8726842 |
|
|
|
Y'a quelques comptes Twitter qui se sont fait pirater ce soir, et pas n'importe lesquels. Obama, Coinbase, Bitfinex, Justin Sun, Binance, Apple, Elon Musk, Warren Buffet,Jeff Bezos etc. Certains de ces comptes ont la sécurité 2FA, cela n'a rien empêché. La personne derrière s'est permise de poster un tweet au sujet d'un giveaway de 5000 BTC. Le scam typique que l'on retrouve sur Youtube.Si tu leur envoie des bitcoins, tu reçois ensuite le double  ET bien entendu des personnes tombent dans le panneau... https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/bc1qxy2kgdygjrsqtzq2n0yrf2493p83kkfjhx0wlh |
|
|
|
Did anyone had any issues with Bitcoins that you sent to exchanges after mixing coins with ChipMixer, and do you have any suggestions about this and advice for reducing this (excluding not using centralized exchanges  )? From my experience, never I got trouble and did it more than 1 time. As for the suggestion: making fake transactions. I mean to send bitcoins to yourself to create transaction history (since they scan the lastest transactions). If you add a dozen of "hops" you can be pretty sure to be fine (from centralized exchanges at least) |
|
|
|
Congratz @The Pharmacist you're not BTM virgin anymore  Coincloud has one of the higher fees btw. @o_e_l_e_o with this issuer the limit is up to $2000 you need a phone number. For anything above (and up to $10k per day) you need to scan your ID. To compare, with Shitcoins.club they can buy up to €10k without ID |
|
|
|
...
Ils sont marrant chez Binance. Ils annoncent le lancement de leur carte en Europe avec des "inscrivez vous !" alors qu'en vérité les gens ne peuvent la commander qu'à partir du mois prochain. C'est comme lorsqu'ils ont annoncé le lancement de leur carte (en Mars) alors qu'ils n'avaient pas encore fait l'acquisition de Swipe (le mois dernier?) L'autre qui annonçait y'a 3-4 jours: "I am so excited. I love beta testing products..." je sais pas si les gens se rappellent que la phase beta a commencé il y a 4 mois de cela. La, on dirait qu'ils ont découvert un trésor lol |
|
|
|
|
The website does nothing more than aggregating data publicly available to anyone. If someone thinks it will tell you if the USA is watching you, nope. It simply uses different block explorersand web crawlers with basic privacy observation like Esplora, KYCP, Checkbitcoinaddress.com,...
Saying if an address is "known to surveillance" is also the same for the average Joe
|
|
|
|
When using such software it is also the user's responsibility to keep up to date with it. Especially since we're talking about money it should be something natural from the user. It's not as if you were installing CCleaner.
Vulnerability mostly come from user's faults:
- Don't backup their seeds.
- Don't secure backup well.
- Don't set up a password for their wallet or use too bad/ weak password.
- Don't verify wallet
- and so forth.
It's not what we call a vulnerability, vulnerability is when someone finds a way to compromise a code/system due to coding/programming errors, software flaws, or whatever... What you describe is the habit problems from users |
|
|
|
|
Sauf que vendre des bitcoins et vendre des choses, peu importe la valeur d'ailleurs, chez un antiquaire n'est pas régi par la même loi.
Le "je savais pas monsieur" c'est une réponse parfaite pour faire comprendre à qui te contrôlera que tu le prends pour un con.
Autrement les entreprises comme Paymium, Coinhouse, et autres pourraient se mettre à tenir un stand sur les marchés sans demander de vérification d'identité
|
|
|
|
|
@beerlover
I call this a fake problem. Despite all the AML regulations we have, it doesn't stop the pedos. Currently, banknotes are perhaps the best way to stay under the radar, governments will never ban to use banknotes. (That's also perhaps one of the reasons governments are looking into CBDCs).
It's impossible, for many reasons (unbanked/debunked people, seniors, and so on)
What could they do with privacy-centric cryptocurrencies? At best they could force exchange platforms to not list any coins, the same for marketplaces, anything run by a company that abides by the laws. Other than that? They won't be able to stop people to download a wallet and trade with someone P2P.
|
|
|
|
...
They all do that otherwise, they wouldn't be able to scam or just peanuts. Did you request a refund? No man, he just contacted him to see if they can drink the coffee together and he joined the forum to see how is the weather. it would be good to remove this mixer from the list of work services. I found it on that list and I don't want other people to lose their coins either.
Removed, let me know if he gives back your coins. Thxs |
|
|
|
|
From what I'd read about it in the news and from a video I watched from R Ver at that time, he didn't acquire Purse.io. (at least it was the conclusion to me). He certainly invested money, I don't know under what condition, but he doesn't own it and doesn't have a majority in the shares...
I suppose he invested in just enough to let the company running and force it to add Btrash as a condition to get his money
|
|
|
|
Update :
C'est bon, j'ai récupéré le contrôle de mes comptes :
- coinbase : il a suffit d'une réinitialisation d'Authy.
- kraken : j'ai dû contacter le support et répondre à quelques questions. Ils m'ont désactivé ensuite le google 2FA. J'ai pu reconfigurer mon google authentificator.
Morale de l'histoire : bien penser à sauvegarder le code de récupération master key pour chaque compte !
Salut, j'ai le même problème que toi et je viens de contacter le support. Tu pourrais me dire combien de temps ça prend et quelles sont les questions ? Tu poses une question sur quelque chose qui c'est passé voilà 3 ans, les choses peuvent avoir bien changées depuis. De plus le mec n'utilise plus le forum depuis très très longtemps. Je doute qu'il se reconnecte juste pour répondre à ta question. Sinon, Kraken répond en général en moins de 24 heures, suivant la complexité du ticket. Dans ton cas tu peux imaginer que ce ne sera pas résolu dans la journée |
|
|
|
Hello,
Bref, c'est le genre de petit problèmes à freiner l'adoption par le grand public :s
Pas du tout, parfois tu as besoin de nettoyer le cache de ton browser, c'est pas pour ca que cela a freiner l'adoption d'internet :p Et puis ca peut arriver aussi bien avec Electrum ou même un web wallet. On a vu pire avec Ledger Live  |
|
|
|
Does anyone know if Ledger will bring back all the currency support they use to have? I live in Australia and they use to have an AUD option (amongst many others) but it randomly disappeared one day. I contacted Ledger directly, but support said said something like they were having trouble with the 3rd party they use for currency conversions and are looking for a fix. It has been months now... Using USD is getting frustrating!
Come on Ledger.. all your competitors have AUD!!
Anyone know any update on this sort of thing??
Cheers.
What about using the Singapore Dollar? It has a rate very close to AUD. I know it's not a complete solution, but it can maybe used. There is a difference of only 1 or 2% between both. No one can give you any indication here. |
|
|
|
Round #2 User @ AgiospostLately there seems to be a link between crypto asset price movements and increasingly authoritarian government policies. When President Donald Trump ordered the mass dissolution of peaceful protests in the White House region on June 1, the price of Bitcoin jumped more than 8 percent. originalThere has been some unproven correlation between the rising and falling prices of cryptocurrencies and governments acting more authoritarian. When United States President Donald Trump ordered the forced dispersal of peaceful protesters near the White House grounds on June 1, the price of Bitcoin surged more than 8%. Also reported for copy-pasting Next rounds coming... |
|
|
|
|
Encore faudrait il avoir une demande pour se voir proposer de l'offre. Moyenne d'age sur les marchés dans les villages (pour reprendre ton exemple), 60 ans, je pense pas que Mémé soit intéressée d'acheter du Bitcoin.
Et même si c'était présent, les vendeurs devrait faire ca en douce (si le but est sans KYC), je pense pas qu'ils soient intéressés de mettre leur activité en risque.
Toujours est il qu'en France, peut importe le type d’intermédiaire de la main à la main, il n'y quasiment pas de demande, les gens préfèrent les moyens traditionnels (plateformes d'échanges et autres) et n'ont pas de problème avec le KYC.
Et les BTC ATM en France je me demande si c'est vraiment rentable, même sur le long terme, avec des frais d'achats de 7% et de ventes soumises ou KYC au dessus de 1000€
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
